Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 245099 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

TLC

Birmingham, AL

#147330 Jan 6, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
The "atheist" label in that survey was likely for the atheist religions.
I've been saying all along that atheism is a religion and you just agreed with that. You just called all your lame brained atheist friends liars!!! Thanks for destroying your own kind!!!
Turkey

Oswego, NY

#147331 Jan 6, 2013
Dave Nelson wrote:
http://religion.blogs.cnn.com/ 2013/01/05/my-take-jesus-was-a -dirty-dirty-god/?hpt=hp_c1
A good article.
Something Topix atheists and too many Christians don't truly understand. Divinity comes from within, not without. Wisdom and truth comes from through us, not preached to us.
Stupid Topix atheists, they wrap their "scientists" in white robes and put halos on their head. Then bow at their feet.
Why are Topix atheists incapable of thinking in the abstract? Glorified electrons with limited circuitry.
Existence is a light shining and bouncing off thingies. Something provided the light switch.
:-)
God only reveals himself to those he likes. What a great gift. na nana na na na

Since: Jan 13

Dillon, CO

#147332 Jan 6, 2013
Darwinism: A theory based on all known scientific facts compiled by scientists up to this date, considered by all reputable thinkers as one of the crown jewels of human thought. The Bible: a hodge-podge of 5000 year old Middle Eastern mythology. Hmm. Which shall I believe?
TLC

Birmingham, AL

#147333 Jan 6, 2013
jeffthecheeseman wrote:
Darwinism: A theory based on all known scientific facts compiled by scientists up to this date, considered by all reputable thinkers as one of the crown jewels of human thought. The Bible: a hodge-podge of 5000 year old Middle Eastern mythology. Hmm. Which shall I believe?
Oh lookie, another lying sock puppet on the scene.

Since: Jan 13

Dillon, CO

#147335 Jan 6, 2013
Hey. nice welcome to the forum, TLC. Are all religious folks as welcoming as you?

“Rising”

Since: Dec 10

Milky Way

#147336 Jan 6, 2013
TLC wrote:
<quoted text>
I've been saying all along that atheism is a religion and you just agreed with that. You just called all your lame brained atheist friends liars!!! Thanks for destroying your own kind!!!
Atheism is not a religion . It is as disbelief in any gods .
An atheist religion has no supreme deity or god they worship like... Jainism, Buddhism, Raelism, Neopagan movements such as Wicca and Modern Gaia.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#147337 Jan 6, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Frozen. Costco.
But real maple syrup on them.
And a cup of strong French roast.
Actually, I thought it was some exercise I'd never heard of.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#147338 Jan 6, 2013
Freebird USA wrote:
<quoted text>
The teapot made its debut during the Ming Dynasty in China (approximately 1350ad). The first rocket into space was the German V2 in 1944. Since there is a reliable record of rockets and space exploration since the intial V2. It is safe to say there is no evidence of a teapot anywhere in space.
It's also safe to say there's no evidence of any god.

Since: Sep 10

Long Beach, CA

#147339 Jan 6, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, I thought it was some exercise I'd never heard of.
You're confusing a waffle with a pretzel.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#147340 Jan 6, 2013
Hedonist wrote:
<quoted text>
So, even though you cannot actually prove there is no teapot in space, you consider such a possibility to be so remote as to be an absurd consideration?
That's exactly the way I feel about Shiva, Vishnu, and Brahma ... and Adonai ... and Allah .... and Jehovah ... and Thor ... and Zeus ... and all the others.( www.godchecker.com )
It is MORE probable that there is no teapot based on what "is" known about teapots and what has been shot into space.The best evidence available supports there being no teapot.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#147341 Jan 6, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
It's also safe to say there's no evidence of any god.
That continues to be a matter of opinion.

Since: Jan 13

Dillon, CO

#147342 Jan 6, 2013
Agreed, Aerobatty. I am neither "atheist" nor "religious" If someone could produce for me one iota of proof, not faith, that a God exists, I would convert.I keep on hearing that I lack "faith". Sorry, but I need evidence if I am going to change my life and bet my "soul" on the existence of a God.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#147344 Jan 6, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
What claim?
That atheism is belief depending on evidence.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#147345 Jan 6, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
That's a pretty poor excuse for not having any evidence of your assertion that there is a god, much less the one you ascribe to. Sounds more like you are trying to convince yourself that you know something others don't so you don't have to face facts.
It's no excuse, it's reality.

Can you prove that you love your mom?

Go ahead & try.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#147346 Jan 6, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Um, why did you make up a number. It's 2.04% that openly admit to being atheists. But the "non-religious" count as well, because without a religious belief you lack a belief in a god, therefore you're an atheist as well. The "atheist" label in that survey was likely for the atheist religions, there are a few religious that have no gods in them. So the total actually nears 14%.
But then, it doesn't matter, the majority are wrong more often than correct, and an appeal to popularity is a fallacy.
Whatever then, 2.04%...

But you can't say that 14% are atheists because 13% of them say they are non-religious or agnostic, not atheists.

You don't get to change the stats to suit your argument.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#147347 Jan 6, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
We need to tone down the rhetoric.
What, why? What have we done? Or r u just being sarcastic or something?

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#147348 Jan 6, 2013
TLC wrote:
<quoted text>
I've been saying all along that atheism is a religion and you just agreed with that. You just called all your lame brained atheist friends liars!!! Thanks for destroying your own kind!!!
Ah, twisting the words to suit your fallacy, a typical tactic you enjoy employing, JR. May I call you JR? Typing out Just Results all the time gets tiring. Anyhow, atheism is not a religion, but there are religions that have no gods, therefore, the people following those are categorized as atheist. Do you need more English words explained to you tonight, JR?

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#147349 Jan 6, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Whatever then, 2.04%...
But you can't say that 14% are atheists because 13% of them say they are non-religious or agnostic, not atheists.
You don't get to change the stats to suit your argument.
Non-religious would also be atheist, if you don't believe in any religion, then by default you don't believe in a god, thus the label of atheist includes those as well. Why are you even caring about such numbers anyway? It's silly, childish, and stupid. But your complete disregard of the English language is insulting to the USA.

Since: Oct 12

Location hidden

#147350 Jan 6, 2013
Tide with Beach wrote:
<quoted text>
I've seen Source Code. I liked it. Did you see any of the Back to the Future movies?
If you get yourself killed I'll go back in time and strategically place a banana peel to thwart your would-be assassin.
LOL, u would do that for me? Thanks!

Who the blumin' hell hasn't seen ALL the back to future movies? They must be sad people, lol, I'm joking or am I?

Yh, I liked it too, but i'm soooo confused. When I watched the back to future movies, I was a kid, right, so u didn't think about the science behind the film and with those movies I don't even care about the paradox or things like that, but i'm so confused about source code, coz I started thinking too much about it and it doesn't make sense. How did he send her the text msg?

Another film that I cared about, being confused about, was room 1408, that was another good film, but too confusing.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#147351 Jan 6, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
That atheism is belief depending on evidence.
Meh, it's a logical conclusion since we require evidence before we are willing to believe anything. However, atheism is not a belief, it's a lack of belief and only a lack of belief in a god.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 6 min Chimney1 20,666
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 19 min ChristineW 11,007
John 3:16 24 min superwilly 96
Atheists and the "Moses Syndrome" 2 hr Thinking 21
Atheists should stop feeding the stereotypes 2 hr Thinking 19
News Why Atheism Will Replace Religion (Aug '12) 12 hr ChristineW 14,668
News Si Robertson, 'Duck Dynasty' Star, Says Atheist... Fri thetruth 42
More from around the web