Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 244844 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#150724 Jan 28, 2013
Thinking wrote:
The 2nd Law of Thermodynamics, anyone?
<quoted text>
Is that the one that states that perpetual motions stop?

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#150725 Jan 28, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
You'll have to be much sharper to trap Catcher.
But keep trying.
I do believe, by the way. Right now, I believe I'm going to have a glass of wine. A Provence rose.
Sharpness is not required. A very absorbent paper towel would do just fine. Then a good wipe with detergent.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#150726 Jan 28, 2013
River Tam wrote:
<quoted text>
Is that the one that states that perpetual motions stop?
It's the one that says for every virtual particle there must be a virtual anti-virtual particle.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#150727 Jan 28, 2013
Eagle12 wrote:
<quoted text>
Ordures, sweet pastry.
Aren't you sweet?

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#150728 Jan 28, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Sharpness is not required. A very absorbent paper towel would do just fine. Then a good wipe with detergent.
Fine then.

Keep wiping.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#150729 Jan 28, 2013
River Tam wrote:
<quoted text>
Aren't you sweet?
Ordures?

Eagle meant hors d'oeuvres.

His French is even worse than his English.

“Darwin died for your sins”

Since: Aug 08

Nunya

#150730 Jan 28, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
"efinition of AGNOSTIC
1
: a person who holds the view that any ultimate reality (as God) is unknown and probably unknowable; broadly : one who is not committed to believing in either the existence or the nonexistence of God or a god
2
: a person who is unwilling to commit to an opinion about something <political agnostics> "
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/agn...
That does not support your assertion.
What else are you wrong about?
Like I said, an agnostic deals with what can be known. An theist deals with belief.

Agnostic atheist : "I don't know if gods exist but I don't believe they do"

Agnostic theist : "I don't know if gods exist but I believe they do"

Agnostic : "I just don't know"

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#150731 Jan 28, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
It's the one that says for every virtual particle there must be a virtual anti-virtual particle.
Should I throw away my virtual bible then?

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#150732 Jan 28, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
"efinition of AGNOSTIC
1
: a person who holds the view that any ultimate reality (as God) is unknown and probably unknowable; broadly : one who is not committed to believing in either the existence or the nonexistence of God or a god
2
: a person who is unwilling to commit to an opinion about something <political agnostics> "
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/agn...
That does not support your assertion.
What else are you wrong about?
I often ponder why it's so important to the theists why agnostic must be redefined so it is incompatible with atheism. So why can there not be agnostic atheists?
bohart

Newport, TN

#150733 Jan 28, 2013
christianity is EVIL wrote:
<quoted text>
and your STUPIDITY is showing ,you must be xian
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Abiogenesis
Hey the article states that the idea of spontanous life generation goes back to the greek philosophers, which is what it is ... a damn philosophy with no scientific evidence. I believe you have evolved though, you seem stuck on the evolutionary tree at Homo stupidicus.Probably the result of inbred Frenchmen and low I.Q. Indians , the very flower of Canada.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#150735 Jan 28, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
I often ponder why it's so important to the theists why agnostic must be redefined so it is incompatible with atheism. So why can there not be agnostic atheists?
Because atheism requires just as much belief and commitment as theism.

No middle ground.

Agnostics are not committed to either. They reserve judgment. Atheists already made their judgment.

But I will bet you won't understand that, and will keep on arguing about it.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#150736 Jan 28, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Because atheism requires just as much belief and commitment as theism.
No middle ground.
Agnostics are not committed to either. They reserve judgment. Atheists already made their judgment.
But I will bet you won't understand that, and will keep on arguing about it.
No, that's your own projection. Atheism is, by definition, a lack of belief. You can't change the rules mid-game. Anyone who lacks a belief in a god is an atheist, end of story. You have to justify your own beliefs by projecting your failure to comprehend the differences onto others.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#150737 Jan 28, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
No, that's your own projection. Atheism is, by definition, a lack of belief. You can't change the rules mid-game. Anyone who lacks a belief in a god is an atheist, end of story. You have to justify your own beliefs by projecting your failure to comprehend the differences onto others.
Your confusion about definitions is part of your pathology.

If you just lacked a belief you would not be on here telling theists how stupid they are.

You have faith in your conviction there are no deities. Or you have a different pathology relating to some need to be contrary.

Again, that will go totally over your head, or you are on here just to argue. I believe it WILL go over your head.

You Topix atheists are much too much emotional in your arguments to be rational thinkers.
bohart

Newport, TN

#150739 Jan 28, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Your confusion about definitions is part of your pathology.
If you just lacked a belief you would not be on here telling theists how stupid they are.
You have faith in your conviction there are no deities. Or you have a different pathology relating to some need to be contrary.
Again, that will go totally over your head, or you are on here just to argue. I believe it WILL go over your head.
You Topix atheists are much too much emotional in your arguments to be rational thinkers.
Ouch! that was good.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#150740 Jan 28, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Your confusion about definitions is part of your pathology.
If you just lacked a belief you would not be on here telling theists how stupid they are.
You have faith in your conviction there are no deities. Or you have a different pathology relating to some need to be contrary.
Again, that will go totally over your head, or you are on here just to argue. I believe it WILL go over your head.
You Topix atheists are much too much emotional in your arguments to be rational thinkers.
If theists stopped being stupid, then no one would have reason to call them stupid. I have faith in things with solid evidence, your god has zero, none, so I dismiss your god like all the others, as mythology. I love evidence, evidence is what I study, without evidence there is nothing to accept or deny, it simply does not require any opinion either way.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#150741 Jan 28, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Because atheism requires just as much belief and commitment as theism.
Atheism requires no belief. Are you Riverside Redneck in drag?

“What's left to defend?”

Since: Jan 11

Freedom

#150744 Jan 28, 2013
River Tam wrote:
Should I throw away my virtual bible then?
Did it come with the little cardboard glasses so you can see all three dimensions of God? I think they were called Trinity Blinders or something.

Since: Mar 11

United States

#150745 Jan 28, 2013
RR isn't exactly known for his comprehension skills. He falls into the, god exists because I said so level of stupidity.
The_Box wrote:
<quoted text>
This makes no sense whatsoever.
I can shoot lasers from my eyes. Don't ask for evidence because that means you must believe me!

Since: Nov 12

Location hidden

#150746 Jan 28, 2013
madscot wrote:
<quoted text>
Like I said, an agnostic deals with what can be known. An theist deals with belief.
Agnostic atheist : "I don't know if gods exist but I don't believe they do"
Agnostic theist : "I don't know if gods exist but I believe they do"
Agnostic : "I just don't know"
Well said. Did you get to watch the video i posted for you?

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#150747 Jan 28, 2013
Tide with Beach wrote:
<quoted text>
Did it come with the little cardboard glasses so you can see all three dimensions of God? I think they were called Trinity Blinders or something.
My god can't be seen in RGB.

He's absolutely white.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 3 min Shizle 10,748
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 13 min DanFromSmithville 20,582
Atheists should stop feeding the stereotypes 1 hr Shizle 17
Atheists and the "Moses Syndrome" 5 hr Anonymous1386 11
Santa vs. God: logic? Wed Shizle 2
Is the Christian god good? Wed Shizle 4
Atheist believe, they are just hiding!!! Jul 28 Richardfs 18
More from around the web