Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 258469 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“cdesign proponentsists”

Since: Jul 09

Pittsburgh, PA

#129366 Oct 13, 2012
preterism wrote:
<quoted text> You obviously don't know that it wasn't God'd ideal to have slaves. it was man. God made it easier on the slaved by giving the isralited rules for them concerning there slaves.
Yes, everyone knows that god didn't mean what he said. We are so lucky to have people like you, who can correct god.

I wonder how he feels about murder? On one hand, he says that murder is bad and then he tells his follower to murder their daughters for not being virgins and people who do not believe in him.

“cdesign proponentsists”

Since: Jul 09

Pittsburgh, PA

#129367 Oct 13, 2012
Eagle12 wrote:
<quoted text>
You calling me a coward. Is like a house cat calling a pit bull a coward. While on the tallest limb in a tree.
All I can say, you better not fall to the ground.
:)
LOL! You are such a tough guy! LOL!

“cdesign proponentsists”

Since: Jul 09

Pittsburgh, PA

#129368 Oct 13, 2012
preterism wrote:
<quoted text> You obviously don't know that it wasn't God'd ideal to have slaves. it was man. God made it easier on the slaved by giving the isralited rules for them concerning there slaves.
I think I got it now! god knew that people were going to murder their daughters, so he made the laws to make it easier for them!

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#129369 Oct 13, 2012
Richardfs wrote:
CORRECTION:-
Yet another godbot who is incapable of answering a simple question.
It' tragic to see people who are well educated in english and how to write so but can't grasp what the bible says. It's going to take more than proper grammer to gwt to heaven, but I commend you on your earthly scholastic status. You may please your fellow man on your expertise in the use of proper grammar I hate to say you're batting zero with God, and that's really sad and very tragic.

Since: May 09

Location hidden

#129370 Oct 13, 2012
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would the "natural" selection be interfered with when a human eating a tomato is in fact "natural" to begin with?
"Those that have biological features that tend to prevent them from being eaten also tend to reproduce more than those that don't have those biological features."
That would imply that they are aware. They're not.
"For plants such as potatoes, tomatoes, and others that have seeds, it *benefits* them to be eaten, because it tends to spread their seeds."
Spread their seeds? Through poop? The digestive system of the animal eating the plant destroys the seeds. There's no benefit to the seed to be eaten. But they haven't adapted or evolved to prevent being eaten....
Try eating the foliage of a potato or tomato plant the next time you feel adventurous.

“cdesign proponentsists”

Since: Jul 09

Pittsburgh, PA

#129371 Oct 13, 2012
Richardfs wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why there no commandment saying "Thou shall not own slaves"?
Because god knew that the jews were going to own slaves, so he caved! LOL!

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#129372 Oct 13, 2012
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
BUT!! The self-proclaimed smart people here say that "a species evolves, not an individual".....
A species "evolving" to a better suited species is impossible. ONE individual wolud havebto start the chain reaction...
Not sure what the point the person who said this is trying to make.
Scanning the previous posts, I think they are trying to tell you that the individual does not change in a way that is after birth. They are changing due to the way their genes mixed or mutated. So at the conception they were different than the parent. If the mutation is conducive for the environment, the change may be passed on many times by its offspring and so on.

Many terms and phrases that science uses is not always exact to the common lexicon of lay persons. So the phrase 'a species evolves' may not be what you think it means.
Sometimes it is hard for us to explain in terms all can understand.

There are arguments within the evolution community on some points, so what one person claims is not necessarily what is of the whole of the scientific community.
I certainly do not claim to know all about evolution. I would seriously doubt anyone here would claim they know all about evolution.
So do not expect me to always back what another evolutionist says.
And if I am corrected or disputed, I remain open to be corrected.

Eagle12

“In the beginning God Created..”

Since: Feb 12

Southern Illinois

#129373 Oct 13, 2012
TheBlackSheep wrote:
<quoted text>
I have looked for that case, but could not find it. Do you have a link?
I’m in a small town in Southern Illinois.

It would take me a while to find it in the City Council Meeting minutes.

If you really want to check it out I could give you the phone number of that church.

Eagle12

“In the beginning God Created..”

Since: Feb 12

Southern Illinois

#129374 Oct 13, 2012
TheBlackSheep wrote:
<quoted text>
LOL! You are such a tough guy! LOL!
:)

Since: May 09

Location hidden

#129375 Oct 13, 2012
Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>
.. plants are aware and some scientists think they can see, smell and feel ..
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm...
It's been shown through some preliminary tests that trees and plants react when another plant or tree in the same forest or field sustain damage or injury. Nothing conclusive, but it's interesting.

I know this.

Trees will try to kill you if they can when you cut them<=(exaggerated and anthropomorphic statement, not to imply it is reality).

They do, however, sometimes appear to do things completely unexpected when felling them.

Sinister ba5tards

I never cut one without a well defined and clear path of escape.

“cdesign proponentsists”

Since: Jul 09

Pittsburgh, PA

#129376 Oct 13, 2012
Eagle12 wrote:
<quoted text>
I’m in a small town in Southern Illinois.
It would take me a while to find it in the City Council Meeting minutes.
If you really want to check it out I could give you the phone number of that church.
The case you described would surely be in the news paper!

“cdesign proponentsists”

Since: Jul 09

Pittsburgh, PA

#129377 Oct 13, 2012
Eagle12 wrote:
<quoted text>
I’m in a small town in Southern Illinois.
It would take me a while to find it in the City Council Meeting minutes.
If you really want to check it out I could give you the phone number of that church.
That was Centralia, IL, right?

Since: May 09

Location hidden

#129378 Oct 13, 2012
Tide with Beach wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =1zRAZ_IehjEXX
I miss that show.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#129379 Oct 13, 2012
Eagle12 wrote:
<quoted text>
Sweets, these words were taken right out of your reference. These are the words of creative imaginations of science.
{evidence to suggest that}
{might have given rise to the}
I see in the fossil record a horseshoe crab 500 mya. Today’s horseshoe crab looks identical. Some minor changes noted by biologist, ok no problem. Basically the horseshoe crab has remained unchanged.
The earth and the oceans have changed a lot in 500 million years. Yet the horseshoe crab remains unchanged even though it’s environment was and is constantly changing.
If you were looking at our oceans from the horseshoe crap nebula, would our oceans look to have changed much?

Since: May 09

Location hidden

#129380 Oct 13, 2012
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
BUT!! The self-proclaimed smart people here say that "a species evolves, not an individual".....
A species "evolving" to a better suited species is impossible. ONE individual wolud havebto start the chain reaction...
It's okay. Fortunately, you aren't a scientist.

You should stick to prayers.

Since: Jul 10

Location hidden

#129381 Oct 13, 2012
Richardfs wrote:
<quoted text>
Then why there no commandment saying "Thou shall not own slaves"?
God does not intervene in there lives, just like when they demanded from God to have a King to rule them and God said this isn't a good choice but they wanted a King and got one. God used Divine interventin when he destroyed all the people with the flood, except for Noah and his family and there wives. God does not intervene in your life now just as there are no more miracles as they ceased when the Apostles died. The israelites just like wetoday do stuoid things even when we know we have God watching over us, we still at times want and decide to do it our own way instead of God's way. God speaks of the israelite as being a hard headed people in the bible, as we are still like that today, not much has changed except God doesn't talk to us like he did with Adam, which he did in person and then after that he talked to people chosen, like the the Prophets and finally, he talks to us now throgh the bible.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#129382 Oct 13, 2012
scaritual wrote:
<quoted text>Try eating the foliage of a potato or tomato plant the next time you feel adventurous.
Good point, because eating the tomato does not kill the main part of the plant.

“Breaking the spell ”

Since: Dec 10

of the puppet master

#129383 Oct 13, 2012
preterism wrote:
<quoted text> You obviously don't know that it wasn't God'd ideal to have slaves. it was man. God made it easier on the slaved by giving the isralited rules for them concerning there slaves.
By this logic, it would have made it even more easy on the slaves if god had told someone slavery was an abomination and immoral?

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#129384 Oct 13, 2012
Mike Duquette wrote:
<quoted text>It is called a hypothesis.
Right. Got it.
[QUOTE} Hawking open says he does not know if this is the fact of what happened.[/QUOTE] I'm following...
He says it is a mathematical possibility.
But not fact? huh
Religion on the other hand claims to know absolutely 100% that a god did it.
Wrong. I know with a 100% certainty.
So science does make up possibilities and then tests them and looks for evidence to see if it actually happened.
couple of big words there...
If evidence shows it to be true, it may then become a scientific theory.

there's more of them big 'uns...
Do you know the difference between a scientific theory and a hypothesis?

you had me at hello.
I am not being sarcastic, I just need to know how to explain this to you.
How can you explain to me what I already understand?

“cdesign proponentsists”

Since: Jul 09

Pittsburgh, PA

#129385 Oct 13, 2012
preterism wrote:
<quoted text> God does not intervene in there lives,
You mean, after the flood or after jonah? Or maybe after Jericho? No, it would have to be after he came down and had the jews kill him.

When did he stop intervening?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 14 min Aura Mytha 69,957
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 5 hr 15th Dalai Lama 30,111
News Tampa Teacher @LoraJane Hates Christians, Promo... 6 hr orlando 434
News Atheism and cowardice (Nov '11) 10 hr Roy 12,673
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... 11 hr yehoshooah adam 3,779
Evidence for God! (Oct '14) 18 hr superwilly 579
News The rise of militant atheism (Sep '09) May 21 online reality bu... 9,236
More from around the web