Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 244669 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#151818 Feb 4, 2013
Mikko wrote:
<quoted text>
there is no absolute law of morality
Ahem....Golden Rule. It's like the Hippocratic Oath; do no harm, intentionally.

“Get it right”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#151819 Feb 4, 2013
Just Think wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no empirical evidence for any god's existence.
None.
....
Sure there evidence... The universe is evidence...
but of WHAT is the qusetion...
Instead of saying there is no evidence, I would say there is no evidence which isn't easily and more logically explained as being somehting other than a God's creation.

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#151820 Feb 4, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
It is absolutely not lies that the evidence supports that life sprang from early Earth , and progressed in evolution to what we see today. There is absolutely no evidence of anything else, It isn't what I wanted to hear, it isn't what I cared to find , It is however exactly how it really is. There is no church of abiogenesis, there is no faith in the science, there is only evidence that shows it to be the way it is. It is not my problem accepting the truth, but it sure appears to be yours.
You athesists are a pack of hypocritical anal retentive clods. You run off at the mouth with certainty about the delusional Christian until you are faced with uncertainty, that is. Lying on your death bed knowing that your life is about to vaporize into nothingness, you will cling to even a thin sliver of hope, whether delusion or not, if it keeps you alive.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#151821 Feb 4, 2013
scaritual wrote:
<quoted text>
To promote Abrahamic religious tradition and family values?
Don't forget, in the myth, Adam & Eve began it all, and then the Yahweh! decided it was time for a do over with relatives - again - after the flood.
That's a fantastic myth you've got there.
Is it ego that allows you to pretend its a myth?

Or is it lack of intelligence?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#151822 Feb 4, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
So you prefer not knowing what people really think or would really do in a given situation then trusting them.
Detail exactly what benefit you have when conversing "in person" over that of online.
It doesn't take a month to get out a 3 minute conversation...

You can hear inflections in their voice & see their body language. With this online crap, you don't even know what they look like.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#151823 Feb 4, 2013
trekx wrote:
<quoted text>
From my history book ...
Serbians who were mistreated by the Austrian Government who enforced higher taxes to pay for churches. So Austria invaded Serbia angering other countries which turned into everyone picking sides and fighting each other. So technically religion was a root cause of World War 1. And World War 2 was also mainly caused by religion. Primarily Catholicism cause these wars.
Just like most wars, World War 1 was started by religion.
Plus there are many other country's that have wars that dont involve America that are mostly religious ....
WWI was about territory, not religion. The most immediate cause for the war was tensions over territory in the Balkans.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#151824 Feb 4, 2013
Mikko wrote:
<quoted text>
George Bush has claimed he was on a mission from God when he launched the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq
Lies.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#151825 Feb 4, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:

Does your sorry ass think this is a "social arena" and we're being "social"?!
It aint necessarily so wrote:
Yes.
You're confusing two similar and related words:
Social - of or relating to human society, the interaction of the individual and the group, or the welfare of human beings as members of society
Sociable - marked by or conducive to friendliness or pleasant social relations
OK, then by your definition, we're relating to human society....

But we sure as shit ain't 'being' social.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#151826 Feb 4, 2013
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
God is not natural and can't have supernatural powers. Period.
Thanks for sharing your opinion.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#151827 Feb 4, 2013
EmpAtheist wrote:
<quoted text>
Thats wonderful, except he keps pointing out that the comparison was with Jesus.
I know. That's the funny part.

Jesus wasn't human

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#151828 Feb 4, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Pretty much all of your points can be boiled down to:
People can lie online so they do.
Which is fallacious. Anonymity allows people to not lie, that was the point I stated, but it's not true anonymity, which destroys several of your points as they contradict each other as well as that one simple fact.
Let's use me as an example. In the physical world I am myself, a very open and outspoken atheist, and I am asexual. When a male flirts with me, I tend to ignore it, and tell them no. Their "feelings" get hurt because they're trying to impress their "friends" so they make themselves get angry and begin calling me names, like "dyke" and other variants. I am strong and just ignore them, a few times the cops have offered to arrest guys for that but I tend to decline and just prefer they make fools of themselves anyway.
I also speak freely about being an atheist all the time, if I am traveling to somewhere with someone there's always that "shh, you shouldn't talk about such things" from them, always. People are more interested in their social "appearances" in the physical world than being honest, online you can find a racist/sexist/phobic person in a few posts and know you don't want to associate with them, and then avoid them. In the physical world you cannot avoid the toxic people.
"When a male flirts with me"

Sorry, HA HA HA !!!!

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#151829 Feb 4, 2013
The_Box wrote:
<quoted text>
Rational ideas based on mountains of evidence? Idiotic!
Man made out of dust and woman made out of a rib? Genius!
There is no evidence to suggest that all life came from one life.

Without that guess thrown in the mix, ToE has nothing.

“What's left to defend?”

Since: Jan 11

Freedom

#151830 Feb 4, 2013
mtimber wrote:
I don't have to make a case, the truth of Gods existance is self evident.
Why do you think you have the right to put God on trial?
Either your faith has made you intellectually incompetent, or you always were, and it merely stunted your intellectual growth.

“Rising”

Since: Dec 10

Milky Way

#151831 Feb 4, 2013
BBSting wrote:
<quoted text>
You athesists are a pack of hypocritical anal retentive clods. You run off at the mouth with certainty about the delusional Christian until you are faced with uncertainty, that is. Lying on your death bed knowing that your life is about to vaporize into nothingness, you will cling to even a thin sliver of hope, whether delusion or not, if it keeps you alive.

I have no problem whatsoever with a person who wishes to believe in god. I do have a problem with people who deny the things that are known. You can't can't have a belief in god that distorts the known truths in the reality of the physical universe. You shoot yourself in the foot ,and your belief and becomes looking really stupid when you adhere to ancient mythology's and expect it hold truth and wisdom in the modern world of scientific reasoning.
You fantasy about our end of days is saying more about yourself than it is of anyone else.

Since: Dec 09

Cleveland, TN

#151832 Feb 4, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Is it ego that allows you to pretend its a myth?
Or is it lack of intelligence?
I don't know about pretend. It's probably just the definition of the word that allows them to think it...

myth
noun
1. a traditional or legendary story, usually concerning some being or hero or event, with or without a determinable basis of fact or a natural explanation, especially one that is concerned with deities or demigods and explains some practice, rite, or phenomenon of nature.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#151833 Feb 4, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes you do.
To state any moral position is flawed requires you to substantiate your standard of judgement.
Not on moral principals, no.

Your moral system contradicts itself. It fails right there by YOUR OWN standards.
mtimber wrote:
I can critique your morality because I can account for absolute morality.
You don't even know what my morality is. You're very desperate to get off the topic of your moral system and its failings.

You don't play well when people actually call you out on all the holes in your beliefs. Doesn't fit your script.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#151834 Feb 4, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
I understand you have assumed it.
It's not an assumption. It's a conclusion made based on everything we see in reality.

“The eye has it...”

Since: May 09

Russell's Teapot

#151835 Feb 4, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Is it ego that allows you to pretend its a myth?
Or is it lack of intelligence?
The definition of the word, "myth" allows me to call it exactly what it is.

Noun: myth
1. A traditional or legendary story, usually concerning some being or hero or event, with or without a determinable basis of fact or a natural explanation, especially one that is concerned with deities or demigods and explains some practice, rite, or phenomenon of nature.
2. A traditional story accepted as history; serves to explain the world view of a people.
WordWeb Pro 6.0

A myth.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#151836 Feb 4, 2013
mtimber wrote:
<quoted text>
You do not have the right to discuss sin until you can account for it...
No one needs to account for sin until someone actually provides proof that it exists.

Since: Dec 11

Location hidden

#151837 Feb 4, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no evidence to suggest that all life came from one life.
Without that guess thrown in the mix, ToE has nothing.
Nothing besides the fossil record, genetics, comparative anatomy, biogeography, and 150 years of science work all supporting it.

But I guess that's not much compared to...a book that a primitive people wrote.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 32 min dirtclod 20,472
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 51 min Thinking 10,608
There is no meaning without God 4 hr Thinking 2
Atheists and the "Moses Syndrome" 9 hr Anonymous1386 3
Atheist believe, they are just hiding!!! 19 hr Richardfs 17
Atheists should stop feeding the stereotypes 20 hr Thinking 4
John 3:16 Mon Thinking 65
More from around the web