Why would you ever consider going to me for evidence of a deity? I'm not a god and I'm not a spokesman for a god.<quoted text>
If you EVER produce ANY evidence that your particular deity is the right one AND all the others are NOT, I'll consider it.
Why not go to the source? Only God can provide persuasive evidence that he exists to you. Don't look for convincing evidence, that is not effective, look for persuasive evidence.
The problem a lot of people have with getting evidence that God exists is that they do not understand the difference between persuasive and convincing evidence. Acquiring convincing evidence is not feasible because it would require that you look at all aspects of all religions and would take longer than a lifetime to accomplish. Acquiring persuasive evidence, however, tips the scale and allows an individual to form a basis for belief extending beyond the limitations of reasonable doubt.
How do you find persuasive evidence? You can "audit" the religions, first setting a level of "audit risk" or risk you are willing to take at coming to the wrong conclusion about a faith and then set your other risk levels (such as sampling risk, detection risk etc) accordingly to determine what constitutes a "material misstatement" by a religious faith and conduct your audit from there. Following this method would take a little less time than acquiring "convincing evidence" because you are sampling religions rather than analyzing the whole entity.
OR you can save yourself a big head ache and pray about it sincerely and see where that takes you.