Census data reveal there are 4million...

Census data reveal there are 4million fewer Christians and one in four is now an atheist

There are 394 comments on the Mail on Sunday story from Dec 11, 2012, titled Census data reveal there are 4million fewer Christians and one in four is now an atheist. In it, Mail on Sunday reports that:

Data from last year's census today revealed the stunning decline of religion in the UK - with the number of Christians dropping by more than 4million.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Mail on Sunday.

Thinking

Cirencester, UK

#217 Dec 13, 2012
'cos you're a snippy cu*t.
rio wrote:
<quoted text>
I have seen a few of your posts, and you don't seem to agree with me. I wonder why?

“It's just a box of rain...”

Since: May 07

Knoxville, TN

#218 Dec 13, 2012
It's actually a bit odd that "Paki" is considered offensive. Its Urdu/Farsi root means "the pure." Logically, if Paki is offensive, Kurd, Afghani, Uzbeki, Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Turkmeni, and Tajik should be as well. I think Pakis should take back their name with the pride that all nationalities have a right to feel/

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#219 Dec 13, 2012
NightSerf wrote:
It's actually a bit odd that "Paki" is considered offensive. Its Urdu/Farsi root means "the pure." Logically, if Paki is offensive, Kurd, Afghani, Uzbeki, Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Turkmeni, and Tajik should be as well. I think Pakis should take back their name with the pride that all nationalities have a right to feel/
the point being,RONAN/RIO usually goes mental if anyone calls an Asian "Paki" but he let the mask slip the other day and used the word himself, to insult an Asian guy who had the audacity to disagree with him!

HYPOCRISY is the word.
John

Teneriffe, Australia

#220 Dec 13, 2012
Thinking wrote:
Define "Atheist fundamentalist"
<quoted text>
An "atheist fundamentalist" is the species of conceited faux intellectual atheist who foams at the mouth and rants at the very suggestion that there might be a god or that there is some worth in Christianity.
Thinking

Cirencester, UK

#221 Dec 13, 2012
Well we can't currently prove that no god could exist, but I know 100% for sure there is no such thing as an all powerful benevolent god.
John wrote:
<quoted text>
An "atheist fundamentalist" is the species of conceited faux intellectual atheist who foams at the mouth and rants at the very suggestion that there might be a god or that there is some worth in Christianity.
John

Teneriffe, Australia

#222 Dec 13, 2012
Thinking wrote:
Define "Atheist fundamentalist"
<quoted text>
I should also point out that atheist fundamentalists also push their fanatic beliefs into ridiculous evil behaviour for no better reason than they refuse to admit they are wrong.
The vegan AR fanatics are a classic example.
They are without exception atheists, the direct descendent of "counter culture" hippies and are rabid fundamentalists.
To them there is no god so man has no soul, therefore man is just an animal, therefore animals are as important as people (actually more important since people are guilty of "atrocities" against animals), therefore all human rights must be given to all animals and anybody who eats an animal or keeps a pet or rides a horse is a criminal to be destroyed.
These fanatics routinely starve their own children of the nutrients they need to survive. They burn the property of those who disagree with them. The fabricate evidence to push their cult.
They picket food outlets.
They attack anybody who disagrees with them.
John

Teneriffe, Australia

#223 Dec 13, 2012
I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
How does coveting private information, stealing it and then encouraging someone to kill themselves fit with christian ideals?
I'm pretty sure it breaks 3 of the ten commandments.
What "private information"?
Everybody knew she was there and why she was there.
Nobody encouraged anybody to commit suicide. The nurse spaz did it all on her own.
Thinking

Cirencester, UK

#224 Dec 13, 2012
F**k off now, you're boring me.
John wrote:
<quoted text>
I should also point out that atheist fundamentalists also push their fanatic beliefs into ridiculous evil behaviour for no better reason than they refuse to admit they are wrong.
The vegan AR fanatics are a classic example.
They are without exception atheists, the direct descendent of "counter culture" hippies and are rabid fundamentalists.
To them there is no god so man has no soul, therefore man is just an animal, therefore animals are as important as people (actually more important since people are guilty of "atrocities" against animals), therefore all human rights must be given to all animals and anybody who eats an animal or keeps a pet or rides a horse is a criminal to be destroyed.
These fanatics routinely starve their own children of the nutrients they need to survive. They burn the property of those who disagree with them. The fabricate evidence to push their cult.
They picket food outlets.
They attack anybody who disagrees with them.
John

Teneriffe, Australia

#225 Dec 13, 2012
I can read wrote:
<quoted text>
Sounds like you want to bring back witch burning.
PS If evil exists, you're it.
Like talking to a child.
John

Teneriffe, Australia

#226 Dec 13, 2012
Thinking wrote:
christianity has no monopoly on those values and doesn't always support them.
christianity delayed the emancipation of slaves, women and homosexuals. In some cases, it still does.
<quoted text>
Horseshit.
Let me point out the self evident.
The concepts of banning slavery, women's suffrage, and the tolerance of homosexuals, were all achieved first and only achieved in CHRISTIAN nations.
This is no coincidence.
They are all based on the unique Christian principal of do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
Get a clue.

Since: Mar 12

Location hidden

#227 Dec 13, 2012
John wrote:
<quoted text>
What "private information"?
Everybody knew she was there and why she was there.
Nobody encouraged anybody to commit suicide. The nurse spaz did it all on her own.
"the nurse spaz"

very classy john.it is strange to think there are total pricks like you out there,you most be very of taking being a prick to a new level.

well done.

“It's just a box of rain...”

Since: May 07

Knoxville, TN

#228 Dec 13, 2012
Thinking wrote:
Well we can't currently prove that no god could exist, but I know 100% for sure there is no such thing as an all powerful benevolent god.
<quoted text>
Doesn't matter much to me. "Proof," as if there was any such thing, is only useful to those who want to convert those who believe differently. How many here really want to do that? Most on both sides are simply defending what they do believe, which is just as useless--why should any of us bother? The whole debate fills the space between posts that are actually insightful and interesting with page after page of annoyance, boredom, and stupidity. But those few posts are worth the effort it takes to find them.

But I do offer this challenge to the other writers here: look over the last few posts you have written. Do they offer anything that's really worth reading or thinking about? Or do they contribute more to the constant and worthless bickering that fills these pages? Can you do better, offer more substance? With a little effort, can you substantiate the assertions that you offer without any support at all?

Read! Think! Write! Isn't that what we're really here for?
Thinking

Cirencester, UK

#229 Dec 13, 2012
Your lot said "suffer little children", you sick bastards.
John wrote:
<quoted text>
Like talking to a child.
John

Teneriffe, Australia

#231 Dec 13, 2012
Thinking wrote:
Great point.
You couldn't even get an English language bible until the 16th Century.
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/William_Tyndale
<quoted text>
The whole point of the corrupt church of the middle ages trying to keep the bible in Latin was to prevent the people finding out what Christ actually said.
Once the bible was translated into English the power of the clergy was broken, church was separated from state, and Christianity went back to being what it was before the state got hold of it.
Rejecting Christianity because of what some medieval government tyrants did is stupid.
Thinking

Cirencester, UK

#233 Dec 13, 2012
GFY

These things all happened in countries where religion first started to lose its grip.
John wrote:
<quoted text>
Horseshit.
Let me point out the self evident.
The concepts of banning slavery, women's suffrage, and the tolerance of homosexuals, were all achieved first and only achieved in CHRISTIAN nations.
This is no coincidence.
They are all based on the unique Christian principal of do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
Get a clue.
John

Teneriffe, Australia

#234 Dec 13, 2012
Thinking wrote:
Your lot said "suffer little children", you sick bastards.
<quoted text>
Now your just being pathetic.
Christ said "Suffer the little children to come unto me and forbid them not, for of such is the kingdom of God."
In other words, do not forbid the little children to come near me, for such as they is the Kingdom Of God.
Thinking

Cirencester, UK

#235 Dec 13, 2012
I came here via the christian forum because of the lies about Evolution. There's a lot of useless religious bastards eating cycles which could be better devoted to advancing knowledge.
NightSerf wrote:
<quoted text>
Doesn't matter much to me. "Proof," as if there was any such thing, is only useful to those who want to convert those who believe differently. How many here really want to do that? Most on both sides are simply defending what they do believe, which is just as useless--why should any of us bother? The whole debate fills the space between posts that are actually insightful and interesting with page after page of annoyance, boredom, and stupidity. But those few posts are worth the effort it takes to find them.
But I do offer this challenge to the other writers here: look over the last few posts you have written. Do they offer anything that's really worth reading or thinking about? Or do they contribute more to the constant and worthless bickering that fills these pages? Can you do better, offer more substance? With a little effort, can you substantiate the assertions that you offer without any support at all?
Read! Think! Write! Isn't that what we're really here for?
John

Teneriffe, Australia

#236 Dec 13, 2012
mikev483 wrote:
<quoted text>
"the nurse spaz"
very classy john.it is strange to think there are total pricks like you out there,you most be very of taking being a prick to a new level.
well done.
Alright, she was a genius.
All geniuses kill themselves over nothing.
John

Teneriffe, Australia

#237 Dec 13, 2012
Thinking wrote:
GFY
These things all happened in countries where religion first started to lose its grip.
<quoted text>
No, these all happened in countries where the tyrants had lost their grip and people started living in accordance with their own Christian ethics.
Face it, "do unto others as you would have others do unto you" is uniquely Christian.
Thinking

Cirencester, UK

#238 Dec 13, 2012
jesus killed himself and he was made out of godspunk.

Allegedly.
John wrote:
<quoted text>
Alright, she was a genius.
All geniuses kill themselves over nothing.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... 2 hr nanoanomaly 117
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 3 hr 15th Dalai Lama 74,760
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... 5 hr Dogen 4,048
The Dumbest Thing Posted by a Godbot (Jun '10) 13 hr Subduction Zone 6,084
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) Thu Subduction Zone 32,062
News The war on Christmas (Dec '10) Wed John 4,951
News Why do public atheists have to behave like such... Jun 21 Eagle 12 - 4
More from around the web