Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 258476 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#146646 Jan 2, 2013
G_O_D wrote:
<quoted text>
Yet they , like full auto weapons, arelegal to own in most of the USA.
When was the last time you heard of a full auto or silenced weapon used in a crime ? Please provide proof <court transcripts>
All the anti-gun nuts are clueless and usually liars.
I just looked.

They are legal in some states.

Not mine.

And I'm sure you won't get this, but I'm not an anti-gun nut.

If you tried following along without your confirmation bias, you would know this.

And outside of being the same kind of liar that everybody is (I.E., No. That dress doesn't make your ass look big.), you owe me an apology.

I won't hold my breath, though.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#146647 Jan 2, 2013
Adam wrote:
<quoted text>
I think the best answer would be to adopt similar laws to other countries where the problems of gun crime are less. But I cant see that happening, cause the love affair with guns is so strong.
As a point of interest, I was reading a US Christian forum, where the majority was very strongly in favour of assult weapons. I find it interesting that the two go together, a Bible in one hand, and an assult weapon in the other.
Let's not forget the hip flask of Jack Daniels in their pocket.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#146648 Jan 2, 2013
UidiotRaceMAKEWORLDPEACE wrote:
<quoted text>See my post about biometric/ Profiling is one good way to separate those who have violent streaks ... should not be allowed near any projectiles...
There's a brain scan now that shows a specific area of the brain that doesn't register in psychopaths.

An interesting part of this finding was that the man who discovered it did a scan on himself and found the he was actually a psychopath.

After the scan, he recognized the properties of psychopathy in himself that he hadn't realized before.

“LOL Really?”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#146649 Jan 2, 2013
NightSerf wrote:
In order to justify the denial of a constitutional right, the government would need a lot more than a profile, biometric or otherwise--that's the difference between a right and a privilege. Our laws allow denying even the right to vote to convicted felons, but the rest of us enjoy all of the rights guaranteed by the Constitution. I doubt that denying any rights based on profiling would survive a court challenge. That's why it makes more sense to define rights more precisely than to deny them to any class of citizens.
The Constitution doesn't guarantee the rights of citizens. The Constitution limits the rights of the government. The citizens have all the rights. How was that forgotten?

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#146650 Jan 2, 2013
River Tam wrote:
<quoted text>
The Constitution doesn't guarantee the rights of citizens. The Constitution limits the rights of the government. The citizens have all the rights. How was that forgotten?
exactly.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#146651 Jan 2, 2013
River Tam wrote:
<quoted text>
The Constitution doesn't guarantee the rights of citizens. The Constitution limits the rights of the government. The citizens have all the rights. How was that forgotten?
That's correct.

As they say in aviation, if it's not prohibited, it's allowed.

“LOL Really?”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#146652 Jan 2, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
That's correct.
As they say in aviation, if it's not prohibited, it's allowed.
In aviation, I'd think, once you get off the ground you be on yo own. When they say, "I'll talk you down", that's just talk.

I'm just guessin

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#146653 Jan 2, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
That's correct.
As they say in aviation, if it's not prohibited, it's allowed.
In NY where I lived for too many years the Building and Zoning Dept of the Town I lived in had an official policy of if its not covered in the code its prohibited. Now matter how simple the issue was it was prohibited and you were held hostage until they adressed whatever it was you were desirous of doing.

Since: Aug 11

Location hidden

#146654 Jan 2, 2013
River Tam wrote:
<quoted text>
The Constitution doesn't guarantee the rights of citizens. The Constitution limits the rights of the government. The citizens have all the rights. How was that forgotten?
A good start to those abuses were the actions perpetrated by the Federal Government to wage their war against the Southern States in the War for Southern Indepedence.
Adam

Stoke-on-trent, UK

#146655 Jan 2, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's not forget the hip flask of Jack Daniels in their pocket.
Good one. Hipflask of JD in pocket, KJV held aloft, gun holstered on hip, holding placard "We are a christian nation". They are great comedy value.

“When you treat people as they ”

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#146656 Jan 2, 2013
bossdrop wrote:
<quoted text>Make believe? you mean like Atheism. Indeed, Atheism, does not work. Its actually mythical religious nonsense believed by people that have a "god" that is Self.
Wrong, you projections don’t work here but what can we expect from the deliberately ignorant

“When you treat people as they ”

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#146657 Jan 2, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Another redirect?
Oh, you're good...
No another fact, when you can show me a talking snake I will withdraw my statement. Until that time, tough.

“When you treat people as they ”

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#146658 Jan 2, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
You aren't showing any evidence, you're just spouting opinion.
I have repeatedly offered evidence, you have repeatedly poo poo’d it, ignored it, tried (and failed) to talk it round, made excuses, attempted re-direction and outright lied.

If you really want me to re-state the sources of my evidence I will but I feel it will be a complete waste of time because you will go round and round again in the pathetic attempts of yours to discredit DOCUMENTED evidence based on nothing more than you personal belief.

“"None shall pass"”

Since: Jul 11

There

#146659 Jan 2, 2013
River Tam wrote:
<quoted text>
The Constitution doesn't guarantee the rights of citizens. The Constitution limits the rights of the government. The citizens have all the rights. How was that forgotten?
Public Education: Social Studies AKA brainwashing.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#146660 Jan 2, 2013
River Tam wrote:
<quoted text>
In aviation, I'd think, once you get off the ground you be on yo own. When they say, "I'll talk you down", that's just talk.
I'm just guessin
Nope.

There are a lot of rules and responsibilities when you take a 2500 pound vehicle into the sky.

There are altitude restrictions, airspace and communication requirements. See and avoid requirements. Right of way rules.

The FAR/AIM, which spells out these rules, is thicker than the bible.

But even the FAA will tell you that if you can't find a regulation against something, then you can do it.

For instance, under 3000 feet AGL (above ground level) over land, you can fly at any altitude as long as you remain more than 500 above any people or structures within an half mile radius. Above 3000 feet AGL, you must fly at odd thousands plus 500' on easterly headings and even thousands plus 500' on westerly headings. This is intended to keep crossing traffic separated by altitude.

In unpopulated areas or over water (as long as you remain at least 500' horizontally and vertically from boats or people), you can fly as low as you want to.

You can't fly into towered (Controlled) airspace without establishing communications with the tower.

There's a ton of stuff, but it's a big sky.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#146661 Jan 2, 2013
River Tam wrote:
<quoted text>
In aviation, I'd think, once you get off the ground you be on yo own. When they say, "I'll talk you down", that's just talk.
I'm just guessin
And the whole "talk you down" thing is in the case that the pilot becomes incapacitated and the passenger has to fly.

There is a program that gives regular passengers (spouses, friends, etc.) just enough training that, if needed, they could get a plane safely back on the ground. It's saved some lives, but often there is a pilot/controller on the ground that will help with navigation and talk them through landing procedures.
He is Coming Soon

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#146662 Jan 2, 2013

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146663 Jan 2, 2013
Drew Smith wrote:
If you don't think that cause of death is related to gun control, then why did you bring it up in the first place?
<quoted text>
Except, which you seem to have so quickly forgotten, it's not a "minor" percentage of deaths when you're dealing with people 44 and younger. It's one of the top causes of death.
Wrong.

According to the charts on this link, under "United States, by age group", firearm death is pretty much near the bottom of the "leading causes of death" under ANY age.....

en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_causes_of_death...

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146664 Jan 2, 2013
Tide with Beach wrote:
I &#9829; River.
&#9786;
Are you posting to me?

See? I told you beer n Topix don't mix...

But no one listens to the redneck.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146665 Jan 2, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:

Liar.

You know you can't read.

RiversideRedneck wrote:

Liar.

You know you can't read.
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
What?
Liar.

You know you can't read.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Dumbest Thing Posted by a Godbot (Jun '10) 13 min Into The Night 6,083
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... 15 min Nemesis 102
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 35 min 15th Dalai Lama 74,670
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 15 hr Subduction Zone 32,062
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... 16 hr Dogen 4,040
News The war on Christmas (Dec '10) Wed John 4,951
News Why do public atheists have to behave like such... Wed Eagle 12 - 4
More from around the web