Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 258476 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“LOL Really?”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#153773 Feb 13, 2013
Thinking wrote:
Open fat people?
<quoted text>
Only when they don't tip.

Liver ain't cheap.
Imhotep

Palatka, FL

#153774 Feb 13, 2013
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>I wish he had created time with some of the drummers I've played with!!!!
http://touch.dailymotion.com/video/x15z0w_dav...

One of the finest... ;)
Imhotep

Palatka, FL

#153775 Feb 13, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
:-)
One man's music is another man's caterwauling.
Sometimes 'caterwauling' is entertaining!

http://www.youtube.com/embed/4Wb2nZR6qbE...

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#153776 Feb 13, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>This'll be good...

[QUOTE] Why do skeptics rail against Christianity?
Answer: Christian superstition is viewed as a negative influence on society [[[[SCREEEEEEEEECH!!!!]]]] "

By whom?

Who, other than skeptics, view Christianity as a negative influence?

Surely not the millions upon millions that Christianity feeds & houses.......
Muslims.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#153777 Feb 13, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>You do?

I've only seen your insane atheist rantings, nothing more.
No you haven't.

You've seen nothing of the sort, and you know it.

Why do you knowingly lie?

God hates liars.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#153778 Feb 13, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>Both Jewish and Roman sources and traditions admit an empty tomb. Those resources range from Josephus to a compilation of fifth-century Jewish writings called the "Toledoth Jeshu." Dr. Paul Maier calls this "positive evidence from a hostile source, which is the strongest kind of historical evidence. In essence, this means that if a source admits a fact decidedly not in its favor, then that fact is genuine."

http://www.leaderu.com/everystudent/easter/ar...
Or this:

http://static.justchristians.com/abundantLife...

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#153779 Feb 13, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>If it began with "Once upon a time", it'd be more accurate.
And even the apocalyptically gullible might be able to tell which was its proper library classification.
I move bibles to the fiction section in books stores.
Imhotep

Palatka, FL

#153780 Feb 13, 2013
Eagle12 wrote:
<quoted text>
We didn't start the fire in hell. We just do our best to tell people don't go there. I'll be damn if there isn't people like you that run through the road block holding up the middle finger.
When I get to heaven I’ll return you the favor.
Interesting... When you get there...

What will you say to Islam's martyrs from 9/11?Will you see their 72 Virgin stash and be jealous?
Where are the toilets?
Will you fish in the lake of fire?(Pre cooked)!
Will ANY tele-evangelist be there?
Will nuns and priests finally get laid... And By whom?

What does heaven mean to you?

I envision too many problems, especially previous relatives!

;)

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#153781 Feb 13, 2013
Eagle12 wrote:
<quoted text>Moon base?

I would rather see unmanned vehicles working on the moon and controlled from Houston. With the ability to send back any rocks or samples we may desire.

Hell it was exciting to land men on the moon. No other country has done so. But it is damn risky and we can’t sustain human life very long there. Why not use advanced machines with a 30 to 40 year life span?

I would be in favor of a manned telescope like the Hubble in low Earth orbit.
A manned space telescope would be nonsensical.

What do you think would be the benefit?

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#153782 Feb 13, 2013
Eagle12 wrote:
<quoted text>
I really don't think we are going to Mars. That may remain a goal but the budget is going to keep it from happening. NASA needs to scrap man space flight beyond Earth orbit or Congress will. With the baby boomers getting older there's not going to be enough money for it.
Mars is a long term goal, the SLS will make it possible for lifting to the ISS, and the eventual long range trips to planets.
You see it is modular , once the 1st stage is ready , the second and third stages are easy, because they will only require more engines.
The second and third stage engines are all the same.
But we already have much this and they are already building more of them.

So you see going to mars wont cost much more, the only loss would be not getting a paycheck for lifting cargo.

“LOL Really?”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#153783 Feb 13, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
A manned space telescope would be nonsensical.
What do you think would be the benefit?
Didn't they try that once?

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#153784 Feb 13, 2013
Hedonist wrote:
<quoted text>
SLS is the HLLV system that was chosen. This entire concept is still the brute force method and the per pound to LEO cost is still way too high. But it is a tried and true type of multi-stage system.
I don't think any technology have been born, to counter the price of overcoming gravity from a Earth launch. But this is why the eventual
establishment of a moon base is inevitable. Along with mining space for the fuel and resources .

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup...

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#153785 Feb 13, 2013
River Tam wrote:
<quoted text>Didn't they try that once?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =JlSQAZEp3PAXX
Maybe get duck12 to ride one?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#153786 Feb 13, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
No you haven't.
You've seen nothing of the sort, and you know it.
Why do you knowingly lie?
God hates liars.
They lie because they have no morals. The funny thing is that they are here trying to sell us on how great their morals are...
Siro

Canberra, Australia

#153787 Feb 13, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
They lie because they have no morals. The funny thing is that they are here trying to sell us on how great their morals are...
Thus speaketh the maltheist who has no sense of right and wrong and thinks morality is relative to whoevers salad hes tossing
Imhotep

Palatka, FL

#153788 Feb 13, 2013
Eagle12 wrote:
The Pope is resigning, a new Pope will be selected, and we are all going to have to hear about it even if we don’t want too.
I believe in religious freedom. But I don’t believe the Pope and the Catholic church deserve the thousands of hours the news media is going to give them.
If they want to advertise it, place a small add in the El Paso Newspaper and be done with it.
Did you know? ;)

The only 'true faith' is the Catholic one, all others were created after the Vatican establishment.

The Bible was written by some 50 men, only one of whom (Luke) was a Gentile.

The first five books of the OT (Genesis, Exodus, Leviticus, Numbers and Deuteronomy) are known as the Five Books of Moses, the Pentateuch, or the Torah.

They are traditionally held to have been written by Moses, but modern scholars have proposed that there were four or five authors.

The book of Esther is the only book of the Bible that never mentions God.

Let the Pope slide into obscurity, he was a pedophile protector (crimens solicitations) and a former Hitler Jugen.

http://nationalcatholicreporter.org/update/bn...

Since: Sep 08

La Veta, CO

#153789 Feb 13, 2013
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>It sure did seem more carefree...maybe because we were young. Simpler times. You ate your breakfast and out the door you went. Back for lunch and then back out till supper. No parents to organize our activities. We occupied ourselves and made our own rules and learned how to interact with others. Walked into town by ourselves to go to the movies. I remember taking my 22 rifle into town to buy some ammo. Walked down the road with the gun over my shoulder on my way to pluck cans and bottles. Wonder what would happen today if you did that. Use to take my horn out in the field by my house and practice all day. No one complained, not even the cows.
Life was centered much more locally, particularly the legal system. So much of it was county and state based jurisdiction. There were a lot of crimes you jut had to step over a county line to escape. Lots of municipal courts. Lots of abuses of powers by the local authorities, too. There came quite a change in the legal system as state and federal government took over more jurisdiction of such offenses. Laws got applied more evenly, and you had less places to run to. Between that and the ascent of insurance companies, there came a more preventative mindset than punishment for violations on an individual basis, criminal and civil.

Insurance companies run the government now.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#153790 Feb 13, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
This'll be good...
<quoted text>
By whom?
Who, other than skeptics, view Christianity as a negative influence?
Surely not the millions upon millions that Christianity feeds & houses.......
By anyone who prefers rational thought over superstition. By anyone who sees Christianity's cultural views to be outdated (ie most young people).
blacklagoon

Boston, MA

#153791 Feb 13, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Why do you post this garbage?
The 4 questions go unanswered, why is that? Coward? Can't understand the question? Just plain stupid?
blacklagoon

Boston, MA

#153792 Feb 13, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
8 churches, one McDonald's.
Since both are extremely unhealthy, this goes to show what a danger religion is to our society.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... 10 min John 144
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 1 hr Subduction Zone 74,920
The Dumbest Thing Posted by a Godbot (Jun '10) 2 hr Subduction Zone 6,092
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 6 hr Subduction Zone 32,045
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... 10 hr Dogen 4,059
News The war on Christmas (Dec '10) Sat John 4,952
News Why do public atheists have to behave like such... Jun 21 Eagle 12 - 4
More from around the web