Sorry but I'll take real scientist words over yours.<quoted text>That's not true, GR is a REAL Theory.
The assumption you're making is a theory could explain the very tiniest scale to the atomic scale all the way to a universal scale. But there may not be a complete bridge between these gaps. We just assume there should be, and perhaps there should be.
But our failing doesn't discount what we do know, which we know is incomplete. We just don't know everything yet.
I don't make fun of your faith, It is the ridiculousness of YOUR denial that I poke at. When most of us say god doesn't exist, what we really mean is the biblical rendition of god is completely and utterly preposterous. There is too many mistakes about it to be true, and to believe it is over science is well sorry ,,,,stupid as hell.
" If anyone finds a case where all or part of a scientific theory is false, then that theory is either changed or thrown out.
A scientific theory in one branch of science must hold true in all of the other branches of science. "
"For decades, every attempt to describe the force of gravity in the same language as the other forcesâthe language of quantum mechanicsâhas met with disaster
S. JAMES GATES, JR.: You try to put those two pieces of mathematics together, they do not coexist peacefully.
The laws of nature are supposed to apply everywhere. So if Einstein's laws are supposed to apply everywhere, and the laws of quantum mechanics are supposed to apply everywhere, well you can't have two separate everywheres.
BRIAN GREENE: In the years since, physics split into two separate camps: one that uses general relativity to study big and heavy objects, things like stars, galaxies and the universe as a whole...
...and another that uses quantum mechanics to study the tiniest of objects, like atoms and particles. This has been kind of like having two families that just cannot get along and never talk to each other...
There just seemed to be no way to combine quantum mechanics...
and general relativity in a single theory that could describe the universe on all scales.
So here's the question: if you're trying to figure out what happens in the depths of a black hole, where an entire star is crushed to a tiny speck, do you use general relativity because the star is incredibly heavy or quantum mechanics because it's incredibly tiny?
Well, that's the problem. Since the center of a black hole is both tiny and heavy, you can't avoid using both theories at the same time. And when we try to put the two theories together in the realm of black holes, they conflict. It breaks down. They give nonsensical predictions. And the universe is not nonsensical; it's got to make sense.