Why Atheism Will Replace Religion

Aug 27, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: News24

Please note that for this article "Atheism" also includes agnostics, deists, pagans, wiccans... in other words non-religious.

You will notice this is a statement of fact. And to be fact it is supported by evidence (see references below). Now you can have "faith" that this is not true, but by the very definition of faith, that is just wishful thinking.
Comments
10,161 - 10,180 of 14,385 Comments Last updated Nov 23, 2013

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10520
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

[QUOTE who="KJV
"]<quoted text>
Please list the documented proof to back up your fact.[/QUOTE]

Show us the proof of your god you lying sack of shit theist troll.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10521
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
That is very nice, then please provide a Definition of Atheism that has "all these catch words"!!
That is what I am asking all along. To have a definition of Atheism that has some "positive traits" in it.
And how can we find out who is an Athiest.
Come on, you have done fine, a few more brain storming sessions and you will get it, may be in 2050!!
Atheism is a lack of belief in god.

Your requirement that is be "positive" like your claimed cult / religion (which it is not) is foolish and ignorant.

You repeat your stupidity because you know you are wrong.

In the meantime, no proof of your f*cking bullsh*t god whatsoever and you continue to lie while selling us moral superiority.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10522
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

2

1

MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
How something will replace religion when you are not even able to can survive? It is only a deception, a mirage!!
The only deception here is MUQ with no proof of god, who knows he's a liar and doesn't know when to go away and leave atheists alone.

Nobody is converting to your stupid cult, in fact you guys are being arrested one by one because you guys are stupid enough to enact the bullsh*t written in your violent, hateful rag cult instruction manual.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10523
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

JewGoyimApartheid wrote:
<quoted text>
Korolev had beat Wernher Von Braun to putting a man into space.
So... How could Wernher Von Braun's team be behind that then!?
Wernher Von Braun & Korolev had both read up the modern basis of rocketry by Polish Russian Konstantin Ciolkowski!
In the U.S the main person to put man into space was Polish German Wernher Von Braun from Poznan.
But... In the Soviet Union Ukrainian Russian Korolev had put the first man into space by the workd of Konstantin Ciolkowski!
The world continues to ignore my pioneering experiments with bottle rockets!

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10524
May 10, 2013
 
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
That is very nice, then please provide a Definition of Atheism that has "all these catch words"!!
That is what I am asking all along. To have a definition of Atheism that has some "positive traits" in it.
And how can we find out who is an Athiest.
Come on, you have done fine, a few more brain storming sessions and you will get it, may be in 2050!!
Still no word from you about:-

Too difficult for you to answer?

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10525
May 10, 2013
 
Imhotep wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's an interesting situation for you being in Britain to ponder. ;)
During the Battle of Britain one of the determining factors was the lack of fuel and ability to fight over British airspace
The Messerschmitt fighter had a short range And the Spitfire wasn't much better
3000 miles away in Japan they had the Zero fighter, 1000 mile range. Cheap to manufacture.
Armed with both Cannon & machine guns
Japan Germany and Italy were allies in the axis
If Germany had used Japanese zeros the Battle of Britain would've been the decidedly different.
Perhaps the greatest irony of all in World War II
The Japanese had a perfect surprise attack Pearl Harbor
Six months later they lost four carriers to inferior aircraft
But superior-Intelligence capability.
Like the British wizards at Bletchley Park w/Enigma Machines, they cracked the Japanese naval code and ambushed the fleet.
I've read there was some technology swapping between the Japs and Krauts ... engines and such that could be shipped via submarine. I think the Japs used a German designed engine in their 'Tony' fighter, which departed from the normal Jap air-cooled engines. They didn't like it much. There was so much politics and good-old-boyism in the German aircraft procurement process that a lot of good designs (mainly by Heinkel) got left behind. They were probably too 'proud' to copy anything the Japs had. I bet the lightly armored Zero would have been a good match against Spits with their puny .303 machine guns.

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10526
May 10, 2013
 
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
How something will replace religion when you are not even able to define it?
You cannot leave people hanging in the void, do you?
Please explain what is this Atheism, so people can analyze it and accept it.
Otherwise it is just a wish list.
I agree that most of religions based on superstition and non reasonable grounds and racism and nationalism might fade away.
But true religion based on solid foundation of reason and logic and truth and revelation from God shall survive, any shock and tidal wave of Atheism as they did in past.
These so called Atheists are not a "new phenomenon" they are as old as the religion themselves.
There were always people in every age, who claimed there is no God, but they were in miniscule minority, now there numbers have gone up slightly, due to the Modern Materialistic Philosophy.
But their days are numbered as you cannot hold on a falsehood for more time.
Look at Nazism, Look at Fascism, Look at Communism, look at Socialism?
Atheism will find the same fate as other "isms"!!
A thing which can not be even defined with a positive words, how it can survive? It is only a deception, a mirage!!
Still no word from you about:-

Too difficult for you to answer?

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10527
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Muq how many times do we have to explain to you that atheism is simply not believing in god/s?

Now obviously you are not educated and not very intelligent. Even so surely by now after it being explained to you dozens of times even a barbaric Muslim like you should be able to understand.

Don't you think if Muslims acted a bit more civilized and not so barbaric like beasts they would be more respected?
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>How something will replace religion when you are not even able to define it? It is only a deception, a mirage!!
MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10528
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

[QUOTE who="KJV
"]<quoted text>
This is true.[/QUOTE]

Thank you, you seem to have your heart at the right place!!
MUQ

Dammam, Saudi Arabia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10530
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Givemeliberty wrote:
Muq how many times do we have to explain to you that atheism is simply not believing in god/s?
Now obviously you are not educated and not very intelligent. Even so surely by now after it being explained to you dozens of times even a barbaric Muslim like you should be able to understand.
Don't you think if Muslims acted a bit more civilized and not so barbaric like beasts they would be more respected?
<quoted text>
How can "lack of something" will replace the thing?

You have to replace something with another thing of the same kind.

If Atheism has to replace religion, then we should be able to define what is Atheism.

And all the Superbrains on this thread are unable to do it!!

I never thought that my question will be so difficult to answer !!

Knowingly or unknowingly, I seem to attacked the Very Root of this so called "Atheism"!!

Sorry folks, but truth is to be told at some stage.!!

Have a Nice Time finding the answer!!
MUQ

Jubail, Saudi Arabia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10531
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
Atheism is a lack of belief in god.
Your requirement that is be "positive" like your claimed cult / religion (which it is not) is foolish and ignorant.
You repeat your stupidity because you know you are wrong.
In the meantime, no proof of your f*cking bullsh*t god whatsoever and you continue to lie while selling us moral superiority.
Do you think your abusive and cursing and insulting language will "prove" you case?

I consider that as a "sure shot answer" that you have no answer at all to my simple question!!

Leave those hyperbole words and come to ground level and define Atheism, as what is it, not what it is not!!

Since: Mar 11

Lexington, KY

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10532
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Once again swine, atheism just means not believing in god. The theists like yourself have failed miserably to show your claim for a god is true, we being people of reason reject your claims until you can show observable proof. Atheism only reflects on the position of believing in god, nothing else.

Now my world view would be progressive secular humanist. This is what shapes my interactions with other people around me and brings my zeal and lust for life.
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>How can "lack of something" will replace the thing?

You have to replace something with another thing of the same kind.

If Atheism has to replace religion, then we should be able to define what is Atheism.

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10533
May 10, 2013
 
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you think your abusive and cursing and insulting language will "prove" you case?
I consider that as a "sure shot answer" that you have no answer at all to my simple question!!
Leave those hyperbole words and come to ground level and define Atheism, as what is it, not what it is not!!
Still no word from you about:-

Too difficult for you to answer?

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10534
May 10, 2013
 
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
How can "lack of something" will replace the thing?
You have to replace something with another thing of the same kind.
If Atheism has to replace religion, then we should be able to define what is Atheism.
And all the Superbrains on this thread are unable to do it!!
I never thought that my question will be so difficult to answer !!
Knowingly or unknowingly, I seem to attacked the Very Root of this so called "Atheism"!!
Sorry folks, but truth is to be told at some stage.!!
Have a Nice Time finding the answer!!
Still no word from you about:-

Too difficult for you to answer?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10535
May 10, 2013
 
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Do you think your abusive and cursing and insulting language will "prove" you case?
I consider that as a "sure shot answer" that you have no answer at all to my simple question!!
Leave those hyperbole words and come to ground level and define Atheism, as what is it, not what it is not!!
You have no proof of god and are lying about god. That is a fact.

When you grow up, mature and learn about honestly, please let the atheists know.

Until then f*ck off back to your hateful cult of ignorant people who don't care about facts of honesty.

“Engaged to the love of my life”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10536
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>How can "lack of something" will replace the thing?

You have to replace something with another thing of the same kind.

If Atheism has to replace religion, then we should be able to define what is Atheism.

And all the Superbrains on this thread are unable to do it!!

I never thought that my question will be so difficult to answer !!

Knowingly or unknowingly, I seem to attacked the Very Root of this so called "Atheism"!!

Sorry folks, but truth is to be told at some stage.!!

Have a Nice Time finding the answer!!
When you're on a diet, you replace chocolate with no chocolate.
Nothing is something, and therefore can replace something.

The problem is that you don't understand what the word "replace" means.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10537
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
"God does not play dice with the universe". Albert Einstein
"Stop telling God what to do"

Neils Bohr
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10538
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Lincoln wrote:
<quoted text>
There are no court fees.
No trials.
Mentioning Intelligent design takes five minutes tops.
There is no curriculum and no evidence.
Bingo. Which is why it should only take 5 seconds: ID = Goddidit with magic. Zero evidence.

However the Dover trial (plus every creationism vs evolution trial before then) proves that there ARE court trials. And fees. Which could be dumped on the school board.

Though personally I think they should leave the school board alone and sue the douches responsible for pushing anti-reality religious apologetics into the curriculum. Otherwise they get off scott-free and just try again later. Hopefully next time that'll be the case.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10539
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

JewGoyimApartheid wrote:
<quoted text>
The first to crack the engima code were Polish scientists!
This is true. As I understand it it was a team of Polish and British working together, the Polish are credited with cracking the code and the British developed the machine that automated the translation process.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#10540
May 10, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Imhotep wrote:
<quoted text>
Here's an interesting situation for you being in Britain to ponder. ;)
During the Battle of Britain one of the determining factors was the lack of fuel and ability to fight over British airspace
The Messerschmitt fighter had a short range And the Spitfire wasn't much better
3000 miles away in Japan they had the Zero fighter, 1000 mile range. Cheap to manufacture.
Armed with both Cannon & machine guns
Japan Germany and Italy were allies in the axis
If Germany had used Japanese zeros the Battle of Britain would've been the decidedly different.
Perhaps the greatest irony of all in World War II
The Japanese had a perfect surprise attack Pearl Harbor
Six months later they lost four carriers to inferior aircraft
But superior-Intelligence capability.
Like the British wizards at Bletchley Park w/Enigma Machines, they cracked the Japanese naval code and ambushed the fleet.
We'd have still kicked their azzes.

;-)

Zeroes may have had greater range, but then we really didn't need it as much, since our goal was defense rather than conquer. We also had fuel kindly provided to us by the Americans while the US was also blockading the Japanese supply lines, which was what precipitated the surprise attack on Pearl Harbour in the first place. Plus our planes and pilots were better than both the Germans and the Japanese. Especially the latter as they kept crashing into things!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••