Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 258473 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“Darwin died for your sins”

Since: Aug 08

Nunya

#147877 Jan 10, 2013
Freebird USA wrote:
<quoted text>
Here is something related to your point. Al Gore high priest of Global Warming sells his little cable channel to Al Jazeera and pockets $100,000,000. Who is the major stake holder in Al Jazerra? The Oil rich royal family of Qatar. Al is a phony of the highest order.
In an awkward moment on Fox News this week, a pundit suggested that a member of the Saudi royal family who has supported the bridge-building work of the imam behind a planned Muslim community center and mosque in Lower Manhattan “funds radical madrasas all over the world.” The awkwardness came from the fact — unmentioned by anyone on the Fox set — that the same Saudi, Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, also happens to be the second-largest shareholder in News Corp., the parent company of the Fox News Channel.
http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/26/s...

“Darwin died for your sins”

Since: Aug 08

Nunya

#147878 Jan 10, 2013
Freebird USA wrote:
<quoted text>
Here is something related to your point. Al Gore high priest of Global Warming sells his little cable channel to Al Jazeera and pockets $100,000,000. Who is the major stake holder in Al Jazerra? The Oil rich royal family of Qatar. Al is a phony of the highest order.
You do realize that Al Jazeera is based in Qattar, don't you? The country where the U.S. has it's biggest military base in the middles east.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#147879 Jan 10, 2013
madscot wrote:
<quoted text>
A lot of those guys had mustaches too. I guess you're saying people with mustaches shouldn't be in power?
He is saying despite the claims of Dawkins and others who state the atheism of those particular despots was not a motivating factor in their actions,for at least some it was clearly part of their agenda.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#147880 Jan 10, 2013
madscot wrote:
<quoted text>
In an awkward moment on Fox News this week, a pundit suggested that a member of the Saudi royal family who has supported the bridge-building work of the imam behind a planned Muslim community center and mosque in Lower Manhattan “funds radical madrasas all over the world.” The awkwardness came from the fact — unmentioned by anyone on the Fox set — that the same Saudi, Prince Alwaleed bin Talal, also happens to be the second-largest shareholder in News Corp., the parent company of the Fox News Channel.
http://thelede.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/08/26/s...
Anti fracking zealot Matt Damons film Promised Land was bankrolled by the United Arab Emirates.

“It's just a box of rain...”

Since: May 07

Knoxville, TN

#147881 Jan 10, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
And exactly what would 150 years of cover ups and hush money falsified evidence etc. to advance the ToE hope to attain from such a conspiracy??
Oddly enough, considering the RR is citing the book to support his usually conservative point of view, Merchants of Doubt was written to expose the role of conservative contrarian scientists is slowing popular and political recognition of climate change as an issue long after a consensus had been reached on it among scientists in the fields that study it. The Wikipedia article on the book sums it up thus:

Oreskes and Conway write that a handful of politically conservative scientists, with strong ties to particular industries, have "played a disproportionate role in debates about controversial questions".[4] The book states that these scientists have challenged the scientific consensus about the dangers of smoking, the effects of acid rain, the existence of the ozone hole, and the existence of anthropogenic climate change.[4] The authors write that this has resulted in "deliberate obfuscation" of the issues which has had an influence on public opinion and policy-making.[4] Oreskes and Conway reach the conclusion that:

There are many reasons why the United States has failed to act on global warming, but at least one is the confusion raised by Bill Nierenberg, Fred Seitz, and Fred Singer.[4][5]

All three are physicists: Singer was a rocket scientist, whereas Nierenberg and Seitz worked on the atomic bomb.[6] Oreskes and Conway state: "small numbers of people can have large, negative impacts, especially if they are organised, determined and have access to power".[7]

So the pressure from moneyed interests comes from scientists who work in relatively unrelated fields, but use their credentials to assail the work of scientists whose expertise exceeds their own. Kinda like the pattern we see in the opposition to the ToE and Big Bang theory.

“Darwin died for your sins”

Since: Aug 08

Nunya

#147882 Jan 10, 2013
Freebird USA wrote:
<quoted text>
He is saying despite the claims of Dawkins and others who state the atheism of those particular despots was not a motivating factor in their actions,for at least some it was clearly part of their agenda.
No it wasn't. Power and control was THE motivating factor. Eliminating all threats.

“Darwin died for your sins”

Since: Aug 08

Nunya

#147883 Jan 10, 2013
Freebird USA wrote:
<quoted text>
Anti fracking zealot Matt Damons film Promised Land was bankrolled by the United Arab Emirates.
So what? Are you saying that Fox news gets of free while Current are muslim loving money grubbers? I'll take Qattar over KSA any day.

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#147885 Jan 10, 2013
NightSerf wrote:
<quoted text>
Oddly enough, considering the RR is citing the book to support his usually conservative point of view, Merchants of Doubt was written to expose the role of conservative contrarian scientists is slowing popular and political recognition of climate change as an issue long after a consensus had been reached on it among scientists in the fields that study it. The Wikipedia article on the book sums it up thus:
Oreskes and Conway write that a handful of politically conservative scientists, with strong ties to particular industries, have "played a disproportionate role in debates about controversial questions".[4] The book states that these scientists have challenged the scientific consensus about the dangers of smoking, the effects of acid rain, the existence of the ozone hole, and the existence of anthropogenic climate change.[4] The authors write that this has resulted in "deliberate obfuscation" of the issues which has had an influence on public opinion and policy-making.[4] Oreskes and Conway reach the conclusion that:
There are many reasons why the United States has failed to act on global warming, but at least one is the confusion raised by Bill Nierenberg, Fred Seitz, and Fred Singer.[4][5]
All three are physicists: Singer was a rocket scientist, whereas Nierenberg and Seitz worked on the atomic bomb.[6] Oreskes and Conway state: "small numbers of people can have large, negative impacts, especially if they are organised, determined and have access to power".[7]
So the pressure from moneyed interests comes from scientists who work in relatively unrelated fields, but use their credentials to assail the work of scientists whose expertise exceeds their own. Kinda like the pattern we see in the opposition to the ToE and Big Bang theory.
Well this is sort of like what he said in reverse. But the problem with global warming is it would only hurt American companies , the Chinese and Russians wouldn't follow, because it isn't economically viable. But we are seeing it happen and it will get worse 2012 being the hottest year on record.
Will this continue on a warming trend?

If it does we could see polar melt way sooner than all predictions.
But I have seen where they went there and they are dissipating so fast , because of subterranean rivers boring huge caverns and small state sized chunks breaking away.
I hate to think what it could lead too.
Lincoln

United States

#147886 Jan 10, 2013
In the story,
Tiny Tim is known for the statement,

"God bless us,
every one!"

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#147887 Jan 10, 2013
Freebird USA wrote:
<quoted text>
He is saying despite the claims of Dawkins and others who state the atheism of those particular despots was not a motivating factor in their actions,for at least some it was clearly part of their agenda.
Hitler's motivation was to "punish the Jews," the others it was power. All you have shown is that absolute power corrupts. Anyhow, if you want to base it on numbers, christians and Muslims have killed in the name of their religion more than anyone.
Thinking

Leighton Buzzard, UK

#147888 Jan 11, 2013
BS. They weren't all Atheists.
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
The 20th century soaked in blood of atheist in power.
Hitler,
Stalin,
Lenin,
Castro,
Trotsky,
Kamenev,
Zinoviev,
Mao,
Himler,
Eichmann all were atheists.

Since: Mar 11

Scottsburg, IN

#147889 Jan 11, 2013
But Jesus sharting out the universe is totally fact for you.
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
"Showing us life started from bacteria and advanced ever since"
As I said, suppositions.....
Adam

Stoke-on-trent, UK

#147890 Jan 11, 2013
madscot wrote:
<quoted text>
What's your point?
Maybe Lincoln's point is that God or gods allowed wars and atrocities to happen in the 20th century, and therefore if deities exist they are evil and not worthy of our worship or admiration.

“When you treat people as they ”

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#147891 Jan 11, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
Adam wasn't a gun owner.
That did not stop him having access when he wanted it.

“When you treat people as they ”

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#147892 Jan 11, 2013
KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
No that was a joke. You might want to google "joke"
Was it? Funnily enough clairvoyance is one of those skills that I am not blessed with

And why is it that some particular people come up with “that was a joke” when they are shown for what they are, warts and all?

“When you treat people as they ”

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#147893 Jan 11, 2013
KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
Why is it that atheist can't seem to dream up a stronger irony meter?
They always are busting or falling a part. Kind of a weak imagination.
Is it because cristards are allows breaking the bounds of irony?

“When you treat people as they ”

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#147894 Jan 11, 2013
KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
irony meter
A mythical device often mentioned on Internet discussion fora, the irony meter is a device for measuring unintentional irony. It is best known for breaking or exploding when the irony becomes too strong.
You need to do better. These things are junk. Like a flash bulb used once and done. And there is no recording method to record peak irony.
God

Mythical being often mention in bronze age religious texts and claimed to be responsible an unthinking macho deity known as the first trickster and first mass murders and the convenor of genocide, child murder, rape and slavery. An allegory blindly worshipped by deliberately ignorant people who find that such faith in magic and bronze age mayhem is preferable to actually educating themselves

You need to do better. These god ideas are junk. Like a florescent tube they shine brightly when new but degrade over time. And there is no recording method to record deliberate ignorance.
Lincoln

United States

#147895 Jan 11, 2013
madscot wrote:
<quoted text>
A lot of those guys had mustaches too. I guess you're saying people with mustaches shouldn't be in power?
In 20th century atheist in power murdered millions. As a result turning to atheism is not an easy solution.
Hitler,
Stalin,
Lenin,
Castro,
Trotsky,
Kamenev,
Zinoviev
Mao,
Himler,
Eichmann
all examples of atheists not to be trusted,
Lincoln

United States

#147896 Jan 11, 2013
Thinking wrote:
BS. They weren't all Atheists.
<quoted text>
Denial does not help!

In 20th century atheist in power murdered millions. As a result turning to atheism is not an easy solution.
Hitler,
Stalin,
Lenin,
Castro,
Trotsky,
Kamenev,
Zinoviev
Mao,
Himler,
Eichmann
all examples of atheists not to be trusted,
Thinking

Leighton Buzzard, UK

#147897 Jan 11, 2013
GFY liar.
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
Denial does not help!
In 20th century atheist in power murdered millions. As a result turning to atheism is not an easy solution.
Hitler,
Stalin,
Lenin,
Castro,
Trotsky,
Kamenev,
Zinoviev
Mao,
Himler,
Eichmann
all examples of atheists not to be trusted,

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 3 min Paul Scott 66,736
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 8 hr Aura Mytha 28,500
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... 13 hr Dogen 3,439
The Dumbest Thing Posted by a Godbot (Jun '10) Sat IB DaMann 5,975
Atheist Humor (Aug '09) Apr 21 Eagle 12 456
News Unholy? Atheists should embrace the science of ... Apr 20 Eagle 12 9
Where have all the Atheists gone? Apr 18 Eagle 12 13
More from around the web