Why Atheism Will Replace Religion

Why Atheism Will Replace Religion

There are 14730 comments on the News24 story from Aug 27, 2012, titled Why Atheism Will Replace Religion. In it, News24 reports that:

Please note that for this article "Atheism" also includes agnostics, deists, pagans, wiccans... in other words non-religious.

You will notice this is a statement of fact. And to be fact it is supported by evidence (see references below). Now you can have "faith" that this is not true, but by the very definition of faith, that is just wishful thinking.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at News24.

Siro

Auburn, Australia

#5728 Feb 16, 2013
Khatru wrote:
<quoted text>
Here you say that Satan is theistic being.
You also said that the Church of Satan do not recognise a theistic being.
<quoted text>
In other words, you appear to be saying that Satan is not a theistic being.
Satan is a theistic being because he is an object of worship for his followers and they have rituals in order to do so.
These people are theistic satanists.

The church of satan was established by anton lavey, he was an atheist as are the adherants of the church.
They use the name to describe their subconscious feelings of hedonism, greed, etc and justify their action for doing acts to achieve these ends.
These people while describing themselves as satanists are actually atheists for they do not believe in either God or satan as animated beings.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#5729 Feb 16, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
Did Jesus have any older brothers or sisters? LOL
Yeah. "Billy Christ". He wore thick glasses and drank a lot of beer.

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#5730 Feb 16, 2013
Khatru wrote:
<quoted text>
What teachings would they be and how do you know they are Islamic?
Oh wait, that's easy.
It the teachings are for men only, then they are Islamic.
Are prostate glands Islamic?

“Vita e' Bella.”

Since: May 12

Location hidden

#5731 Feb 16, 2013
Givemeliberty wrote:
Hey if you got a crush on Tom Brady suggest that to him. I notice you couldn't refute what I said.
I humbly accept your surrender.
<quoted text>
Silly rabbit Trix are for kids. What did u offer that was worthy of refutation? That Professor Herman is a respected religion scholar? Best selling author? Noted expert on early Christianity? Commentator sought by the History Channel?
Jumper The Wise

Morgantown, KY

#5732 Feb 16, 2013
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>This is an atheist thread* in an atheist forum, you ass wipe. I would never show up in your church, and say what I think of you and your interest in other males danglies. Maybe you should take your crap, to where your kind congregate, you are doing them no favors by mouthing off here.
*for all intents and purposes consider this our(the atheist) living room and when you're pissing all over the place, it says more about who you are, than who you think we are.
I know some atheists personally and they are wonderful people that have allowed me into their living room over a many nights of cold beer.
So I can say that there are some azzes out there as yourself who give you guys a bad wrap.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#5733 Feb 16, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
<quoted text>
We still want answers, and "fairy tales" have evolved. The questions are still there though.
<quoted text>
We're all indoctrinated everyday, largely through adverstising. As to skeptical thinking, we all should use more of it. However, even the most skeptical of minds, will sometimes wonder "why"? "Why amm I here"? "Why was I born where I was born, to whom, etc?"
<quoted text>
Somehow I doubt that, I just think the wars would be shorter, more frequent, and happen once a month.:)
Git-r-done.
We had to invent gods to provide the "why" factor which everyday experience shows does not exist. How, when and where are better questions.

Since: Mar 11

Scottsburg, IN

#5734 Feb 16, 2013
Just because you tossed a lot of man salad and had your prostate poked by dozens of black Muslim inmates doesn't make the prostate Islamic.

Turds are Islamic and Christian because they come out of your christhole.
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
Are prostate glands Islamic?

Since: May 10

Location hidden

#5735 Feb 16, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
We had to invent gods to provide the "why" factor which everyday experience shows does not exist. How, when and where are better questions.
Really?

You can get away free with killing another person, or you can go to death row, depending on the answer to,..."why?".

Powerful, for something that doesn't exist.
Henry

Thum, Germany

#5736 Feb 16, 2013
Hidingfromyou wrote:
<quoted text>
Yaaay! Thank you for your kind words - and IANS for bringing me here.
Yeah, the article is basically saying "thanks to a wider access of education, entertainment, health medicine and social connections, religion is dying." I'd agree with that.
Strong belief, as denoted by church attendance and paying attention to religious leaders, is at a historical low and continues to drop. Even those who "believe in God" and are self-professed Christians don't know the Bible, don't attend church, don't think about God much. I see this every day in my classes. Since I teach evolution, people are compelled to write to me "I believe in God, but..." I get these letters all the time instead of the assignments they are supposed to write - telling you the low quality of k-12 education in America, sorry - but few of them are strong believers. Maybe one in every class of 40.
Subsequently I get a few letters - again, only one or two - of people who write "I can't believe someone is talking about their religion again. Don't they understand anything about science?" or other letters disparaging the poor quality of thinking that Creationists have.
So it's moving away from strongly religious for a no. of reasons. America is a nation that draws strength in individuality and there's been a movement toward personalizing religion - each finds their own God. Couple that with the massive amount of easily accessible information - science has crushed all that religion once held on high. Only an uneducated person could be a Bible literalist in today's world. All but the deceitful religious leaders have admitted the world is old, evolution occurs, we don't live in an earth or heliocentric universe - and they've basically had to move to esoteric spiritualism.
The new ways in which we create community without religion make religion redundant. Religion no longer explains the universe around us (or does so with such ridiculous absurdity, it's laughably undermining itself). And I think that's the crux of the matter. Religion isn't necessary if we can form larger than kin-based social bonds through our education, entertainment, economies, treaties, societal laws and so on.
But it will remain a fascinating and rich historical narrative, so that children can ask their parents "why would anyone believe the world was 6000 years old? why would anyone believe in hell?"
Real fascinating for the children is the world of science. The poorer countries have mostly parents who have a poor education and for lack of money parent have not the financial ressources for the education of their children even for their substitution. Capitalism is the real reason for this misere!
Henry

Thum, Germany

#5737 Feb 16, 2013
MUQ wrote:
<quoted text>
Ans.
And who told you anything from God cannot be misused by humans?
God did create Uranium and see how humans are misusing it for planning to destroy entire humanity?
The religion is from Guide and it is only a set of guidelines for humans to practice and be successful in this world and in the hereafter.
It is like a Doctor’s prescription, it is only effective, if it is used properly and people avoid the prohibitions that are prescribed.
If God wanted to “force” every one to become like angels, what was the need to create humans and give them choice.
It is in the hereafter that the results shall be declared, one group shall go to heavens and another to hell.
Do you know in which group you belong to? I do not know, what about you?
Well forget that insane religions at all. There is no heaven and of course no hell ether. Science is the only target for people.
Henry

Thum, Germany

#5738 Feb 16, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
Did Jesus have any older brothers or sisters? LOL
Jesus died 2000 years ago and about this human is only very little known. The scriptures are full of fakes, lies and errors. The mighty and rich one have manipulated in the last milleniums whatever they liked in their own interests!
Henry

Thum, Germany

#5739 Feb 16, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
If one doesn't believe in a magical fairy in the sky named god, then one doesn't believe in it's children named angels.
Ergo one does not believe in satan since according to your fairy tales, he is a fallen angel.
Therefore satanism has nothing to do with atheism.
You religious nuts have nothing better to do than to deny reality and fact.
Amusing satanism is of course religious garbage than all religions!

“Trolls are Clueless”

Since: Dec 07

Aptos, California

#5740 Feb 16, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
Really?
You can get away free with killing another person, or you can go to death row, depending on the answer to,..."why?".
Powerful, for something that doesn't exist.
I would say it is more about having money and support to pay for a real defense than anything else.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#5741 Feb 16, 2013
Pietro Armando wrote:
So, did Jesus really exist? With his new book, Did Jesus Exist? The Historical Argument for Jesus of Nazareth, Bart Ehrman, historian and professor of religious studies at the University of North Carolina Chapel Hill, wanted to provide solid historical evidence for the existence of Jesus."I wanted to approach this question as an historian to see whether that's right or not," Ehrman tells weekends on All Things Considered host Guy Raz.The answer is straightforward and widely accepted among scholars of all faiths, but Ehrman says there is a large contingent of people claiming that Jesus never did exist. These people are also known as mythicists."It was a surprise to me to see how influential these mythicists are," Ehrman says. "Historically, they've been significant and in the Soviet Union, in fact, the mythicist view was the dominant view, and even today, in some parts of the West – in parts of Scandinavia — it is a dominant view that Jesus never existed," he says.Mythicists' arguments are fairly plausible, Ehrman says. According to them, Jesus was never mentioned in any Roman sources and there is no archeological evidence that Jesus ever existed. Even Christian sources are problematic – the Gospels come long after Jesus' death, written by people who never saw the man."Most importantly," he explains, "these mythicists point out that there are Pagan gods who were said to die and rise again and so the idea is that Jesus was made up as a Jewish god who died and rose again."In his book, Ehrman marshals all of the evidence proving the existence of Jesus, including the writings of the apostle Paul."Paul knew Jesus' brother, James, and he knew his closest disciple, Peter, and he tells us that he did," Ehrman says. "If Jesus didn't exist, you would think his brother would know about it, so I think Paul is probably pretty good evidence that Jesus at least existed," he says.In Did Jesus Exist?, Ehrman builds a technical argument and shows that one of the reasons for knowing that Jesus existed is that if someone invented Jesus, they would not have created a messiah who was so easily overcome."The Messiah was supposed to overthrow the enemies – and so if you're going to make up a messiah, you'd make up a powerful messiah," he says. "You wouldn't make up somebody who was humiliated, tortured and the killed by the enemies."So Jesus did exist, but who was he? Ehrman says when historians focus on the life of Jesus, they discover a Jesus who is completely different from the one portrayed by popular culture or by religious texts."The mythicists have some right things to say," Ehrman says. "The Gospels do portray Jesus in ways that are non-historical."When Raz asks Ehrman about his relationship to Jesus, Ehrman says that most of it is very historical but that Jesus teaches us valuable lessons."Jesus' teachings of love, and mercy and forgiveness, I think, really should dominate our lives," he says. "On the personal level, I agree with many of the ethical teachings of Jesus and I try to model my life on them, even though I don't agree with the apocalyptic framework in which they were put."
Too long, no paragraphs=not read.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#5742 Feb 16, 2013
Langoliers wrote:
<quoted text>Nope, no evidence. The server will crash and you will be gone.
Sure, you can just go back to living in your own little fantasy land.

I'll stay here in reality.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#5743 Feb 16, 2013
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>You had better respect him, or he will make you eat your children.

Leviticus 26:29
Oh but that is the moral thing to do, how could the bible EVER be wrong?

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#5744 Feb 16, 2013
Jumper The Wise wrote:
<quoted text>If You don't mind please...leave your comments to those who have adressed YOU.
It's a public forum, people can respond to anyone they want to.

Deal with it.
havent forgotten

Lamoni, IA

#5745 Feb 16, 2013
RHill wrote:
<quoted text>
We had to invent gods to provide the "why" factor which everyday experience shows does not exist. How, when and where are better questions.
and we don't know ye is often the best answer. to be content with not knowing is the best replacement with a false claim to know. to be inquiring should not be dominated by the need to know, since that is a road that could lead to a hurried false conclusion. to be inquiring should be dominated by the need to knquire! atheism that is defined as knwoing there is no God - however defined - is a form of needing to know. atheism that is merely not believing, and is happily content with not claiming to know for sure, is agnostic atheism, and the sensible alternative which allows for inquiry - with out rushing to judgment about anything. The only thing we need to rush to judgment on is what the risk is if we are mistaken about something and act upon that mistake. so risk assessment must replace firm belief in many instances. particularly the global warming issue, and the need for a priority on searching for asteroids that might collide with earth. it is not necessary to have a belief about this, only a risk assessment of how bad it would be if we were sanguine and mistaken.

I do not think this applies to the socalled risk of going to hell if we do not believe in a God. since the God that would send us to hell for not believing in it would be a bad God not worth believing in. better separation from such a god than proximity to it. the "devil" could not be much worse than such a deity, and would be far more interesting, one suspects!

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#5746 Feb 16, 2013
Buck Crick wrote:
<quoted text>
Really?
You can get away free with killing another person, or you can go to death row, depending on the answer to,..."why?".
Powerful, for something that doesn't exist.
We're not talking about the various and mundane reasons people do what they do. Me & Pietro talking cosmic "Why's" here, Bucko.

“Blue Collar Philosopher”

Since: Nov 08

Texas, USA

#5747 Feb 16, 2013
Henry wrote:
<quoted text>
Jesus died 2000 years ago and about this human is only very little known. The scriptures are full of fakes, lies and errors. The mighty and rich one have manipulated in the last milleniums whatever they liked in their own interests!
Of course. I was making a joke regarding the Virgin Birth. All of Jesus' brothers (and sisters) would have to be younger.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
The Dumbest Thing Posted by a Godbot (Jun '10) 10 min Richardfs 5,700
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 29 min Into The Night 48,654
Athetists' best bet is that there is a God. 2 hr JustASkeptic 40
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 8 hr scientia potentia... 23,511
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 9 hr Thinking 21,875
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 11 hr ChristineM 258,041
News Louisiana Christians reclaim safe space by runn... 13 hr Mikko 1
More from around the web