Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 239400 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#147126 Jan 4, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, I have heard that "Oh god, Oh god!!!"
It's a satisfying thing to hear.
That's why it's called the G spot.

:)

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#147127 Jan 4, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, guns kill people, violence doesn't always kill people. YOu are once again using that typical creationist tactic of shifting the goalposts.
Violence doesn't always kill people.

Neither do guns.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#147128 Jan 4, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey you are the on who claimed a gun kept YOU safe. Not your children or anyone elseís children but YOU, you selfish moron.
We were talking about MURDER weapons, not common sense.
It is not common sense to point a loaded weapon designed to kill people at a childís head and pull the trigger, that does not stop guns being used in that way but it is most certainly not common sense
That is so typical of a MURDER weapon lover to fall back on citing common sense precautions as the reason he owns a gun. What total bollocks - you own a gun because you are a weak minded moron who wants to feel like a big macho man.
Itís not that I dislike guns, they have their place in the military and even when adequately monitored in ďofficialĒ security situations (but even that fail as is shown by the Swiss murder statistics).
What I do dislike is the morons like you who make false claims (something you do often) about what you are unwilling to consider. Those ignorant morons who see guns as a comfort in the arms race they call their life
Life has much more to offer than living in fear of some dickhead like you having a mental breakdown and shooting someoneís children.
Your biggest misconception is that gun owners, specifically those that have guns for home protection, live in fear.

It's not living in fear, not at all. It's acknowledging that threats exist and using whatever means you can to protect yourself from those threats.

“In the beginning God Created..”

Since: Feb 12

Southern Illinois

#147129 Jan 4, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
With a compass in the stock and a thing which tells time.
After my father died, I was cleaning out his garage and I found my Daisy BB gun that I got for Christmas probably a little older than Ralphie, but in exactly the same manner. Mom against it. All presents opened. No gun. Then "something" behind the couch over there.
ha, ha, ha, I still have mine too but it no longer shoots.

Dad should have never let me have that thing.

“In the beginning God Created..”

Since: Feb 12

Southern Illinois

#147130 Jan 4, 2013
One man with a gun can control 100 without one.
Vladimir Lenin

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#147131 Jan 4, 2013
Eagle12 wrote:
One man with a gun can control 100 without one.
Vladimir Lenin
Not quite accurate, actually. Two well trained persons could take out a person with a gun very well. The problem is that most people lack the time in their lives for such training.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#147132 Jan 4, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Not quite accurate, actually. Two well trained persons could take out a person with a gun very well. The problem is that most people lack the time in their lives for such training.
Terrorists took over 4 planes with box cutters.....

“In the beginning God Created..”

Since: Feb 12

Southern Illinois

#147133 Jan 4, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
Its proven that your population cannot be trusted with handguns.
Thats what the stats and the headlines show.
If guns cause crime, then pencils cause misspelled words.

“In the beginning God Created..”

Since: Feb 12

Southern Illinois

#147134 Jan 4, 2013
Criminals love gun control -- it makes their jobs safer.

“In the beginning God Created..”

Since: Feb 12

Southern Illinois

#147135 Jan 4, 2013
The American Revolution would never have happened with gun control.

“In the beginning God Created..”

Since: Feb 12

Southern Illinois

#147136 Jan 4, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
First you need to sh*t the f*ck up. There are no further steps creationist.
You need to watch Jack's Big Music Show.

It will calm you down.

“It's just a box of rain...”

Since: May 07

Knoxville, TN

#147137 Jan 4, 2013
TheBlackSheep wrote:
<quoted text>
If original intent is your criteria:
Dynamite is mainly used in the mining, quarrying, construction, and demolition industries, and it has had some historical usage in warfare. However the unstable nature of nitroglycerin, especially if subjected to freezing, has rendered it obsolete for military uses.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dynamite
Since TNT was not invented to kill people, why is it against the law for me to buy it?
TNT, along with other explosives, is a very useful substance, but it is also too dangerous in the hands of the untrained and unskilled to allow unlicensed personnel to have access to it. Nor are there any non-industrial uses for it that I can think of. Firearms are less dangerous and more useful for the general population and can be used effectively with far less training. They are also the weapons of choice when crimes are being committed, and homicide rates tend to be lower for societies in which they are less available.

It all comes back to the basic tradeoff between security and personal freedom. I tend to lean more toward the latter, which is why I dislike many of the provisions of the so-called Patriot Act. I don't own any firearms, but I'm comfortable with the fact that many of my friends and acquaintances do and that some have carry permits. But it does make sense to clearly define where the line between the two is drawn.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#147138 Jan 4, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey if you have a mental paddy you are capable of any act, if you carry a gun that makes the mayhem you can cause so much easier (and incidentally more removed from reality)
Itís hard to murder someone in cold blood when you do not have a weapon to do it for you second hand.
Personally I donít need to worry that some dipshit freebird with personal issues is packing and on the edge of shooting my childen
What you worry about is up to you.
You're delusional. I for one am grateful you don't have a gun.But then your type prefers to use government to infringe on the rights of those you disagree with,the law be damned.

“In the beginning God Created..”

Since: Feb 12

Southern Illinois

#147139 Jan 4, 2013
Give a boy a squirt gun.

And he will shoot the girls on the nipples every time.

Squirt guns donít shoot girls on their nipples.

Boys do.

“It's just a box of rain...”

Since: May 07

Knoxville, TN

#147140 Jan 4, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
It's no surprise we are different. We believe in peace through superior firepower. We can test your hypothesis , when mad drug crazed lunatic lunges at you with a gun you can hold up your protest sign. I however will reserve the right to defend myself as my forefathers did. Anything less is not American and is not in our best interest.
Now I am not without sympathy for the problem we have , but your idea is historically led to nothing but a powerless and benign subculture of groupies that would instead of charging the enemy
in fact run and beg for mercy and lose all sovereignty to ruthless dictators.
I am not against the ownership and proper use of firearms, but sloppy thinking about the issue does not help to define what is proper and what is not. You seem to be projecting a hypothesis on me that I have never articulated. Protest sign? Where did you get that? Calling a fire arm a "device for delivering a projectile to a target at high speed" is a diversionary semantic tactic. You own belief in peace through superior firepower show that you don't really define them that way either.

There is a difference between force and violence, and force, even deadly force, is sometimes, but rarely, a necessary response to violence. Peace does not come about because of superior firepower but because most people prefer peace over violent conflict. That's why the homicide rate in the U.S., while higher than Canada or the U.K., is still quite low--4.8 per 100,000 in 2010. With or without guns, we could all kill others if we chose to do so. All but an incredibly tiny minority choose not to. smaller but still overwhelming majorities choose not to victimize others in any way at all. Peace comes from that choice, not firepower.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#147141 Jan 4, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Terrorists took over 4 planes with box cutters.....
A good example of how training and practice can accomplish more than a weapon itself, yes.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#147142 Jan 4, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
A good example of how training and practice can accomplish more than a weapon itself, yes.
Ya, the civilians on those 4 planes should've been armed. Then the terrorists would've accomplished nothing.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#147143 Jan 4, 2013
Eagle12 wrote:
Give a boy a squirt gun.
And he will shoot the girls on the nipples every time.
Squirt guns donít shoot girls on their nipples.
Boys do.
Guns don't kill people,
husbands that come home early do.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#147144 Jan 4, 2013
Eagle12 wrote:
Give a boy a squirt gun.
And he will shoot the girls on the nipples every time.
Squirt guns donít shoot girls on their nipples.
Boys do.
Guns don't kill people,
dangerous minorities do.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#147145 Jan 4, 2013
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
There are always "throwbacks" and various flaws in the development of the brain which do cause such, yes. But in general, humans want to do what's right by the species, even if they don't want to actually figure out what's right through logic.
As demonstrated in Darfur? In Bosnia? In China? Germany? The USSR? Chile?Central America? Assorted Tribal conflicts in Africa?
The aftermath of Katrina? The south central LA Riots? I think human nature contains a more than healthy dose of barbarism.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Science Disproves Evolution (Aug '12) 24 min Thinking 2,218
News Phil Robertson talks against Atheists 1 hr Insults Are Easier 125
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 2 hr Chimney1 19,071
News Richard Dawkins insists he's not an angry athei... 4 hr Thinking 2
John 3:16 4 hr Thinking 2
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 4 hr ChristineM 7,471
News Atheists' problem with the Bible (Sep '09) 4 hr Exodus771 7,502
More from around the web