I am not denying that the big bang could have happened. I do accept that probability. My point is to use the big bang to confirm<quoted text>
How about concrete proofs that the people who wrote the scriptures are there to witness it? What, you can’t supply any, yet you want concrete proof of the opposing argument – how very hypocritical of you.
A Belgian priest named Georges Lemaître first suggested the big bang idea based on the observations of Edwin Hubble. It continues to be validated in different ways on a regular basis. But hey, we have been here several times and you ignored it so in you typical godbot way you go round and round again and get nowhere.
Evidence of the big bang
Redshift (Large-scale homogeneity)
CMB and fluctuations in the CMB
Makeup of the Elements, the abundance of lighter elements
Observations of far galaxies and the Evolution of galaxies
Large-scale structure of the universe
Age of stars
Time dilation in supernova brightness curves
So lets look at your view of evidence from the scriptures – no one saw it, no one measured it but obviously godidit because god said so in the bronze age, that’s what you believe and that what you are sticking to – right?
what the Scriptures have been saying for thousands of years: That the universe had a beginning. And now, in 1922 Georges Lemaitre made the atheists stop believing that the universe was without a beginning. Now, if the big bang was the beginning of the universe,
how did it happen? To believe so 100%, you must have some idea of how. Go ahead and share it with me. If it is by faith, you can keep
it for yourself. I don't believe in anything by faith but all on the basis of the concept of probability.