First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Since: Mar 11

Florence, KY

#86 Oct 14, 2012
Yawn you posted this under your other screen name remember?
Doctor Who Two wrote:
"Atheism, as defined by the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, the Routledge Encyclopedia of Philosophy, and other philosophy reference works, is the denial of the existence of God."
Wikipedia:
"Denial
Denial (also called abnegation) is a defense mechanism postulated by Sigmund Freud, in which a person is faced with a fact that is too uncomfortable to accept and rejects it instead, insisting that it is not true despite what may be overwhelming evidence. The subject may use:
simple denial: deny the reality of the unpleasant fact altogether"

“Tis the Season for Reason!”

Since: Feb 11

Pale Blue Dot

#87 Oct 14, 2012
Givemeliberty wrote:
Yawn you posted this under your other screen name remember?
<quoted text>
Was that Educated What Not?

Since: Apr 12

Location hidden

#89 Oct 21, 2012
It may well go down as the biggest radiocarbon dating mistake in history; not because there is anything wrong with the measurement process (there may not have been); not because there is anything inherently wrong with carbon 14 dating (there is not); not because of shoddy sample taking (which indeed was shoddy); not because of red flags that should have raised serious questions (there were quite a few); and not even because a basic tenet of archaeological dating was ignored by good scientists.

No, the reason is because, now, nearly two decades later, whenever carbon 14 dating is discussed in high school or college classrooms, students are likely to raise a hand and ask some probing questions: What about the Shroud of Turin? Was it dated correctly? If not, how could so many scientists from so many reputable radiocarbon dating laboratories screw up so badly?

http://www.innoval.com/C14/

Since: Apr 08

Nottingham, UK

#90 Oct 21, 2012
Doctor Who Two wrote:
<quoted text>
The church?
I don't worship a church
I belong to no religious group.
I have a book it contains the word of God. That's all that's needed
You have a copy of the Quran?
KJV

Brooklyn, NY

#91 Oct 21, 2012
http://www.genesispark.org/exhibits/evidence/...

"In 1944, as a ten year old boy, Newton Anderson dropped a lump of coal and broke it in half in his basement and found that it contained this bell inside. The bituminous coal that was mined near his house in Upshur County West Virginia is supposed to be about 300 million years old! What is a brass bell with an iron clapper doing in coal ascribed to the Carboniferous Period? According to Norm Sharbaugh’s book Ammunition (which includes several “coal anecdotes”) the bell is an antediluvian artifact (made before the Genesis Flood). The Institute for Creation Research had the bell submitted to the lab at the University of Oklahoma. There a nuclear activation analysis revealed that the bell contains an unusual mix of metals, different from any known modern alloy production (including copper, zinc, tin, arsenic, iodine, and selenium)."

Since: Mar 11

Chicago, IL

#92 Oct 21, 2012
I see the Christholes are still making complete jackasses out of themselves. Hey guess what losers? Even if tomorrow some time traveler came and showed today's scientists the errors about everything scientific and a better proven testable way it still wouldn't prove that some ancient tribal sheep fckers had it right thinking an angry God sat in the clouds watching.

You rejects think hundreds if not thousands of Jewish zombies walked into Jerusalem and nobody noticed. You think there was a talking snake. You think te earth was plagued by ten foot tall giants. You think the oceans had seven headed dragons. You think the Big Bang happened after the Sumerians started selling beer.

Lmfao

Since: Mar 11

Chicago, IL

#94 Oct 21, 2012
Madscot runs it in for the two points! Team straw man is finished!:)
madscot wrote:
<quoted text>
Wrong, Serpent can't handle misrepresentation. Which is exactle what you did.
http://profesorbaker.files.wordpress.com/2011...

“I see quantum effects”

Since: Jan 11

In the macro world.

#95 Oct 30, 2012
Langoliers wrote:
You'll get no argument from me on that one.

Carbon dating is only accurate back a few thousand years. So if scientists believe that a creature lived millions of years ago, then they would need to date it another way.

But there is the problem. They assume dinosaurs lived millions of years ago (instead of thousands of years ago like the bible says). They ignore evidence that does not fit their preconceived notion.

What would happen if a dinosaur bone were carbon dated?- At Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Scientists dated dinosaur bones using the Carbon dating method. The age they came back with was only a few thousand years old.

This date did not fit the preconceived notion that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago. So what did they do? They threw the results out. And kept their theory that dinosaurs lived "millions of years ago" instead.

This is common practice.

They then use potassium argon, or other methods, and date the fossils again.

They do this many times, using a different dating method each time. The results can be as much as 150 million years different from each other!- how’s that for an "exact" science?

They then pick the date they like best, based upon their preconceived notion of how old their theory says the fossil should be (based upon the Geologic column).

So they start with the assumption that dinosaurs lived millions of years ago, then manipulate the results until they agree with their conclusion.

Their assumptions dictate their conclusions.

So why is it that if the date doesn't fit the theory, they change the facts?

Unbiased science changes the theory to support the facts. They should not change the facts to fit the theory.

A Dinosaur carbon dated at 9,890 and 16,000 years old NOT millions of years old like evolutionists claim
So you're a young earther.

How cute.

“Cave ab homine unius libri”

Since: Feb 07

Cape Town

#96 Oct 31, 2012
You clearly dont like scientists or science. Evolution is evil. Physics is evil.

Thats fine.

But your faith requires that you not be hypocrites. As such, please hand in all the fruits of modern science as you exit the forum and head to your idyllic bronze age lives.

This would include all computers, phones, cars, clothes and anything else that uses electricity, micro-circuitry or was manufactured or transported by such means.

Please refrain from using modern medicine as well as weapons that use metals harder than bronze.

Oh.... and please prepare, we will be raiding your village soon. We will take all your females as slaves.

Goodbye

Since: Apr 08

Nottingham, UK

#97 Oct 31, 2012
Aerobatty wrote:
<quoted text>
So you're a young earther.
How cute.
Young Earth Creationists

or

YECS

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker
First Prev
of 4
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 16 min Joe fortuna 233,215
Can Atheists Know God Does Not Exist When They ... 2 hr Richardfs 179
Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... 2 hr Morse 2,625
Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038 (Apr '12) 2 hr Morse 23,279
Why Do Atheists Ridicule Christianity? (May '11) 2 hr Morse 5,960
faith & pride 3 hr geezerjock 1
A New Kinder, Gentler Atheism 6 hr _Bad Company 214
More from around the web