Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

Full story: Webbunny tumblelog

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Comments (Page 7,163)

Showing posts 143,241 - 143,260 of216,878
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149102
Jan 21, 2013
 
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
"that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom"
--Abraham Lincoln, 19NOV1863
In 1951, the Knights of Columbus, the world's largest Catholic fraternal service organization, began including the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance. In 1952 they adopted a resolution urging that the change be made universal and copies of this resolution were sent to the President, the Vice President and the Speaker of the House.

The phrase "under God" was incorporated into the Pledge of Allegiance June 14, 1954, by a Joint Resolution of Congress.
Thinking

Huntingdon, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149103
Jan 21, 2013
 
Whereas you suffer with arseteroids.
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>You just like IPU because it lives in Uranus.
Adam

Stoke-on-trent, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149104
Jan 21, 2013
 
The pope shows how he is down with the kids, sending a tweet in latin. Is it any wonder their followers are leaving in droves when they are so out of touch.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-22654...
Lincoln

United States

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149105
Jan 21, 2013
 
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
So then your God created pure evil.
How do you define pure evil?

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149106
Jan 21, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

The Atheist's Manifesto

"We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdidy of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravangant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstatiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It's not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counterintuitive, no matter how mystifying to the unitiated. Moreover, that Materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door." - Carl Sagan

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149107
Jan 21, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Givemeliberty wrote:
According to the bible myth your retarded god is the creator of all and everything so he just have created satan and hell right?
<quoted text>
According to a Barna Group survey (2011), Atheism is the Tea Party of fringe cults, predominantly white, male and bigoted.
Adam

Stoke-on-trent, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149108
Jan 21, 2013
 
digitaldan wrote:
The Atheist's Manifesto
What are you saying? Science is wrong, and religion right? Please explain. Cause if you are looking for absurdities try the so called holy books.
Adam

Stoke-on-trent, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149109
Jan 21, 2013
 
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you define pure evil?
The god of the old testament got to high on that list of evil characters.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149110
Jan 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

digitaldan wrote:
The Atheist's Manifesto
"We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdidy of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravangant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstatiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It's not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counterintuitive, no matter how mystifying to the unitiated. Moreover, that Materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door." - Carl Sagan
First of all, this is NOT the position of the vast majority of atheists.

Second, it was NOT a quote of Carl Sagan. it is a quote from Richard Lewontin who was reviewing a book of Sagan's.

Third, if you can find a way to test the 'non-material', I'm sure there are many scientists who would be willing to theorize, test, and figure out how it works. The rule of science isn't some fuzzy materialism, but the simple idea that ideas must be testable and that general principles must stand up to tests designed to show them wrong.

Finally, Dr. Lewontin is not a spokesman for ALL atheists or even all scientists. Lewontin was a marxist, with very particular views (which were often wrong).
Adam

Stoke-on-trent, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149111
Jan 21, 2013
 
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all, this is NOT the position of the vast majority of atheists.
Second, it was NOT a quote of Carl Sagan. it is a quote from Richard Lewontin who was reviewing a book of Sagan's.
Third, if you can find a way to test the 'non-material', I'm sure there are many scientists who would be willing to theorize, test, and figure out how it works. The rule of science isn't some fuzzy materialism, but the simple idea that ideas must be testable and that general principles must stand up to tests designed to show them wrong.
Finally, Dr. Lewontin is not a spokesman for ALL atheists or even all scientists. Lewontin was a marxist, with very particular views (which were often wrong).
Love it. Digitaldan, well and truly busted!!
Thinking

Huntingdon, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149112
Jan 21, 2013
 
F**k off you lying POS.

Sagan didn't write that.

Do you want to say who did?
digitaldan wrote:
The Atheist's Manifesto
"We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdidy of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravangant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstatiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It's not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counterintuitive, no matter how mystifying to the unitiated. Moreover, that Materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door." - Carl Sagan
Thinking

Huntingdon, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149113
Jan 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Funny that digitaldan "forgot" to quote the next line:

"The eminent Kant scholar Lewis Beck used to say that anyone who could believe in God could believe in anything."
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all, this is NOT the position of the vast majority of atheists.
Second, it was NOT a quote of Carl Sagan. it is a quote from Richard Lewontin who was reviewing a book of Sagan's.
Third, if you can find a way to test the 'non-material', I'm sure there are many scientists who would be willing to theorize, test, and figure out how it works. The rule of science isn't some fuzzy materialism, but the simple idea that ideas must be testable and that general principles must stand up to tests designed to show them wrong.
Finally, Dr. Lewontin is not a spokesman for ALL atheists or even all scientists. Lewontin was a marxist, with very particular views (which were often wrong).

“Today we pray”

Since: Jul 12

"tomorrow we win"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149114
Jan 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Thinking wrote:
In the free world, "liberal" is not a pejorative.
<quoted text>
You sure about that?

“Today we pray”

Since: Jul 12

"tomorrow we win"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149116
Jan 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Hedonist wrote:
<quoted text>
In 1951, the Knights of Columbus, the world's largest Catholic fraternal service organization, began including the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance. In 1952 they adopted a resolution urging that the change be made universal and copies of this resolution were sent to the President, the Vice President and the Speaker of the House.
The phrase "under God" was incorporated into the Pledge of Allegiance June 14, 1954, by a Joint Resolution of Congress.
And? We are one nation under God.

“Today we pray”

Since: Jul 12

"tomorrow we win"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149115
Jan 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

RiversideRedneck wrote:
What makes you assume there'd be any remains left to find? Bones decompose, too. After several thousand years, they'd be indiscernible from the dirt.
Richardfs wrote:
It's a desert.
Thanks for conceding.

“Today we pray”

Since: Jul 12

"tomorrow we win"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149117
Jan 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all, this is NOT the position of the vast majority of atheists.
Second, it was NOT a quote of Carl Sagan. it is a quote from Richard Lewontin who was reviewing a book of Sagan's.
Third, if you can find a way to test the 'non-material', I'm sure there are many scientists who would be willing to theorize, test, and figure out how it works. The rule of science isn't some fuzzy materialism, but the simple idea that ideas must be testable and that general principles must stand up to tests designed to show them wrong.
Finally, Dr. Lewontin is not a spokesman for ALL atheists or even all scientists. Lewontin was a marxist, with very particular views (which were often wrong).
I've seen this "work" before. It really amazes me.

"We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdidy of some of its constructs"

" in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravangant promises of health and life, "

"in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstatiated just-so stories,"

"because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism."

"Moreover, that Materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door."

So basically, he'll believe in science no matter what - so long as that "divine foot" stays out...

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149119
Jan 21, 2013
 
RiversideRedneck wrote:
We are one nation under God.
We may be one nation, although even that can be disputed, as it has been in Colin Woodard's 2011 book "American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America".

But there is as yet no evidence that any of us are under a "god".

“Today we pray”

Since: Jul 12

"tomorrow we win"

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149120
Jan 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Drew Smith wrote:
<quoted text>
We may be one nation, although even that can be disputed, as it has been in Colin Woodard's 2011 book "American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America".
But there is as yet no evidence that any of us are under a "god".
Just a heads up. North America is not a nation.

Just sayin........

America (the nation) is under God.
Pat

Granby, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149121
Jan 21, 2013
 
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
And? We are one nation under God.
We are one nation under no gods.
Pat

Granby, CT

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#149122
Jan 21, 2013
 
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
And? We are one nation under God.
Some dishonest pandering politicians put god in the pledge and all it proves is their lack of moral sense and lack of appreciation for the separation of church and state which this country so clearly stands for. Is your imaginary god more believable for you now with god in the pledge? LOL

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 143,241 - 143,260 of216,878
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••