Richard Dawkins - God is evil, pedoph...

Richard Dawkins - God is evil, pedophilesa not so bad

There are 3146 comments on the Examiner.com story from Sep 14, 2013, titled Richard Dawkins - God is evil, pedophilesa not so bad. In it, Examiner.com reports that:

"The God of the Qur'an is arguably the most unpleasant character in all fiction: jealous and proud of it; a petty, unjust, unforgiving control-freak; a vindictive, bloodthirsty ethnic cleanser; a misogynistic, homophobic, racist, infanticidal, genocidal, filicidal, pestilential, megalomaniacal, sadomasochistic, capriciously malevolent bully.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Examiner.com.

Since: Oct 13

Location hidden

#1353 Dec 8, 2013
Quadratus wrote:
<quoted text>
Anyway,
While certainly man cannot ever become God, God could become Man. We both would agree that this would not be too hard for Him. God through His Spirit could incorporate Himself into whatever He wished actually, and still retain every infinite aspect of the Spirit essense He is.
If the essense of God is trinity, He could do the same to the eternal Son and once again nothing of His Spirit essense would be lost.
If you believe this did not happen because your prophet said it didnt that us one thing. Our conversation then is about prophets. But if you believe it didnt because its impossible, I dont see iit that way. I think that limits God.
so you are basically saying that Jesus is god because we shouldnt limit god, we have agreed that God knows everything, did Jesus know everything ?!

Since: Oct 13

Location hidden

#1354 Dec 8, 2013
Mahmood wrote:
<quoted text>
We cannot put aside allah's foreknowledge and claim that we have free will. If we have freewill, then Allah is not omniscient. Time and again in the Koran, Allah takes full responsiblity for guidance and misguidance.
28:56 - It is true thou wilt not be able to guide every one, whom thou lovest; but God guides those whom He will and He knows best those who receive guidance.
6:125 - Those whom God (in His plan) willeth to guide,- He openeth their breast to Islam; those whom He willeth to leave straying,- He maketh their breast close and constricted, as if they had to climb up to the skies: thus doth God (heap) the penalty on those who refuse to believe.
What is your understanding of these verses? Looking forward to your response.
Lets take you as an example, you decided to leave Islam, did anyone force you to leave it ?! or was it your choice ?
Quadratus

Seattle, WA

#1355 Dec 8, 2013
hazem selawi wrote:
<quoted text>
so you are basically saying that Jesus is god because we shouldnt limit god, we have agreed that God knows everything, did Jesus know everything ?!
I havent got to that point yet.
I am simply pointing out that God could take on manhood without losing His Godness. And that if the biblical concept of the trinity is correct, then God the Son could do the same.
Do you see a problem with the concept itself?
I understand that there is a passage where Jesus does not know something the Father knows - that is not an inurmountable problem according to Philippians 2:6-8

Since: Oct 13

Location hidden

#1356 Dec 8, 2013
Quadratus wrote:
<quoted text>
I havent got to that point yet.
I am simply pointing out that God could take on manhood without losing His Godness. And that if the biblical concept of the trinity is correct, then God the Son could do the same.
Do you see a problem with the concept itself?
I understand that there is a passage where Jesus does not know something the Father knows - that is not an inurmountable problem according to Philippians 2:6-8
So according to the trinity, God took on manhood without losing his godness, But at the same time we agree that Jesus didn't know everything as the Bible says , when Jesus was asked about “The Hour” that is The Day of Judgement, Jesus said “No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.”[Matthew 24:36]
Also , when Jesus went to get fruit from a fig tree, there was no fruit and he cursed the tree.[Matthew 21:18-22] Surely if he was God, he would have known that before he went to the tree!

Philippians 2:6-8 proves that there is nothing mutual between God and Jesus, as long as he is in a form of a slave.

anyways do you believe that Jesus was god or the son of god ?
Quadratus

Seattle, WA

#1357 Dec 8, 2013
hazem selawi wrote:
<quoted text>
So according to the trinity, God took on manhood without losing his godness, But at the same time we agree that Jesus didn't know everything as the Bible says , when Jesus was asked about “The Hour” that is The Day of Judgement, Jesus said “No one knows about that day or hour, not even the angels in heaven, nor the Son, but only the Father.”[Matthew 24:36]
Also , when Jesus went to get fruit from a fig tree,
there was no fruit and he cursed the tree.[Matthew 21:18-22] Surely if he was God, he would have known that before he went to the tree!
Philippians 2:6-8 proves that there is nothing
mutual between God and Jesus, as long as he is in a form of a slave.
anyways do you believe that Jesus was god or the son of god ?
Expected points and answerable. But first I would like to know if you agree with the concept I proposed.

Since: Oct 13

Location hidden

#1358 Dec 8, 2013
Quadratus wrote:
<quoted text>
Expected points and answerable. But first I would like to know if you agree with the concept I proposed.
your concept is that God could take on manhood without losing His Godness. And that if the biblical concept of the trinity is correct, then God the Son could do the same.
I totally agree that god can do anything, he is the almighty but Many people are called sons of God in the Bible. For example, Adam was called the son of God (Luke 3:38) and so was David (2 Samuel 7:14). Jesus himself, in the Bible said “Blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called Sons of God.”(Matthew 5:9) In the Bible, lots of good people are called Sons of God, and from what Jesus said in The Bible, any good person is a ‘son of God.’

I don't get your concept, if god wanted to take down to manhood, then we are all the sons of god not only Jesus
Quadratus

Seattle, WA

#1359 Dec 8, 2013
hazem selawi wrote:
<quoted text>
your concept is that God could take on manhood without losing His Godness. And that if the biblical concept of the trinity is correct, then God the Son could do the same.
I totally agree that god can do anything, he is the almighty but Many people are called sons of God in the Bible. For example, Adam was called the son of God (Luke 3:38) and so was David (2 Samuel 7:14). Jesus himself, in the Bible said
“Blessed are the peacemakers for they shall be called Sons of God.”(Matthew 5:9) In the Bible, lots of good people are called Sons of God, and from what Jesus said in The Bible, any good person is a ‘son of God.’
I don't get your concept, if god wanted to take down to manhood, then we are all the sons of god not only Jesus
The Bible calls Jesus Christ the begotten Son. There is a difference between that and the Jewish phrase son of whatever. In Acts, Barnabus was called Son of Consolation. Meaning that he was known for being a very merciful person. It is I believe what Jesus was referring to in Matthew. Jesus however was called begotten, that means natural born, in His case, from God Himself.
In John 3, Jesus referrs to those who believe in Him as becoming born again into Gods family - literally born from above. In this case the Holy Spirit comes into the believer and literally makes them alive spiritually. In reference to this the Bible teaches that we are literally spiritually born into Gods family and as such are sons and daughters of God. But the Bible doesnt say that we are begotten sons like it says of Jesus.

“Evil Atheist :-)”

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#1360 Dec 8, 2013
hazem selawi wrote:
<quoted text>
Or [they are] like darknesses within an unfathomable sea which is covered by waves, upon which are waves, over which are clouds - darknesses, some of them upon others. When one puts out his hand [therein], he can hardly see it. And he to whom Allah has not granted light - for him there is no light.
in Arabic its obvious that the verse is describing the depth of the sea, " And he to whom Allah has not granted light - for him there is no light." and he to whom Allah has not granted light is describing the structure of some creatures whom live deep down in the water,
Yes I get that the deep dark sea is being used as an example of darkness but we're discussing the seas internal waves here and those waves are transparent. They don't stop light penetrating the deep (though they do refract it).
What the verse actually says is “an unfathomable sea which is covered by waves“. Those have to be surface waves.
It then states “upon which are waves”. So that's waves above surface waves not internal waves, just like in a storm.
hazem selawi wrote:
there are numerous types of creatures with actual lights in their physical structure, I sent you a youtube link that shows some of these creatures.
I'm well aware of such creatures (I love nature films) but they aren't mentioned in the verse and so are irrelevant here.

“Evil Atheist :-)”

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#1361 Dec 8, 2013
hazem selawi wrote:
<quoted text>
Alright, lets assume I told you that "christenm" told me That "thinking" told her that "abdullah" told him that "john" told him that "George" told him that "Albert" told him that "hassan" told him that he once was setting with Queen Elizabeth and queen Elizabeth told him "Dont wash your hands after eating"
now how can we know if this statement of queen Elizabeth is true or not ?
According to Hadith science the list of narrators is called Al Sanad, and the statement is Al matan.
Al Sanad contains me, christenm, thinking, abdullah, john, George, Albert, hassan.
Al Maten "Dont wash your hands after eating"
now what if we know that Queen Elizabeth died before the born of Hassan?!! this means that the statement of queen Elizabeth was obviously Fake.
what if we know that one of the narrators had a memory problem ?!! what if we know that one of the narrators was a knownto be a liar ?!! what if we know that one and only one of the narrators used to behave badly ? a very small mistake can instantly make a narrator unworthy of narrating a Hadith thus take the Hadith into a different type, an Authentic Hadith may go down to weak because of the behavior of one narrator.
what if we never received this statement about Queen Elizabeth in any other way beside this list of narrators ?!
what if the Statement ( Al Maten) contradicts directly with other authentic teachings ?!
science of Hadith isn't a game, its very accurate and complicated it mainly depends on details and specific criteria and standards, Authentic Hadiths were classified as authentic only after a complete correspondence with all these standards, some authentic Hadiths have hundreds of Isnad (different list of narrators) and all these different list of narrators literally match with the last statement of Mohammed (Al Matin), not to mention that all of this work was only in one language which is Arabic.
its not a coincidence we have numerous types of Hadith, authentic Hadiths are also classified into different types , good Hadiths were classified into different types as well, even the weak Hadiths were classified into numerous of types, thousands of hadiths were classified as false.
Science of hadith is a very wide scope, not any muslim can just come up and classify Hadiths as he want, there are numerous books that only show the basics of science of Hadith such ; "Mashariq Al Anwaar" of Al Saghani ,Al Masabeeh of Al Baghawi, "Jami Al Usool" of Ibn Kathir, "Scimces of Hadeeth" of Ibn Al Salah, "Al Taqrib and Taysir" of Al Nawawi , some scholars nowadays claim to be specialized in Hadith after reading some Hadith books...!!!
science of Hadith is way more complicated than you can imagine.
You have more faith in the accuracy of narrators than I have.

“Evil Atheist :-)”

Since: Mar 07

Location hidden

#1362 Dec 8, 2013
hazem selawi wrote:
<quoted text>
The Quranic verses contain numerous allegorical Questions,
52:33-38
-Or do they say, "He has made it up"? Rather, they do not believe.
-Then let them produce a statement like it, if they should be truthful.
-Or were they created by nothing, or were they the creators [of themselves]?
-Or did they create the heavens and the earth? Rather, they are not certain.
-Or have they the depositories [containing the provision] of your Lord? Or are they the controllers [of them]?
-Or have they a stairway [into the heaven] upon which they listen? Then let their listener produce a clear authority.
so what would your answer be for these allegorical Questions ..!!
If we don't know the answer to a question it's best to just admit it. The worst thing to do is just make something up to fill in the gaps in our knowledge.
Religion is the worst offender here though many scientists have been guilty of this as well.

We need some evidence before we can sure of the answers.
hazem selawi wrote:
Actually Islam encourage or even insist on getting education and seeking for knowledge.
Quran and the message of Islam was not proved to be wrong nor contradicts with proved scientific facts.
Religions only encourage science up to the point where science and religion disagree. They're not so enthusiastic after that.
And there are plenty of errors in the Quran.

67:5 And we have,(from of old), adorned the lowest heaven with Lamps, and We have made such (Lamps)(as) missiles to drive away the Evil Ones, and have prepared for them the Penalty of the Blazing Fire.

Stars are used as missiles?
hazem selawi wrote:
Purely natural or obviously indicates a perfect Order not chaos ..!!
Quantum physics which basically says the universe is made from bits of energy of a fixed size (the Plank constant) provides all the structure needed.
How much structure would be needed for a God to just exist?
hazem selawi wrote:
It doesnt matter who jumped first, Abbas could make a change in his days after a careful study to a single verse in the Quran, the point is Quran encourage science and the attempts to improve life on earth.
Everyone can see birds fly so we know it's possible with wings like a birds.
Nobody needs a book to encourage them to try and fly but what they do need is some science.
Mahmood

Keswick, Canada

#1363 Dec 8, 2013
hazem selawi wrote:
<quoted text>
Lets take you as an example, you decided to leave Islam, did anyone force you to leave it ?! or was it your choice ?
Whether it my choice or Allahs, we will discuss later. First give me your interpretation of the verses I quoted.

Since: Oct 06

Location hidden

#1364 Dec 8, 2013
Mahmood wrote:
<quoted text>
Whether it my choice or Allahs, we will discuss later. First give me your interpretation of the verses I quoted.
He seems to be playing a game of cat and mouse with you. Just saying...maybe he's afraid?
Thinking

Merthyr Tydfil, UK

#1365 Dec 9, 2013
This latest religitard attempt to twist Dawkins' words goes back to what he wrote in the God Delusion way back in 2006. He received the following text in a letter from an American woman in her forties.

"Being fondled by the priest simply left the impression (from the mind of a 7 year old) as ‘yucky’ while the memory of my friend going to hell was one of cold, immeasurable fear. I never lost sleep because of the priest – but I spent many a night being terrified that the people I loved would go to Hell. It gave me nightmares."
NinaRocks wrote:
<quoted text>
If you actually read the article you would know that it was a school teacher, but that is also beside the point. The point was Dawkins belief that pedophiles are harmless and we make to much of a fuss over them. He called the modern 'hysteria' over them a 'modern witchhunt'.
“we live in a time of hysteria about paedophilia, a mob psychology that calls to mind the Salem witch-hunts of 1692…the boarding schools I attended employed teachers whose affections for small boys overstepped the bounds of propriety. That was indeed reprehensible. Nevertheless, if, fifty years on, they had been hounded by vigilantes or lawyers as no better than child murderers, I should have felt obliged to come to their defence, even as the victim of one of them (an embarrassing but otherwise harmless experience).”
Explain how this is right.

“When you treat people as they ”

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#1366 Dec 9, 2013
NinaRocks wrote:
<quoted text>
I am struck by your persistant need to read things into what is said so as to justify an emotional response. Is it that you are incapable of logic?
You are not the only one touched by tragedy. My own sister in law had multiple miscarrages and when they finally had a son, he died at four months. This is tragic, but it is also life. We all lose. I did not say anything about equating rebirth with the death of a child. When was anything said about athiests being unfeeling nonhumans? I also don't allow myself to become angry enough over a meer discussion to reduce myself to name-calling and ridiculous euphemisms. You can't even say the word Christian(which is telling in itself, and speaks to your own fear, evasion and prudery), but must call them godbots or christards. How grown up you are.
Since you are incapable of the logic necessary to answer my earlier post, I will spell it out for you:
If there is no god, no power higher than you to hold you to account, why could you not, then, murder your neighbor? Why should pedophilia be wrong? There is no right but what you decide it is, is there?
This is a serious question, to which I would appreciate an unemotional, logical response.
Ignored on the grounds that you are morally illiterate.

“When you treat people as they ”

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#1367 Dec 9, 2013
NinaRocks wrote:
<quoted text>
Why would you not take the British to task for that then? They are a Christian nation. How many have died in Northern Ireland? or is death by soldier more legitimate? It's no where near you, so it's not a problem, right?
How many men, women and children have died in the middle east by foriegn soldiers just because they were in the wrong place at the wrong time?
Any country or group can call themselves Christian and attempt to hide their actions behind the Bible, but that makes it no more true, and makes them no more Christian. Any group can hide behind the Koran too. It is not a black and white world. Deceit is everywhere.
Ignored on the grounds that you are morally illiterate.

“When you treat people as they ”

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#1368 Dec 9, 2013
NinaRocks wrote:
<quoted text>
"Bigoted Christian child abusers"? No bias there, I see.
I also think you are wrong. I walked away from the church at 18. Twenty years later two of my children decided they wanted to be baptised. I had never brought them to church. They attended public school. The only thing I wanted to drill into their heads was that they are responsible for what they believe, and could never take the word of someone else. It is their responsibility to know. My eldest claims that I stiffled his infatuation with Christianity because his friends had taken him to some kind of music revival thing, and he returned home full of emotion over it. I warned him against that because no belief can be based on a purely emotional response. He was angry because I said it was great that he felt good, but asked him what he really knew about wanting to be a Christian. He does not attend church now. I simply did not want him swayed by people making noise and jumping around.
Ignored on the grounds that you are morally illterate.

“When you treat people as they ”

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#1369 Dec 9, 2013
hazem selawi wrote:
<quoted text>
yes we did agree on this specific subject,Finally ..!!
<quoted text>
Thank you for the outstanding solution, I guess if we just increased the zinc in our bread we'll be fine, anyways our original conversation focused on finding solution to all world problems, I never mentioned problems of middle east.
I wonder what did diplomats and politicians offered so far to solve problems like the Global Economy, Proliferation of weapons of mass destruction, poverty, Species Extinction, the high rate of crimes,
and the list goes on.
most people think that Islam is only a religion that offers solutions ….
We agreed at the time, the disagreement was over the relevance of historical incidences.

Nope our original conversation focussed on the subjugation of women as taught by the Quran in particular and the majority of the Muslim faith in general. You brought in world problems to obfuscate the conversation and drive it away from criticism of the Quran

I don’t know about your lot but on this side of the Bosphorus we have these things called charities that help out in so many of the worlds disasters. It is not up to politicians and diplomats to solve world problems other than on local country wide and inter country scale. The only reason that they attempt to intervene in world problems is because of the will of the electorate. Tell me, does your country have democratic political elections? Without that will they would be content to let the Jew - Palestinian slaughter continue as well as Muslim slaughter of Muslims because they have a 1400 years old disagreement on who should teach the Quran. DOES IT MATTER- REALLY? Is it worth killing for? To the rest of the world the whole childish situation is pathetic.

You will note that the most powerful countries do attempt to intervene and are often hated by people, countries and their affiliates for doing so. Tell me why do you hate western countries so much? Could it be because the western countries have intervened in parts of the continent you abide?

World problems would be much reduced if people just stopped killing each other because of religious differences. So there is your answer to world peace, get rid of religion.(see # aside below)

Wrong, some few Muslims think that Islam is the only religion that offers solutions, some christians think the same about their religion - if everyone believed exactly like you then all the worlds problems would just go away”– right?. I have mentioned this before in a different context but outcome is the same. Freedom under YOUR terms is not freedom but dictatorship and the majority of people in this world are not willing to live under a dictatorship.

When you read the Quran you interpret and selectively filter what you want to believe in exactly the same way as christians do when they read the babble, you are no different, only the prophets differ.

Of course I care and that is the very reason why I know that religion is not a solution.

# Aside
You will note that despite all the shouts of atheism and communism being responsible for more deaths through the ages religious wars are responsible for about 10 times more deaths have been caused/blamed on atheism.

You will also note that it was a religious guy (just one guy) named Thomas Midgely who was single handily responsible for more deaths and disease than any other atrocity in history (I omit the genocide myth of Noah’s flood). Now almost 70 years after Midgelys death millions of people are still dying early each year because of his “discovery”.

You will also note that it was an atheist who discovered the gene manipulation that allowed corn to resist disease. It is estimated that he is personally responsible for preventing over one billion people from dying of malnutrition.
/#
Mahmood

Peterborough, Canada

#1370 Dec 9, 2013
ChristineM wrote:
<quoted text>
We agreed at the time, the disagreement was over the relevance of historical incidences.
Nope our original conversation focussed on the subjugation of women as taught by the Quran in particular and the majority of the Muslim faith in general. You brought in world problems to obfuscate the conversation and drive it away from criticism of the Quran
I don’t know about your lot but on this side of the Bosphorus we have these things called charities that help out in so many of the worlds disasters. It is not up to politicians and diplomats to solve world problems other than on local country wide and inter country scale. The only reason that they attempt to intervene in world problems is because of the will of the electorate. Tell me, does your country have democratic political elections? Without that will they would be content to let the Jew - Palestinian slaughter continue as well as Muslim slaughter of Muslims because they have a 1400 years old disagreement on who should teach the Quran. DOES IT MATTER- REALLY? Is it worth killing for? To the rest of the world the whole childish situation is pathetic.
You will note that the most powerful countries do attempt to intervene and are often hated by people, countries and their affiliates for doing so. Tell me why do you hate western countries so much? Could it be because the western countries have intervened in parts of the continent you abide?
World problems would be much reduced if people just stopped killing each other because of religious differences. So there is your answer to world peace, get rid of religion.(see # aside below)
Wrong, some few Muslims think that Islam is the only religion that offers solutions, some christians think the same about their religion - if everyone believed exactly like you then all the worlds problems would just go away”– right?. I have mentioned this before in a different context but outcome is the same. Freedom under YOUR terms is not freedom but dictatorship and the majority of people in this world are not willing to live under a dictatorship.
When you read the Quran you interpret and selectively filter what you want to believe in exactly the same way as christians do when they read the babble, you are no different, only the prophets differ.
Of course I care and that is the very reason why I know that religion is not a solution.
# Aside
You will note that despite all the shouts of atheism and communism being responsible for more deaths through the ages religious wars are responsible for about 10 times more deaths have been caused/blamed on atheism.
You will also note that it was a religious guy (just one guy) named Thomas Midgely who was single handily responsible for more deaths and disease than any other atrocity in history (I omit the genocide myth of Noah’s flood). Now almost 70 years after Midgelys death millions of people are still dying early each year because of his “discovery”.
You will also note that it was an atheist who discovered the gene manipulation that allowed corn to resist disease. It is estimated that he is personally responsible for preventing over one billion people from dying of malnutrition.
/#
Who was the person who responsible for gene manipulation that allowed corn to resist disease?
Mahmood

Peterborough, Canada

#1371 Dec 9, 2013
Trisha wrote:
<quoted text>
He seems to be playing a game of cat and mouse with you. Just saying...maybe he's afraid?
No response from him yet. I don't like rubbing salt on wounds, so I'll let it fly for now.

“When you treat people as they ”

Since: Nov 10

treat you they get offended.

#1372 Dec 9, 2013
Mahmood wrote:
<quoted text>
Who was the person who responsible for gene manipulation that allowed corn to resist disease?
I am not 100% sure, which is why I omitted a name but Norman Borlaug comes to mind.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 8 min nanoanomaly 32,612
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 32 min Science 80,105
News Atheist inmate wins right to practice his faith... (Aug '15) 1 hr Amused 176
News People's forum - Get off the fence of religious... (May '10) 2 hr Amused 70
what science will NEVER be able to prove Mon Eagle 12 - 10
How To Get To Heaven When You Die (Jan '17) Mon Eagle 12 - 106
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) Sep 20 The pope 258,485
More from around the web