20+ Questions for Theists
Siro

Australia

#61 Apr 12, 2013
Thinking wrote:
What a load of old bollocks you do talk.
<quoted text>
So you have a valid explanation of such things?
Or is this just another of your 'me too!' posts on behalf of bob?
Your idioms in your posts strike a resemblance to skeptic....oh well its not like you use a sock is it?....brit expat
Thinking

Bolton, UK

#62 Apr 12, 2013
I only post as "Thinking", cuntard.

Don't judge everyone else by your low standards.
Siro wrote:
<quoted text>
So you have a valid explanation of such things?
Or is this just another of your 'me too!' posts on behalf of bob?
Your idioms in your posts strike a resemblance to skeptic....oh well its not like you use a sock is it?....brit expat

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

#63 Apr 12, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
Move your money to the Cayman Islands :-) is the Republican solution.
76% of statistics are made up.:-)
US is more religious than Europe.
Only atheists think Hitler was a Christian.
Not true, but it is the Christain who will lie about it.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#64 Apr 12, 2013
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>Not true, but it is the Christain who will lie about it.
Why not?

The fundamental requirement to BE a christian, is to lie to yourself.

So lying about historical figures is just second nature to them.
Andre

Durban, South Africa

#66 Apr 17, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
If it's so pointless, why are you replying in the dimwitted hope that you can create more ignorant cult believers here?
Speaking of zero, its exactly how much proof of god the sum total of all your believers that ever walked the planet, have ever presented to sane people since the beginning of time itself.
Just passing through and noticed the same lack of proper argument from atheists that I experienced on this forum.
Conclusion? Atheists' lack of faith is not based on proper evaluation of fact but an emotional response - rejection of God/rebellion against God.
However I am not implying that intellectual assent to Christianity makes you a true Christian.
Imhotep

Saint Petersburg, FL

#67 Apr 17, 2013
Andre wrote:
<quoted text>Just passing through and noticed the same lack of proper argument from atheists that I experienced on this forum.
Conclusion? Atheists' lack of faith is not based on proper evaluation of fact but an emotional response - rejection of God/rebellion against God.
However I am not implying that intellectual assent to Christianity makes you a true Christian.
Your conclusion is flawed

"Religion prevents our children from having a rational education; religion prevents us from removing the fundamental causes of war; religion prevents us from teaching the ethic of scientific cooperation in place of the old fierce doctrines of sin and punishment. It is possible that mankind is on the threshold of a golden age; but, if so, it will be necessary first to slay the dragon that guards the door, and this dragon is religion.
~Bertrand Russell

Topix theists posting in atheist forums have a mental disorder which manifests itself with an inflated sense of their own importance and a deep need for admiration.

Behind this mask of ultra-confidence lies a fragile self-esteem, vulnerable to the slightest criticism.

Narcissistic people like Topix theists have traits that cause them to feel and behave in socially distressing ways, limiting their ability to function in relationships and in other areas of their life, such as work or school.

And how does this anti-atheist bile affect our elected leaders?

"I don't know that atheists should be considered as citizens, nor should they be considered patriots. This is one nation under God."
~ George Herbert Walker Bush
KJV

United States

#68 Apr 17, 2013
Andre wrote:
<quoted text>Just passing through and noticed the same lack of proper argument from atheists that I experienced on this forum.
Conclusion? Atheists' lack of faith is not based on proper evaluation of fact but an emotional response - rejection of God/rebellion against God.
However I am not implying that intellectual assent to Christianity makes you a true Christian.
Amen

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#69 Apr 17, 2013
Andre wrote:
<quoted text>Just passing through and noticed the same lack of proper argument from atheists that I experienced on this forum.
Conclusion? Atheists' lack of faith is not based on proper evaluation of fact but an emotional response - rejection of God/rebellion against God.
However I am not implying that intellectual assent to Christianity makes you a true Christian.
You're lying about god and have no proof of it whatsoever. Amen to that.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#70 Apr 17, 2013
Andre wrote:
<quoted text>Just passing through and noticed the same lack of proper argument from atheists that I experienced on this forum.
Conclusion? Atheists' lack of faith is not based on proper evaluation of fact but an emotional response - rejection of God/rebellion against God.
However I am not implying that intellectual assent to Christianity makes you a true Christian.
How is it an "emotional response" when all we ask for, is certifiable proof of this myth, this.. "god" thing.

The emotions you witness, are due to god-robots committing atrocity and worse, in the names of their fantasy-delusions.

That cannot stand.

But I see you have failed to post even one argument in support of your fantasy-delusion (god).

Why is that?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#71 Apr 17, 2013
KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
Amen
So you agree that there can be no proof of your fantasy-delusional godling?
KJV

United States

#72 Apr 17, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>So you agree that there can be no proof of your fantasy-delusional godling?
Not at all. I have proof.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#73 Apr 17, 2013
KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
Not at all. I have proof.
Present it.

Or go away.

That is the crux of the issue, isn't it?

You claim you have this... ahem... "proof".... yet you never bother to present it.

Pity for you, in your insanity.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#74 Apr 17, 2013
KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
Not at all. I have proof.
Hint: your bible is not proof.

Why, you ask?

Well, due the the simple fact that to be PROOF, you will have to PROVE THE BIBLE TOO.

Or, rather prove it FIRST.

Can you do that?

No?

Too bad, isn't it?
KJV

United States

#75 Apr 17, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>Present it.

Or go away.

That is the crux of the issue, isn't it?

You claim you have this... ahem... "proof".... yet you never bother to present it.

Pity for you, in your insanity.
How old is the universe?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#77 Apr 17, 2013
KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
How old is the universe?
The above is not proof of your god-- it is not even an argument.

Present your god-proof.

Or go away.

That is the crux of the issue, isn't it?

You claim you have this... ahem... "proof".... yet you never bother to present it.

Pity for you, in your insanity.
KJV

United States

#79 Apr 17, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>The above is not proof of your god-- it is not even an argument.

Present your god-proof.

Or go away.

That is the crux of the issue, isn't it?

You claim you have this... ahem... "proof".... yet you never bother to present it.

Pity for you, in your insanity.
How old is the universe?

When you answer this we can move forward to the proof.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#80 Apr 17, 2013
KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
How old is the universe?
When you answer this we can move forward to the proof.
The above is not proof of your god's existence.

In fact?

This is still valid:

Proof your god isn't real: I submit... the sum-total of YOUR UGLY POSTS.

Especially the ones in which you ridicule and belittle others you perceive to not be in your tight little club.

Now. Presuming this "god" of yours is an actual... divine being?

Then we may expect that this god is interested in Divine levels of Justice, and equally Divine levels of Goodness?

The proof runs like this: what god, who was truly interested in both Justice and Good, would permit the likes of ...

... YOU ...

... to be It's spokes-person, it's missionary to people who do NOT believe in It?

Answer:

No god who was GOOD or JUST would suffer the likes of YOU.

There you have it!

Irrefutable proof, that your god is not real.

(too easy)

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

#81 Apr 17, 2013
KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
How old is the universe?
When you answer this we can move forward to the proof.
Millions of years older than your god-myth. If fact it is millions of years older than any god-myth.

BTW: Yours is one of the newer god-myths.

It is answered, now show us the proof of your silly god.
KJV

United States

#82 Apr 18, 2013
Science dates the universe at:

<<<<<<< <<<<<<< <<<<<<< <<<<<<< <

This article is about scientific estimates of the age of the universe.

The age of the universe is defined inphysical cosmology as the time elapsed since the Big Bang. The best estimate of the age of the universe, as of 22 March 2013, is 13.798 ± 0.037 billion years (4.351 ± 0.017 × 1017 seconds) within the Lambda-CDM concordance model. The uncertainty of 37 million years has been obtained by the agreement of a number of scientific research projects, such as microwave background radiation measurements by the Planck satellite, the Wilkinson Microwave Anisotropy Probe and other probes. Measurements of the cosmic background radiation give the cooling timeof the universe since the Big Bang, and measurements of the expansion rate of the universe can be used to calculate its approximate age by extrapolating backwards in time.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Age_of_the_uni...

Hubble Time

The inverse of the Hubble constant H has the units of time because the Hubble law is
v = H d
where v is the velocity of recession, H is the Hubble constant, and d is the distance. Thus, from this equation, we have that 1/H = d/v. but d/v is distance divided by velocity, which is time (e.g., if I travel 180 miles at 60 miles/hour, the time required is t = d/v = 180/60 = 3 hours).

Thus, the Hubble time T is just the inverse of the Hubble Constant:

T = 1 / H
Taking a value of H = 20 km/s/Mly (where Mly means mega-light years),

where all the factors are necessary to convert the time units to years and I've rounded some numbers to simplify the display.

The physical interpretation of the Hubble time is that it gives the time for the Universe to run backwards to the Big Bang if the expansion rate (the Hubble "constant") were constant. Thus, it is a measure of the age of the Universe. The Hubble "constant" actually isn't constant, so the Hubble time is really only a rough estimate of the age of the Universe.

Reasonable assumptions for the value of the Hubble constant and the geometry of the Universe typically yield ages of 10-20 billion years for the age of the Universe. For example, H near 50 km/s/Mpc gives a larger value for the age of the Universe (around 16 thousand million years), while a larger value of 80 km/s/Mpc gives a lower value for the age (around 10 thousand million years). Therefore, we shall take this information, and additional information from other methods to estimate the age of the Universe that we have not discussed, to indicate an age of approximately 15 billion years for the Universe.

http://csep10.phys.utk.edu/astr162/lect/cosmo...

April 24, 2002 — The Hubble Space Telescope has read the embers of burnt-out stars to come up with a new way of estimating the universe’s age, scientists said Wednesday. The latest age estimate — 13 billion to 14 billion years — is consistent with the conclusions reached using other methods.

Past observations of faraway celestial objects known as Cepheid variable stars have yielded estimates of 12 billion to 15 billion years for the universe’s age. But those observations depended on assumptions related to how the universe has expanded over those billions of years.

Another method, used by the European Southern Observatory, depended on estimating the rate of radioactive decay within old stars. The European researchers came up with a figure of more than 12.5 billion years.

University of Chicago astrophysicist Michael Turner, commenting on the latest research, said that further studies were essential because the question of the universe’s age is so fundamental to our understanding of the cosmos.

“What’s exciting is, we’re now making enough measurements that we can do these critical tests for age consistency,” he toldMSNBC.com .

http://www.nbcnews.com/id/3077812/

Do you agree with this date?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#83 Apr 18, 2013
KJV wrote:
...
The above is not proof of your god's existence.

In fact?

This is still valid:

Proof your god isn't real: I submit... the sum-total of YOUR UGLY POSTS.

Especially the ones in which you ridicule and belittle others you perceive to not be in your tight little club.

Now. Presuming this "god" of yours is an actual... divine being?

Then we may expect that this god is interested in Divine levels of Justice, and equally Divine levels of Goodness?

The proof runs like this: what god, who was truly interested in both Justice and Good, would permit the likes of ...

... YOU ...

... to be It's spokes-person, it's missionary to people who do NOT believe in It?

Answer:

No god who was GOOD or JUST would suffer the likes of YOU.

There you have it!

Irrefutable proof, that your god is not real.

(too easy)

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Why Do Atheists Ridicule Christianity? (May '11) 1 min NightSerf 9,730
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 39 min Regolith Based Li... 31,253
Religion is the cause of war and most suffering... 2 hr Eagle 12 20
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 2 hr Regolith Based Li... 13,263
News In America, atheists are still in the closet (Apr '12) 2 hr Eagle 12 51,147
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 2 hr superwilly 255,294
News Speaking for God 6 hr Amused 582
More from around the web