Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 258515 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#218161 Mar 11, 2014
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
forcing your hate and religion onto everyone.
<quoted text>
Like I give a ratfart what pedophiles like YOU think.
Calm down, your weakened sphincter will create a mess!

What a ugly, ignorant, bigoted statement. I'm not 'forcing' anything on anyone, nor is a 'faith' that has choice a fundamental tenant.

I simply note a medical fact; Anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning. Why would you try to defend such a disgusting, ugly behavior???

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#218162 Mar 11, 2014
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
So you ignore the Old Testament.
Good.
That's a start.
So you are a immoral 'rational atheist' oxymoron who can't defend her assertion.

Got it.

Smirk.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#218163 Mar 11, 2014
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
Rolling papers? Oh dear, I hope you use a vaporizer. Much healthier. So I've heard. ;)
Anyway, I really find apologists for slavery puzzling. The fact that God ever condoned slavery for anyone should bring immediate condemnation from any rational and moral person. And if Leviticus was only for the Levites, does that mean everything else in that book, including condemnation of gay relationships, only applies to that specific group as well?
I find 'rational atheist' oxymorons very consistent.

You want to pin the ancient dictates of another faith on Christians.

You ignore the Letter to Philemon that expresses the Christian position on slavery.

But more so, you ignore the fact that in recent history, Christianity has stood, virtually alone, in the fight against slavery. First in regards to African Americans, and now in regards to the sex trade.

Even more telling? Many of you 'rational atheist' oxymorons have visited the boys of Brazil or the girls of Thailand.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#218164 Mar 11, 2014
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
A law is either in force or it isn't. If Jesus did not come to abolish them, then presumably they are still in force. Please explain what your understanding of the term "fulfill" means in the context of this topic.
Why are you pretending you not only don't have access to the answer, but you don't know the answer?

I have a question for you;

Is an inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning behavior an act of love?

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#218165 Mar 11, 2014
wilderide wrote:
<quoted text>
Man is certainly the intelligent designer of religion.
I agree that man is often the designer of their belief systems, but 'intelligent'???

Hence my comments to 'rational atheist' oxymorons.

Smirk.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#218166 Mar 11, 2014
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
So what if atheism **WAS** a religion?(it's not-- but so what if it was)?
It doesn't have **ANY** bearing on EVOLUTION-- which is SCIENCE.
Are you seriously this STUPID, or did you take too many getting-hit-on-your-head lessons again?
You are dumber than a box of rocks.
At it's most basic essence, marriage is a cross cultural constraint on evolutionary mating behavior.

Ss couples are a defective failure of mating behavior making ss marriage an oxymoron.

Smile.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#218167 Mar 11, 2014
Tide with Beach wrote:
<quoted text>
Did you find that moral condemnation of slavery in the Bible?
Nope.
Now, if the Bible didn't mention slavery, and didn't purport to be the ultimate moral guide, I couldn't make this point, but since it does, I can.
The Bible condones slavery.
Perfect example of a 'rational atheist' oxymoron....

Smirk.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#218168 Mar 11, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
Nope. Basically, irreducible complexity means it is impossible to reduce the complexity of a complex system by removing any of its parts and still maintain its functionality. The common mousetrap illustrates irreducible complexity. It's made of five integral parts: a catch, a spring, a hammer, a holding bar and a foundation. Remove any of them and the design fails. It is complexity that cannot be reduced or simplified.
Here's your irreducible complexity of a mousetrap argument deconstructed in three minutes


Incidentally, this is why the argument for irreducible complexity doesn't win converts from the evidence based community. Just because you can't imagine functionality in less complex forms doesn't mean that they can't have function, perhaps of a very different nature than the larger mechanism, or that this function couldn't have been selected by nature by virtue of it conferring a competitive advantage.

You really can't look at a natural mechanism and declare it irreducibly complex just because you can't imagine a slightly less complex mechanism with functionality. Many systems have been offered as examples of irreducible complexity only to have it shown that there was functionality in slightly less complex systems. Famous examples apart from the mousetrap include the flagellar motor on some microorganisms, the coagulation cascade, and the eye.

Also, consider this arch:
http://web.mst.edu/~rogersda/phd_research/Lan...

You can't remove any segment of the arch without the whole thing coming down. Does this mean that it was intelligently designed and constructed?

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#218169 Mar 11, 2014
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>
It's not a concept at all. Laws can't be fulfilled.
And a welcome back to the ranking 'rational atheist' oxymoron!!!

I drove the speed limit yesterday, fulfilling the law regulating speed.

I'm not trying to embarrass idiots, but you just keep on giving me material...

Smirk.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#218170 Mar 11, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
I don't believe a puddle of goop could flourish into life without the assistance of a designer.
From http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Argument_from_ig... :

Argument from incredulity/Lack of imagination - Arguments from incredulity take the form 'P is too incredible (or: I cannot imagine how P could possibly be true); therefore P must be false (or, I cannot imagine how P could possibly be false; therefore P must be true).' These arguments are similar to arguments from ignorance.[How rude!]
RiversideRedneck wrote:
I believe that designer is God.
Statement of faith.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#218171 Mar 11, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
The Old Testament laws actually forbade the kind of slavery that happened in America. Exodus 21:16 Whoever steals a man and sells him, and anyone found in possession of him, shall be put to death.
There's no way you could get around that, is there? Didn't Jesus say he fulfilled that law?

Since: Dec 12

Location hidden

#218172 Mar 11, 2014
KiMare wrote:
<quoted text>Calm down, your weakened sphincter will create a mess!

What a ugly, ignorant, bigoted statement. I'm not 'forcing' anything on anyone, nor is a 'faith' that has choice a fundamental tenant.

I simply note a medical fact; Anal sex is inherently harmful, unhealthy and demeaning. Why would you try to defend such a disgusting, ugly behavior???

Smile.
Why not ask some priests? Or do you think it's ok when it's with children and in the name of "god"?

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#218173 Mar 11, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>Atheism was manufactured later than religion.

It originated in the 16th century. Modern atheism, about the 18th century. Atheism as a political force got rolling with Lenin and Stalin with, shall we say, unfavorable results.

Religion is far older than atheism. Atheism is manufactured, same as religion, only later.

Your default position is stupidity.
Atheism was the default position long before religion was manufactured.

Only the WORD for atheism was manufactured, necessarily, after religion was MANufactured.

You really ARE desperate, aren't you.

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#218174 Mar 11, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
...face in hands...
High levels of CSI are not explained naturally, and the hypothesis does not begin with a designer, and definitely not with a deity.
Stop being so scared! God is not required for the hypothesis!
Stop trembling! It makes you atheist A-holes say such stupid things.
Well you admit it a hypothesis, but more importantly is a a hypothesis based on
unfalsifiable claims. That means it's not only a failed hypothesis, it's not even scientific.
In reality ID looks for unexplained phenomena in biology and paint's it with impossible numerical odds, irreducible complexity, fine-tuning and then argues it can't be explained by natural selection or natural means. This has been shown to be false in every case.
In fact it has already been falsified, but that doesn't stop the 00 Buck's from proselytizing it's pseudoscience.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#218175 Mar 11, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>Can you have a Big Bang without having a cause or initiating action?

We consider the BB a valid theory. Cosmological physics, even Stephen Hawking, admits we don't know the cause.

A designer, same as the cause of the BB, can be implied, but it's nature and identity are not required for the theory to advance.

Being a slip-and-fall attorney, I don't expect you to understand how evidence works. But what I'm telling you here is valid science.

I know you are terrified by ID and hate it because you think it might suggest God exists. But let's just follow the evidence.
If time did not exist before the Big Bang, in other words there WAS no "before" the Big Bang, then no cause was required.

The same can't be said of design needing a designer.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#218176 Mar 11, 2014
KiMare wrote:
I drove the speed limit yesterday, fulfilling the law regulating speed.
Is that what you think Jesus did and reported? If so, your god isn't much brighter than you are.

You didn't fulfill a law, you fulfilled the requirements of the law. You complied with the law when you fulfilled its requirements. You simply can't fulfill a law.

And if you had fulfilled it - whatever that means - is the speeding law is no longer in effect?
KiMare wrote:
I'm not trying to embarrass idiots ... Smirk
"Idiot" is a little harsh. You just have bad luck with thinking.

“KiMare'a the Monster Mutation”

Since: Nov 10

Location hidden

#218177 Mar 11, 2014
Divinity Surgeon wrote:
<quoted text>
Why not ask some priests? Or do you think it's ok when it's with children and in the name of "god"?
I think gay pedophiles using the Church as a cover is despicable.

But they are not the only ones who use the sacred as a cover for the carnal, are they?

A rational person would separate the baby from the bathwater. Just not a 'rational atheist' oxymoron...

Smirk.

“Life may be sweeter for this”

Since: Nov 08

Fennario

#218178 Mar 11, 2014
Aerobatty wrote:
Atheism was the default position long before religion was manufactured. Only the WORD for atheism was manufactured, necessarily, after religion was MANufactured.
Do you know about retronyms? Once upon a time, what we call acoustic guitars were just called guitars. Then came electric guitars, and that older type of guitar became the acoustic guitar. Likewise, once snow skiing was just skiing - until water skiing came along. Consider phrases like analog clock and cloth diaper, which were just clocks and diapers until digital clocks and disposable paper diapers came along. A more modern one is brick and mortar store.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#218179 Mar 11, 2014
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>Do you know about retronyms? Once upon a time, what we call acoustic guitars were just called guitars. Then came electric guitars, and that older type of guitar became the acoustic guitar. Likewise, once snow skiing was just skiing - until water skiing came along. Consider phrases like analog clock and cloth diaper, which were just clocks and diapers until digital clocks and disposable paper diapers came along. A more modern one is brick and mortar store.
Well, NOW I do.

:)

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#218180 Mar 11, 2014
It aint necessarily so wrote:
<quoted text>Is that what you think Jesus did and reported? If so, your god isn't much brighter than you are.

You didn't fulfill a law, you fulfilled the requirements of the law. You complied with the law when you fulfilled its requirements. You simply can't fulfill a law.

And if you had fulfilled it - whatever that means - is the speeding law is no longer in effect?

KiMare wrote, " I'm not trying to embarrass idiots ... Smirk"

"Idiot" is a little harsh. You just have bad luck with thinking.
That speeding analogy was mine.

Your explanation is much better.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 20 min Wisdom of Ages 93,415
News Scientific, Philosophical Case for God's Existe... 22 hr blacklagoon 3 89
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... (Jun '17) Mon superwilly 6,056
News American Atheists terminates its president over... Apr 20 Eagle 12 - 19
Science Disproves Evolution (Aug '12) Apr 14 blacklagoon 3 4,141
News The Anti-Christian Movement Apr 10 blacklagoon 3 11
a prayer of salvation for those who are willing (Oct '17) Apr 2 blacklagoon 3 35