Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

Jul 18, 2009 Read more: Webbunny tumblelog 237,766
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent. Read more

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#152541 Feb 8, 2013
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes it is
It's a religion
Religion
Synonyms: credo, creed, cult, FAITH, persuasion
faith\ˈfāth\
noun
b (1): firm belief in something for which there is no proof
Atheism
Belief that there is no Deity or Deities.
Hence - Atheism = Religion
And bald is a hair colour. Why do you insist on been stupid?

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#152542 Feb 8, 2013
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
It's a religion.
Religion
Synonyms: credo, creed, cult, FAITH, persuasion
faith\ˈfāth\
noun
b (1): firm belief in something for which there is no proof
Atheism
Belief that there is no Deity or Deities.
Hence - Atheism = Religion
So antiUnicorniasm is a religion too, right?

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#152543 Feb 8, 2013
River Tam wrote:
Christianity or Hamburger Helper?
Technically, wouldn't christians prefer tuna helper?

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#152544 Feb 8, 2013
Just Think wrote:
Sin is a man made concept used to control people.
Correct. Religion also uses fear to control people.

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#152545 Feb 8, 2013
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes it is
It's a religion
Religion
Synonyms: credo, creed, cult, FAITH, persuasion
faith\ˈfāth\
noun
b (1): firm belief in something for which there is no proof
Atheism
Belief that there is no Deity or Deities.
Hence - Atheism = Religion
People who believe there is no such things as Leprechauns have their own religion? Really?

“There is no god!”

Since: Jun 12

Sdertlje, Sweden

#152546 Feb 8, 2013
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>
It's a religion.
Religion
Synonyms: credo, creed, cult, FAITH, persuasion
faith\ˈfāth\
noun
b (1): firm belief in something for which there is no proof
Atheism
Belief that there is no Deity or Deities.
Hence - Atheism = Religion
No it isn't

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#152547 Feb 8, 2013
Just Think wrote:
<quoted text>
People who believe there is no such things as Leprechauns have their own religion? Really?
There must be lots of nonreligions anti Toothfairy, anti Santa, anti Easter bunny....

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#152548 Feb 8, 2013
Mylan wrote:
<quoted text>Technically, wouldn't christians prefer tuna helper?
That would be lesbians but thanks for playing.
tabby

Warrensburg, MO

#152549 Feb 8, 2013
The conflict over the principles of evolution has become a religious war. But initiated by the evolutionary side of the argument. It really is no longer about scientific investigation. It's about the evolutionist demonizing any opposing view. Why?
Because if they allow one aspect of their theory to be closely scrutinized it all falls down like a house of cards. Why do you suppose evolutionists run from questions about the very foundation of their belief; How do we get from the inorganic world to the world of the cell? How did the non-living become the living? How can there be a Darwinian theory about life without a theory of how that life began? Therefore, the use of hyperbole and ad hominem attacks.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#152550 Feb 8, 2013
The mental state of these "atheists", their detachment from reality and creating their own version is really on the sad side.

You have to laugh at them and play along with their fantasies to keep from getting so depressed.

They love the interaction. Kind of a fuzzy grounding, but keeps them from getting too lost.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#152551 Feb 8, 2013
The irrationality exhibited by these Topix atheist regarding the definition of atheist is the real indicator of their mental state. They refute long established definitions. There appears to be some kneejerk reaction to being judged or classified in some group, though they don't hesitate to do it to everyone that disagrees with them, which is another telling point. If you don't agree with them exactly, then you are lumped into one great big group oppressing them.

There are some serious mental issues among them. The scary part is they are empowered to vote and determine the destiny of man, while their issues can be manipulated by others with axes to grind.

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#152552 Feb 8, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
their detachment from reality and creating their own version is really on the sad side. You have to laugh at them and play along with their fantasies to keep from getting so depressed. They love the interaction. Kind of a fuzzy grounding, but keeps them from getting too lost.
You're talking about religious people and their bibull right? LOL... OK, that's rhetorical.
Imhotep

United States

#152553 Feb 8, 2013
Hedonist wrote:
<quoted text>
You forget the Conservative version of the Bible --
"You were hungry and thirsty, so I eliminated funding for Meals on Wheels and food banks. You were a stranger, so I vilified you and demanded that you be deported. You were naked, so I called you an evil Liberal who hates Conservative family values. You were sick, so I repealed your only hope for health care. You were in prison, so I tortured you."
The Bible... Unfit for children to read.
Seldom,if ever, read by the faithful.

Modern scholarship exposes the nonsense of the Bible as never before. The men who wrote these gospels, knew nothing of science and rationality. They could not anticipate the skills and insights which would be brought to bear on their silly fantasy far into the future.

Until recent times, the Bible was a forbidden book, denied to all but the clergy. In the vast compendium of nonsense, selectively read in Latin to illiterate peasantry, who would have noticed the myriad inconsistencies, contradictions and absurdities?
Atheist Silurist

Portadown, UK

#152554 Feb 8, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
The irrationality exhibited by these Topix atheist regarding the definition of atheist is the real indicator of their mental state. They refute long established definitions. There appears to be some kneejerk reaction to being judged or classified in some group, though they don't hesitate to do it to everyone that disagrees with them, which is another telling point. If you don't agree with them exactly, then you are lumped into one great big group oppressing them.
There are some serious mental issues among them. The scary part is they are empowered to vote and determine the destiny of man, while their issues can be manipulated by others with axes to grind.
How would you define a person that doesn't swallow childish superstitious bollocks like religious myths and fables?

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#152555 Feb 8, 2013
The Topix atheist pattern of demonizing the more than overwhelming majority of the world's belief systems, their special knowledge and insight coupled with their need to proselytize, while doing that demonizing, along with logical thinking they present not of the caliber they advertise, their almost universal reading the same identical script in their talking points, and propensity to be obnoxious rather than reasoned and rational is downright unsettling. Perhaps it is the concentration of them on forums like this that magnifies the threat they are.

Weird.

I think I may indulge myself and have a nightmare where they take over the world.
Atheist Silurist

Portadown, UK

#152556 Feb 8, 2013
Imhotep wrote:
<quoted text>
The Bible... Unfit for children to read.
Seldom,if ever, read by the faithful.
Modern scholarship exposes the nonsense of the Bible as never before. The men who wrote these gospels, knew nothing of science and rationality. They could not anticipate the skills and insights which would be brought to bear on their silly fantasy far into the future.
Until recent times, the Bible was a forbidden book, denied to all but the clergy. In the vast compendium of nonsense, selectively read in Latin to illiterate peasantry, who would have noticed the myriad inconsistencies, contradictions and absurdities?
The first hand-written English language Bible manuscripts were produced in the 1380's AD by John Wycliffe, an Oxford professor, scholar, and theologian. Wycliffe,(also spelled Wycliff & Wyclif), was well-known throughout Europe for his opposition to the teaching of the organized Church, which he believed to be contrary to the Bible. With the help of his followers, called the Lollards, and his assistant Purvey, and many other faithful scribes, Wycliffe produced dozens of English language manuscript copies of the scriptures. They were translated out of the Latin Vulgate, which was the only source text available to Wycliffe. The Pope was so infuriated by his teachings and his translation of the Bible into English, that 44 years after Wycliffe had died, he ordered the bones to be dug-up, crushed, and scattered in the river!

One of Wycliffes followers, John Hus, actively promoted Wycliffes ideas: that people should be permitted to read the Bible in their own language, and they should oppose the tyranny of the Roman church that threatened anyone possessing a non-Latin Bible with execution. Hus was burned at the stake in 1415, with Wycliffes manuscript Bibles used as kindling for the fire.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#152557 Feb 8, 2013
tabby wrote:
The conflict over the principles of evolution has become a religious war. But initiated by the evolutionary side of the argument. It really is no longer about scientific investigation. It's about the evolutionist demonizing any opposing view. Why?
Because if they allow one aspect of their theory to be closely scrutinized it all falls down like a house of cards. Why do you suppose evolutionists run from questions about the very foundation of their belief; How do we get from the inorganic world to the world of the cell? How did the non-living become the living? How can there be a Darwinian theory about life without a theory of how that life began? Therefore, the use of hyperbole and ad hominem attacks.
Anthropologists are concerned about where you came from.

Evolution doesn't go backwards.

"Ralph hides in the jungle, worrying about his wounds and the inhuman violence into which the boys on the island have devolved. He thinks about Simon and Piggy and realizes that civilization is now impossible among the boys. Ralph, who is not far from the Castle Rock, thinks he sees Bill in the distance. He concludes that the boy is not Bill-at least not any more. This boy is a savage, entirely different from the boy in shorts and shirt he once knew. Ralph is certain that Jack will never leave him alone. Noticing the Lord of the Flies, now just a skull with the skin and meat eaten away, Ralph decides to fight back. He knocks the skull from the stick, which he takes, intending to use it as a spear. From a distance, Ralph can still make out the boys' chant: "Kill the beast. Cut his throat. Spill his blood."" ~ William Golding

Stop worrying about where you came from and start thinking about where you're going.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#152558 Feb 8, 2013
Atheist Silurist wrote:
<quoted text>
How would you define a person that doesn't swallow childish superstitious bollocks like religious myths and fables?
Why do you describe yourself as atheist?

And then ask a stupid question like that?

"Atheism requires as much faith as religion?"

That is the title of this forum. That is also the question. Here is another one.

Do you have faith your lack of belief in superstitions and etc is correct? That can also be phrased do you believe your lack of belief is correct.

Or are you just a great big zero or question mark passing judgments on the beliefs of others?

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#152559 Feb 8, 2013
Mylan wrote:
<quoted text>You're talking about religious people and their bibull right? LOL... OK, that's rhetorical.
No.

I was talking about you.
Atheist Silurist

Portadown, UK

#152560 Feb 8, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
I think I may indulge myself and have a nightmare where they take over the world.
Better to have Islam take over the world,right?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Why Atheism Will Replace Religion (Aug '12) 2 hr James 14,565
News Confessions of a black atheist 2 hr Savant 340
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 2 hr Dogen 18,495
The Ultimate Evidence of God (Mar '14) 2 hr James 153
Science Disproves Evolution (Aug '12) 8 hr thetruth 1,996
News Atheists open up: What they want you to know 8 hr thetruth 23
News The Consequences of Atheism 11 hr Thinking 1,268
More from around the web