Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 258038 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

blacklagoon

Boston, MA

#227655 Apr 29, 2014
Eagle 12 wrote:
<quoted text>
I’m not surprised Doctor.
That’s what happens when a Chiwawa does a research study on the intelligence between German Shepherds and Chiwawas.
Of course the Chiwawa is going to claim to be a overall more intelligent and a bad a** Mother F**ker.
What Chiwawa doesn’t think that way?, lol.
[hats off to the Chiwawas!]
Thanks for making the point once again that believers are less intelligence than non-believers, with you misspell of Chihuahua. It takes almost no intelligence at all to look up a word you are unfamiliar with. Lazy or stupid? Both maybe?

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#227656 Apr 29, 2014
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
Observation and experimentation, coupled with logic and experience in the world, and a minimal amount of indoctrination by self serving interests.
How is that?
Now. You prove yourself.
Oops. Sorry. I forgot. You done bit the dust.
More of your ping pong ball and fart bubble experiments?

“Evolved hunter/gatherer”

Since: Jan 08

Location hidden

#227657 Apr 29, 2014
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>He was right, Goddidit is not an answer, it only deepens the non-answer. Saying Goddidit presents more questions than it answers since God is a non-existent entity. Saying a non-existent entity did anything is a logical impossibility.
You confuse your rejecting an answer with there being no answer to reject.
It was still an answer. You did not like it. You argue against your own crap sir.

“let's do this thang!”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#227658 Apr 29, 2014
No Shiite wrote:
I just watched a show called Vice on HBO. One segment was about Colorado and pot, which estimates that this year $2 billion dollars that would have gone to the Mexican drug cartels will stay in Colorado and be taxed at something like 20%. It's free market capitalism and it will be coming to a state near you.
The more interesting segment was on defectors from North to South Korea and the struggles they have. Most are sponsored by a church with a very brave minister (well, not brave enough to flex his Christian muscles on Topix every day. That is the ultimate form of bravery.) who helps them defect. He was asked how the North Koreans were embracing membership in his church.
He explained it this way: the North Koreans already have a religion. The only difference is the subject. Kim Il Sung is God. Kim Jong Il is Jesus. Their Bible is their party doctrine.
These are the words of the South Korean Christian minister. Her recognizes that Communist leaders become the religious figureheads of their societies that are, therefore, no less religious than any nation full of a Christians. The only difference is the tangibility of the god.
moral of story - why are you so interested in having a corrupt and narcissisitc communist/socialist leader like the north koreans instead of having the Perfect Lord Jesus Christ who loved us and gave Himself for us???

“let's do this thang!”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#227659 Apr 29, 2014
No Shiite wrote:
<quoted text>Unlike Christians, Sikhs are required to leave peaceful lives. One who ran a bodega near where I used to live wore a button that explained I am a Sikh not a Muslim after 9-11.
why do you lie about Christ's Body on earth when paul commisions us to "as much as depends on you, live peaceably with all men"

do you think you can besmerch God's reputation and get away with it?:

"But I say to you that for every idle word men may speak, they will give account of it in the day of judgment" - Jesus

buckle-up friend, cuz payback is a bitch!

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#227660 Apr 29, 2014
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>
A new review of 63 scientific studies stretching back over decades has concluded that religious people are less intelligent than non-believers.
A piece of University of Rochester analysis, led by Professor Miron Zuckerman, found “a reliable negative relation between intelligence and religiosity” in 53 out of 63 studies.
According to the study entitled,'The Relation Between Intelligence and Religiosity: A Meta-Analysis and Some Proposed Explanations', published in the 'Personality and Social Psychology Review', even during early years the more intelligent a child is the more likely it would be to turn away from religion.
In old age above average intelligence people are less likely to believe, the researchers also found.
One of the studies used in Zuckerman's paper was a life-long analysis of the beliefs of 1,500 gifted children with with IQs over 135.
The study began in 1921 and continues today. Even in extreme old age the subjects had much lower levels of religious belief than the average population.
The review, which is the first systematic meta-analysis of the 63 studies conducted in between 1928 and 2012, showed that of the 63 studies, 53 showed a negative correlation between intelligence and religiosity, while 10 showed a positive one.
Only two studies showed significant positive correlations and significant negative correlations were seen in a total of 35 studies.
The authors of the review looked at each study independently, taking into account the quality of data collection, the size of the sample and the analysis methods used.
The three psychologists carrying out the review defined intelligence as the “ability to reason, plan, solve problems, think abstractly, comprehend complex ideas, learn quickly, and learn from experience”.
Religiosity is defined by the psychologists as involvement in some (or all) facets of religion.
According to the review, other factors - such as gender or education - did not make any difference to the correlation between intelligence and religious belief.
The level of belief, or otherwise, did however vary dependent upon age with the correlation found to be weakest among the pre-college population.
The paper concludes that: "Most extant explanations (of a negative relation) share one central theme —the premise that religious beliefs are irrational, not anchored in science, not testable and, therefore, unappealing to intelligent people who 'know better'."
Criticisms of the conclusions include that the paper only deals with a definition of analytic intelligence and fails to consider newly identified forms of creative and emotional intelligence.
The psychologists who carried out the review also sought to pre-empt the secularist interpretation of the findings by suggesting that more intelligent people are less likely to have religious beliefs as they associate themselves with ideas around personal control.
"Intelligent people typically spend more time in school - a form of self-regulation that may yield long-term benefits," the researchers wrote.
"More intelligent people get higher level jobs (and better employment (and higher salary) may lead to higher self-esteem, and encourage personal control beliefs."
You're welcome!!
"Religiosity is defined by the psychologists as involvement in some (or all) facets of religion."

Amusing.

May I point out you are involved in some or all facets of religion by your preaching on here?

There is no difference between a Jew and a Christian arguing the fine points as a theist and a Topix atheist.

You are too involved to be a ratioanl atheist.

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#227661 Apr 29, 2014
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
More of your ping pong ball and fart bubble experiments?
I have a vague memory of posting that quite some time ago. However, the last line I don't remember.

Why are you reaching so far back, and why can't you post a link to the message instead of representing such words as a direct quote?

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#227662 Apr 29, 2014
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>why do you lie about Christ's Body on earth when paul commisions us to "as much as depends on you, live peaceably with all men"

do you think you can besmerch God's reputation and get away with it?:

"But I say to you that for every idle word men may speak, they will give account of it in the day of judgment" - Jesus

buckle-up friend, cuz payback is a bitch!
You should really read what you wrote.

You'd better not only buckle up, but wear a helmet and buy some Kevlar.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#227663 Apr 29, 2014
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>Thanks for making the point once again that believers are less intelligence than non-believers, with you misspell of Chihuahua. It takes almost no intelligence at all to look up a word you are unfamiliar with. Lazy or stupid? Both maybe?
Really?

A 'rationally atheist' oxymoron who ran like a sissy?

You parrot atheist talking points that distort and ignore information without applying your own reasoning. Now you want to judge a faith calls people to better themselves and help others?

What a hypocrite and fraud!
blacklagoon

Boston, MA

#227664 Apr 29, 2014
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>
"Religiosity is defined by the psychologists as involvement in some (or all) facets of religion."
Amusing.
May I point out you are involved in some or all facets of religion by your preaching on here?
There is no difference between a Jew and a Christian arguing the fine points as a theist and a Topix atheist.
You are too involved to be a ratioanl atheist.
No conversations or responses with, or to the mentally impaired, sorry!!!

“let's do this thang!”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#227665 Apr 29, 2014
Rosa_Winkel wrote:
<quoted text>
And in case anyone thinks that accusation was over the top, here's his response when I pulled him up for his sleazy talk to an underage poster.
http://www.topix.com/forum/topstories/TOCO8TE...
Don't you love good Xians.
you're wrong Rosa (ya gotta luv the self-righteous anticristers)!

YOU brought slease into the scenario when you accused me for no reason of being a perv. THEN i accused you of being a perv back!

you anti's think you can do/say anything you want without being responsible, but you're in for a big surprise!
blacklagoon

Boston, MA

#227666 Apr 29, 2014
Aquarius-WY wrote:
<quoted text>
You confuse your rejecting an answer with there being no answer to reject.
It was still an answer. You did not like it. You argue against your own crap sir.
Goddidit is ONLY an answer to those suffering from that dreaded disease called delusional disorder, the inability to distinguish what is real from that with is not. If you want to call and answer accepted by only those with mental impairments as an "answer" then shame on you.
blacklagoon

Boston, MA

#227667 Apr 29, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
Really?
A 'rationally atheist' oxymoron who ran like a sissy?
You parrot atheist talking points that distort and ignore information without applying your own reasoning. Now you want to judge a faith calls people to better themselves and help others?
What a hypocrite and fraud!
Go and talk to your Alien friends, you know the ones in the bible ROTFLMAO. Aliens in the bible are right up there with the Noah flood. What's astounding is that people really believe these childish stories.

Was it the Aliens that convinced your God to murder innocent little babies? Maybe it was the Aliens that told God that keeping slaves was a great idea.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#227668 Apr 29, 2014
Dave Nelson wrote:
<quoted text>I have a vague memory of posting that quite some time ago. However, the last line I don't remember.

Why are you reaching so far back, and why can't you post a link to the message instead of representing such words as a direct quote?
I don't use my computer often here. It's too clunky and jammed with ads. I logged in this morning and that's where it dumped me. Didn't notice how far back it was until I saw the post number as I hit send.

So...

How are the experiments going, anyway?

“let's do this thang!”

Since: Aug 10

Location hidden

#227669 Apr 29, 2014
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
You should really read what you wrote.
You'd better not only buckle up, but wear a helmet and buy some Kevlar.
are you talking about MOI?!

have you ever heard about the BLOOD OF THE LAMB OF GOD? yeah, it cleanses and covers us from all sin!

those who depise & reject It will be guilty of shedding innocent blood and for all the evil that men do under the sun!

Since: Sep 08

Westcliffe, CO

#227670 Apr 29, 2014
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
I don't use my computer often here. It's too clunky and jammed with ads. I logged in this morning and that's where it dumped me. Didn't notice how far back it was until I saw the post number as I hit send.
So...
How are the experiments going, anyway?
Get Adblock Plus.

Experiments are over.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#227671 Apr 29, 2014
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>Go and talk to your Alien friends, you know the ones in the bible ROTFLMAO. Aliens in the bible are right up there with the Noah flood. What's astounding is that people really believe these childish stories.
Was it the Aliens that convinced your God to murder innocent little babies? Maybe it was the Aliens that told God that keeping slaves was a great idea.
There we go again with the atheist talking points!

Still too stupified to answered my question? A 'rational atheist' oxymoron once again dumbfounded when challenged to think for himself...

Man up punk!
blacklagoon

Boston, MA

#227672 Apr 29, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>
There we go again with the atheist talking points!
Still too stupified to answered my question? A 'rational atheist' oxymoron once again dumbfounded when challenged to think for himself...
Man up punk!
Are you too cowardly to answer my question? Man up dipshit, WAS it Aliens that convinced your God to murder innocent little babies?

Did you ask a question, must have missed it or it was so pathetic it didn't warrant an answer.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#227673 Apr 29, 2014
waaasssuuup wrote:
<quoted text>are you talking about MOI?!

have you ever heard about the BLOOD OF THE LAMB OF GOD? yeah, it cleanses and covers us from all sin!

those who depise & reject It will be guilty of shedding innocent blood and for all the evil that men do under the sun!
Does it cover you so that you can become a lying, judgmental hypocrite?
andet1987

Chicago, IL

#227674 Apr 29, 2014
blacklagoon wrote:
<quoted text>Are you too cowardly to answer my question? Man up dipshit, WAS it Aliens that convinced your God to murder innocent little babies?
Did you ask a question, must have missed it or it was so pathetic it didn't warrant an answer.
God is not a murderer. the Bible is written by man. anyone can write anything in that book. and the Bible is not written or the word of God.

God is can do better than that. God helps, God heals, and God gives guidance.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 16 min Into The Night 48,392
Why you need to make sure you are saved before ... 17 hr Scaritual 14
News The war on Christmas (Dec '10) 21 hr Amused 4,906
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 21 hr Amused 21,861
Jesus Christ and Wisdom, Knowledge, Understandi... Nov 29 Richardfs 5
News Delta Schools Will Get Satanic Coloring Books o... (Apr '16) Nov 29 Amused 7
News Atheism vs. Theism: Knowns and Unknowns (Sep '14) Nov 28 hpcaban 441
More from around the web