Why Atheism Will Replace Religion

Aug 27, 2012 Full story: News24 14,431

Please note that for this article "Atheism" also includes agnostics, deists, pagans, wiccans... in other words non-religious.

You will notice this is a statement of fact. And to be fact it is supported by evidence (see references below). Now you can have "faith" that this is not true, but by the very definition of faith, that is just wishful thinking. Full Story

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

#10737 May 15, 2013
Provide a link to the works of others that you are stealing this from please.

You were already warned about this from NS.

Provide the link please and then I can factually destroy it. Also what is your native language as it can't be English.

Your inability to comprehend English is what makes you sound so ignorant when defending your Christian faith on here.
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>The Soviet Union was the first state to have, as an ideological objective, the elimination of religion and its replacement with universal atheism. The communist regime confiscated religious property, ridiculed religion, harassed believers, and propagated atheism in schools. The confiscation of religious assets was often based on accusations of illegal accumulation of wealth.

The vast majority of people in the Russian empire were, at the time of the revolution, religious believers, whereas the communists aimed to break the power of all religious institutions and eventually replace religious belief with atheism.

"Science" was counterposed to "religious superstition" in the media and in academic writing. The main religions of pre-revolutionary Russia persisted throughout the entire Soviet period, but they were only tolerated within certain limits. Generally, this meant that believers were free to worship in private and in their respective religious buildings (churches, mosques, etc.), but public displays of religion outside of such designated areas were prohibited. In addition, religious institutions were not allowed to express their views in any type of mass media, and many religious buildings were demolished or used for other purposes.
Lincoln

United States

#10738 May 15, 2013
the delusion of being "the atheist moderator" is revealing.

In East Germany people attempting to leave the atheist state were shot in the back. This included men, women, and children.
Further information regarding atheist East Germany may be found in histories of Germany.

atheist denial of history is amusing.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#10739 May 15, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
The Soviet Union was the first state to have, as an ideological objective, the elimination of religion and its replacement with universal atheism. The communist regime confiscated religious property, ridiculed religion, harassed believers, and propagated atheism in schools. The confiscation of religious assets was often based on accusations of illegal accumulation of wealth.
The vast majority of people in the Russian empire were, at the time of the revolution, religious believers, whereas the communists aimed to break the power of all religious institutions and eventually replace religious belief with atheism.
"Science" was counterposed to "religious superstition" in the media and in academic writing. The main religions of pre-revolutionary Russia persisted throughout the entire Soviet period, but they were only tolerated within certain limits. Generally, this meant that believers were free to worship in private and in their respective religious buildings (churches, mosques, etc.), but public displays of religion outside of such designated areas were prohibited. In addition, religious institutions were not allowed to express their views in any type of mass media, and many religious buildings were demolished or used for other purposes.
Hmmmmm. Sounds reasonable. The main reason I didn't like the Soviets was that they were our primary partner in the nuclear annihilation dance-a-thon. Together we wasted a lot of time and treasure in MADness. We could have been all over the Solar System by now, I mean as colonists, had we not wasted all those resources in our stupid little game.

Our swords were being rattled by god-fearing christians and theirs by bible-burning atheists. What's the difference? The results are the same. Besides, we have new enemies now that make the Commies look all reasonable. If the Jihadists get nukes, I doubt there'll be any SALT talks or 'detente' being established.

The Soviet government saw religion as an impediment to social and scientific progress, as do I, as do many of us. It's clear that religion is doing NOTHING to ease tensions or promote the Holy Grail of "World Peace". Quite the opposite. The point is ... we'd be better off without it (religion that is). You may consider that an 'arguable point'... in fact, I'm sure you do. It has already been pointed out that Mankind has had religion, in one form or another, since the 'Dawn of Time' and look where that's gotten us.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#10740 May 15, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
the delusion of being "the atheist moderator" is revealing.
In East Germany people attempting to leave the atheist state were shot in the back. This included men, women, and children.
Further information regarding atheist East Germany may be found in histories of Germany.
atheist denial of history is amusing.
Who is denying history? Who divided that utterly defeated country up? Who prospered during the Cold War and who suffered? You live in a Glass House and you're throwing stones. Smart.

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

#10741 May 15, 2013
It is revealing how? This is once again a failure to express a point in proper English on your part.

I know you lack proper English comprehension skills but let's try this anyways.

http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/East_Germany

East Germany is historically 90% Protestant and the church remained strong even throughout the time of Stalin. They even cordially invited more Catholics to move there.

Any friction was caused when certain churches would not go along with political leaders, not because of their faith.

90% Protestant historically.

Do you deny history or just not comprehend it?
Lincoln wrote:
the delusion of being "the atheist moderator" is revealing.

In East Germany people attempting to leave the atheist state were shot in the back. This included men, women, and children.
Further information regarding atheist East Germany may be found in histories of Germany.

atheist denial of history is amusing.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#10742 May 15, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
01. Who says God does not talk "back and forth" with the prophets? The prophet's do communicate with God many times.
Depending upon the needs of the people, God does send His revelation to His chosen prophets, many times during their tenure as a prophet.
Calling Prophets as Charlatans means that you know nothing about the office of prophet. I do not know any prophet built their "empire" on this earth.
They taught their followers all good morals and how to pass the test of this life.
What morality we see in the world is only because of the efforts of the prophets.
02. I do not see any prophet of God "begging in the street, did you"?
Some of them worked also to earn their lawful living.
But the work to guide humans and bring them closer to their Creator is much more important than working in the field.
And for that reason why you pay so much to your Presidents and Prime Ministers and other politicians, what they do really?
03. Your grudge against prophets seem to be personal and unreasonable and may be it is your envy that how come they got Billions of followers and you could not gain any one.
Try, Try My friend , may be you get some one who will follow to the end of the world!!
Wow. Prophet's really need people like you to 'profit'. LOL

There's been a lot of quotes passed back and forth ... the "Mankind will not know peace until the last king is strangled in the entrails of the last priest" (from Diderot) has got to be my favorite. I use politicians and prophets interchangeably to keep it contemporary.
Thinking

Hounslow, UK

#10743 May 15, 2013
No it wasn't.
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
The Soviet Union was the first state to have, as an ideological objective, the elimination of religion and its replacement with universal atheism. The communist regime confiscated religious property, ridiculed religion, harassed believers, and propagated atheism in schools. The confiscation of religious assets was often based on accusations of illegal accumulation of wealth.
The vast majority of people in the Russian empire were, at the time of the revolution, religious believers, whereas the communists aimed to break the power of all religious institutions and eventually replace religious belief with atheism.
"Science" was counterposed to "religious superstition" in the media and in academic writing. The main religions of pre-revolutionary Russia persisted throughout the entire Soviet period, but they were only tolerated within certain limits. Generally, this meant that believers were free to worship in private and in their respective religious buildings (churches, mosques, etc.), but public displays of religion outside of such designated areas were prohibited. In addition, religious institutions were not allowed to express their views in any type of mass media, and many religious buildings were demolished or used for other purposes.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#10744 May 15, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
That is what I said and as expected he cowered away.
<quoted text>
You drop off the grid a few days and this is what happens! Sorry if I belabored a point already well thrashed. It's just amazing how ... how ... DUMB ... godbots can be. It's a pity their blinders don't work both ways.

Hey godbots! We can still see you!!!
CunningLinguist

Lady Lake, FL

#10745 May 15, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
Generalizing from incidents.
Cleveland sad events could be used to state
"Americans keep girls in slavery" as a rule, not a sad event.
Cherry picking events on your part?
'Generalizing' is because you haven't the skill to properly research anything.

From what I have observed you are well versed in lying, deception and a host of other maladies known specifically to industrious Xtians in their never ending quest for validity.

My answer for you're Xtian 'love'...

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#10746 May 15, 2013
polymath257 wrote:
<quoted text>
The problem is that at some level we *do* understand these things. Each and every prediction of quantum mechanics, no matter how 'strange', has been substantiated. In a real sense we *do* understand how quantum particles behave: they behave like interfering probability waves. This is well-understood and not even controversial any longer.
The Many Worlds description that you seem to dislike quite a bit actually follows from taking the equations we have seriously. It describes the universe as a single probability wave function that evolves through time. But what happens is that the wave function itself breaks down into components that don't interact with each other. It then happens that each component evolves via the same overall equation as the larger wave function. And *that* is what is meant by 'splitting universes'. The lack of interaction keeps them separate, which justifies the use of the word 'universe'. But there is still only *one* overall wave function.
Here is a (pretty bad analogy). Take the positive integers: 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8...
After one second, split them into two groups, the even and the odds:
1,3,5,7,9,....
2,4,6,8,.....
Now, make a choice of 'first thing', either 1 or 2. Let's say we pick 1. THrow it out of that sequences
Then, divide the odds into two groups, taking every other number in the group chosen:
3,7,11,15,19....
5,9,13,17,21,...
Now take the first out of one of these and throw it out, say we pick 5. Now divide that list into two:
9,17,25,33,...
13,21,29,27,...
The point? We can keep going like this forever. The original sequence 'divides' into two subsequences at each choice. Are all those other sequences there? Sure, yes, whatever.
In the same way, whenever a quantum observation is made, the list of future possibilities is restricted. This can be *interpreted* as a splitting off of other universes. But is is less interesting than it sounds.
I mean, mathematics is a wonderful tool for understanding these phenomenon, no doubt, but when you start talking 'splitting off other universes' and stuff like that it quits being quite so abstract. Universes, at least the one we reside in, is not 'abstract' at all. I can kind of grasp that all these various particles, in their various quantum states present themselves because that particle exists simultaneously in multiple 'dimensions' or 'universes' or maybe everything is made out of super-strings and the multiverse and the Flying Spaghetti Monster are all in on it!!!!

<poof!... brain just exploded, excuse me while I reboot and try to clean up this mess>
Lincoln

United States

#10747 May 15, 2013
Thinking wrote:
No it wasn't.
<quoted text>
The Soviet Union was the first state to have, as an ideological objective, the elimination of religion[1] and its replacement with universal atheism.[2][3] The communist regime confiscated religious property, ridiculed religion, harassed believers, and propagated atheism in schools.[4] The confiscation of religious assets was often based on accusations of illegal accumulation of wealth.
The vast majority of people in the Russian empire were, at the time of the revolution, religious believers, whereas the communists aimed to break the power of all religious institutions and eventually replace religious belief with atheism. "Science" was counterposed to "religious superstition" in the media and in academic writing. The main religions of pre-revolutionary Russia persisted throughout the entire Soviet period, but they were only tolerated within certain limits. Generally, this meant that believers were free to worship in private and in their respective religious buildings (churches, mosques, etc.), but public displays of religion outside of such designated areas were prohibited. In addition, religious institutions were not allowed to express their views in any type of mass media, and many religious buildings were demolished or used for other purposes ..........

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_...

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#10748 May 15, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
The Soviet Union was the first state to have, as an ideological objective, the elimination of religion[1] and its replacement with universal atheism.[2][3] The communist regime confiscated religious property, ridiculed religion, harassed believers, and propagated atheism in schools.[4] The confiscation of religious assets was often based on accusations of illegal accumulation of wealth.
The vast majority of people in the Russian empire were, at the time of the revolution, religious believers, whereas the communists aimed to break the power of all religious institutions and eventually replace religious belief with atheism. "Science" was counterposed to "religious superstition" in the media and in academic writing. The main religions of pre-revolutionary Russia persisted throughout the entire Soviet period, but they were only tolerated within certain limits. Generally, this meant that believers were free to worship in private and in their respective religious buildings (churches, mosques, etc.), but public displays of religion outside of such designated areas were prohibited. In addition, religious institutions were not allowed to express their views in any type of mass media, and many religious buildings were demolished or used for other purposes ..........
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_...
Dumb creationist f*ck with no proof of god.
CunningLinguist

Lady Lake, FL

#10749 May 15, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
The Soviet Union was the first state to have, as an ideological objective, the elimination of religion[1] and its replacement with universal atheism.[2][3] The communist regime confiscated religious property, ridiculed religion, harassed believers, and propagated atheism in schools.[4] The confiscation of religious assets was often based on accusations of illegal accumulation of wealth.
The vast majority of people in the Russian empire were, at the time of the revolution, religious believers, whereas the communists aimed to break the power of all religious institutions and eventually replace religious belief with atheism. "Science" was counterposed to "religious superstition" in the media and in academic writing. The main religions of pre-revolutionary Russia persisted throughout the entire Soviet period, but they were only tolerated within certain limits. Generally, this meant that believers were free to worship in private and in their respective religious buildings (churches, mosques, etc.), but public displays of religion outside of such designated areas were prohibited. In addition, religious institutions were not allowed to express their views in any type of mass media, and many religious buildings were demolished or used for other purposes ..........
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_...
You should have read more from your site ...

Although Lenin believed that eventually all nationalities would merge into one, he insisted that the Soviet Union be established as a federation of formally equal nations. In the 1920s, genuine cultural concessions were granted to the nationalities. Communist elites of various nationalities were permitted to flourish and to have considerable self-government. National cultures, religions, and languages were not merely tolerated but, in areas with Muslim populations, encouraged.

Soviet officials identified religion closely with nationality. The implementation of policy toward a particular religion, therefore, depended on the regime's perception of the bond between that religion and the nationality practicing it, the size of the religious community, the extent to which the religion accepted outside authority, and the nationality's willingness to subordinate itself to political authority. Thus the smaller the religious community and the more closely it identified with a particular nationality, the more restrictive were the regime's policies, especially if the religion also recognized a foreign authority such as the pope.

In 1929, with the onset of the Cultural Revolution in the Soviet Union and an upsurge of radical militancy in the Party and Komsomol, a powerful "hard line" in favor of mass closing of churches and arrests of priests became dominant and evidently won Stalin's approval. Secret "hard line" instructions were issued to local party organizations, but not published. When the anti-religious drive inflamed the anger of the rural population, not to mention that of the Pope and other Western church spokesmen, the regime was able to back off from a policy that it had never publicly endorsed anyway.

Although all Soviet leaders had the same long-range goal of developing a cohesive Soviet people, they pursued different policies to achieve it. For the Soviet regime, questions of nationality and religion were always closely linked.

Therefore their attitude toward religion also varied from a total ban on some religions to official support of others.

Now what were you saying again?
Lincoln

United States

#10750 May 15, 2013
"Therefore their attitude toward religion also varied from a total ban on some religions to official support of others."

Under Atheist Stalin 20 Million were killed.

Read a 20th century history and atheism and murder will appear hand in had.
Thinking

Hounslow, UK

#10751 May 15, 2013
No it wasn't.

From your link: "This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed.(January 2008)"
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
The Soviet Union was the first state to have, as an ideological objective, the elimination of religion[1] and its replacement with universal atheism.[2][3] The communist regime confiscated religious property, ridiculed religion, harassed believers, and propagated atheism in schools.[4] The confiscation of religious assets was often based on accusations of illegal accumulation of wealth.
The vast majority of people in the Russian empire were, at the time of the revolution, religious believers, whereas the communists aimed to break the power of all religious institutions and eventually replace religious belief with atheism. "Science" was counterposed to "religious superstition" in the media and in academic writing. The main religions of pre-revolutionary Russia persisted throughout the entire Soviet period, but they were only tolerated within certain limits. Generally, this meant that believers were free to worship in private and in their respective religious buildings (churches, mosques, etc.), but public displays of religion outside of such designated areas were prohibited. In addition, religious institutions were not allowed to express their views in any type of mass media, and many religious buildings were demolished or used for other purposes ..........
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Religion_in_the_...
Thinking

Hounslow, UK

#10752 May 15, 2013
You already agreed that Atheism can't be blamed for atrocities, remember?
Lincoln wrote:
"Therefore their attitude toward religion also varied from a total ban on some religions to official support of others."
Under Atheist Stalin 20 Million were killed.
Read a 20th century history and atheism and murder will appear hand in had.
Lincoln

United States

#10753 May 15, 2013
"Therefore their attitude toward religion also varied from a total ban on some religions to official support of others."

Under Atheist Stalin 20 Million were killed.

Read a 20th century history and atheism and murder will appear hand in hand.
Thinking

Hounslow, UK

#10754 May 15, 2013
If it was written by a lying cu*t like you, maybe.
Lincoln wrote:
"Therefore their attitude toward religion also varied from a total ban on some religions to official support of others."
Under Atheist Stalin 20 Million were killed.
Read a 20th century history and atheism and murder will appear hand in hand.
Lincoln

United States

#10755 May 15, 2013
Thinking wrote:
You already agreed that Atheism can't be blamed for atrocities, remember?
<quoted text>
Atheism, Islam, Judism, and Christianity may be be blamed for atrocities. They are, almost daily, on atheist threads :-)

Atheist threads often mentions the Roman Catholic inquisition but not Stalin
CunningLinguist

Lady Lake, FL

#10756 May 15, 2013
Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
Atheism, Islam, Judism, and Christianity may be be blamed for atrocities. They are, almost daily, on atheist threads :-)
Atheist threads often mentions the Roman Catholic inquisition but not Stalin
Everyone has the right to be stupid, but you have abused the privilege.

Have you considered suing your brains for nonsupport?

It is no secret you are forever lost in thought, it's unfamiliar territory.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... 1 hr serfs up 815
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 4 hr Morse 231,776
Pastafarian former porn star Asia Lemmon allowe... 9 hr tha Professor 1
10) Experts debate reality of God (May '10) Thu Morse 8,934
"No Master! No God!" - Isms, Religion and Atheism (Aug '13) Thu God worships Sin ... 2
Siro is writing a new book Thu Siro 2
Science Disproves Evolution (Aug '12) Thu Morse 1,418

Atheism People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE