Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 20 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#129264 Oct 13, 2012
Gate Keeper 1 wrote:
<quoted text>BLAHHHHH,bull......... .awchooo...
You are so ten years ago, it is not even funny. Don't post about what you have simply heard and do not comprehend. There are millions and millions of black holes in our galaxy and billions upon billions in millions of galaxies, yet not one has ever been seen, observed, or photographed. Physics actually breaks down with singularity. When you deal with quantum mechanics and quantum gravity, scientist say duh, we don't know anything and abiogenesis and the age of the universe falls apart. The Big Bang is simply what we describe as the universe massively expanding, which means that there was a Big Bang within every single black hole.
We have already gotten to the point where Einstein's theory of relativity is not relative. We reach a point in the Black hole with quantum gravity where 1/o=infinity, which means that time stopped and ceased to move.
We are developing a theory which I will name as the "God Hole" to replace the Black Hole. Evolution always breaks down at the quantum level and the quantum level is the smallest partical and atom that forms the larger masses. In fact, there are millions of places where Einstein's theory breaks down, including within every single singularity within each God Hole.
Alphabet soup.

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#129265 Oct 13, 2012
Gate Keeper 1 wrote:
<quoted text>Really, really. Atheism has killed over 200 million people in the last 90 years alone, exceeding all the Holy Wars combined.
How can there be a "holy" war?

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#129266 Oct 13, 2012
Gate Keeper 1 wrote:
<quoted text>If Al Garcia displays cowardice, do you believe it's improper for you to no point it out?
That's a yes or no question.
Perhaps, you meant selective assignment, rather than accurate assessment.
Another godbot who can not answer a simple question

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#129267 Oct 13, 2012
preterism wrote:
Atheism simply put are made up of individuals that rather believe that a creator isn't necessary to produce life. There's nothing wrong with saying a big bang happen, except it was done by God. God said in the beginning he created the heavens and earth. He created everything to reproduce after it's kind, including Adam and Eve which were created from dust. So having said that I see nothing wrong with the big bang producing life, because the heavens and the earth had the necessary ingredients to produce the big bang which God created with his word. the word being the source for the big bang.
Proof?

Show us one scientific theory which has a goddidit term.

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#129268 Oct 13, 2012
Gate Keeper 1 wrote:
<quoted text>It could not possibly be that you see everything satanically, without seeing satan, so no matter what Christians and Christians alone say or see, you follow his lead. Consider this wicca has over 300 gods and Hindu has 66 msjor and 330 million minor gods, but since they are productions of satan, you do not see it that way. Oops, that was according to God, but not found in the Bible.
Hummmm, all gods are are satan except yours. How do you know yours is the right one?

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#129269 Oct 13, 2012
Gate Keeper 1 wrote:
<quoted text>All your post means is that you base your life on weeks of lusting after gays. Based on the two options, yours is the wrong one.
Again with your fixation on homosexuals. You have to be a closet gay. When is your coming out party?

Since: Mar 11

Louisville, KY

#129270 Oct 13, 2012
Don't tell an evolution science hating creationist that. They will argue that it's angels that hold everything down.
preterism wrote:
<quoted text>Every time you jump, you experience gravity. It pulls you back down to the ground. Without gravity, you'd float off into the atmosphere -- along with all of the other matter on Earth.

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#129271 Oct 13, 2012
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
"Species evolve, not individuals. Say it with me. Species evolve, not individuals. One more time? Species evolve, not individuals."
Those were your words, lovey.
If an individual inherited mutated genes from its parent, did it not evolve?
Yes, those are my words. Apparently they're quite difficult for you to grasp.

No, individuals with mutations do not evolve. They are individuals born with mutations.

Once again, evolution is defined as "allelic frequency changes in a gene pool, over time."

The individual born with mutations would be part of the evolutionary process, but does not themself evolve. That would require their genes to change and that doesn't happen.
Or its offspring if such mutation enabled its survival and reproduction? If that individual was the only offspring and died before it reproduced, did it not affect the evolution of the species genomes?
Individuals are not gene pools. Only species compromise gene pools. Individuals' genes do not change during their lifetime.
If they were units, it would be assumed their survival to reproduce, or death before such, evolved the species.
Sure. Individuals contribute to the evolution of a species. They don't evolve, though.
On the individual level. For one thing, the individual had to develop the mutation for it to be passed on. Its individual ability to exploit an advantage evolved within itself.
No. For mutations to be passed on, they have to be in the germline DNA - so the gametes. You're a man, presumably, and you make sperm every day. Each one of those sperms, well the fertile ones anyways, has a chance to have a mutation. That doesn't mean the mutation is represented in your body, though.

Remember your basic biology? Meiosis? In males, meiosis is the largest cause of mutations in the sperm. However, your gametes can also be hit by mutagens, too. No, that doesn't alter your genetic makeup, only that of your gametes.

If, on the other hand, you were born of one of those mutated sperm, then the mutant gene is already expressed throughout your body (or where ever it expresses itself). Again, you're not evolving since your genes aren't changing. You were born that way, the genes stay that way your entire life.

I suppose you could imagine some kind of Star Trek disease/parasite that changes your entire genome. In that case, you would have evolved. That doesn't happen in nature. The closest parallel to this sci-fi would be something like a somatic-line genetic virus that humans have turned HIV into. The first time it was used, it caused massive organ failure and the patient died in 48 hours. So, they didn't evolve. They just died b/c their DNA was disrupted and they could no longer function.

Since: Mar 11

Louisville, KY

#129272 Oct 13, 2012
Perhaps but all would have a good time and it beats the hell out of flying planes into buildings.
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
hahaha, totally!
You'd want to be careful around Bacchus followers, though, they would drink you under the table every single time.

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#129273 Oct 13, 2012
preterism wrote:
<quoted text> It wasn't done with God's approval these atrocities you speak of were done by evil people. The devi is very cunning in his ways, as stalin was of the devil in his actions and deeds. This is so ridiculous to say that stalin or hitler were Christians, only your deeds and actions prove you a Christian or, a wolf in sheep's clothing.
Baby, neither of your gods, "God" or "Satan" exist. Men act all by themselves.

All the killing that has gone on in the name of religion is not because some god is directing its worshipers to kill, it's because the people either 1) believe that some god is telling them to kill or 2) are using religion as an excuse to further their political desires.

Since: Mar 11

Louisville, KY

#129274 Oct 13, 2012
Perhaps the horseshoe crab made Jesus very angry all those millions of years ago and that's why he didn't allow them to evolve?:)
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
What's your reasoning here? Why would a crab with a body shape well suited for its environment change? Why would it become intelligent? What selection pressures would push it to be intelligent?
No, Eagle, they did not stop evolving. The horseshoe crab you see today is not the same species as the one in the past. They have speciated several times. The current one evolved around 18 million years ago. Remember? I already posted a link to an article by the world's leading horseshoe crab expert. He said, and I'm paraphrasing here, "that's a malicious untruth."
1) Do you not follow my links b/c you're genuinely not interested in knowing how and what science has evidence for?
2) Are you incapable of learning?
3) Or did you just miss the post?

“There is no god!”

Since: Jun 12

Södertälje, Sweden

#129275 Oct 13, 2012
preterism wrote:
<quoted text> It wasn't done with God's approval these atrocities you speak of were done by evil people. The devi is very cunning in his ways, as stalin was of the devil in his actions and deeds. This is so ridiculous to say that stalin or hitler were Christians, only your deeds and actions prove you a Christian or, a wolf in sheep's clothing.
the ware christian and what ever you say doesn't change it and the christian churches approved of it all

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#129276 Oct 13, 2012
Givemeliberty wrote:
Perhaps but all would have a good time and it beats the hell out of flying planes into buildings.
<quoted text>
I'm right with you there. How does that go again?

Science taught us to build planes. Religion taught us to fly them into buildings.
scouse55

Lydney, UK

#129277 Oct 13, 2012
Quote.....

.......No, individuals with mutations do not evolve. They are individuals born with mutations......

The very basis of the chicken and the egg argument.. proving the egg came first in evolutionary terms.

Bloody good summation in your lengthy submission, hence my just quoting that one sentence.

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#129278 Oct 13, 2012
scouse55 wrote:
Quote.....
.......No, individuals with mutations do not evolve. They are individuals born with mutations......
The very basis of the chicken and the egg argument.. proving the egg came first in evolutionary terms.
Bloody good summation in your lengthy submission, hence my just quoting that one sentence.
Thank you :)

Sorry for being long. Dave is not super good at understanding concepts, so they have to be explained in an exhaustive manner to him. Even then, he won't understand. But I tried and now you have tried - thanks.

Since: Oct 10

Location hidden

#129279 Oct 13, 2012
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm right with you there. How does that go again?
Science taught us to build planes. Religion taught us to fly them into buildings.
Gerhard Neumann allowed us to do it with fan jets.

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#129280 Oct 13, 2012
Forgive me for this wall of text. I'm going to do what Eage12 and so many other Christians on this thread do - I'm just going to paste something that I can't honestly verify. Unlike them, I freely admit my ignorance on these issues. I'm only pasting it to demonstrate how ridiculous it is for Christians to paste comments they don't understand about science down and subsequently pretend they've made an argument.

That said, here it goes. Jesus never existed. He is a fictional figure:

"There is no contemporary historical record of any kind of Jesus!! No written Roman, Greek or Jewish sources from this time (apart from the gospels) know of any historical Jesus or Christ. The name "Christ" is mentioned in some later texts (Tacitus, Suetonius Pliny d.y.) but then merely as the name of the idol of the Christians' worship (Read what these sources really say here). We don't even know who the writers of the Gospels were, and don't have the original manuscripts themselves either. We just have later copies of copies of copies of copies … of copies of the assumed lost originals. And with each copy the copyist usually felt free to alter details or rewrite whole parts of the manuscript.(We usually don't trust dubious anonymous sources as evidence for anything, do we?)

All the divine aspects of the Jesus figure are "stolen" from earlier similar dying and resurrected godmen, such as Dionysos, Osiris, Hercules, Attis, Mithra, Horus, Zarathustra and others. Actually there are few (if any) things about Jesus that are original at all. Jesus is just the Jewish version of this popular mythic Saviour- character in the Mystery-religions of Antiquity.(See the similarities here).

All the teachings of Jesus are "borrowed" from older sources, for example from the teachings of Buddha. Many of Jesus teachings are almost word for word identical with some of Buddhas sayings (400 years earlier). The so-called "Golden rule" can be found in several earlier pagan Greek (and Jewish) texts. The famous "Sermon on the Mount" was never held by Jesus (of course, since he never existed), but also because it was actually first produced in the second century AD by Christian priests, assembled from what they assumed were sayings of Jesus in different other texts."

Because the Christians on here rarely provide links to their biased source material, neither will I. It's pretty easy to discover though. Just highlight some text and google search it.

:)
:)
:)

“Why does my ignorance”

Since: Mar 11

justify your deity?

#129281 Oct 13, 2012
Some more:

"Note:
Much of the writings and research on the Jesus figure is amazingly biased, vague, tendentious and pervaded with wishful thinking.

One should in general be a bit sceptical to Christian scholars who often (obviously) don't have the necessary distance to their subject and obviously seem to be on a mission to prove the statements in the Bible, no matter what the real evidence say. As Christians they are usually convinced that Jesus did once exist as a real person in the first place, and are just looking for a confirmation."

True to form, I'm going to purposefully misquote my sources now, as RiversideRedneck taught me to do on the "Prove there's a god" thread. Unlike Riverside, I am being honest in telling you that I am deliberately misquoting in order to deceptively support my point. Riverside is fundamentally dishonest, though, so he covers up his manipulations:

"The best-known recent proponents of mythicism are Bible scholar Robert Price, German historian George Wells, mythicist-popularizer Earl Doherty, and historian Richard Carrier...

... scholars such as Paula Fredriksen, Robert Funk and E. P. Sanders hold that much of the material about him in the New Testament should not be taken at face value as it is driven by theological agendas.
Critics skeptical of the existence of a historical Jesus believe that Christian influence and bias (conscious or unconscious) has extended far outside the walls of formal Christianity. For example, atheist activist and Bible scholar Hector Avalos speaks of an "ecclesiastical-academic complex" which he believes has widely contaminated scholarship even in non-Christian academic institutions which nonetheless have a culturally Christian background or roots in religious institutions.
The history of the Christ myth theory can be traced to the French Enlightenment thinkers Constantin-François Volney and Charles François Dupuis in the 1790s. Notable proponents include Bruno Bauer; William Benjamin Smith; John Mackinnon Robertson; Arthur Drews; Paul-Louis Couchoud in the 20th century."

So, in the same manner that creationist Christians on this thread question biological science, based on my 1) ignorance, 2) unfamiliarity with the source material, 3) reference-less history I've provided above and 4) purposeful misquotes, we can determine that Jesus never existed.

Oh, wait, let me state that in their terms "I have proved that Jesus never existed."

There! That sounds a lot like creationist thinking!

Thanks for reading, it was fun :)
:)
:p

“Love much, trust none”

Since: Jul 11

There

#129282 Oct 13, 2012
Eagle12 wrote:
<quoted text>
In the case of the horseshoe crab. I guarantee you the pressures and it’s environment has changed plenty in 500 million years. Yet it has remained unchanged in 500 million years.....
Nope. The horshoe crab along with many creatures, have not changed because their environment has not changed to the point they needed to.

“Love much, trust none”

Since: Jul 11

There

#129283 Oct 13, 2012
RiversideRedneck wrote:
G_O_D, Mark was NOT talking about the Jewish ritual of baptising.....
Sure, they was just taking baths in the Jordan cuz the Romans wouldn't let Jews in their bathhouses.

You are a moron.
Read a friggin book.
Sart with thte entire Bible instead of repeating the bits your misiter reads to you and tells you what they mean.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 3 hr Chimney1 18,851
why Atheists believe in incest,pedophilia and b... 22 hr Amused 25
News Confessions of a black atheist 22 hr thetruth 465
News Why Do Atheists Ridicule Christianity? (May '11) Sun thetruth 6,124
Science Disproves Evolution (Aug '12) Sun thetruth 2,094
News The Consequences of Atheism Sat Koala_Gums 1,340
News Gary Gutting and Alvin Plantinga "Is Atheism Ir... Sat geezerjock 1
More from around the web