Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 258484 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#218627 Mar 12, 2014
Chess Jurist wrote:
<quoted text>
Really?
You here me there?
I here all.

I sea all.

“MEET KIKI -She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#218628 Mar 12, 2014
lightbeamrider wrote:
<quoted text> You are just like the abuser. Unpredictable. Everyone walks around the house on eggshells hoping to not offend the abuser who can be gentile and likable for the most part but then go off at the drop of a hat over any perceived slight or no slight at all. You are enemy centered and subject to severe mood swings just like the abuser and your posts reflect that. Indirectly blaming Christianity for 9/11, you really show your true colors and I believe you believe the poison you spew. At best it is a bimbo eruption and at worst well it is just venom. Thanks for revealing your true colors and I have been around long enough to remember the harassment heaped upon that Christian woman a while back. You folks were like a pack of rabid dogs to her as I recall. If there is any justice you will get yours. Whatever she was she did not deserve the abuse she received here. So don't go getting so sanctimonious now about abusers. Just go look in the mirror.
.. boy, oh boy, oh boy, the Christian men on this thread are really in a tether ..

.. tremendous change has occurred in western societies. Expecting women to adhere to ancient religious and moral codes that demean their gender will only make them reject all Abrahamic religions. Don't you get that ??..

.. you probably don't endorse female genital mutilation or sanctioned rape but some cultures do. It is for these women, the females living in countries like Afghanistan or Uganda, that I weep ..

.. in an effort to make this about me instead of women, you utilize character assassination. Do you feel so threatened by my views that you seek revenge and think, "If there is any justice you will get yours". What's that all about? Are you offended by my critique of religion or does it threaten your perceived superior position ??..

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#218629 Mar 12, 2014
Happy Lesbo wrote:
.. what did you expect? An endorsement of sanctioned rape, female genital mutilation, illiteracy or death by stoning for a widow who indulges in 'illicit' sex ??..
.. throughout the world, religious discrimination against women is alive and thriving ..
Thus I find questionable the claim that the current state of affairs is the “same as it ever was”, implying that the patriarchy responsible for bootstrapping Western Civ from mud huts on the banks of the Rubicon to a complex post-industrial society is also the very same patriarchy that turns men into kitchen bitches today. Yes, patriarchy…literally, the ‘rule of the father’…places responsibilities on men. Responsibility to act in a socially productive manner. Responsibility to care for his kin, his children, his woman. Responsibility to fight in the defense of his community. In exchange he is guaranteed a link to his seed, and in a monogamous patriarchy, is more or less guaranteed access to sex. His role as the master of his home is codified and protected in law. Usurpers of that order–cads, women too big for their britches or who attempt to abrogate the terms of the social contract, adultresses, rapists–are punished commensurate with their violation.

But just as patriarchy places limits upon the freedom of men in favor of the larger social order, patriarchy also keeps the voracious appetite of the hungry beast known as female sexuality in its box. More importantly, patriarchy keeps the feminine, a spirit that knows no limits, justice, or fairness, a force that is all id and no superego, productive in moderation and destructive in excess, inward-focused on the self as opposed to outward-focused on others, in balance with the masculine. Just as patriarchy channels men’s excess energies in a socially productive manner, patriarchy also channels and caps women’s energies in a socially productive manner. It keeps her innate hypergamy in check; indeed patriarchy prevents the feminine from becoming intensely dysgenic and destructive of the social order.

Keep reading at http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/07/27/in-de...

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#218630 Mar 12, 2014
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>Oh, you want a timeline? Okay, here's one at grade school level. Learn something.
http://patrickgrant.com/BBTL.htm
I almost made it through the first sentence, then my skepticism kicked in.

"The Big Bang
10-43 seconds
The universe begins with a cataclysm that generates space and time,"

I hadda stop there.

Because that is 100% assumption and speculation.

“BAS in Electrical Engineering”

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#218631 Mar 12, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
I almost made it through the first sentence, then my skepticism kicked in.
"The Big Bang
10-43 seconds
The universe begins with a cataclysm that generates space and time,"
I hadda stop there.
Because that is 100% assumption and speculation.
That is actually 100% based on observation and physically possible events. Also experimentation on much smaller scales.

“Credulity is not a virtue”

Since: Apr 09

San Francisco

#218632 Mar 12, 2014
So I'm curious: to those who insist that atheism is a belief, please describe what that belief necessarily entails. I'm an atheist, so I'm interested to see what I therefore must believe as a consequence.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#218633 Mar 12, 2014
Electrical Engineer wrote:
<quoted text>
That is actually 100% based on observation and physically possible events. Also experimentation on much smaller scales.
There is no observation of that event.

And "physically possible events" doesn't necessarily mean fact.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#218634 Mar 12, 2014
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
And the people? They don't count?
What do you mean?

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#218635 Mar 12, 2014
wilderide wrote:
So I'm curious: to those who insist that atheism is a belief, please describe what that belief necessarily entails. I'm an atheist, so I'm interested to see what I therefore must believe as a consequence.
The belief is that gods don't exist.

For some atheists, they specify gods. Some of them here go as far as to say the god of the Bible doesn't exist.

Since that opinion can't be proven, it's a belief.

“MEET KIKI -She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#218636 Mar 12, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Thus I find questionable the claim that the current state of affairs is the “same as it ever was”, implying that the patriarchy responsible for bootstrapping Western Civ from mud huts on the banks of the Rubicon to a complex post-industrial society is also the very same patriarchy that turns men into kitchen bitches today. Yes, patriarchy…literally, the ‘rule of the father’…places responsibilities on men. Responsibility to act in a socially productive manner. Responsibility to care for his kin, his children, his woman. Responsibility to fight in the defense of his community. In exchange he is guaranteed a link to his seed, and in a monogamous patriarchy, is more or less guaranteed access to sex. His role as the master of his home is codified and protected in law. Usurpers of that order–cads, women too big for their britches or who attempt to abrogate the terms of the social contract, adultresses, rapists–are punished commensurate with their violation.
But just as patriarchy places limits upon the freedom of men in favor of the larger social order, patriarchy also keeps the voracious appetite of the hungry beast known as female sexuality in its box. More importantly, patriarchy keeps the feminine, a spirit that knows no limits, justice, or fairness, a force that is all id and no superego, productive in moderation and destructive in excess, inward-focused on the self as opposed to outward-focused on others, in balance with the masculine. Just as patriarchy channels men’s excess energies in a socially productive manner, patriarchy also channels and caps women’s energies in a socially productive manner. It keeps her innate hypergamy in check; indeed patriarchy prevents the feminine from becoming intensely dysgenic and destructive of the social order.
Keep reading at http://www.the-spearhead.com/2010/07/27/in-de...
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: "EW is a well-trained monkey charged with operating heavier-than-air machinery. His interests outside of being an opinionated rabble-rouser are hunting, working out, motorcycling, spending time with his family, and flying. He is a father to three, a husband to one, and is a sometime contributor here at Spearhead. More of his intolerable drivel is available at
the blog The Elusive Wapiti."

.. sounds like your kind of guy Ar-Ar ..

.. no rebuttal necessary ..

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#218637 Mar 12, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
it's also about someone being responsible for others, which is historically a job that most women don't want.
Happy Lesbo wrote:
.. women don't take responsibility for their offspring ??..
I said others, not children. Don't change the words to suit your argument.

“MEET KIKI -She Seeks Home”

Since: Oct 10

With Established Harem

#218638 Mar 12, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
it's also about someone being responsible for others, which is historically a job that most women don't want.
Happy Lesbo wrote:
.. women don't take responsibility for their offspring ??..
RiversideRedneck wrote:
RiversideRedneck wrote:
it's also about someone being responsible for others, which is historically a job that most women don't want.
<quoted text>
I said others, not children. Don't change the words to suit your argument.
.. aren't children 'others'??..

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#218639 Mar 12, 2014
Happy Lesbo wrote:
<quoted text>
ABOUT THE AUTHOR: "EW is a well-trained monkey charged with operating heavier-than-air machinery. His interests outside of being an opinionated rabble-rouser are hunting, working out, motorcycling, spending time with his family, and flying. He is a father to three, a husband to one, and is a sometime contributor here at Spearhead. More of his intolerable drivel is available at
the blog The Elusive Wapiti."
.. sounds like your kind of guy Ar-Ar ..
.. no rebuttal necessary ..
That's right, attack the author and ignore his points.

“BAS in Electrical Engineering”

Since: Jan 14

Location hidden

#218640 Mar 12, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no observation of that event.
And "physically possible events" doesn't necessarily mean fact.
It is fact to this day until proven otherwise. Given what we know it is the only outcome. Until proven otherwise.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#218641 Mar 12, 2014
Happy Lesbo wrote:
.. aren't children 'others'??..
Possibly.

But others aren't necessarily children.

Throughout history the patriarchal family unit has succeeded and thrived, it still thrives today. It isn't about control and it isn't about sexism as you claim. It's about family structure, structure that appears to be nonexistent today, but it isn't.

You're gonna sit here and say that a man being in charge of his house is as violent as radical terrorists killing thousands of people, I have a problem with that because it isn't true. If you prefer to have a man under your heel, that's between you and a particular man. If you want to say that all men should be like that, you and I are going to have a problem. Men aren't supposed to be kitchen bitches like you want them to be.

Catcher1

Since: Sep 10

Fremont, CA

#218642 Mar 12, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
That's right, attack the author and ignore his points.
That's far preferable to attacking a helpless motorist with a club, which is what you did.

Was the guy white, or was your violence triggered by racism?

Catcher1

Since: Sep 10

Fremont, CA

#218643 Mar 12, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Possibly.
But others aren't necessarily children.
Throughout history the patriarchal family unit has succeeded and thrived, it still thrives today. It isn't about control and it isn't about sexism as you claim. It's about family structure, structure that appears to be nonexistent today, but it isn't.
You're gonna sit here and say that a man being in charge of his house is as violent as radical terrorists killing thousands of people, I have a problem with that because it isn't true. If you prefer to have a man under your heel, that's between you and a particular man. If you want to say that all men should be like that, you and I are going to have a problem. Men aren't supposed to be kitchen bitches like you want them to be.
But you take patriarchy to the extreme.

You feel entitled to hit your wife.

You feel entitled to hit a six-month-old baby.

And you consistently demean women.

In other words, you're a pig.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#218644 Mar 12, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
There is no observation of that event.
And "physically possible events" doesn't necessarily mean fact.
Sheesh.

You've no idea who Penzias and Wilson are, do you, much less what they discovered?
The significance of the Cosmic Backgroud Radiation?
That IS the Big Bang.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#218645 Mar 12, 2014
Electrical Engineer wrote:
It is fact to this day until proven otherwise. Given what we know it is the only outcome. Until proven otherwise.
Oh.

I didn't know that.

Then God's existence is a fact until proven otherwise.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#218646 Mar 12, 2014
Catcher1 wrote:
That's far preferable to attacking a helpless motorist with a club, which is what you did. Was the guy white, or was your violence triggered by racism?
Not a club, The Club.

What violence?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 7 min Superwilly 79,767
News People's forum - Get off the fence of religious... (May '10) 1 hr Eagle 12 - 36
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 5 hr Science 32,576
News Atheist inmate wins right to practice his faith... (Aug '15) Sep 16 blacklagoon 3 91
How To Get To Heaven When You Die (Jan '17) Sep 15 xfrodobagginsx 101
News Atheist billboards to mock Romney, Obama faith (Aug '12) Sep 15 superwilly 47
what science will NEVER be able to prove Sep 15 Me _ Myself _ I 8
More from around the web