Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

Full story: Webbunny tumblelog

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.
Comments
137,041 - 137,060 of 226,293 Comments Last updated 5 min ago
miley

Des Plaines, IL

#142610 Dec 8, 2012
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
It's "Cro-magnon".
Unless you're talking about a gun specifically for crows.
That would be a "crow-magnum".
Actualy I am talking about a gun.A cave man with a gun.As opposed to a bird with a gun which is quite popular!!!!

“MEET ROSEMARY-She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#142612 Dec 8, 2012
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Precedent, Eagle.
When the Supreme Court rules, it will set precedent.
Not precedence--precedent.
You'll have to hold your breath for the result..
.. currently, marriage laws are under the purview of individual states ..

.. when SCOTUS rules in favor of gay marriage, will marriage laws become federal ??..

Since: Sep 10

United States

#142613 Dec 8, 2012
Eagle12 wrote:
<quoted text>
Which way do you predict it's going to fall?
4 one way, 4 the other.

The 5th vote, Justice Kennedy, will decide.

He has been supportive of gay rights, so I am hopeful.

Since: Sep 10

United States

#142614 Dec 8, 2012
Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>
.. currently, marriage laws are under the purview of individual states ..
.. when SCOTUS rules in favor of gay marriage, will marriage laws become federal ??..
Yes, possibly.

They can hold that it is unconstitutional for a state to deny homosexuals the right to marry.
Think About It

Magalia, CA

#142615 Dec 8, 2012
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, possibly.
They can hold that it is unconstitutional for a state to deny homosexuals the right to marry.
No state denies the right to marry.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#142616 Dec 8, 2012
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>And it's a perfect example of it's self correcting nature.
Touche

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#142617 Dec 8, 2012
timn17 wrote:
<quoted text>I don't think any religious person can claim to be a true skeptic. If they were, they wouldn't be religious. You may be interested in science, but I don't think you are a skeptic.
That depends on which definition of skeptic...

In this sense, I am a skeptic:
"a person who questions the validity or authenticity of something purporting to be factual. "

In this sense, I am not:
"a person who doubts the truth of a religion, especially Christianity, or of important elements of it. "

Ain't it funny that dictionary.com singles out Christianity in it's definition of skeptic...

Perhaps a skeptic wrote that defintion lol

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#142618 Dec 8, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Argh, the cro-magnum level of study ... it hurts my head.
No, we first thought it was finite, then we thought it was infinite .... the Hawking proposed that it was finite, which pretty much everyone agrees now ... however now we have this concept of a lot of, possibly infinite in number, universes all over the place just like ours, or perhaps ours is part of another. Do you read anything that is printed after 1930?
Thanks Dr Hawking!

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#142619 Dec 8, 2012
Tide with Beach wrote:
This is for believers in this thread that still don't understand atheism.

http://www.youtube.com/watch ...
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Great video.
Very compelling, but it won't sway the hardcore believer.
It will just piss him off. Truth does that to the desperately faithful.
Atheism sure didn't teach that man how to dress....

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#142620 Dec 8, 2012
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
Name one atheist-hell, name ANYBODY-who thinks science is a perfect and flawless system.
blacklagoon

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#142621 Dec 8, 2012
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
You don't want truth.
You want to be rescued from death.
lol

That IS truth.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#142622 Dec 8, 2012
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
It didn't take long to correct, did it.
Yet, more than 3000 years later and the bible STILL hasn't been corrected.
And you claim the bible is better?!
What doesn't need correction will not be corrected.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#142623 Dec 8, 2012
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't.
Good girl.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#142624 Dec 8, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Aw, you're a fan of mine. Sorry, but autographs are only signed on the second Tuesday of the fifth week of every month. Under the giant golden Darwin statue at the rec center. Be there or be square.
You're gonna slowly start turing Darwin into Buddha.....

When will you start praying to him, I mean "Him"?

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#142625 Dec 8, 2012
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
It's "Cro-magnon".
Unless you're talking about a gun specifically for crows.
That would be a "crow-magnum".
Nah, cro-magnum is condoms for crows.

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

#142626 Dec 8, 2012
I suppose you would say the hundreds of errors as contradictions give the bible character.
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
What doesn't need correction will not be corrected.
Think About It

Magalia, CA

#142627 Dec 8, 2012
Givemeliberty wrote:
I suppose you would say the hundreds of errors as contradictions give the bible character.
<quoted text>
I think this is what was said,

RiversideRedneck wrote:

<quoted text>
What doesn't need correction will not be corrected.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#142628 Dec 8, 2012
Givemeliberty wrote:
I suppose you would say the hundreds of errors as contradictions give the bible character.
<quoted text>
Ya, that's what you athiests say but not one of your assertions in valid.

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#142629 Dec 8, 2012
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes, possibly.
They can hold that it is unconstitutional for a state to deny homosexuals the right to marry.
Homosexuals CAN marry....

So, the states are following the Constitution just fine.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#142630 Dec 8, 2012
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>What doesn't need correction will not be corrected.
And, apparently, what does need correction won't be.

No rational person can believe the bible is without error.

Unless he's never read it.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Should Uninformed Opinion Be Respected? 11 min Patrick 27
How much faith it takes to believe in Evolution. 20 min Patrick 172
Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038 (Apr '12) 25 min Patrick 21,501
Our world came from nothing? 29 min Patrick 418
Atheists forgetting the meaning of freedom 1 hr True Christian wi... 44
100% Faith Free 3 hr Thinking 11
Science Disproves Evolution (Aug '12) 4 hr ChristineM 902
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Atheism People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••