Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 258039 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#152413 Feb 8, 2013
Just Think wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no empirical evidence for any god's existence.
None.
All there is, is a philosophical suppression of the truth, that requires fairy tales to be accepted.
And a faith in that fairy tale.
You have self deceived faith that a "goddidit", nothing else.
And the only reason you have that, is because your fearful nature seeks to deny that you are the master of your own life. It seems to be a responsibility that you are too afraid to bear.
There is plenty of empirical evidence, recorded in history.

Also the evidence is within you and around you, in all the laws that govern mind and matter.

The problem is not evidence, the problem is tha you do not want to be led down the path the evidence provides.

So you suppress the truth, so that you can continue in sin.

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

#152414 Feb 8, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
Love.
1. Love God - your Creator.
2. Love your neighbour - His Creation.
So all Hindus, Buddhists, Jainists, etc. are immoral in your mind.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#152415 Feb 8, 2013
The_Box wrote:
<quoted text>
Not on moral principals, no.
Your moral system contradicts itself. It fails right there by YOUR OWN standards.
<quoted text>
You don't even know what my morality is. You're very desperate to get off the topic of your moral system and its failings.
You don't play well when people actually call you out on all the holes in your beliefs. Doesn't fit your script.
Still avoiding the question, as to how you account for the absolute morality that you appeal to constantly and deny exist on the other hand I see.

Avoiding the question, does not mean you have presented an argument.

It just shows you do not have the courage to put your own worldview out there for examination.

But rather hide behind attacking others...

Since: Sep 08

Lamar, CO

#152416 Feb 8, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
Sorry you senile around so much it's easy to confuse you and John McCain. Nothing to do with politics just your dementia.
What links do you want to see Senile Dave?
<quoted text>
The one of your creation in particular. You know, your momma and those guys? One of those 15 should be your daddy.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#152417 Feb 8, 2013
EmpAtheist wrote:
<quoted text>
We don't though. We all disagree on different levels. We all seem to agree on some things... but like i was pointing out with the hostage situation, some we disagree on. The funny thing is... nobody is bringing up these situations. Instead... the atheists are pointing out the immoral things in the bible and acting as if you would agree with them... and the Christians dodge that and tell the atheists that they have no way to be moral or that they are lying because their bible says so.... and I'm sorry but we are all full of it. None of us are rapists that i know of... something ELSE is going on and that is what we disagree with.
<quoted text>
Please explain what "transcendent" laws of morality are and how you know this.
<quoted text>
As a skeptical human being I do not see any reason to believe in a god. This has nothing to do with accounting for morals. However, for whatever reason it may be, I find the thought of another human being unnecessarily harmed in any way to make me feel pain. I have empathy and wish for equality. I do not want to hurt anyone and i don't need the fear of god or hell to keep me from harming someone. If someone does need that fear... they need psychological help.
<quoted text>
What action could please someone enough to ignore being tortured for eternity assuming they believed they knew that was the consequence?
If anything i think if atheists really did believe in god... it would show how morals are higher than god. I would say... if Abraham chose not to kill his son... it would be a more moral action that obeying God.
How do you feel about that kind of rejection?
Would it be immoral of Abraham to reject god and not kill his son?
Can you explain why Atheists make appeals to absolute moral standards?

That is the point I am making.

By the way, I am not a holder of the eternally burning sinner in hell position.

I do not believe it is warranted from the scripture (but thats another topic).

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#152418 Feb 8, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
"First cause" can be a quantum fluctuation or a singularity exploding. It can also be the exhaust fumes of some space craft, or the formation of an atom belonging to some pond scum in another universe. Your assuming it's a god, and your specific god, makes you a failure at logic.
Lot of faith going on there.

Interesting how it can be "anything but God"...

Why would you suppress that one singular option?

Of course, my argument being true, we do not need to answer that, when we fully know that that is the one thing your sinful nature desires to suppress.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#152419 Feb 8, 2013
EmpAtheist wrote:
<quoted text>
Wow. Shocked again.
Am i summarizing this correctly?
He said that rape and slavery is condoned in the bible.
Your response was " why would you care?".
You didn't deny it or account for it or even try to pull the out-of-context (because you know its immoral so you have to account for it) card.
You instead tried to show that he is either in fact fine with rape or that he actually does believe in god and that is why he isn't a rapist who is ok with slavery.
This is a problem for you if the bible condones slavery and rape...
Which brings us right back to his comment to you and renders your entire response meaningless unless you do at the very least try to make an excuse for the Bible
First of all, I do not accept his anti-theistic interprestion.

Second, on what basis, in his worldview, does he offer the moral outrage that he presents?

He cannot.

But rather appeals to the laws (corrupted as they are by sin in him), that he denies...

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#152420 Feb 8, 2013
EmpAtheist wrote:
<quoted text>
I thought intellect came as a trick from a talking snake that made us all born sinners. That is a horrible gift.
Carnal reasoning is not intellect.

Reasoning apart from God, is not intellect.

It is foolishness.

Why would reasoning from a narrow perspective be better than reasoning along with the loving Creator of the universe.

You are equivocating here.

Not good.

I expect better from you.

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

#152421 Feb 8, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
Atheism:
"The fool says in his heart, there is no God."
"whosoever shall say, Thou Fool, shall be in danger of hell fire."

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#152422 Feb 8, 2013
EmpAtheist wrote:
<quoted text>
No. You don't have to know all the answers to point out failure.
If x+21=28 and x+42=49.... and the problem was to solve x+64=?
If your answer was either "64,864,953,854" or "purple giraffe"... i dont have to know the answer to see you went wrong here.
Or maybe see it from our perspective...
If you saw my phone bill... and it said i paid $39.99 for 450 min... and i told you my bill shows the truth and i have 1400 min.... this is self contradiction... you don't have to have verizon to know something is wrong here.
But then you have to account for logical mathematics...

You see, you cannot escape the atheistic predicament.

Atheism cannot account for any transcendent law, that is self evident in the universe.

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

#152423 Feb 8, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
Can you explain why Atheists make appeals to absolute moral standards?
That is the point I am making.
By the way, I am not a holder of the eternally burning sinner in hell position.
I do not believe it is warranted from the scripture (but thats another topic).
You are the only one trying to claim societal morals are "absolute". But you've yet to provide independently verifiable evidence for such a claim.

Since: Jan 13

Location hidden

#152424 Feb 8, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
There is mucho truth in what you say.
Topix atheists have the freedom to define reality the way they feel it should be, the world be damned. They will exercise their rights. Deal with it, world.
Astute observation.

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

#152425 Feb 8, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
But then you have to account for logical mathematics...
You see, you cannot escape the atheistic predicament.
Atheism cannot account for any transcendent law, that is self evident in the universe.
You keep making stuff up.

"Transcendence" refers to the aspect of God's nature and power which is wholly independent of (and removed from) the material universe.

You have yet to prove that the concept of "independent / removed / outside the universe" is even meaningful possible. Do that and then you can work on what evidence you have of any intelligence behind it.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#152426 Feb 8, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>Love.

1. Love God - your Creator.
2. Love your neighbour - His Creation.
Don't need god for that.

And love isn't absolute.
Thinking

Poole, UK

#152427 Feb 8, 2013
It's not a false claim.~40% of fertilised eggs don't make it.
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
And why would that be wrong,(leaving aside the falsity of the claim), in your worldview?

“Sweden more democratic thanUSA”

Since: Jun 12

Nykvarn, Sweden

#152428 Feb 8, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
Atheism:
"The fool says in his heart, there is no God."
whoever says,‘You fool!’ will be liable to the hell of fire

“Sweden more democratic thanUSA”

Since: Jun 12

Nykvarn, Sweden

#152429 Feb 8, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
So "anything goes" is your standard of morality?
nope.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#152430 Feb 8, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all, I do not accept his anti-theistic interprestion.
Second, on what basis, in his worldview, does he offer the moral outrage that he presents?
Humanism. No deity required.

Since: Sep 08

Lamar, CO

#152431 Feb 8, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text> Humanism. No deity required.
What is humanism?

What is humanist, and what is not?

What did it arise from? How did it come into being?

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

#152432 Feb 8, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
What is humanism?
What is humanist, and what is not?
What did it arise from? How did it come into being?
" http://lmgtfy.com/... ;

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 13 min One way or another 48,495
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 1 hr scientia potentia... 23,492
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 1 hr Rosa_Winkel 21,866
Athetists' best bet is that there is a God. 3 hr Uncle Sam 7
News The war on Christmas (Dec '10) Sat Eagle 12 4,907
Why you need to make sure you are saved before ... Fri Scaritual 14
Jesus Christ and Wisdom, Knowledge, Understandi... Nov 29 Richardfs 5
More from around the web