Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 256578 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“First it steals your mind..”

Since: Jun 11

..and then it steals your soul

#129795 Oct 15, 2012
Serah wrote:
<quoted text>DNA has never proven anyone to have originated from an ape or a chimp or a fish or anything other than human beings. End of...
You can keep on saying that, but it changes nothing.

Facts are these:

- We have the fossil links proving the ape to man evolution
- We share more than 96% of our DNA with chimps

The overwhelming consensus is that humans and chimps have a common ancestor.

Richardfs

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#129796 Oct 15, 2012
Martina Navratilover wrote:
<quoted text>Why don't you get your facts straight? from a blog site, skeptics, puhleez, you have no credibility.
But, even your site does not say what you project.
Right here, it says that it is 30% atheists, and 30% I do not know (agnostics). If you followed my blogging, I have pointed out that most atheist scientists soon move into the agnostic category or I do not know. So, if you want to come at me, try to do better than some blog site, without credibility and that does not support your position.
FROM YOUR SITE:
Moving down a step in terms of scientific street cred, there was also a 2007 paper which surveyed 1,646 academic scientists at 21 top universities on their belief in god. Their findings show rates of atheism at about 30% and agnosticism also at 30%, and find that the rates are not dependent on academic discipline; academic scientists in the natural and social sciences have similar rates of atheism.
In contrast to the high rates of atheism among academic professionals, there was a study carried out by The Pew Forum on religious belief in the general population along with several other social factors, including education. 17% of American adults surveyed identified as "unaffiliated" and only 1.6% of the population said that the were atheists and 2.4% agnostic.
Why are godbot so dishonest:-

1. You originally quoted from an none cited poll taken back in the 60's
2. Yes I quote from a blog but the data came from http://pewresearch.org/
3. The original discussion was about scientists not the general public.

The comparison of the rate of none belief between scientists and the general public shows quit convincingly that belief in fairy tales and myths is inversely proportional to education.

Richardfs

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#129797 Oct 15, 2012
Martina Navratilover wrote:
<quoted text>Absolute denial and desperation. Why would I say anything about the percentage of scientists, since your gay bias group never mentions the percentage of gays that are pedophiles compared to the general population. I am still way smarter than Hiding, a fact she has admitted to, on many occasions. It is funny, how convenience always seems to fall in the realm of your desperation.
What you should have said is that all gays are liars and that there are no honest atheists period, a fact that has been demonstrated since the time your gang first tried your flat earth bull.
Is it just me but has anybody else noticed that as soon as a godbot gets their butt handed to them on a plate they start rabbiting on about gays.

“A sentient umbrella speaks”

Since: Mar 11

Some stable somewhere

#129798 Oct 15, 2012
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> Salvation more important than arm. Mark 9: 43-47.
LB, you're a thoughtful man. We both know that in the history of prayer, not once has an amputee's limb grown back. It's never happened. Not once.

Prayer doesn't work, LB. It's that simple. Oh, it works as a placebo effect - it exactly matches the placebo effect in terms of efficacy, actually.

But let's pretend that prayer works. Let's further pretend that your deity is real, all powerful and all loving. LB, you are welcome to pray that God visits me and I have a Christian experience that I cannot deny.

I know your deity cannot grow missing limbs back. And here you claim that "salvation" is more important anyways, so be my guest and demonstrate this to all here.

I, for one, would be quite excited to have my worldview shattered by your deity. Any deity for that matter. It would totally change the nature of the universe for me - exciting!

Richardfs

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#129799 Oct 15, 2012
Serah wrote:
<quoted text>Hi DF ~ I was thinking this morning I haven't seen you around for awhile :)
A non-belief is a belief and their faith is in their beliefs and ours is in our belief :)
and not collecting stamps is a hobby.

“First it steals your mind..”

Since: Jun 11

..and then it steals your soul

#129800 Oct 15, 2012
Serah wrote:
<quoted text>
Whatever.... tell theses scientists they are not scientists, it means jack to me 'cause I simply do not believe you. However, I do think you do believe you, but as we previously posted, ignorance is not an excuse.
They have been told.

By scientists themselves:

http://books.google.co.za/books...

And then, the Check Mate, the matter has gone to Court, and Creationism/Intelligent Design were shown to be nothing but lies:

http://ncse.com/taking-action/ten-major-court...

Serah, you and I have done this before.

With all due respect, you are a sweet lady with no clue about natural science. No problem with that - I don't say that to devaluate you. There are plenty of talents that you have, I am sure.

However, this debate is settled by those with great understanding of natural science.

And those who understand it ALL write off Creationism.

Serah, this is no debate. It is simple fact vs fiction.
Universities, scholars, professors even the Courts shoots Creationsim full of holes.

Richardfs

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#129801 Oct 15, 2012
Black Thunder 42 wrote:
<quoted text>Your problem is this, the people who portray Odin as a god, portray him as a Norse mythology. Big difference. The God of the Bible is not portrayed as a mythical figure
You are not being truthful, the atheists and agnostics never address the 300 wiccan gods, Odin and Zeus being to of them. You never confront Kaitlin or Bitner. You only seem concerned about the one God of the Bible, which means that you have doubts about your disbelief concerning only the Biblical God.
All that shows is that todays god is tomorrows myth.

“Thank you GOD for JESUS”

Since: Jul 07

And thank you JESUS for caring

#129802 Oct 15, 2012
Double Fine wrote:
<quoted text>
You can keep on saying that, but it changes nothing.
Facts are these:
- We have the fossil links proving the ape to man evolution
- We share more than 96% of our DNA with chimps
The overwhelming consensus is that humans and chimps have a common ancestor.
We all had the same Creator; why would we not be similar? GOD just varied the pattern a bit and created different species, makes a lot of sense to me.

Richardfs

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#129803 Oct 15, 2012
Serah wrote:
<quoted text>DNA has never proven anyone to have originated from an ape or a chimp or a fish or anything other than human beings. End of...
Wrong.

“Thank you GOD for JESUS”

Since: Jul 07

And thank you JESUS for caring

#129804 Oct 15, 2012
Double Fine wrote:
<quoted text>
They have been told.
By scientists themselves:
http://books.google.co.za/books...
And then, the Check Mate, the matter has gone to Court, and Creationism/Intelligent Design were shown to be nothing but lies:
http://ncse.com/taking-action/ten-major-court...
Serah, you and I have done this before.
With all due respect, you are a sweet lady with no clue about natural science. No problem with that - I don't say that to devaluate you. There are plenty of talents that you have, I am sure.
However, this debate is settled by those with great understanding of natural science.
And those who understand it ALL write off Creationism.
Serah, this is no debate. It is simple fact vs fiction.
Universities, scholars, professors even the Courts shoots Creationsim full of holes.
I read what you say, DF, but I also read what Francis Collins says, along with many others, and cheers to say I believe them! Why would I not?

Creationism might be full of holes, but the big bang is full of ... well, holes I suppose :)

“First it steals your mind..”

Since: Jun 11

..and then it steals your soul

#129805 Oct 15, 2012
Serah wrote:
forgot the link to the scientists...
***Many secular and atheist groups mock Answers in Genesis and the Creation Museum for not being scientific. However, some of the most influential scientists past and present have been and are creationists (see below).
http://www.answersingenesis.org/home/area/bio... ***
Too many for me to list, but you might want to see who you are accusing of lying and deceit LOL
You are shooting yourself in the foot here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Level_of_support...

Read up. Evolution wins hands down.

Interesting bit, from the article:

"A 1997 study found that fewer than 20% of Americans possessed basic scientific literacy[145] and a People for the American Way poll found that less than half (48%) of those polled chose the correct definition of evolution from a list.[139] In 2006, New Scientist reported that almost 2/3 of Americans believe they share less than half their genes with "monkeys", when in fact the figure is between 95–99% depending on the primate and comparison method."

Serah, you would fall in the group labled 'scientifically illiterate' and therefore you are able to fall for the rubbish the Creationists teach you.

“Thank you GOD for JESUS”

Since: Jul 07

And thank you JESUS for caring

#129806 Oct 15, 2012
***Enter Fibonacci’s Ratio…

Also known as the Golden Mean, Phi, or Divine Proportion, this law was made famous by Leonardo Fibonacci around 1200 A.D. He noticed that there was an absolute ratio that appears often throughout nature, a sort of design that is universally efficient in living things and pleasing to the human eye. Hence, the “divine proportion” nickname.

Since the Renaissance, artists and architects have designed their work to approximate this ratio of 1:1.618. It’s found all over the Parthenon, in famous works of art like the Mona Lisa and the Last Supper, and it’s still used today. The divine proportion has been used by companies like Apple to design products, it’s said to have been used by Twitter to create their new profile page, and has been used by major companies all over the world to design logos. It’s not talked about in most photography circles because it’s a somewhat advanced method of composition and can be confusing to a lot of people. It’s so much easier to just talk about the “rule of thirds” because it’s exact, precise and easy to follow.

This ratio can be used in many ways to compose a photograph. Lightroom 3 even has a golden ratio overlay option when you go to crop on image. This way, you can line up a grid of the golden ratio to coincide with lines or points of interest in your photograph. At this point, you may be quite confused. If you are, please take a few moments to watch any one (or all) of these videos that seek to explain this ratio.

Video 1: Natures Number: 1.618
Video 2: Nature by Numbers
Video 3: Golden Ratio

Read more: http://digital-photography-school.com/divine-... ***

Evolution is not amazingly intelligent, it is only a matter of survival

“Thank you GOD for JESUS”

Since: Jul 07

And thank you JESUS for caring

#129807 Oct 15, 2012
Richardfs wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong.
Give me the link to support what you have said 'cause I don't believe you

Richardfs

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#129808 Oct 15, 2012
Serah wrote:
<quoted text>I read what you say, DF, but I also read what Francis Collins says, along with many others, and cheers to say I believe them! Why would I not?
Creationism might be full of holes, but the big bang is full of ... well, holes I suppose :)
The Big Bang is a fact. The theory behind it is been researched.

Creationism on the other hand is nothing but a children's story.

“First it steals your mind..”

Since: Jun 11

..and then it steals your soul

#129809 Oct 15, 2012
Serah wrote:
<quoted text>
We all had the same Creator; why would we not be similar? GOD just varied the pattern a bit and created different species, makes a lot of sense to me.
Sure it does. That is because you lack the scientific knowledge to interpret any of the relevant facts.

Think of it this way - would you argue about the technical apsects of a new Ferrari with a mechanical engineer?

“First it steals your mind..”

Since: Jun 11

..and then it steals your soul

#129810 Oct 15, 2012
Serah wrote:
<quoted text>I read what you say, DF, but I also read what Francis Collins says, along with many others, and cheers to say I believe them! Why would I not?
Creationism might be full of holes, but the big bang is full of ... well, holes I suppose :)
Yes.

Francis Collins openly rejects Creationism, did you know that?

“A sentient umbrella speaks”

Since: Mar 11

Some stable somewhere

#129811 Oct 15, 2012
preterism wrote:
<quoted text>
biopoiesis (biological process)-- Britannica Online Encyclopedia
www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/66167/biop...
a process by which living organisms are [thought] to develop from nonliving matter, and the basis of a [theory] on the origin of life on Earth. According to this [theory],...
Two things wrong with this, and they are the words thought and theory, which makes this to be found in the fiction aisle of your nearest bookstore Why not read a book that is non-fiction and can save your soul and help you live a more happier life. Acts 2:38-38 37 Peter’s words pierced their hearts, and they said to him and to the other apostles,“Brothers, what should we do?”
38 Peter replied,“Each of you must repent of your sins and turn to God, and be baptized in the name of Jesus Christ for the forgiveness of your sins
Sorry, baby, the Bible is in the mythology section, not the non-fiction section.

“A sentient umbrella speaks”

Since: Mar 11

Some stable somewhere

#129812 Oct 15, 2012
Serah wrote:
<quoted text>that's why you believe in atheism.....
Atheism is not something you believe in. It's merely the absence of belief in deities.

I don't do anything that defines me as an atheist - there are no rituals associated with it.

Richardfs

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#129813 Oct 15, 2012
Serah wrote:
<quoted text>Give me the link to support what you have said 'cause I don't believe you
http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/03/...
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/animals/sci...
http://humanorigins.si.edu/evidence/genetics

Is there any more homework you want me to do for you?

“A sentient umbrella speaks”

Since: Mar 11

Some stable somewhere

#129814 Oct 15, 2012
Serah wrote:
<quoted text>
We all had the same Creator; why would we not be similar? GOD just varied the pattern a bit and created different species, makes a lot of sense to me.
hahahaha! How arrogant!

Why your god and not one from Hindu or the Yanomami or the Trobriand Islanders or anyone???

Every believer in every religion has found the one, true god. You are just like them!

hahahaha

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 47 min Chimney1 43,335
A Universe from Nothing? 49 min Thinking 545
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 54 min Thinking 18,596
News Why Do Atheists Ridicule Christianity? (May '11) 55 min thetruth 10,066
Atheism is a mental illness 2 hr thetruth 16
News Hitchens, Dawkins and Harris are old news - a t... 2 hr thetruth 76
Christianity isn't based on... (Feb '10) 2 hr thetruth 94
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 2 hr thetruth 21,204
For Atheists: Why do You Call Theories "Scient... 6 hr Eagle 12 770
More from around the web