Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 243102 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

Since: Mar 11

Chicago, IL

#149097 Jan 21, 2013
Yahweh/Jesus is scared of iron chariots and is so retarded he thinks you can build a tower going into his living room.

If you are going to threaten me with a deity could you at least chose a semi-intelligent one?
southerncross wrote:
<quoted text>
That's right. Satan is God's personal varmint exterminator and you're on his most wanted hit list.
Thinking

Leighton Buzzard, UK

#149098 Jan 21, 2013
But the IPU is the only true invisible pink unicorn, which is better. So I win.
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>Dudeism is more real because there isn't a "god" requirement. So, there.:P

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#149100 Jan 21, 2013
Thinking wrote:
But the IPU is the only true invisible pink unicorn, which is better. So I win.
<quoted text>
You just like IPU because it lives in Uranus.

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

#149102 Jan 21, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
"that we here highly resolve that these dead shall not have died in vain—that this nation, under God, shall have a new birth of freedom"
--Abraham Lincoln, 19NOV1863
In 1951, the Knights of Columbus, the world's largest Catholic fraternal service organization, began including the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance. In 1952 they adopted a resolution urging that the change be made universal and copies of this resolution were sent to the President, the Vice President and the Speaker of the House.

The phrase "under God" was incorporated into the Pledge of Allegiance June 14, 1954, by a Joint Resolution of Congress.
Thinking

Leighton Buzzard, UK

#149103 Jan 21, 2013
Whereas you suffer with arseteroids.
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>You just like IPU because it lives in Uranus.
Adam

Stoke-on-trent, UK

#149104 Jan 21, 2013
The pope shows how he is down with the kids, sending a tweet in latin. Is it any wonder their followers are leaving in droves when they are so out of touch.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-22654...
Lincoln

United States

#149105 Jan 21, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
So then your God created pure evil.
How do you define pure evil?

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#149106 Jan 21, 2013
The Atheist's Manifesto

"We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdidy of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravangant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstatiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It's not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counterintuitive, no matter how mystifying to the unitiated. Moreover, that Materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door." - Carl Sagan

Since: Mar 10

Location hidden

#149107 Jan 21, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
According to the bible myth your retarded god is the creator of all and everything so he just have created satan and hell right?
<quoted text>
According to a Barna Group survey (2011), Atheism is the Tea Party of fringe cults, predominantly white, male and bigoted.
Adam

Stoke-on-trent, UK

#149108 Jan 21, 2013
digitaldan wrote:
The Atheist's Manifesto
What are you saying? Science is wrong, and religion right? Please explain. Cause if you are looking for absurdities try the so called holy books.
Adam

Stoke-on-trent, UK

#149109 Jan 21, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
How do you define pure evil?
The god of the old testament got to high on that list of evil characters.

“Think&Care”

Since: Oct 07

Location hidden

#149110 Jan 21, 2013
digitaldan wrote:
The Atheist's Manifesto
"We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdidy of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravangant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstatiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It's not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counterintuitive, no matter how mystifying to the unitiated. Moreover, that Materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door." - Carl Sagan
First of all, this is NOT the position of the vast majority of atheists.

Second, it was NOT a quote of Carl Sagan. it is a quote from Richard Lewontin who was reviewing a book of Sagan's.

Third, if you can find a way to test the 'non-material', I'm sure there are many scientists who would be willing to theorize, test, and figure out how it works. The rule of science isn't some fuzzy materialism, but the simple idea that ideas must be testable and that general principles must stand up to tests designed to show them wrong.

Finally, Dr. Lewontin is not a spokesman for ALL atheists or even all scientists. Lewontin was a marxist, with very particular views (which were often wrong).
Adam

Stoke-on-trent, UK

#149111 Jan 21, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all, this is NOT the position of the vast majority of atheists.
Second, it was NOT a quote of Carl Sagan. it is a quote from Richard Lewontin who was reviewing a book of Sagan's.
Third, if you can find a way to test the 'non-material', I'm sure there are many scientists who would be willing to theorize, test, and figure out how it works. The rule of science isn't some fuzzy materialism, but the simple idea that ideas must be testable and that general principles must stand up to tests designed to show them wrong.
Finally, Dr. Lewontin is not a spokesman for ALL atheists or even all scientists. Lewontin was a marxist, with very particular views (which were often wrong).
Love it. Digitaldan, well and truly busted!!
Thinking

Leighton Buzzard, UK

#149112 Jan 21, 2013
F**k off you lying POS.

Sagan didn't write that.

Do you want to say who did?
digitaldan wrote:
The Atheist's Manifesto
"We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdidy of some of its constructs, in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravangant promises of health and life, in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstatiated just-so stories, because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism. It's not that the methods and institutions of science somehow compel us to accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to material causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how counterintuitive, no matter how mystifying to the unitiated. Moreover, that Materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door." - Carl Sagan
Thinking

Leighton Buzzard, UK

#149113 Jan 21, 2013
Funny that digitaldan "forgot" to quote the next line:

"The eminent Kant scholar Lewis Beck used to say that anyone who could believe in God could believe in anything."
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all, this is NOT the position of the vast majority of atheists.
Second, it was NOT a quote of Carl Sagan. it is a quote from Richard Lewontin who was reviewing a book of Sagan's.
Third, if you can find a way to test the 'non-material', I'm sure there are many scientists who would be willing to theorize, test, and figure out how it works. The rule of science isn't some fuzzy materialism, but the simple idea that ideas must be testable and that general principles must stand up to tests designed to show them wrong.
Finally, Dr. Lewontin is not a spokesman for ALL atheists or even all scientists. Lewontin was a marxist, with very particular views (which were often wrong).

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#149114 Jan 21, 2013
Thinking wrote:
In the free world, "liberal" is not a pejorative.
<quoted text>
You sure about that?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#149116 Jan 21, 2013
Hedonist wrote:
<quoted text>
In 1951, the Knights of Columbus, the world's largest Catholic fraternal service organization, began including the words "under God" in the Pledge of Allegiance. In 1952 they adopted a resolution urging that the change be made universal and copies of this resolution were sent to the President, the Vice President and the Speaker of the House.
The phrase "under God" was incorporated into the Pledge of Allegiance June 14, 1954, by a Joint Resolution of Congress.
And? We are one nation under God.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#149115 Jan 21, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
What makes you assume there'd be any remains left to find? Bones decompose, too. After several thousand years, they'd be indiscernible from the dirt.
Richardfs wrote:
It's a desert.
Thanks for conceding.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#149117 Jan 21, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
First of all, this is NOT the position of the vast majority of atheists.
Second, it was NOT a quote of Carl Sagan. it is a quote from Richard Lewontin who was reviewing a book of Sagan's.
Third, if you can find a way to test the 'non-material', I'm sure there are many scientists who would be willing to theorize, test, and figure out how it works. The rule of science isn't some fuzzy materialism, but the simple idea that ideas must be testable and that general principles must stand up to tests designed to show them wrong.
Finally, Dr. Lewontin is not a spokesman for ALL atheists or even all scientists. Lewontin was a marxist, with very particular views (which were often wrong).
I've seen this "work" before. It really amazes me.

"We take the side of science in spite of the patent absurdidy of some of its constructs"

" in spite of its failure to fulfill many of its extravangant promises of health and life, "

"in spite of the tolerance of the scientific community for unsubstatiated just-so stories,"

"because we have a prior commitment, a commitment to materialism."

"Moreover, that Materialism is absolute, for we cannot allow a Divine Foot in the door."

So basically, he'll believe in science no matter what - so long as that "divine foot" stays out...

Since: Feb 08

Tampa, FL

#149119 Jan 21, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
We are one nation under God.
We may be one nation, although even that can be disputed, as it has been in Colin Woodard's 2011 book "American Nations: A History of the Eleven Rival Regional Cultures of North America".

But there is as yet no evidence that any of us are under a "god".

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 28 min Brian_G 19,744
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 1 hr NoahLovesU 9,227
Science Disproves Evolution (Aug '12) 1 hr ChristineM 2,283
News Aliens and evolution (Jun '12) 1 hr NoahLovesU 6,172
Should atheists have the burden of proof? 7 hr superwilly 18
John 3:16 16 hr superwilly 30
Atheists have morals too! 21 hr Amused 4
More from around the web