Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 258512 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“Be strong ...”

Since: Nov 10

...I whispered to my coffee

#233986 Jul 31, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
That was not remotely her argument.
But it is equally stupid.
Congratulations.
And

“Christine uses e=mc^2 to prove non-existence of God, since God is "all-powerful".”

Is not remotely my argument, you deliberately omit a major part of my argument to make yourself feel good, if self deception is how you get you hights then fine, to other people it’s just butt crack lies.

“Be strong ...”

Since: Nov 10

...I whispered to my coffee

#233987 Jul 31, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
You are correct in one thing.
I am not capable of thinking on her level.
Or yours.
Self-contradiction ain't my thing.
Being stupid like you and Christine ain't my thing.
I suppose you also side with her on Stalin being a Christian and the Pope an atheist.
Congratulations. Enjoy.
This is true,(wow buck has broken a lifetime rile and spoken truth)
I actually think that most of the time you are not capable of thinking on any level – period

Buck Crick

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#233988 Jul 31, 2014
Patrick wrote:
<quoted text>
President Bush, who four years ago couldn’t identify a single mistake by his administration, on Monday ticked off a list of its shortcomings and disappointments, ranging from failures to find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq to its oft-criticized response to Hurricane Katrina.
And in his 50th and final solo White House press conference, the president said his successor, Barack Obama, will feel the weight of the presidency and the nation’s safety on his shoulders. He also spoke of making his wife, Laura, coffee on his first morning out of office.
Mr. Bush displayed flashes of remorse, wit and humor when discussing missteps such as the Abu Ghraib prison scandal in Iraq,
his attempt to overhaul Social Security rather than take on immigration reform in 2005,
and the unfurling of a “Mission Accomplished” banner on an aircraft carrier shortly after Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein was toppled.
W. was mistaken - Obama feels no weight on his shoulders.

He doesn't give a crap. He wants the celebrity, not the job.

He floats above it. To cool for school.

Knocks out Jimmy Carter as worst president.

Buck Crick

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#233989 Jul 31, 2014
CunningLinguist wrote:
<quoted text>
His future only exists here on topix.
What a lonely childlike soul he is; wasting away his life in this forum, commenting on anything and everything desperately seeking attention.
Gradeschool level mentality.
Superb at copy paste without even the slightest understanding of what he pasted.
The rebel without a clue!
And a mouth that could use a big bar of Ivory soap inserted horizontally.
He's already foaming, courtesy of you!
You want me to take you seriously. I don't.

Buck Crick

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#233990 Jul 31, 2014
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
??? Your absence seems to have allowed your brain to atrophy
“Perhaps you don't understand how those observations and logic are created on an initial arbitrary basis.”– why do you have difficulty understanding the words OBSERVATION and LOGIC? Surely they are not that too difficult to understand?
Perhaps you don’t understand how the scientific method works. One man (or team) makes the model and others follow trying to break the model, if it is broken then they either start all over again using different parameters or they consider it a dead horse.
I don’t need plastic, I prefer the real thing,
That is incorrect.

What type of glue do they use on the models they make?

Buck Crick

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#233991 Jul 31, 2014
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
So you can provide no evidence about your claims – fair enought
My icon is real and factual evidence that you godbots are lying, funny how you never even noticed that eh?
Your icon is evidence?

You icon is stupid, not to mention factually false.
CunningLinguist

Windermere, FL

#233992 Jul 31, 2014
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
This is true,(wow buck has broken a lifetime rile and spoken truth)
I actually think that most of the time you are not capable of thinking on any level – period
The 'troll' is strong in this one Obi-Wan!

Buck only wants attention... me me me me me. I get bored feeding goldfish. Mr. creek is that goldfish, actively circling for a doorway to immortality. When the tooth fairy denied him a nickel under his pillow he developed his current attitude. At least this stopped him from knocking out any more of his teeth.

Faith must oppose science for its very survival. If theists applied reason and science to their faith, their religion would die.

Buck Crick

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#233993 Jul 31, 2014
CunningLinguist wrote:
<quoted text>
The 'troll' is strong in this one Obi-Wan!
Buck only wants attention... me me me me me. I get bored feeding goldfish. Mr. creek is that goldfish, actively circling for a doorway to immortality. When the tooth fairy denied him a nickel under his pillow he developed his current attitude. At least this stopped him from knocking out any more of his teeth.
Faith must oppose science for its very survival. If theists applied reason and science to their faith, their religion would die.
Theism is not religion.

Get an education if you want me to take you seriously.

Alternatively, you could attempt a valid point.

Buck Crick

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#233994 Jul 31, 2014
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
And
“Christine uses e=mc^2 to prove non-existence of God, since God is "all-powerful".”
Is not remotely my argument, you deliberately omit a major part of my argument to make yourself feel good, if self deception is how you get you hights then fine, to other people it’s just butt crack lies.
That is precisely your argument.

I don't blame you for disowning it.

Buck Crick

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#233995 Jul 31, 2014
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
This is true,(wow buck has broken a lifetime rile and spoken truth)
I actually think that most of the time you are not capable of thinking on any level – period
Sure. That's why you log on, go back and find my posts, then respond to them.

“Be strong ...”

Since: Nov 10

...I whispered to my coffee

#233996 Jul 31, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
That is incorrect.
What type of glue do they use on the models they make?
Nope you are wrong or you lie, either defines you
That sort of ignoramus inspired comment shows precisely how fooking stupid you are. Perhaps you need to talk to dumbo dave about models, he was the one who brought the concept up.

Buck Crick

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#233997 Jul 31, 2014
number four wrote:
<quoted text>..oh , my gosh ..you stupid ass ..Can "we" reach the border ..........
What border? The border of time?

There is no border.

If you want to claim future time projects infinitely, while a questionable deduction, I have no problem with that.

Because my problem is physical infinities. There are none. Aura, and others, claim they exist.

Future time is theoretical - it is a mental expectation.

It is irrelevant to the question of whether infinity exists in physical reality.

You are quick to call someone a "stupid ass" when it is your own thinking that is stupid.

We could say "infinitely stupid". Because infinity is only a figure of speech.

It's only use is to express the approach of limits.

Nothing gets there. Not the universe, not black holes, not donuts or figure-eights.

Welcome to Buck School. Have a seat in the back next to the guy who says "it cannot happen, but that doesn't mean it cannot happen".

“Be strong ...”

Since: Nov 10

...I whispered to my coffee

#233998 Jul 31, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
Your icon is evidence?
You icon is stupid, not to mention factually false.
Yup - the icon is evidence and proven in several different ways to be factually genuine but of course you are too stupid to understand it so ask me if I am bothered by your stupidity?

Or then again, perhaps I should ignore the archaeologists, anthropologist, historians and other experts and rely on the incredulous insight of an overweight prisoner of little intelligence?

Buck Crick

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#233999 Jul 31, 2014
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope you are wrong or you lie, either defines you
That sort of ignoramus inspired comment shows precisely how fooking stupid you are. Perhaps you need to talk to dumbo dave about models, he was the one who brought the concept up.
He didn't claim scientists make them.

Though it is possible, if they have hobbies like building model airplanes.

“Be strong ...”

Since: Nov 10

...I whispered to my coffee

#234000 Jul 31, 2014
CunningLinguist wrote:
<quoted text>
The 'troll' is strong in this one Obi-Wan!
Buck only wants attention... me me me me me. I get bored feeding goldfish. Mr. creek is that goldfish, actively circling for a doorway to immortality. When the tooth fairy denied him a nickel under his pillow he developed his current attitude. At least this stopped him from knocking out any more of his teeth.
Faith must oppose science for its very survival. If theists applied reason and science to their faith, their religion would die.
Of course there faith would die, it does not even need reason, just acceptance of facts. This is why they lie and make up all sorts of garbage just to big up their own ego. They live a delusion and don’t even realise it

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#234001 Jul 31, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no future time.
When you look from the ship to see where you will go in the future, you are looking at distance of the landscape, or seascape.
You are not looking at time. You cannot see time.
Time only quantifies the occurence of events.
It's also finite.
You are not equipped to discuss these matters.
Oh so you are imagining past time, since you can't see time.:)
The error is strong in you , my young padawan learner.

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#234002 Jul 31, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong.
You cannot count future time. You can count a projection of time in the future by use of time in the past and present. But your projection is not time. It is an expectation or a forecast of time that might become.
An expectation is a mental construct. Counting what is expected is not counting what is.
The future has not happened. Time occurs as it happens.
You can count the inches past the top of a post. But you are not counting the post.
So calenders are fictitious now are they? Appointments made for the future useless and there is no morrow?

Good heavens, no wonder you Christians are so afterlife conscious, you are already half dead!

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#234003 Jul 31, 2014
CunningLinguist wrote:
<quoted text>
His future only exists here on topix.
What a lonely childlike soul he is; wasting away his life in this forum, commenting on anything and everything desperately seeking attention.
Gradeschool level mentality.
Superb at copy paste without even the slightest understanding of what he pasted.
The rebel without a clue!
And a mouth that could use a big bar of Ivory soap inserted horizontally.
He's already foaming, courtesy of you!
I ain't falling for no banana in the tail pipe.



hahahahah

“Be strong ...”

Since: Nov 10

...I whispered to my coffee

#234004 Jul 31, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
Theism is not religion.
Get an education if you want me to take you seriously.
Alternatively, you could attempt a valid point.
Theism “Belief in the existence of a god or gods, specifically of a creator who intervenes in the universe”
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/...

Religion “The belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a personal God or gods”
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/definition/...

Note the belief and god or gods - close enough not to confuse anyone other than butt crack

“Be strong ...”

Since: Nov 10

...I whispered to my coffee

#234005 Jul 31, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
That is precisely your argument.
I don't blame you for disowning it.
That is not my argument and you frigginbg well know it – here let me repeat my argument for the hard of thinking and the deliberate liars - again

E=MC^2 shows that the omnipotent god as described in KJV revelation 19:6 cannot exist in this universe at the same time as you.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 34 min Wisdom of Ages 95,377
News Scientific, Philosophical Case for God's Existe... 3 hr Elganned 174
man 15 hr blacklagoon 3 1
The atheists mind Jun 15 Elganned 63
Why creation? Jun 14 Elganned 55
News Atheism and Wonder Jun 14 Eagle 12 - 50
A question for Christians... Jun 14 Eagle 12 - 115