Why Atheism Will Replace Religion

Aug 27, 2012 Full story: News24 14,385

Please note that for this article "Atheism" also includes agnostics, deists, pagans, wiccans... in other words non-religious.

You will notice this is a statement of fact. And to be fact it is supported by evidence (see references below). Now you can have "faith" that this is not true, but by the very definition of faith, that is just wishful thinking. Full Story

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

#14656 Sep 17, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you a parrot?
Repeating the same old song? Again and Again, why can't you "invent" a positive definition of Atheism in all this time?
The word is not mine to define. If I were to invent a definition, It would be a lie, I am not a liar. You have been given the correct definition again and again, and you will not see the truth, no matter how often it is shown to you, why?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#14657 Sep 18, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you a parrot?
Repeating the same old song? Again and Again, why can't you "invent" a positive definition of Atheism in all this time?
again and again everyday people are telling you things and you choose to ignore them and repeat your cult nonsense.

As I said before - mental illness.
MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

#14658 Sep 18, 2013
R Hill wrote:
I borrowed liberally from H.G. Wells "The Time Machine" for my fanciful future. As we all know, monsters still lurked and preyed upon the innocent Eloi. I'm sure most political-economic systems that come to rate their own 'ism' aim for a similar idyllic future and must wrestle their own monsters.

Unfortunately, that monster is US (not the United States, but US as in 'we the people', Humanity ... me & you). Religion and most of the 'bad' things we Humans do have been tied together in a long dance since Time (or at least recorded History) began.

Maybe the Commies thought if you throw out religion the other 'bad things' would go with it. After all, if you fairly share the labor and the goods ... what's anybody got to complain about? Looks good on paper!
Ans.

So many things look good on paper, but come out to be "impractical" when you try them out.

Communism was one such thing, it looks very attractive and reasonable, but when you put into practice, you find it is against human nature.

Religions have been in "use" since the time humanity began and they have done their job well!!

This Atheism "fad" is just like Communism and looks good on paper, but once you try it out, it will prove out to be as against human nature as communism was.

MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

#14659 Sep 18, 2013
DAKO wrote:
Communism was not just Atheism! Communism failed because it was not compatible with human nature of self interest at least 50% of the time!

It was then economical failure of the centrally planned system that exposed communism as unworkable! Typically, you want to jump to the conclusion of your liking! OH! MUQ!
Ans.

Communism consisted of two parts, one part was 'Strict Atheism", they were Anti religious people, they tried their very best to root out religion from their countries.

They gave their people "every right" to propagate their "wrong views" against religions and did not allow religious people to answer them back. This was against human nature.

Then they had economic policies, which denied people to hold any land or factory. Everything became "Community Property".

It is strange that Communists talked so much about "Workers and Formers" and their rights, while the people who were persecuted most were "Workers and Farmers"!!

And they failed on agriculture and Industrial output!!

Both policies of Communists, their Atheism and their Economic policies, were against human nature.

That is why Communism failed on both ground.

This Capitalist and Atheist and Materialistic philosophy of so called Western Nations is also against human nature and this also will meet the same end as Communism.
Dak-Original

Cowdenbeath, UK

#14660 Sep 18, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
So many things look good on paper, but come out to be "impractical" when you try them out.
Communism was one such thing, it looks very attractive and reasonable, but when you put into practice, you find it is against human nature.
Religions have been in "use" since the time humanity began and they have done their job well!!
This Atheism "fad" is just like Communism and looks good on paper, but once you try it out, it will prove out to be as against human nature as communism was.
Atheism is a belief like religion but it is not a religion. However, the Atheist lot are far more logical than those who tell us belief matters are the "truth". Yes, the Atheists have no answer as the why of all existence and then as even Professor Dawkins altered his stance to state that "probably there is no GOD" from "there is no GOD"! Human psyche evolved in belief and hence GOD is needed but then it does not follow that a disproved belief system is the answer. OH! MUQ!
EdSed

Hamilton, UK

#14661 Sep 18, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
Communism consisted of two parts, one part was 'Strict Atheism", they were Anti religious people, they tried their very best to root out religion from their countries.
They gave their people "every right" to propagate their "wrong views" against religions and did not allow religious people to answer them back. This was against human nature.
Then they had economic policies, which denied people to hold any land or factory. Everything became "Community Property".
It is strange that Communists talked so much about "Workers and Formers" and their rights, while the people who were persecuted most were "Workers and Farmers"!!
And they failed on agriculture and Industrial output!!
Both policies of Communists, their Atheism and their Economic policies, were against human nature.
That is why Communism failed on both ground.
This Capitalist and Atheist and Materialistic philosophy of so called Western Nations is also against human nature and this also will meet the same end as Communism.
No god/allah sent a prophet to Earth.
Grow up
Thinking

UK

#14662 Sep 18, 2013
All three judaist religions are capitalist in the extreme - including your offshoot.
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
Communism consisted of two parts, one part was 'Strict Atheism", they were Anti religious people, they tried their very best to root out religion from their countries.
They gave their people "every right" to propagate their "wrong views" against religions and did not allow religious people to answer them back. This was against human nature.
Then they had economic policies, which denied people to hold any land or factory. Everything became "Community Property".
It is strange that Communists talked so much about "Workers and Formers" and their rights, while the people who were persecuted most were "Workers and Farmers"!!
And they failed on agriculture and Industrial output!!
Both policies of Communists, their Atheism and their Economic policies, were against human nature.
That is why Communism failed on both ground.
This Capitalist and Atheist and Materialistic philosophy of so called Western Nations is also against human nature and this also will meet the same end as Communism.
Dak-Original

Cowdenbeath, UK

#14663 Sep 18, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
Communism consisted of two parts, one part was 'Strict Atheism", they were Anti religious people, they tried their very best to root out religion from their countries.
They gave their people "every right" to propagate their "wrong views" against religions and did not allow religious people to answer them back. This was against human nature.
Then they had economic policies, which denied people to hold any land or factory. Everything became "Community Property".
It is strange that Communists talked so much about "Workers and Formers" and their rights, while the people who were persecuted most were "Workers and Farmers"!!
And they failed on agriculture and Industrial output!!
Both policies of Communists, their Atheism and their Economic policies, were against human nature.
That is why Communism failed on both ground.
This Capitalist and Atheist and Materialistic philosophy of so called Western Nations is also against human nature and this also will meet the same end as Communism.
Communism failed due to economic reasons only. Even the most (85%) in post communist Estonia are still Atheists, despite attempts by missionaries there. Most in Kryghistan are only muslims in name. OH! MUQ!
EdSed

Hamilton, UK

#14664 Sep 18, 2013
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
Atheism is a belief like religion but it is not a religion....
And disbelief in fairies is just as reasonable and rational as belief in fairies. Oh Dak!
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/atheist
JBH

Richmond, Canada

#14665 Sep 18, 2013
That is why Russia calls US as the exceptionalism.
One of the example is the way of dong things by slaughtering a few hundred thousands of people for nothing in Iraq.

That is the exceptionalism--it is very terrible of the insanity creed by bombing and hitting the unknown (the unknown was even called as a sure known by Bush saying there were definitely for certainty WMD in Iraq), and the uncertainty-- uncertainty included what would happen if any insurgents uprising to do continuous violences so generated by invading Iraq, and many other such bad things and crisis DRAMA resulted as well.

Now Obama is doing that drama recycling again to Syria, with many other such bad examples of DRAMA in Libya , Egypt, as all the same as whatsoever psycho exceptionalism.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#14666 Sep 18, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
Communism consisted of two parts, one part was 'Strict Atheism", they were Anti religious people, they tried their very best to root out religion from their countries.
They gave their people "every right" to propagate their "wrong views" against religions and did not allow religious people to answer them back. This was against human nature.
Then they had economic policies, which denied people to hold any land or factory. Everything became "Community Property".
It is strange that Communists talked so much about "Workers and Formers" and their rights, while the people who were persecuted most were "Workers and Farmers"!!
And they failed on agriculture and Industrial output!!
Both policies of Communists, their Atheism and their Economic policies, were against human nature.
That is why Communism failed on both ground.
This Capitalist and Atheist and Materialistic philosophy of so called Western Nations is also against human nature and this also will meet the same end as Communism.
You're a religious liar who has failed to understand atheism.

Now you are riding on the strawman of communism in order to fool us.

What a f*cking bullsh*t cult you work for.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#14667 Sep 18, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
So many things look good on paper, but come out to be "impractical" when you try them out.
Communism was one such thing, it looks very attractive and reasonable, but when you put into practice, you find it is against human nature.
Religions have been in "use" since the time humanity began and they have done their job well!!
This Atheism "fad" is just like Communism and looks good on paper, but once you try it out, it will prove out to be as against human nature as communism was.
Idiot theist with no proof of god blebbering his pig-ignorant cult views in public.

When you are brave enough to prove the god you're lying to us about through your keyboard, you will stop looking like an idiot here.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#14668 Sep 18, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
So many things look good on paper, but come out to be "impractical" when you try them out.
Communism was one such thing, it looks very attractive and reasonable, but when you put into practice, you find it is against human nature.
Religions have been in "use" since the time humanity began and they have done their job well!!
This Atheism "fad" is just like Communism and looks good on paper, but once you try it out, it will prove out to be as against human nature as communism was.
You sure are 'big' on Human Nature. Would you say Human Nature is positive or negative? Kind of a grey area, wouldn't you say. We are capable of everything from the sublime to the ridiculous. From the petty to the magnificent, from the Milk of Human Kindness to tear-your-face-off ugly. Just about what you would expect from a Naked Ape that evolved 'intelligence' and doesn't quite know what to do with it.

One of the things we did with it was INVENT. Invented things like Communism and religion, anesthesia and atom bombs. Positive or Negative? You tell me. We learned how to give and how to take away.

I personally think Communism is a fairly effective way to feed billions of people on limited resources. Same way I'm starting to think Islamic Dictatorship is a fairly effective way to keep primitive nomadic tribes from murdering each other. A variation, of sorts, on how Christianity helps make intelligent, naked apes into harmless consumers who are too busy to think about it much.

Humanity needs Atheists. We're here to remind everybody that it's all bull crap. We are freedom.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#14669 Sep 18, 2013
JBH wrote:
That is why Russia calls US as the exceptionalism.
One of the example is the way of dong things by slaughtering a few hundred thousands of people for nothing in Iraq.
That is the exceptionalism--it is very terrible of the insanity creed by bombing and hitting the unknown (the unknown was even called as a sure known by Bush saying there were definitely for certainty WMD in Iraq), and the uncertainty-- uncertainty included what would happen if any insurgents uprising to do continuous violences so generated by invading Iraq, and many other such bad things and crisis DRAMA resulted as well.
Now Obama is doing that drama recycling again to Syria, with many other such bad examples of DRAMA in Libya , Egypt, as all the same as whatsoever psycho exceptionalism.
EVERYTHING VIOLENT we do in the Middle East is in response to violence. EVERYTHING COMMERCIAL we do in the region is to feed our EXCEPTIONAL need for energy. I would much rather see the United Nations become an effective World Policeman, but I guess that ain't going to happen. WMD's exist in the region. Maybe they move around. Maybe the Sarin Assad is using against his rebels was moved out of Iraq. Maybe the Iranians only want nuclear power for their toaster ovens and public address systems. Who knows? I don't know. Do you know? Did Bush? Does Obama? How about the CIA?

How about making the country you live in 'exceptional'? If we can do it ... anybody can. Without 'exceptional' what do you have? Bland. You want the world to be BLAND? There's your problem! You think the world should be BLAND, so you have become a BLAND citizen of a BLAND country, bleating meekly for a BLAND world. What? Your country isn't BLAND?!?!? Sounds like you got a bad case of NATIONALISM!! What? Don't want NATIONALISM? EXCEPTIONALISM getting you down? How about BANALISM?!?!? Let's hoist up the old BANAL flag and see if we can't get a rally going around THAT!!

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#14670 Sep 18, 2013
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
again and again everyday people are telling you things and you choose to ignore them and repeat your cult nonsense.
As I said before - mental illness.
The exceptionally bad mental illness of Religious Godbotism!
JBH

Richmond, Canada

#14671 Sep 18, 2013
DROP THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS ISSUE PURSUIT FIRST.
STOP THE FIGHTING AT THE SAME TIME.
GET PEOPLE BACK TO THEIR USUAL AND ORDINARY LIVES AND ACTIVITIES.
THEN after that, THERE ARE LOTS OF TIME TO TALK AND FIGURE OUT CHEMICAL WEAPONS, and for talks of what the Syrian people want in regard to see what rebels have to say.
Otherwise, by using chemical weapons issue, it will never have an end and will have another Iraq bad crisis drama.

They are not the chemical weapons which cause disaster and destruction to the Syrian people, but the infighting form Muslim rebels, and the threat of US strike .

These civil violences have destroyed the everyday life of the Syrian people, from schools, to work places, to homes, that people feel unsafe that many have to flee because of all the violences doing on both sides.

As It is not possible to have Syria regime to give up, it is required that rebels must stop then, so that people can return to homes and usual living.

The only thing necessary is that rebels give up fighting, so that Syrian people can come back to ordinary activities.

Obama is wrong by keeping on talking on chemical weapons, for that will destroy more lives and cause large unstable activities of the region, where lots of more people can never return to their ordinary activities again.

It is never about chemical weapons issue, because by far that does not affect most people.

Instead of having Syrian people come back to their usual lives, Obama's vicious way of siding with rebels to encourage them fighting and inflaming on chemical weapons issue has resulted the destruction of daily routine activities of the Syrian people.

When that is done, go from there, and talk chemical weapons later, as people get back to their lives in order first.

The stand to have Syrian people to do ordinary lives and activities has not anything to do with chemical weapons. Yet, using chemical weapons indulging has worsened the Syrians to get back to their way of life because Syrians are not killed by sarin gas at all, by far, but will be killed BY US strike by doing chemical weapons issue.

So, they have to give up the chemical weapons issue and Rebels fighting first, as that is the only way of Syrian people can go back home, go to schools, and go back to work as they need those first.
Since Syrian people are not afraid of sarin gas, what is the point of Obama by talking about sarin gas to strike to kill them?

CONCLUSION IS the NO STRIKE AND NO HIT OF SYRIA ,as whatever WILL BE, if it is BASED on CHEMICAL Weapons issue, when Syria abandons agreement on chemical weapons proposal, at the same time with evidence of sarin gas usage or not by any one.

THROW AWAY WHAT OBAMA SAYS.
Otherwise, by using chemical weapons issue, it will never have an end and will have another Iraq bad crisis drama.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#14672 Sep 18, 2013
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
Communism failed due to economic reasons only. Even the most (85%) in post communist Estonia are still Atheists, despite attempts by missionaries there. Most in Kryghistan are only muslims in name. OH! MUQ!
No sane person would willingly go to church or worship invisible sky-daddies. They have to be coerced or programmed from birth. It's hard to get 'em back on the farm once they've seen the Big City.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#14673 Sep 18, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
Communism consisted of two parts, one part was 'Strict Atheism", they were Anti religious people, they tried their very best to root out religion from their countries.
They gave their people "every right" to propagate their "wrong views" against religions and did not allow religious people to answer them back. This was against human nature.
Then they had economic policies, which denied people to hold any land or factory. Everything became "Community Property".
It is strange that Communists talked so much about "Workers and Formers" and their rights, while the people who were persecuted most were "Workers and Farmers"!!
And they failed on agriculture and Industrial output!!
Both policies of Communists, their Atheism and their Economic policies, were against human nature.
That is why Communism failed on both ground.
This Capitalist and Atheist and Materialistic philosophy of so called Western Nations is also against human nature and this also will meet the same end as Communism.
I think it's important, in these troubled, uncertain times, to limber up the old DICTIONARY whenever matters arise of uncertain provenance. Let's look at this <courtesy of "Free Online Dictionary">:

"com·mu·nism (kmy-nzm)
n.
1. A theoretical economic system characterized by the collective ownership of property and by the organization of labor for the common advantage of all members.
2. Communism
a. A system of government in which the state plans and controls the economy and a single, often authoritarian party holds power, claiming to make progress toward a higher social order in which all goods are equally shared by the people.
b. The Marxist-Leninist version of Communist doctrine that advocates the overthrow of capitalism by the revolution of the proletariat."

Tell me MUQ ... did you SEE the word 'atheist' in there? Please point it out 'cause I can't see it. YET ... you say 'strict Atheism' is half of what Communism is. The folks at "Free Online Dictionary" must have missed it as well. Maybe they're not trying to promulgate an empty philosophy by way of false association! Yeah, maybe that's it. You see MUQ ... there's the "REAL" and there's the world as godbots see it. It's not the same, MUQ. Y'all really need to work on that.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#14674 Sep 18, 2013
JBH wrote:
DROP THE CHEMICAL WEAPONS ISSUE PURSUIT FIRST.
STOP THE FIGHTING AT THE SAME TIME.
GET PEOPLE BACK TO THEIR USUAL AND ORDINARY LIVES AND ACTIVITIES.
THEN after that, THERE ARE LOTS OF TIME TO TALK AND FIGURE OUT CHEMICAL WEAPONS, and for talks of what the Syrian people want in regard to see what rebels have to say.
Otherwise, by using chemical weapons issue, it will never have an end and will have another Iraq bad crisis drama.
They are not the chemical weapons which cause disaster and destruction to the Syrian people, but the infighting form Muslim rebels, and the threat of US strike .
These civil violences have destroyed the everyday life of the Syrian people, from schools, to work places, to homes, that people feel unsafe that many have to flee because of all the violences doing on both sides.
As It is not possible to have Syria regime to give up, it is required that rebels must stop then, so that people can return to homes and usual living.
The only thing necessary is that rebels give up fighting, so that Syrian people can come back to ordinary activities.
Obama is wrong by keeping on talking on chemical weapons, for that will destroy more lives and cause large unstable activities of the region, where lots of more people can never return to their ordinary activities again.
It is never about chemical weapons issue, because by far that does not affect most people.
Instead of having Syrian people come back to their usual lives, Obama's vicious way of siding with rebels to encourage them fighting and inflaming on chemical weapons issue has resulted the destruction of daily routine activities of the Syrian people.
When that is done, go from there, and talk chemical weapons later, as people get back to their lives in order first.
The stand to have Syrian people to do ordinary lives and activities has not anything to do with chemical weapons. Yet, using chemical weapons indulging has worsened the Syrians to get back to their way of life because Syrians are not killed by sarin gas at all, by far, but will be killed BY US strike by doing chemical weapons issue.
So, they have to give up the chemical weapons issue and Rebels fighting first, as that is the only way of Syrian people can go back home, go to schools, and go back to work as they need those first.
Since Syrian people are not afraid of sarin gas, what is the point of Obama by talking about sarin gas to strike to kill them?
CONCLUSION IS the NO STRIKE AND NO HIT OF SYRIA ,as whatever WILL BE, if it is BASED on CHEMICAL Weapons issue, when Syria abandons agreement on chemical weapons proposal, at the same time with evidence of sarin gas usage or not by any one.
THROW AWAY WHAT OBAMA SAYS.
Otherwise, by using chemical weapons issue, it will never have an end and will have another Iraq bad crisis drama.
I am 100% for citizens of Nations working out their own problems. By vote or by revolution as befits the nature of their government. I've been to Syria several times and I've never seen a people more frightened of their government. I say "Viva la revolucion" !!!
Yolo

Lexington, KY

#14675 Sep 18, 2013
Is there anything bad that a person can do without feeling guilty?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038 (Apr '12) 9 min fadu singh 22,353
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 1 hr Aura Mytha 227,740
Another week, another atheist demands we call h... 1 hr P_Smith 1
Can atheists pray? Gretta Vosper on Andrew W.K.... 2 hr P_Smith 1
The problem of evil and hate (Oct '13) 2 hr wondering 338
Atheism vs. Theism: Knowns and Unknowns 5 hr BeHereNow 134
An atheist returns to Christ (Jan '09) 5 hr Patrick 4,111
•••

Atheism People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••