Why Atheism Will Replace Religion

Why Atheism Will Replace Religion

There are 14730 comments on the News24 story from Aug 27, 2012, titled Why Atheism Will Replace Religion. In it, News24 reports that:

Please note that for this article "Atheism" also includes agnostics, deists, pagans, wiccans... in other words non-religious.

You will notice this is a statement of fact. And to be fact it is supported by evidence (see references below). Now you can have "faith" that this is not true, but by the very definition of faith, that is just wishful thinking.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at News24.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#14642 Sep 17, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
I wish, we could live in that "ideal world" which you are dreaming of.
And your diagnosis is wrong that "the root cause" we do not have ideal world is because of religion.
Why you forgot about "Communist experience"? That regime was devoid of religion, why it could not create that Ideal world which they dream of?
The world which you have dream of and much better with all "positives" and no "negatives" is indeed the eternal abode of those who pass this test of human life!!
Why not prepare for it, right now?
When you can prove your god beyond doubt with physical evidence, you will cease to be just another, common mentally ill liar for your cult.
Thinking

Royston, UK

#14643 Sep 17, 2013
Ending FGM is not a religion, that is why muslims keep mutilating little girls.
MUQ wrote:
Atheism is NOT a religion, that is why it will replace religion!!
This is fantastic, a thing which does not even have a positive definition will replace religion.
What wastage of logic and reason, these people make.
Thinking

Royston, UK

#14644 Sep 17, 2013
Think of religion as a tumour and reason as healthy tissue.
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
If religion is a cancer, how it will be "replaced" by Atheism?
Do you replace cancer by something else? or you remove it?
Perhaps you do not know how to phrase your words. Please re-try it.!!

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

#14645 Sep 17, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Again the same "Negative" definition, not able to define what Atheism is and who is an atheist!!
It has been defined again and again for you, and it seems that you choose not to understand.

The lack of theism, that is the definition, it is not a positive nor a negative definition. It is incredibly simple to understand. Atheism is just the lack of theism.

If there is no cancer, is that negative?
If there are no Pixies, is that positive?

The atheist isn't theist, and atheism is the lack of theism.
Dak-Original

Edinburgh, UK

#14646 Sep 17, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
I wish, we could live in that "ideal world" which you are dreaming of.
And your diagnosis is wrong that "the root cause" we do not have ideal world is because of religion.
Why you forgot about "Communist experience"? That regime was devoid of religion, why it could not create that Ideal world which they dream of?
The world which you have dream of and much better with all "positives" and no "negatives" is indeed the eternal abode of those who pass this test of human life!!
Why not prepare for it, right now?
Communism was not just Atheism! Communism failed because it was not compatible with human nature of self interest at least 50% of the time! It was then economical failure of the centrally planned system that exposed communism as unworkable! Typically, you want to jump to the conclusion of your liking! OH! MUQ!

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#14647 Sep 17, 2013
spudgun wrote:
<quoted text>
Atheism is already the default position in many countries in the world. In Estonia "76% of the population state no specific religious affiliation." If >you< were born in Estonia to an atheist family, what are the chances you would be a devout muslim? In reality, next to zero.
My bet is that those 76% don't consider themselves "Atheist" either. The word does ride on the coat-tails of religion and is just as loaded with negative implications. It's a shame really. As soon as you pick a word you think describes "no specific religious affiliation" somebody is going to start calling it a 'religion'. Misery loves company!

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#14648 Sep 17, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
I wish, we could live in that "ideal world" which you are dreaming of.
And your diagnosis is wrong that "the root cause" we do not have ideal world is because of religion.
Why you forgot about "Communist experience"? That regime was devoid of religion, why it could not create that Ideal world which they dream of?
The world which you have dream of and much better with all "positives" and no "negatives" is indeed the eternal abode of those who pass this test of human life!!
Why not prepare for it, right now?
I borrowed liberally from H.G. Wells "The Time Machine" for my fanciful future. As we all know, monsters still lurked and preyed upon the innocent Eloi. I'm sure most political-economic systems that come to rate their own 'ism' aim for a similar idyllic future and must wrestle their own monsters. Unfortunately, that monster is US (not the United States, but US as in 'we the people', Humanity ... me & you). Religion and most of the 'bad' things we Humans do have been tied together in a long dance since Time (or at least recorded History) began. Maybe the Commies thought if you throw out religion the other 'bad things' would go with it. After all, if you fairly share the labor and the goods ... what's anybody got to complain about? Looks good on paper!

“Leave That Thing Alone!”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#14649 Sep 17, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
I borrowed liberally from H.G. Wells "The Time Machine" for my fanciful future. As we all know, monsters still lurked and preyed upon the innocent Eloi. I'm sure most political-economic systems that come to rate their own 'ism' aim for a similar idyllic future and must wrestle their own monsters. Unfortunately, that monster is US (not the United States, but US as in 'we the people', Humanity ... me & you). Religion and most of the 'bad' things we Humans do have been tied together in a long dance since Time (or at least recorded History) began. Maybe the Commies thought if you throw out religion the other 'bad things' would go with it. After all, if you fairly share the labor and the goods ... what's anybody got to complain about? Looks good on paper!
There will always be that segment of a population that won't be satisfied with "enough"

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#14650 Sep 17, 2013
TerryL wrote:
<quoted text>There will always be that segment of a population that won't be satisfied with "enough"
Yeah. I've come full circle. From a 'doom & gloom' Global Warming apocalypse, through a 'religion free Garden of Eloi' back to stark reality. The 'bots outnumber us 10 to 1 and there's no sign they are going to change any time soon. That "segment" rests firmly within the religious contingent for whom an eternal existence in Paradise, rubbing elbows with the Supreme Creator-being, is barely sufficient.

“Leave That Thing Alone!”

Since: Nov 07

Location hidden

#14651 Sep 17, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah. I've come full circle. From a 'doom & gloom' Global Warming apocalypse, through a 'religion free Garden of Eloi' back to stark reality. The 'bots outnumber us 10 to 1 and there's no sign they are going to change any time soon. That "segment" rests firmly within the religious contingent for whom an eternal existence in Paradise, rubbing elbows with the Supreme Creator-being, is barely sufficient.
Well said.

I'd be a lot less annoyed with the godbots if they actually were what they claim to be instead of the polar-opposite they present to us here.

BTW... I really enjoy reading your posts. You have a great knack for, and grasp of, the language

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#14652 Sep 17, 2013
TerryL wrote:
<quoted text>Well said.
I'd be a lot less annoyed with the godbots if they actually were what they claim to be instead of the polar-opposite they present to us here.
BTW... I really enjoy reading your posts. You have a great knack for, and grasp of, the language
Well ... that and a dollar (or two or three) will get ya a cup of coffee. But, thanks! I enjoy inflicting them on people ...
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#14654 Sep 17, 2013
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>It has been defined again and again for you, and it seems that you choose not to understand.
The lack of theism, that is the definition, it is not a positive nor a negative definition. It is incredibly simple to understand. Atheism is just the lack of theism.
If there is no cancer, is that negative?
If there are no Pixies, is that positive?
The atheist isn't theist, and atheism is the lack of theism.
Are you a parrot?

Repeating the same old song? Again and Again, why can't you "invent" a positive definition of Atheism in all this time?

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

#14655 Sep 17, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Again the same "Negative" definition, not able to define what Atheism is and who is an atheist!!
Do you understand what capital letters are? I will define atheism and I will type it in capital letters so that you might have a chance of seeing the beam in your own eye.

>>> ATHEISM IS THE LACK OF THEISM <<<

That is the definition. It is not negative, and it clearly defines atheism. Atheism is the lack of theism. And to define atheist, is just as simple, it is one who is not theist.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

#14656 Sep 17, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you a parrot?
Repeating the same old song? Again and Again, why can't you "invent" a positive definition of Atheism in all this time?
The word is not mine to define. If I were to invent a definition, It would be a lie, I am not a liar. You have been given the correct definition again and again, and you will not see the truth, no matter how often it is shown to you, why?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#14657 Sep 18, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Are you a parrot?
Repeating the same old song? Again and Again, why can't you "invent" a positive definition of Atheism in all this time?
again and again everyday people are telling you things and you choose to ignore them and repeat your cult nonsense.

As I said before - mental illness.
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#14658 Sep 18, 2013
R Hill wrote:
I borrowed liberally from H.G. Wells "The Time Machine" for my fanciful future. As we all know, monsters still lurked and preyed upon the innocent Eloi. I'm sure most political-economic systems that come to rate their own 'ism' aim for a similar idyllic future and must wrestle their own monsters.

Unfortunately, that monster is US (not the United States, but US as in 'we the people', Humanity ... me & you). Religion and most of the 'bad' things we Humans do have been tied together in a long dance since Time (or at least recorded History) began.

Maybe the Commies thought if you throw out religion the other 'bad things' would go with it. After all, if you fairly share the labor and the goods ... what's anybody got to complain about? Looks good on paper!
Ans.

So many things look good on paper, but come out to be "impractical" when you try them out.

Communism was one such thing, it looks very attractive and reasonable, but when you put into practice, you find it is against human nature.

Religions have been in "use" since the time humanity began and they have done their job well!!

This Atheism "fad" is just like Communism and looks good on paper, but once you try it out, it will prove out to be as against human nature as communism was.

MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

#14659 Sep 18, 2013
DAKO wrote:
Communism was not just Atheism! Communism failed because it was not compatible with human nature of self interest at least 50% of the time!

It was then economical failure of the centrally planned system that exposed communism as unworkable! Typically, you want to jump to the conclusion of your liking! OH! MUQ!
Ans.

Communism consisted of two parts, one part was 'Strict Atheism", they were Anti religious people, they tried their very best to root out religion from their countries.

They gave their people "every right" to propagate their "wrong views" against religions and did not allow religious people to answer them back. This was against human nature.

Then they had economic policies, which denied people to hold any land or factory. Everything became "Community Property".

It is strange that Communists talked so much about "Workers and Formers" and their rights, while the people who were persecuted most were "Workers and Farmers"!!

And they failed on agriculture and Industrial output!!

Both policies of Communists, their Atheism and their Economic policies, were against human nature.

That is why Communism failed on both ground.

This Capitalist and Atheist and Materialistic philosophy of so called Western Nations is also against human nature and this also will meet the same end as Communism.
Dak-Original

Edinburgh, UK

#14660 Sep 18, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
So many things look good on paper, but come out to be "impractical" when you try them out.
Communism was one such thing, it looks very attractive and reasonable, but when you put into practice, you find it is against human nature.
Religions have been in "use" since the time humanity began and they have done their job well!!
This Atheism "fad" is just like Communism and looks good on paper, but once you try it out, it will prove out to be as against human nature as communism was.
Atheism is a belief like religion but it is not a religion. However, the Atheist lot are far more logical than those who tell us belief matters are the "truth". Yes, the Atheists have no answer as the why of all existence and then as even Professor Dawkins altered his stance to state that "probably there is no GOD" from "there is no GOD"! Human psyche evolved in belief and hence GOD is needed but then it does not follow that a disproved belief system is the answer. OH! MUQ!
EdSed

Hamilton, UK

#14661 Sep 18, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
Communism consisted of two parts, one part was 'Strict Atheism", they were Anti religious people, they tried their very best to root out religion from their countries.
They gave their people "every right" to propagate their "wrong views" against religions and did not allow religious people to answer them back. This was against human nature.
Then they had economic policies, which denied people to hold any land or factory. Everything became "Community Property".
It is strange that Communists talked so much about "Workers and Formers" and their rights, while the people who were persecuted most were "Workers and Farmers"!!
And they failed on agriculture and Industrial output!!
Both policies of Communists, their Atheism and their Economic policies, were against human nature.
That is why Communism failed on both ground.
This Capitalist and Atheist and Materialistic philosophy of so called Western Nations is also against human nature and this also will meet the same end as Communism.
No god/allah sent a prophet to Earth.
Grow up
Thinking

Royston, UK

#14662 Sep 18, 2013
All three judaist religions are capitalist in the extreme - including your offshoot.
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
Communism consisted of two parts, one part was 'Strict Atheism", they were Anti religious people, they tried their very best to root out religion from their countries.
They gave their people "every right" to propagate their "wrong views" against religions and did not allow religious people to answer them back. This was against human nature.
Then they had economic policies, which denied people to hold any land or factory. Everything became "Community Property".
It is strange that Communists talked so much about "Workers and Formers" and their rights, while the people who were persecuted most were "Workers and Farmers"!!
And they failed on agriculture and Industrial output!!
Both policies of Communists, their Atheism and their Economic policies, were against human nature.
That is why Communism failed on both ground.
This Capitalist and Atheist and Materialistic philosophy of so called Western Nations is also against human nature and this also will meet the same end as Communism.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 15 min scientia potentia... 48,521
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 17 min scientia potentia... 23,498
Athetists' best bet is that there is a God. 3 hr JustASkeptic 11
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 9 hr Rosa_Winkel 21,866
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) Sat Eagle 12 258,039
News The war on Christmas (Dec '10) Sat Eagle 12 4,907
Why you need to make sure you are saved before ... Fri Scaritual 14
More from around the web