Atheism requires as much faith as rel...

Atheism requires as much faith as religion?

There are 258476 comments on the Webbunny tumblelog story from Jul 18, 2009, titled Atheism requires as much faith as religion?. In it, Webbunny tumblelog reports that:

Atheism requires as much faith as religion? bearvspuma : The only problem with this rationalization is that ita s assuming all athiests are so because theya re intelligent in the ways of science and reasoning and all people that believe in a form of god are unintelligent.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Webbunny tumblelog.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#217955 Mar 10, 2014
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Buck, I'll state my view, but won't belabor it: Religion has no place in our public schools. English, history, math, science, physical education, woodshop, yes. Religion, no. I don't consider creationism to be science and it doesn't fit into any of the other categories. I don't consider Intelligent Design to be science and it doesn't fit into any of the other categories--it's religion, thinly masked.
"Neutrality," whatever you may mean by the term, has nothing to do with it for me. My view is that there should be no government entanglement with religion, and to permit religion to be taught in the public schools is indeed entanglement.
I'm all in favor of what you propose, but only in private schools. The government should not interfere with the teaching of religion in private schools.
No, you are happy to have government entanglement with religion.

You simply have a different choice of religion.

And, from the indications, you don't know what religion is.

Also, people don't have to give you what you want. Do you always get what you want?

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#217956 Mar 10, 2014
lightbeamrider wrote:
Thought it was the infinite doughnut hole?
I'd rather not speculate.....

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#217957 Mar 10, 2014
It aint necessarily so wrote:
Where does this "thought crimes" stuff come from? Who used that phrase or made any similar claim?
"Some propositions are so dangerous that it may even be ethical to kill people for believing them."

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#217958 Mar 10, 2014
KiMare wrote:

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2014/mar/ ...
"North Korea tyrant Kim Jong-un has reportedly ordered that 33 Christians believed to be working alongside South Korean Baptist missionary Kim Jung-wook be put to death."
ChristINSANITY is EVIL wrote:
Only 33,,dude needs to do better then that!!
LOL
There's that Topix Atheist! love.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#217959 Mar 10, 2014
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
I doubt that--
I don't care.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#217960 Mar 10, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:

Then you lose.
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
Nope.
It is you who is losing -- every time a poll is taken in the US?
The number of unbelievers grows.
And the number of Genuine Christholes™ takes a sharp decline.
I call that winning.
What?

You claimed there are 100s of verses in the Bible commanding me to kill you and you refused to post even one.

You lose.

Judged:

11

11

9

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!
OG Kush

Jacksonville, FL

#217961 Mar 10, 2014
lightbeamrider wrote:
Found a bunch of old Tales From The Crypt episodes on line
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v =wlNG5rWNokkXX
http://mobile.nytimes.com/2013/10/27/arts/des...

EC comics of the early 50s were once vilified - now original copies of these are worth thousands of dollars.

HBO to its credit chose to air a number of these great stories. I've always enjoyed the laugh of the crypt keeper!

http://m.youtube.com/watch...

http://www.comicvine.com/the-crypt-keeper/400...

Catcher1

Since: Sep 10

Redondo Beach, CA

#217962 Mar 10, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
Should the materialism of Darwinism, as it rules out a god, be forced out of public schools on the grounds of violating neutrality toward religion?
It does violate neutrality, obviously. What to do?
We have the predominant religions in America saying God created Adam and Eve, and all foul of the air, beasts of the field.
Darwinism says no, it didn't happen that way. The beasts came first, millions of years before Adam.
So it has to go, right Counselor? That proposition cannot possibly be neutral toward religion.
Science belongs in the public schools; religion does not.

Stop with the materialism and neutrality bullshit.

Judged:

10

10

10

Reply »
Report Abuse Judge it!

Catcher1

Since: Sep 10

Redondo Beach, CA

#217963 Mar 10, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
No, you are happy to have government entanglement with religion.
You simply have a different choice of religion.
And, from the indications, you don't know what religion is.
Also, people don't have to give you what you want. Do you always get what you want?
It's not about me.

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

Location hidden

#217964 Mar 10, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>What does the cause of the Big Bang look like?

What does dark matter look like?
So no answer.

Figured as much

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#217965 Mar 10, 2014
Catcher1 wrote:
Science belongs in the public schools; religion does not. Stop with the materialism and neutrality bullshit.
Which parts of science belongs in schools and who gets to decide that?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#217966 Mar 10, 2014
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>
Science belongs in the public schools; religion does not.
Stop with the materialism and neutrality bullshit.
So you don't have an answer.

Numerous courts, including the Supreme Court, have said Atheism is a religion, or can be considered a religion.

Materialist theories and dogma, as in Darwinism, is atheistic and obviously breaches the requirement that government schools be neutral toward religion.

Do you deny the courts have insisted on this neutrality?

So evolution has to go. You should be standing up for civil liberties! Where's the ACLU?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#217967 Mar 10, 2014
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
So no answer.
Figured as much
If you are not obliged to tell me what an implication of one scientific theory looks like, I'm not obliged to tell you what another looks like.

You somehow view this as a weakness on my part, but not on yours.

That's irrational. But then, you are also not required to be rational. So carry on.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#217968 Mar 10, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Which parts of science belongs in schools and who gets to decide that?
The people with the deepest pockets.

In the case of the Intelligent Design controversy, it's the ACLU and various science organizations who are religiously and philosophically materialists, which means they are atheists.

Materialism has assumed the role of an Establishment of Religion.

Of the deepest irony,....and this is the clincher that will make you light your head on fire:

** They achieve the Establishment on the basis that there can be no Establishment !!**

This bears reiterating...to put it another way...

**Materialism is the exclusive State Church, and achieved it by insisting there can be No State Church !!***

[Write this down and pass it to your grandchildren. When they find that they no longer have a sovereign nation to live in, they will be able to know you warned them.]

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#217969 Mar 10, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
The people with the deepest pockets.
In the case of the Intelligent Design controversy, it's the ACLU and various science organizations who are religiously and philosophically materialists, which means they are atheists.
Materialism has assumed the role of an Establishment of Religion.
Of the deepest irony,....and this is the clincher that will make you light your head on fire:
** They achieve the Establishment on the basis that there can be no Establishment !!**
This bears reiterating...to put it another way...
**Materialism is the exclusive State Church, and achieved it by insisting there can be No State Church !!***
[Write this down and pass it to your grandchildren. When they find that they no longer have a sovereign nation to live in, they will be able to know you warned them.]
You weren't supposed to answer. My questions were that of rhetoric and designed to help Feltcher think.

Oops did I say they were designed? I meant to say that my questions were spontaneous and random...

Have you seen the atheist mega churches? I wonder what their sermons are about.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#217970 Mar 10, 2014
Catcher1 wrote:
<quoted text>

Science belongs in the public schools; religion does not.
That is your belief. Why do you think you have the right to impose your belief on others?

Why should taxpayers have to support your belief in public schools, but not others?

Are you not embarrassed that your belief is so lame that you must try and prohibit any rival being seen on the same stage?

Is weakness embarrassing for you?

Wouldn't the honest thing be to try and get laws passed or constitutional amendments saying that religion is not allowed in public schools?

Have you thought of that tactic? If the majority is inclined to agree with you, such an amendment could be accomplished.

Wonder why no one has thought of that before?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#217972 Mar 10, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>

"Some propositions are so dangerous that it may even be ethical to kill people for believing them."
No, but he's not talking about killing people for believing something. Hiding told me.

It's one of those cases where someone's real meaning is totally different than the plain words they write down, but it requires a third person who never met them to explain what that different meaning is, though it contradicts the plain words.

It happens all the time. There should be a linguistic term for it. I mean,...other than bull shit.

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#217974 Mar 10, 2014
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
No, but he's not talking about killing people for believing something. Hiding told me.
It's one of those cases where someone's real meaning is totally different than the plain words they write down, but it requires a third person who never met them to explain what that different meaning is, though it contradicts the plain words.
It happens all the time. There should be a linguistic term for it. I mean,...other than bull shit.
It's like IANS telling us that the Bible means whatever the reader interprets it to mean.

I guess these freethinkers have learned to interpret Harri's words into something less criminal and vile.

Well, that's how I imterpret it anyway...

Since: Mar 09

Location hidden

#217975 Mar 10, 2014
RiversideRedneck wrote:
<quoted text>
Which parts of science belongs in schools and who gets to decide that?
Definitely a scientific fact that should be taught is that sneezing with your eyes open is impossible.

True fact

I bet someone could pop an eyeball trying to force one open during a sneeze!

Had time off work and decided to use the time on things I can't do when tied up with work rather than post. I see a few rooms don't have much traffic in them. Wonder if its the same all over?

Anyway, just wanted to say what's up

RiversideRedneck

“Ditat Deus”

Since: Jul 12

Location hidden

#217976 Mar 10, 2014
Skombolis wrote:
Definitely a scientific fact that should be taught is that sneezing with your eyes open is impossible.
True fact
I bet someone could pop an eyeball trying to force one open during a sneeze!
Had time off work and decided to use the time on things I can't do when tied up with work rather than post. I see a few rooms don't have much traffic in them. Wonder if its the same all over?
Anyway, just wanted to say what's up
Skom!

They let you out?

Wherethefuck you been?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 4 hr Regolith Based Li... 32,169
hell is a real place. so.. ahtiesm is a faux li... 5 hr Eagle 12 - 12
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... 5 hr Eagle 12 - 760
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 6 hr Science 76,945
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... (Jan '17) 10 hr Dogen 4,309
News The war on Christmas (Dec '10) Jul 18 John 4,952
The Dumbest Thing Posted by a Godbot (Jun '10) Jul 17 Eagle 12 - 6,123
More from around the web