Why Atheism Will Replace Religion

Aug 27, 2012 Full story: News24 14,385

Please note that for this article "Atheism" also includes agnostics, deists, pagans, wiccans... in other words non-religious.

You will notice this is a statement of fact. And to be fact it is supported by evidence (see references below). Now you can have "faith" that this is not true, but by the very definition of faith, that is just wishful thinking. Full Story

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#13361 Jul 17, 2013
ezdzit wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's what I wrote again:
Genetic tests indicates that 90% of todays Jews, i.e. the Ashkenazi, never had any ancestors who "wandered" around the Middle East, therefore Ashkenazi Jews can not possibly be the blood descendants of Abraham nor do they have any ancestral ties to any country in the ME, including Palestine.
Ashkenazi Jew genes and Arab genes are not similar. Palestinian Arab genes, regardless of their religious affiliation, i.e. Jew, Christian, Muslim, Samaritan, etc., and ME Arab genes in general test positive for the same haplogroups found in blacks of North Africa. NO Ashkenazi Jew genes have this gene marker. The "smoking gun" gene marker they do have indicating their Kazarian ancestry is the haplogroup Q gene marker.
Ashkenazi Jews are not and never were the descendants of Abraham or any Israelites, Palestine is not and never was their ancestral homeland, and they have absolutely NO cultural ties to ANY country in the Middle East. As Helen Thomas said: "The Jews need to get the hell out of Palestine."
So, we're going to redefine global boundaries based upon ancestral and cultural ties? That's going to make something of a mess don't you think? Most of us Americans are going to have to vacate the premises. I heard Palestine is nice ...
MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

#13362 Jul 17, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
Really? Their kids get nothing? That is odd. Let's face it, some people have more money than they know what to do with. Giving massive amounts to charity is one thing, setting yourself up in a nice theocratic dictatorship is another. You know ... something to do.
May be you are true...but this is not my subject of discussion.

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#13363 Jul 17, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
May be you are true...but this is not my subject of discussion.
Nothing is your subject of discussion you can't even talk about the abuse, rape and murder of little girls caused by your religion.
Dak-Original

Slough, UK

#13364 Jul 17, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
Rama was a well educated fabulously wealthy prince. When you have all day and unlimited resources you can figure out some math.
<quoted text>
A devout believer would attribute his successes to some deity or religion or God. We notice this on the sport fields even these days! If Ramajunna was aspired by his belief then his success cannot be die to that belief deity at work but his psychological condition due to his belief. The guy you are arguing the matter is a muslim and then it is strange that he wants to believe in a Hindu "deity" in a bizzare manner!
Dak-Original

Slough, UK

#13365 Jul 17, 2013
ezdzit wrote:
<quoted text>
Come on, Waleeeeeeeeeeeed.
Turn off the hide your location and show everybody where you are posting from.
Point scoring for the sake of it sounds pointless. It is the substance of the post that counts for thinking lot here.
Dak-Original

Slough, UK

#13366 Jul 17, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
"Prions are unprecedented infectious pathogens that cause a group of invariably fatal neurodegenerative diseases." <thank you National Institute of Health, PubMed>
What do "prions" have to do with the identification of DNA as the primary protein encoding molecule in genetics and evolution?
Nothing.
Ezdizit was then telling me/us a porkie pie when he had lost an argument! LOL!

NB: I was minded to check up since prions have not been in news since the BSE beef outbreak in the UK in 90s.
Dak-Original

Slough, UK

#13367 Jul 17, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
I do not defend any wrongs committed by any one. I only defend and clarify teachings of Islam.
What Saudi Kings do, they have to answer to Allah on the last day, on that day they will appear without any Title or Crowns, or any of their Body Guards.
He will decide what is to be done to them and what shall be done to us.
Every one will be paid back and there shall be no injustice done to any one.
The original MUQ will be upset by your post. It could mean him losing his second home in Saudi's Arabia.
JBH

Richmond, Canada

#13368 Jul 17, 2013
The Nobel Prize Committee has been wrong by granting Obama the Nobel Prize Peace Award.

Obama acts more as unlawfulness like neo-Hilter as radical neo-con by hacking civilians, like Bush (IN IRAQ WAR) as AN outlaw.

In addition, Obama overthrew government in Libya without UN approval.
Obama had done too many drones by killing the wrong people, like families and children and women, by saying they had killed terrorists instead.
As CIA was wrong on Snowden by saying he was on the airplane going to Bolivia (in fact Snowden was not on plane), Obama could be just like the International outlaw Bush, lying about WMD-Iraq, by telling no true facts of chemical weapons usage in Syria.

Obama also gave no real facts of pictures of dead Bin Laden by saying bin Laden was killed, while having the man who gave information of bin Laden to CIA locked up in Pakistan for 30 years, so that he told no more whether the real story of bin Laden was true or not. Yet the CIA made up story of the Bin Laden raid as if they had done that when nobody was there to witness. Since CIA was wrong about many things, how could that be real or not that people could trust?

The Nobel Prize Committee has given too many prizes to US in a lot of areas, from Physics, Chemistry, Economics, etc., by saying the other world universities are not good as they rank the top 100 universities on the planet by naming mostly the US ones, British, and few from Germany and Russia and so on.

Yet the world is uprising with more better people everywhere than those of US, while US is going downhill doing all the wrongs and breaking the Universal rules, it is time the world must carry back-bone moral responsibilities of these modern times to face troubles ahead as it has been made messes by being biased to US, as that was even done by the Nobel Prize Committee.
Dak-Original

Slough, UK

#13369 Jul 17, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
So, we're going to redefine global boundaries based upon ancestral and cultural ties? That's going to make something of a mess don't you think? Most of us Americans are going to have to vacate the premises. I heard Palestine is nice ...
This "ezdzit" thinks he is being clever by associating some particular DNA traits as of "Abraham". However, then he ignores others. Most lot in the world are mixture except for a tribe or two in deepest Africa. ezdzit own DNA would probably surprise him! Askenazi Jews maintained their culture/religion and DNA is only 50% valid since to be a JEW was deemed as from a Jewish mother, irrespective whether dad was Jewish or not. Having said that most Jews lived a strict ghetto lives and outside gene input was far less than on those Arabian speaking lot (nowadays all called the Arabs) in Arabia peninsula. Most Jews left the Arabian peninsula about 1400 years ago.
ezdzit is then labouring to justify his stance using dud arguments. Palestinian issue is a modern political one but it is messed up because of the jihadist sentiments/agenda. I have net many highly educated Palestinians in London and all of them were socialist and not jihadist. Former US President Bill Clinton nearly pulled off a historic compromise in brokering an agreement but he failed due to the formerly socialist Palestinian leader Arafat being unable to let go of Jerusalem on the religious sentiments. Clinton told us that Arafat was unable to transform himself into a statesman for the sake of Palestinians. Arafat strated to behave as if he had defeated Isrealis!.
Dak-Original

Slough, UK

#13370 Jul 17, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
May be you are true...but this is not my subject of discussion.
LOL!
Thinking

York, UK

#13371 Jul 17, 2013
From 2008...

JBH wrote:
The Nobel Prize Committee has been wrong by granting Obama the Nobel Prize Peace Award.
Obama acts more as unlawfulness like neo-Hilter as radical neo-con by hacking civilians, like Bush (IN IRAQ WAR) as AN outlaw.
In addition, Obama overthrew government in Libya without UN approval.
Obama had done too many drones by killing the wrong people, like families and children and women, by saying they had killed terrorists instead.
As CIA was wrong on Snowden by saying he was on the airplane going to Bolivia (in fact Snowden was not on plane), Obama could be just like the International outlaw Bush, lying about WMD-Iraq, by telling no true facts of chemical weapons usage in Syria.
Obama also gave no real facts of pictures of dead Bin Laden by saying bin Laden was killed, while having the man who gave information of bin Laden to CIA locked up in Pakistan for 30 years, so that he told no more whether the real story of bin Laden was true or not. Yet the CIA made up story of the Bin Laden raid as if they had done that when nobody was there to witness. Since CIA was wrong about many things, how could that be real or not that people could trust?
The Nobel Prize Committee has given too many prizes to US in a lot of areas, from Physics, Chemistry, Economics, etc., by saying the other world universities are not good as they rank the top 100 universities on the planet by naming mostly the US ones, British, and few from Germany and Russia and so on.
Yet the world is uprising with more better people everywhere than those of US, while US is going downhill doing all the wrongs and breaking the Universal rules, it is time the world must carry back-bone moral responsibilities of these modern times to face troubles ahead as it has been made messes by being biased to US, as that was even done by the Nobel Prize Committee.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#13372 Jul 17, 2013
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
A devout believer would attribute his successes to some deity or religion or God. We notice this on the sport fields even these days! If Ramajunna was aspired by his belief then his success cannot be die to that belief deity at work but his psychological condition due to his belief. The guy you are arguing the matter is a muslim and then it is strange that he wants to believe in a Hindu "deity" in a bizzare manner!
A deity, any deity ... would strengthen their case.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#13373 Jul 17, 2013
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
This "ezdzit" thinks he is being clever by associating some particular DNA traits as of "Abraham". However, then he ignores others. Most lot in the world are mixture except for a tribe or two in deepest Africa. ezdzit own DNA would probably surprise him! Askenazi Jews maintained their culture/religion and DNA is only 50% valid since to be a JEW was deemed as from a Jewish mother, irrespective whether dad was Jewish or not. Having said that most Jews lived a strict ghetto lives and outside gene input was far less than on those Arabian speaking lot (nowadays all called the Arabs) in Arabia peninsula. Most Jews left the Arabian peninsula about 1400 years ago.
ezdzit is then labouring to justify his stance using dud arguments. Palestinian issue is a modern political one but it is messed up because of the jihadist sentiments/agenda. I have net many highly educated Palestinians in London and all of them were socialist and not jihadist. Former US President Bill Clinton nearly pulled off a historic compromise in brokering an agreement but he failed due to the formerly socialist Palestinian leader Arafat being unable to let go of Jerusalem on the religious sentiments. Clinton told us that Arafat was unable to transform himself into a statesman for the sake of Palestinians. Arafat strated to behave as if he had defeated Isrealis!.
His friends call him 'Zit'... an inflammation filled with hot pus. Appropriate.
Dak-Original

Slough, UK

#13374 Jul 17, 2013
JBH wrote:
The Nobel Prize Committee has been wrong by granting Obama the Nobel Prize Peace Award.
Obama acts more as unlawfulness like neo-Hilter as radical neo-con by hacking civilians, like Bush (IN IRAQ WAR) as AN outlaw.
In addition, Obama overthrew government in Libya without UN approval.
Obama had done too many drones by killing the wrong people, like families and children and women, by saying they had killed terrorists instead.
As CIA was wrong on Snowden by saying he was on the airplane going to Bolivia (in fact Snowden was not on plane), Obama could be just like the International outlaw Bush, lying about WMD-Iraq, by telling no true facts of chemical weapons usage in Syria.
Obama also gave no real facts of pictures of dead Bin Laden by saying bin Laden was killed, while having the man who gave information of bin Laden to CIA locked up in Pakistan for 30 years, so that he told no more whether the real story of bin Laden was true or not. Yet the CIA made up story of the Bin Laden raid as if they had done that when nobody was there to witness. Since CIA was wrong about many things, how could that be real or not that people could trust?
The Nobel Prize Committee has given too many prizes to US in a lot of areas, from Physics, Chemistry, Economics, etc., by saying the other world universities are not good as they rank the top 100 universities on the planet by naming mostly the US ones, British, and few from Germany and Russia and so on.
Yet the world is uprising with more better people everywhere than those of US, while US is going downhill doing all the wrongs and breaking the Universal rules, it is time the world must carry back-bone moral responsibilities of these modern times to face troubles ahead as it has been made messes by being biased to US, as that was even done by the Nobel Prize Committee.
I will only mention one of the deceptions in your post. The US did not get the informant locked up in Pakistan. It was the double dealing Pakistani government! The US lot were not happy but then Pakistanis were not even told of the raid on Bin Laden in the military garrision town of Abbotabad until the mission was accomplished. Why try to confuse those who did not the news at the time?
Dak-Original

Slough, UK

#13375 Jul 17, 2013
JBH wrote:
The Nobel Prize Committee has been wrong by granting Obama the Nobel Prize Peace Award.
Obama acts more as unlawfulness like neo-Hilter as radical neo-con by hacking civilians, like Bush (IN IRAQ WAR) as AN outlaw.
In addition, Obama overthrew government in Libya without UN approval.
Obama had done too many drones by killing the wrong people, like families and children and women, by saying they had killed terrorists instead.
As CIA was wrong on Snowden by saying he was on the airplane going to Bolivia (in fact Snowden was not on plane), Obama could be just like the International outlaw Bush, lying about WMD-Iraq, by telling no true facts of chemical weapons usage in Syria.
Obama also gave no real facts of pictures of dead Bin Laden by saying bin Laden was killed, while having the man who gave information of bin Laden to CIA locked up in Pakistan for 30 years, so that he told no more whether the real story of bin Laden was true or not. Yet the CIA made up story of the Bin Laden raid as if they had done that when nobody was there to witness. Since CIA was wrong about many things, how could that be real or not that people could trust?
The Nobel Prize Committee has given too many prizes to US in a lot of areas, from Physics, Chemistry, Economics, etc., by saying the other world universities are not good as they rank the top 100 universities on the planet by naming mostly the US ones, British, and few from Germany and Russia and so on.
Yet the world is uprising with more better people everywhere than those of US, while US is going downhill doing all the wrongs and breaking the Universal rules, it is time the world must carry back-bone moral responsibilities of these modern times to face troubles ahead as it has been made messes by being biased to US, as that was even done by the Nobel Prize Committee.
No bias of Nobel prize committees. Are you aware that the Peace prize procedure is distinct. Largest world economy by far will always spend more on research and then there will be opportunity for its citizens to shine by making new discoveries.

“Liberty & Justice For All”

Since: Aug 11

United States of America

#13376 Jul 17, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
"Prions are unprecedented infectious pathogens that cause a group of invariably fatal neurodegenerative diseases." <thank you National Institute of Health, PubMed>
What do "prions" have to do with the identification of DNA as the primary protein encoding molecule in genetics and evolution?
Nothing.
Science doesn't know and cannot say for sure what DNA does or how its involved in inherited traits. Your claim that it does know, i.e. that DNA is "the primary protein encoding molecule in genetics and evolution" is simply wishful thinking----not scientific fact.

“Liberty & Justice For All”

Since: Aug 11

United States of America

#13377 Jul 17, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
So, we're going to redefine global boundaries based upon ancestral and cultural ties? That's going to make something of a mess don't you think? Most of us Americans are going to have to vacate the premises. I heard Palestine is nice ...
No. Global boundaries were already redefined back in 1948 based upon zionazi LIES about ancestral and cultural ties to the land of Canaan. And, redefining those boundaries has made a huge mess.

“Liberty & Justice For All”

Since: Aug 11

United States of America

#13378 Jul 17, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
I mean ... what's the big deal? There are probably millions of 'geniuses' out there right now scrubbing toilets or mucking stalls with incredible brilliance. The System, being religious in nature, is designed to keep them right there, doing what they do best! Religion is quite good at keeping them muted. That's why the occasional genius who gets recognized as such seems such a fluke.
LOL Thick as a brick.....

How's that time machine coming, bubba?
Thinking

York, UK

#13379 Jul 17, 2013
Strawman BS. DNA isn't sentient in itself.
ezdzit wrote:
<quoted text>
Science doesn't know and cannot say for sure what DNA does or how its involved in inherited traits. Your claim that it does know, i.e. that DNA is "the primary protein encoding molecule in genetics and evolution" is simply wishful thinking----not scientific fact.

“Liberty & Justice For All”

Since: Aug 11

United States of America

#13380 Jul 17, 2013
Dak-Original wrote:
<quoted text>
This "ezdzit" thinks he is being clever by associating some particular DNA traits as of "Abraham". However, then he ignores others. Most lot in the world are mixture except for a tribe or two in deepest Africa. ezdzit own DNA would probably surprise him! Askenazi Jews maintained their culture/religion and DNA is only 50% valid since to be a JEW was deemed as from a Jewish mother, irrespective whether dad was Jewish or not. Having said that most Jews lived a strict ghetto lives and outside gene input was far less than on those Arabian speaking lot (nowadays all called the Arabs) in Arabia peninsula. Most Jews left the Arabian peninsula about 1400 years ago.
ezdzit is then labouring to justify his stance using dud arguments. Palestinian issue is a modern political one but it is messed up because of the jihadist sentiments/agenda. I have net many highly educated Palestinians in London and all of them were socialist and not jihadist. Former US President Bill Clinton nearly pulled off a historic compromise in brokering an agreement but he failed due to the formerly socialist Palestinian leader Arafat being unable to let go of Jerusalem on the religious sentiments. Clinton told us that Arafat was unable to transform himself into a statesman for the sake of Palestinians. Arafat strated to behave as if he had defeated Isrealis!.
LOL

The Bible, i.e. Song of Songs, describes Solomon as a mulatto with golden skin and bushy black hair.-- kinda like Obama. Before the 1960's and political correctness, people like Solomon and Obama were called "High Yellows".

There are many passages in the Bible describing the ethnicity of the different tribes which the sons and daughters of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob intermarried and bred with and all of them were Arab and North African. NONE of these tribes originated in what it now called Russia or Eastern Europe.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038 (Apr '12) 5 min Eman 22,047
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 6 min TheHeadlines 227,399
Atheists forgetting the meaning of freedom 11 min TheHeadlines 70
Stump a theist with 2 questions 13 min TheHeadlines 17
Atheism 101: What's the most aggravating argume... 1 hr Patrick n Angela 3
How much faith it takes to believe in Evolution. 3 hr Thinking 183
Atheism vs. Theism: Knowns and Unknowns 6 hr Patrick 41
•••
Enter and win $5000
•••

Atheism People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE

•••