I bring it up if I happened to read a post by some ignorant atheist misquoting the parable or ranting about all the alleged errors in the texts.<quoted text>
Yet, you found the rope/camel error significant enough to bring it up and you clearly do not consider yourself an 'ignorant atheist'. Why 200 years? Surely you don't think the book was pristine up to that time.
The actual parable says it's easier for a rope to go through the eye of a needle than a rich man to enter the kingdom of heaven of God.
The other parable about straining gnats out of a cup but swallowing camels contains no mistranslations or copying errors....