Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 258490 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#146342 Jan 1, 2013
TheBlackSheep wrote:
<quoted text>
Who said that? You could buy it in the General Store, until too many people robbed banks with it.
Do not lie for your cause.
And you can buy assault weapons at your local Walmart.

But too many people seem to be using them to slaughter large numbers of people.

Thanks.

Or do you think there haven't been enough mass murders yet.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146343 Jan 1, 2013
WesTheDuck wrote:
<quoted text>
My argument is that guns are weapons.
I know.

Your argument should be:

Guns can be weapons.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146344 Jan 1, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh, right.
You're in third place then.
Wait.

Did Catcher1 err?

woah........

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146345 Jan 1, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
You are getting desperate.
Ever hear the story that you can't get wounded by an M16?
We were told in training that the bullet was designed to be unstable and that once it entered flesh it started tumbling which caused major damage to multiple organs and massive blood loss.
Sounds kinda lethal to me.
So now you're trying to dance around the whole weapon thing by claiming that an assault weapon is not a LETHAL weapon.
Seriously?
A tazer is not a lethal weapon.
A bean bag gun is not a lethal weapon.
An assault rifle is a lethal weapon.
Tazers *can* be lethal.

Bean bag guns *can* be lethal.

Assault rifles *can* be lethal.

“cdesign proponentsists”

Since: Jul 09

Pittsburgh, PA

#146346 Jan 1, 2013
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
"Nanny government" is whenever something you like is regulated. Conservatives give alot of lip service about getting government out of everyone's lives, yet want an enormous military to go global policing with. They also like the idea of the government regulating their often restrictive views on morality on everyone else. But God forbid anyone try and add a waiting period before they can buy a gun.
Now we are getting conservatism and liberalism in the mix?

I do believe that the federal government should not be in our daily lives and I believe that our military should be pulled back and out of other countries, unless of course we are there by there request. A friend should help a friend, most of the time.

Morality is based on the society in which you live, so while I do not believe that it is the governments right or responsibility to dictate morality, it still has to make laws on morality. Such as, Americans, in general, do not believe that we can kill our daughters for dishonoring the family. It seems that some nations are quite OK with this practice. What do we do? Do we make a law against murder or do we say that each individual has the right to their own morals.

If you believe that honor killing is morally right, then you are pissed that the government is dictating your morality. But if you believe that murder is wrong, then you want to live in a society that punishes murders.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146347 Jan 1, 2013
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
And the police.
England would disagree with you.

Just sayin.

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#146348 Jan 1, 2013
WesTheDuck wrote:
<quoted text>
Once again - your argument is flawed. Something's intent is not defined by how people use it (as I said - many people use books to prop things up. Doesn't mean books are made to do that, does it?). It is defined what the people who make it make it to do. Guns are made to harm.
Gun makers do not establish intent in civilian guns , unless they are specifically marketed as such.

For instance the mini 14 ranch rifle is marketed as a ranch target/ hunting /personal defense rifle. They make a target version and a tactical version.

The tactical version you could establish as a military/police style who's purpose and intent is to hurt people.
The other no.

Precision on the Range, at the Ranch, on Patrol or in the Woods. For decades, Ruger® Mini-14® rifles and Mini Thirty® rifles have been the choice for applications ranging from the farm and ranch, to the deep woods, to personal defense. Their short barrels and overall short length make them favorites in any application where maneuverability and ease of handling are priorities. With a variety of configurations from the standard Ranch Rifle, to the extremely accurate Mini-14® Target Rifle, to the Tactical models with ATI folding stock or compact barrel with flash suppressor - there is a Mini-14 or Mini Thirty to meet any demand.

Mini-14 or Mini Thirty to meet any demand.

Clearly one is made with the intent you claim , but only that one.

http://www.ruger.com/products/mini14/index.ht...

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#146349 Jan 1, 2013
WesTheDuck wrote:
<quoted text>
Few problems with the 2nd Amendment.
First, it was very likely intended for military. Not civilians. If the Founding Fathers wanted everyone to have the right to bear arms, they would have mentioned it in another, separate amendment. This is why for 200 years after the founding of our nation, it WASN'T considered a right to own a gun. Not until the mid 20th century.
Second, when it was written the only "arms" people had were inaccurate, single shot rifles. Using it as a standard for all modern weaponry is obviously outdated.
Owning something that has such a capability of damage should be a privilege. Not a right.
Let's not forget the large stake the weapons manufacturers have in this debate.

They made a killing (pun intended) on assault weapon sales after Sandy Hook.

That's because people KNEW that this could be the fatal blow to assault weapons.

Look at the spike in assault weapon sales after Obama was elected.

These are not rational people, but the manufacturers and dealers are making a killing (pun intended again) on their paranoia.

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146350 Jan 1, 2013
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
See? We agree.:)
Stranger things have happened......

:)

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#146351 Jan 1, 2013
WesTheDuck wrote:
<quoted text>
Why should I?
America is my home. I want what is best for my home. You know - like a patriot.
Patriots do not try to change freedom, they defend it. Don't call yourself one clearly you are not!

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146352 Jan 1, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
You changed from "intended" to "designed".
Try to be consistent.
Guns, except for purpose built, high precision, competition guns, are DESIGNED to kill.
They may well be, and are, bought for entirely different INTENDED purposes, such as plinking or target shooting.
But that in no way changes the fact that they are DESIGNED for killing.
And assault weapons, regardless of their INTENDED use, are DESIGNED for killing as many people in as little time as possible.
Guns are designed to fire a projectile.

Guns are intended to fire a projectile.

Period.

What one shoots the projectile at is not the design or intent of the gun.

Period.

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#146353 Jan 1, 2013
WesTheDuck wrote:
<quoted text>
Few problems with the 2nd Amendment.
First, it was very likely intended for military. Not civilians. If the Founding Fathers wanted everyone to have the right to bear arms, they would have mentioned it in another, separate amendment. This is why for 200 years after the founding of our nation, it WASN'T considered a right to own a gun. Not until the mid 20th century.
Second, when it was written the only "arms" people had were inaccurate, single shot rifles. Using it as a standard for all modern weaponry is obviously outdated.
Owning something that has such a capability of damage should be a privilege. Not a right.
So you are a self proclaimed civics professor , I think not!

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#146354 Jan 1, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
I bet you stuck out your tongue when you hit the "post" button.
lol

Thumbs in my ears, saying "neener neener neener!"

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#146355 Jan 1, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm all for gun registration, proper ownership & use. I don't know why you're preaching to the choir....
Your argument is that guns are made for killing, I say you're wrong.
A gun isn't made for killing no more than a car is.
Do you know what a neutron star is?

The reason I ask is...

Oh, never mind.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#146356 Jan 1, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
If we outlaw guns, then only outlaws wil have guns.
Reduced to quoting bumper stickers.

Perfect.
Anon

Cleveland, OH

#146357 Jan 1, 2013
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Of course not. Not without a legitimate purpose and all the proper credentials.
But I fail to see your point.
What exactly is it?
Oh, so now you would deny my right to recreational TNT?:)

Eagle12

“In the beginning God Created..”

Since: Feb 12

Southern Illinois

#146358 Jan 1, 2013
Richardfs wrote:
<quoted text>
For once I agree with you but the laws here are A LOT tougher than you realise:-
1. You can only own a gun/s if you are a member of a gun club.
2. The gun/s must to be stored at the gun club.
3. Professional shooters can store their guns at home BUT the guns and ammo (and I think the bolts as well ) have to be store in separate locked safes.
4. Dumb-dumbs and AP are just out right banned.
5. All military 'style' weapons banned.
6. Saw off barrels banned.
7. Fully auto banned no matter the clip size
8. Silencers banned
Anything out side of this can get you jail time.
Does it stop people killing each; no but it does make it difficult.
That's a bit too stringent for me.

What about bows and crossbows?

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#146359 Jan 1, 2013
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
When it comes to making idiotic statements, it's very close between you and Pattiecake.
I think she wins.
But you come very, very close.
RR uses capitals and punctuation.

I think we have to give him credit for that.

And, he has a slightly better opinion of gays.

But that's as far as I'll go.

“Miles from Nowhere”

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#146360 Jan 1, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
What about ole Bobblow?
I'm not sure what Bobblah writes. I've only read one of his posts. That was all I needed and I'm still not sure what it said.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#146361 Jan 1, 2013
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
"guns were quite obviously created for one purpose - KILLING"
Are you sure?
I think guns were created as a more efficient means of launching projectiles.
Where that projectile went is irrelevant to WHY the first gun was made.
I may have to retract that last post.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 1 hr One way or another 61,504
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... 7 hr Dogen 2,699
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 8 hr Dogen 28,323
The Dumbest Thing Posted by a Godbot (Jun '10) Mar 24 IB DaMann 5,970
Atheist Humor (Aug '09) Mar 22 Eagle 12 452
Deconversion Mar 20 Eagle 12 138
News Quotes from Famous Freethinkers (Aug '12) Mar 18 Eagle 12 2,043
More from around the web