Why Atheism Will Replace Religion

[polymath257]

Colin The Zionist wrote:

<quoted text>
Believing that takes more faith than believing on the world wide flood

Really? We can actually image the folds in the strata. We can see how the oceanic crust is folded to produce the mountains. We can see the scaring on the ocean floor showing how India moved. We can date specific events in the collision. We can measure the rate at which the continents move today and those measurements are consistent with the overall picture.

On the other hand, you have the proposed world-wide flood that left no evidence and which other cultures lived through without noticing.

[Colin The Zionist]

polymath257 wrote:

<quoted text>
Evolutionary theory says nothing about where living organisms came from. it deals with how living species change over time.

To go from the big bang to now life must have come from somewhere, where did it come from.

[Colin The Zionist]

polymath257 wrote:

<quoted text>
Really? We can actually image the folds in the strata. We can see how the oceanic crust is folded to produce the mountains. We can see the scaring on the ocean floor showing how India moved. We can date specific events in the collision. We can measure the rate at which the continents move today and those measurements are consistent with the overall picture.
On the other hand, you have the proposed world-wide flood that left no evidence and which other cultures lived through without noticing.

First the moving crust and folding rocks were caused by the food. There are many cultures that have records of the flood all over the world lol it up.

[Colin The Zionist]

polymath257 wrote:

<quoted text>
You were the one claiming that the Big Bang has something to do with evolution.

Evolution claims that the big bang lie easy the start of the evolution lie. if not where did it all come from

[Hedonist]

Colin The Zionist wrote:

<quoted text>
To go from the big bang to now life must have come from somewhere, where did it come from.

You would first need to understand basic cosmology and then geology and then geochemistry.

You better start with a basic middle school science text book. You've got a long way to go to understand any answer to your question. It would require at least a high school level understanding of the Earth sciences.

[Givemeliberty]

Get your GED and we can go from there. Sadly you are living in the fog of superstition and so won't listen to reason. As soon as someone says something different than Yahweh magicked it you shut down.

Colin The Zionist wrote:

<quoted text>
Ok now you explain where did living organisms come from according to your evolutionary theory.

[Colin The Zionist]

Hedonist wrote:

<quoted text>
You would first need to understand basic cosmology and then geology and then geochemistry.
You better start with a basic middle school science text book. You've got a long way to go to understand any answer to your question. It would require at least a high school level understanding of the Earth sciences.

So what you are actually trying to say is that you either do not know or are not willing to stick your neck out and get caught.

The evolution tag team falls once again since mow the score is:
Evolution tag team - NIL
Me - 8

Thanks for playing you loose once again.

[Colin The Zionist]

A message to all the Evolution tag team members please tag in someone willing to go the distance and will not turn to the age old attempt to run down my education.

[Colin The Zionist]

Givemeliberty wrote:

Get your GED and we can go from there. Sadly you are living in the fog of superstition and so won't listen to reason. As soon as someone says something different than Yahweh magicked it you shut down.
<quoted text>

No YHVH did not "magicked" anything. If I shut down why don't you answer the question I asked. Here it is again, where did life appear from according to evolutionary theory?

Now I have once again asked the failing tag team a question someone please answer it

[Givemeliberty]

Yes when we see people taking myths seriously we lol it up. We lol our @sses off.

Colin The Zionist wrote:

<quoted text>
First the moving crust and folding rocks were caused by the food. There are many cultures that have records of the flood all over the world lol it up.

[Mr Smartypants]

Colin The Zionist wrote:

<quoted text>
To go from the big bang to now life must have come from somewhere, where did it come from.

Abiogenesis. All it takes is a single self-replicating molecule to start everything off. A lot more plausible than some god boot-strapping himself into existence.

[Mr Smartypants]

Thinking wrote:

I prefer the modified Pascal's wager where, against all the odds, there is some deity which rewards all the non-believers for not misrepresenting it and being self reliant.
<quoted text>

That's an idea I've considered as well. The Anti-Pascal's Wager?

[Colin The Zionist]

Mr Smartypants wrote:

<quoted text>
Abiogenesis. All it takes is a single self-replicating molecule to start everything off. A lot more plausible than some god boot-strapping himself into existence.

Ok now where did that single self-replicating molecule come from.?

[Jeff]

Mr Smartypants wrote:

<quoted text>
Abiogenesis. All it takes is a single self-replicating molecule to start everything off. A lot more plausible than some god boot-strapping himself into existence.

Abiogenesis is like a car coming together all by itself. In fact there are better odds of that happening than the first cell coming about by the mindless forces of nature.

[Colin The Zionist]

Givemeliberty wrote:

Yes when we see people taking myths seriously we lol it up. We lol our @sses off.
<quoted text>

So you must be laughing at the evolutionist tag team all the time them.

[downhill246]

Mr Smartypants wrote:

<quoted text>
Abiogenesis. All it takes is a single self-replicating molecule to start everything off. A lot more plausible than some god boot-strapping himself into existence.

Not plausible at all. How low a probability do mathematicians believe makes an event such as abiogenesis essentially impossible?Émile Borel has estimated 10-50 power; and William Dembski has calculated a lower limit of 10-150 power, based on the number of elementary particles in the universe and the age of the universe.
Harold Moskowitz, renowned physicist from Yale Univesity, the author of the 1993 book The Origin of Cellular Life, puts the odds of any kind of random creation of life from non living matter at one in 10 to the billionth power.

[Colin The Zionist]

downhill246 wrote:

<quoted text>
Not plausible at all. How low a probability do mathematicians believe makes an event such as abiogenesis essentially impossible?Émile Borel has estimated 10-50 power; and William Dembski has calculated a lower limit of 10-150 power, based on the number of elementary particles in the universe and the age of the universe.
Harold Moskowitz, renowned physicist from Yale Univesity, the author of the 1993 book The Origin of Cellular Life, puts the odds of any kind of random creation of life from non living matter at one in 10 to the billionth power.

Very good post but I still want them to tell me where they think it came from disregarding the enormous odds.

[Colin The Zionist]

Dirty White Schlepper wrote:

<quoted text>
Or how the ruins @ Puma Punku were made.

WOW Puma Punku is so great. Total proof that we were not the first with technology.

[downhill246]

Colin The Zionist wrote:

<quoted text>
Very good post but I still want them to tell me where they think it came from disregarding the enormous odds.

Abiogenesis is a myth of naturalism.

[emperorjohn]

Colin The Zionist wrote:

<quoted text>
I fully agree evolution is a myth regardless of what language you read it in. But the Torah of YHVH is fact regardless what you may try to claim

The Torah is equally as true as me telling people that I ma nine inch long. Neither can be substantiated by fact.