Why Atheism Will Replace Religion

[01Justsayin]

Adam wrote:

<quoted text>Belief systems of the past, pagan mythologies are myths. We all agree on that. Stories of Muhammed, his night flight to heaven, is a myth. We can agree. 000s of gods and supernatural beings, fairies, goblins, elves, etc. are all myths. We all agree. Shape shifting reptiles, UFOs humping prehistoric man, these are myths if you are a sane person.

It is obvious to all of us. These are myths. But we cannot question the beliefs of the "holy" bible cause it might upset people.

Personally I think its operating a double standard.

No double standard here, friend. Question all you want. After all, how are we supposed to get answers if we don't ask questions. Kindly refrain from judging me as an individual for formulating my own opinion seeing as how I don't do that to you, however. Religious beliefs cannot be analyzed under a microscope. The fact remains that you cannot prove that God (or whatever name other religious groups use for him) doesn't exist. Each of us are entitled to our own beliefs, and believing in God just so happens to be mine.

[Givemeliberty]

Why do you as a believer come to the atheism forum. Oh and just because you are not a catholic doesn't make you any less deluded. The onus is on the person making the claim that something exists not the people who wisely say not buying it.

By that reasoning the crazy man on the corner screaming that he saw a demonic army gathering to storm the city must be taken seriously. Would you take his delusion as serious? If not your argument has fallen apart. You like him are free to live in your delusional world but the rest of us will just walk by and chuckle at both of you.

01Justsayin wrote:

<quoted text>
Again with the insults. Which, as we know, are the lowest form of dialogue. Religious belief cannot be analyzed under a microscope. The fact remains that you cannot prove that God doesn't exist. Thus I'm not a liar. I simply have different beliefs than you. Nothing wrong with that. Simply part of being human. I think the real question is why do you feel the need to get angry at the fact that I don't believe in the same way as you? That's just illogical.

[LuLu Ford]

Langoliers wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL
You're so confused.
Repeat after me
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God

Really? What evidence? What proof?

[Rose_NoHo]

Langoliers wrote:

<quoted text>
Them don't.
Were is the evidence for spontaneous life?

Them don't? Who do?

[Langoliers]

"Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>No christian has ever demanded that the bible be corrected for its false words against athiests."

That's because it has no false words.

[The_Box]

Langoliers wrote:

That's because it has no false words.

How about when the prophet Ezekiel prophesied that Tyre would be destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar and never rebuilt again?

Nebuchadnezzar failed in his siege and Tyre is flourishing today.

[Rose_NoHo]

Langoliers wrote:

<quoted text>
LOL
You're so confused.
Repeat after me
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God

Then why didn't you provide any evidence for god?
My guess is because there isn't any.

[-Skeptic-]

Langoliers wrote:

"Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>No christian has ever demanded that the bible be corrected for its false words against athiests."
That's because it has no false words.

Trust a creationist to lie.

[Rose_NoHo]

01Justsayin wrote:

<quoted text>
I can agree with you. Though I don't believe anyone has the authority to call someone else's beliefs myths. I am right there with you on everything else. Especially the being true to yourself bit.

But what if the beliefs ARE myths? I think it's important to point that out. Especially when people are trying to deny people equal rights based on their beliefs in those myths. If, back in the 60's, fundies had just said, "I believe Genesis 1:4" and then minded their own business, that would have been one thing. But, instead, they used the verse to deny black people equal rights, up to the point of murder.

[Langoliers]

LuLu Ford wrote:

<quoted text>Really? What evidence? What proof?

"What proof?"

You're still so confused.

Repeat after me

There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God
There is evidence for God
There is no proof of God

[Langoliers]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>Them don't? Who do?

Sorry typo "Them = Then"

[Ooogah Boogah]

01Justsayin wrote:

<quoted text>
I'm not even gonna go there. Have fun with that. I do have his writings on a shelf in the top of my bedroom closet if you wanna read em though. It's a very interesting read. Very thought provoking.

And STILL Josephus was born AFTER the supposed Biblical events. He could not have written first hand accounts of them. The best he could have done is to record the oral legends of the time (hearsay). You've still got nothing.

That hasn't changed a whit.

[Rose_NoHo]

TerryL wrote:

<quoted text>She comes off as the type that only reads the parts that are highlighted. The vast majority of the religious people I know (mostly Christians) have never even opened their Bibles aside from opening the cover to fill out family info. That's the funny thing about Christians... every one of them has a Bible... so very few have ever actually read it.

I think if more Christians actually read it, we'd have fewer Christians.

[Ooogah Boogah]

Jumper The Wise wrote:

<quoted text>There is no proof there isn't.

Just like for leprechauns and flying spaghetti monsters.

[Langoliers]

The_Box wrote:

<quoted text>How about when the prophet Ezekiel prophesied that Tyre would be destroyed by Nebuchadnezzar and never rebuilt again?

Nebuchadnezzar failed in his siege and Tyre is flourishing today.

http://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.asp...

[Langoliers]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>Then why didn't you provide any evidence for god?
My guess is because there isn't any.

Now don't be stupid. I know it's hard for you but try and stay with us.

[Ooogah Boogah]

01Justsayin wrote:

<quoted text>
Again with the insults. Which, as we know, are the lowest form of dialogue. Religious belief cannot be analyzed under a microscope. The fact remains that you cannot prove that God doesn't exist. Thus I'm not a liar. I simply have different beliefs than you. Nothing wrong with that. Simply part of being human. I think the real question is why do you feel the need to get angry at the fact that I don't believe in the same way as you? That's just illogical.

Again with the insults. Which, as we know, are the lowest form of dialogue. Religious belief cannot be analyzed under a microscope. The fact remains that you cannot prove that The Flying Spaghetti Monster doesn't exist. Thus I'm not a liar. I simply have different beliefs than you. Nothing wrong with that. Simply part of being human. I think the real question is why do you feel the need to get angry at the fact that I don't believe in the same way as you? That's just illogical.

See how that doesn't work? Bet not!

[The_Box]

Langoliers wrote:

<quoted text>
http://www.apologeticspress.org/apcontent.asp...

That's some quality lying there.

Tyre was an island city. The settlements on the mainland were suburbs. Nebuchadnezzar destroyed those suburbs but failed to defeat the city itself.

The prophecy is quite clearly about Nebby. It says he and his men will destroy it. It is not about Alexander 250 years later.

The prophecy fails.

[Langoliers]

Rose_NoHo wrote:

<quoted text>Then why didn't you provide any evidence for god?
My guess is because there isn't any.

Keep guessing.

[Rose_NoHo]

Langoliers wrote:

<quoted text>
Now don't be stupid. I know it's hard for you but try and stay with us.

Since you tried to insult me instead of providing any evidence god exists, I'll take that to mean you don't have any evidence that god exists.
You know why there isn't any evidence god exists? Well, that's because he doesn't exist.
File that under "Duh".

Or you could provide some evidence. After all, I'm not the only person reading your posts...

What? No evidence?