Is this your new strategy? Are you just gonna copy and paste what people say and slightly change the wording in an attempt to look clever? Your post doesn't even make any sense, you are trying to equate me bringing up shellfish with me being a bigot. It was a valid question. If you fall back on the bible to justify your bigotry, do you also follow the other condemnations the bible makes on things such as shellfish? Or do you only pick and choose to suit your taste?<quoted text>I am not sure what your post had to do with anything. But, since you brought up shellfish, then it had to do with your bigotry and hate. If you think that the Bible was intended to address only you gays, then I ask again, Do you take a soft line when it comes to pedophilia and bestiality?- I was only curious if you disagree with the Bible's condemnation of pedophilia and bestiality, since they are mentioned in the same chapter, three verses apart from homosexuality. I you disagree, then you would still be a bigot, but at least you would be a consistent bigot.
But I'm sure you don't, and that all your posturing about using the bible to the letter is really just your way of justifying your bigotry and deviancy.
Be gay, troll.
What do my views on pedophila and beastiality have to do with anything? My views are completely independent of the bible, so their proximity to the bible's admonitions on shellfish and homosexuality don't matter to me.