Evolution has no evidence!!!

Posted in the Atheism Forum

Comments (Page 3)

Showing posts 41 - 60 of226
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#49
Nov 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Carchar king wrote:
I've noticed that the majority of scientists are atheists. They believe that if God doesn't exist, evolution is the only way humans can come into existence, so they believe we came from apes.
Charles Darwin said that the evolution was part of nature simply because creatures adapt to their enviroment. Since scientists they don't believe in the supernatural, they agreed with evolution.
The supernatural is the only theory that can disprove Evolution and atheists don't believe in the super natural, so they also agree with evolution.
If you take a look a paragraph 2, scientists only agree with evolution, because it's the only logical theory besides the super natural, and the super natural isn't even a theory according to scientists.
So tell me where's the evidence. It's actually just a agreement with atheist scientists.
BTW, the big bang defies the law of cause and effect, which means both atheists and Religion believe in the super natural.
Carchar king wrote: I've noticed that the majority of scientists are atheists.
R. P. wrote: That is because they are smarter than the average bear.

Carchar king wrote: They believe that if God doesn't exist, evolution is the only way humans can come into existence, so they believe we came from apes.
R. P. wrote: We are primates, we come from primates and we have a common anscestor that we share with the apes.

Carchar king wrote: Charles Darwin said that the evolution was part of nature simply because creatures adapt to their enviroment. Since scientists they don't believe in the supernatural, they agreed with evolution.
R. P. wrote: Evolution is adaptive change played out over vast spans of time.

Carchar king wrote: The supernatural is the only theory that can disprove Evolution and atheists don't believe in the super natural, so they also agree with evolution.
R. P. wrote: It's too late, evolution has been proven.

Carchar king wrote: If you take a look a paragraph 2, scientists only agree with evolution, because it's the only logical theory besides the super natural, and the super natural isn't even a theory according to scientists.
R. P. wrote: Well no scientist bothers themselves with the nonexistent.

Carchar king wrote: So tell me where's the evidence. It's actually just a agreement with atheist scientists.
R. P. wrote: The flu proves it by continually evovling.

Carchar king wrote: BTW, the big bang defies the law of cause and effect, which means both atheists and Religion believe in the super natural.
R. P. wrote: No we don't. The atheist is simply one who is not thiest.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#50
Nov 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Siro wrote:
<quoted text>
If I prove you wrong....then what?
You will be more famous than god
Siro

Aspley, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51
Nov 21, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

3

Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>You seem to be suffering from an all too common ailment. I'd see a doctor if I were you, I am told, that IBPPS* can be cured.
You should see a doctor about jungle fever...make sure the doctor aint black
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>And FYI, evolution is the slow adaptive change, that occurs over vast periods of time.
Which has been neither observed or recorded
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>*Itty Bity Pee Pee Syndrome. The insecurity that comes from knowing that somewhere on earth, someone is a bigger prick than you are.
And that bigger prick is you
Siro

Aspley, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52
Nov 21, 2013
 

Judged:

4

4

4

Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>Yet you worship a primate god, and think yourself not a primate? Too funny.
You watch 'planet of the apes' too much...
Oh wait....thats not a TV show...thats your bedroom

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#55
Nov 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Siro wrote:
<quoted text>
You should see a doctor about jungle fever...make sure the doctor aint black
<quoted text>
Which has been neither observed or recorded
<quoted text>
And that bigger prick is you
Skin color is an obsession with you, isn't it? Why? It should pose no problems for surely you know your place in this life, and since you are clearly the inferior one, just go ahead and step back down into your rightful place.

See you do know that IBPPS is all you

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#56
Nov 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Siro wrote:
<quoted text>
You watch 'planet of the apes' too much...
Oh wait....thats not a TV show...thats your bedroom
IBPPS is just eating you up, isn't it? Poor, poor little thang.

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#57
Nov 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Siro wrote:
<quoted text>
If the amount of chromosomes in a species has not changed from a continuous naturally bred lineage then it is not evolution
<quoted text>
If a white woman has a child with a black father do you call that evolution?
The reason why they met and caused a child might be love, geographical isolation, rape, white self loathing, cuckoldry (just ask Thinking), mandingo desire (just ask Reason Personified).
There could be a variety of reasons....it is not evolution
<quoted text>
"current"?????
In other words this 'theory' does not ring true and is subject to change at any given time.
'predictions against reality'?
How far ahead in time do you offer to predict?
And how will you know if you are right?
<quoted text>
Improving ones skill doesnt change ones amount of chromosomes
<quoted text>
In other words all you have is word games, how very dialectical of you....so PC
You crapclown
Based on your absurd rant, EITHER you really don't understand anything about what a scientific theory is and, therefore, have no chance of ever understanding any aspect of evolution...

OR you do have some level of understanding and are just playing dumb to try and elicit some kind of emotional response, which would make you a troll.

I will assume you are not a troll (for the moment). And, to try and give you some idea of just how far off you are ...

You said ""current"????? In other words this 'theory' does not ring true and is subject to change at any given time." Which is actually also true for our gravitational theory, the theory of electricity, and ever other scientific theory out there. Our understanding of any aspect of the physical world is always provisional. That's how science works.

Your lack of understanding of this very basic idea is ample proof that you are unable to discuss any aspect of biology beyond elementary school level.
Gillette

Fairfield, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#58
Nov 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Siro wrote:
You want me to argue with you on your terms
Evolution is a theory
There is no conclusive physical evidence
According to the theory ..evolution is a continuous process, there is no 'finished' product
Therefore all evidence to support the theory is not final or stable at any given time
Evolution has never been observed at any given time
Really? Tell that to the evangelical Christians at Baylor University, the "largest Baptist University in the world," where the students go on mission trips, etc.

This is from the Biology Department at Baylor:
http://www.baylor.edu/biology/index.php...

Statement on Evolution
"Evolution, a foundational principle of modern biology, is supported by overwhelming scientific evidence and is accepted by the vast majority of scientists. Because it is fundamental to the understanding of modern biology, the faculty in the Biology Department at Baylor University, Waco, TX, teach evolution throughout the biology curriculum. We are in accordance with the American Association for Advancement of Science's statement on evolution. We are a science department, so we do not teach alternative hypotheses or philosophically deduced theories that cannot be tested rigorously."

Also, here from the Baylor Geology Department:
http://www.baylor.edu/geology/index.php...

Quote:

"Question: Does the fossil record support the idea of biological change over time (biological evolution)?

Yes. The fossil record clearly indicates...

• a progression in complexity of organisms from very simple fossil forms in the oldest rocks (>3.5 billion years old) to a broad spectrum from simple to complex forms in younger rocks,

• that some organisms that were once common are now extinct, and

• that the living organisms inhabiting our world today are similar (but generally not the same) as organisms represented as fossils in young sedimentary deposits, which in turn have evolutionary ancestors represented as fossils in yet older rocks.

Mammals, for example, are prevalent today and can be traced back in the fossil record for approximately 200 million years, but are not present as mammals in the fossil record before that; however, fossil forms that have reasonably been interpreted to be associated with the evolutionary precursors to mammals are found in older rocks.

Whether biological evolution occurs has not been a matter of scientific debate for more than a century. It is considered a proven fact."

End quote
Gillette

Fairfield, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#60
Nov 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

Siro wrote:
Evolution has no evidence for it.
It has not been observed....ever!
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB910.h...
Siro wrote:
It is just a theory....an opinion...nothing more
In science, a "theory" is not a speculation, a guess or something as yet unproven.

A scientific theory is a grand unifying explanation for a large number of facts that has predictive power.

Saying "evolution is just a theory" is like saying "Bill Gates is just a multi-billionaire."
Siro

Fairfield, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#61
Nov 21, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

All the infidels claim evolution is a fact but cannot cite any physical evidence to actually prove it.
Instead they just play word games hoping the more pompous they sound the more convincing they will be.
And if questioned on the definitions of the words and terms they use.......the typical response is "YOU ARE IGNORANT AND UNENLIGHTENED!!!!!"
Gillette

Fairfield, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#62
Nov 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Siro wrote:
All the infidels claim evolution is a fact but cannot cite any physical evidence to actually prove it.
Instead they just play word games hoping the more pompous they sound the more convincing they will be.
And if questioned on the definitions of the words and terms they use.......the typical response is "YOU ARE IGNORANT AND UNENLIGHTENED!!!!!"
I've just given you THREE POSTS citing physical evidence. I can and will post MANY MORE.

Are you mentally disturbed?
Thinking

Chard, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#63
Nov 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

siro loves wanking inside its cheapo polyester burka.
Gillette wrote:
<quoted text>
http://www.talkorigins.org/indexcc/CB/CB910.h...
<quoted text>
In science, a "theory" is not a speculation, a guess or something as yet unproven.
A scientific theory is a grand unifying explanation for a large number of facts that has predictive power.
Saying "evolution is just a theory" is like saying "Bill Gates is just a multi-billionaire."
Thinking

Chard, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#64
Nov 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

siro's imam has warped him. Maybe it will get better, we can only hope.
Gillette wrote:
<quoted text>
I've just given you THREE POSTS citing physical evidence. I can and will post MANY MORE.
Are you mentally disturbed?
Gillette

Fairfield, IA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#65
Nov 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

"The Clergy letter Project" signed by 12,885 Christian clergy men and women as of today.
http://www.theclergyletterproject.org

Quote

We the undersigned, Christian clergy from many different traditions, believe that the timeless truths of the Bible and the discoveries of modern science may comfortably coexist.

We believe that the theory of evolution is a foundational scientific truth, one that has stood up to rigorous scrutiny and upon which much of human knowledge and achievement rests.

To reject this truth or to treat it as “one theory among others” is to deliberately embrace scientific ignorance and transmit such ignorance to our children.

We believe that among God’s good gifts are human minds capable of critical thought and that the failure to fully employ this gift is a rejection of the will of our Creator. To argue that God’s loving plan of salvation for humanity precludes the full employment of the God-given faculty of reason is to attempt to limit God, an act of hubris.

We urge school board members to preserve the integrity of the science curriculum by affirming the teaching of the theory of evolution as a core component of human knowledge.

We ask that science remain science and that religion remain religion, two very different, but complementary, forms of truth.

End quote

“Putten the SIN ”

Since: Nov 08

back in Wisconsin

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#66
Nov 21, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Carchar king wrote:
I've noticed that the majority of scientists are atheists. They believe that if God doesn't exist, evolution is the only way humans can come into existence, so they believe we came from apes.
Actually theist scientists believe in theistic evolution. A prim mover got the ball rolling but used evolution to creat the diversity of life.

an interesting look at this is the Mathew rainbow kent hovind debate. Just skip over the hovined nonsense.

http://www.youtube.com/watch...
Carchar king wrote:
Charles Darwin said that the evolution was part of nature simply because creatures adapt to their enviroment. Since scientists they don't believe in the supernatural, they agreed with evolution.
Did you know not all atheists believe in evolution?? Did you know there are scientists and atheists who DO believe in the supernatural?? Hell there are lots of scientists and atheists that believe in all kinds of woo.
Carchar king wrote:
The supernatural is the only theory that can disprove Evolution and atheists don't believe in the super natural, so they also agree with evolution.
If you take a look a paragraph 2, scientists only agree with evolution, because it's the only logical theory besides the super natural, and the super natural isn't even a theory according to scientists.
Actually even if a god and or the supernatural were shown to exist evolution would still be a fact. The massive amount of evidence behind it and the the shear convergence from many disciplines of science make evoution a fact.
Carchar king wrote:
So tell me where's the evidence. It's actually just a agreement with atheist scientists.
Well for evidence and some study you can start here http://www.talkorigins.org/ .

As I stated before, not all scientists are Atheists, and not all Atheists believe in evolution, so the logic of your comment doesn't follow.
Carchar king wrote:
BTW, the big bang defies the law of cause and effect, which means both atheists and Religion believe in the super natural.
The realm of physics gets pretty weird, and in the realm of physics there may not be "cause and affect".(crazy right??)

That said with your misunderstanding of physics and science you should be careful with equivocation fallacies.

“official chess Grand master”

Since: Dec 12

Cape Town, South Africa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#67
Dec 12, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

gotnatas wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually theist scientists believe in theistic evolution. A prim mover got the ball rolling but used evolution to creat the diversity of life.
an interesting look at this is the Mathew rainbow kent hovind debate. Just skip over the hovined nonsense.
http://www.youtube.com/watch...
<quoted text>
Did you know not all atheists believe in evolution?? Did you know there are scientists and atheists who DO believe in the supernatural?? Hell there are lots of scientists and atheists that believe in all kinds of woo.
<quoted text>
Actually even if a god and or the supernatural were shown to exist evolution would still be a fact. The massive amount of evidence behind it and the the shear convergence from many disciplines of science make evoution a fact.
<quoted text>
Well for evidence and some study you can start here http://www.talkorigins.org/ .
As I stated before, not all scientists are Atheists, and not all Atheists believe in evolution, so the logic of your comment doesn't follow.
<quoted text>
The realm of physics gets pretty weird, and in the realm of physics there may not be "cause and affect".(crazy right??)
That said with your misunderstanding of physics and science you should be careful with equivocation fallacies.
No, if God existed which he does, he would create humans in his own image instead of wasting his time on evolution and because humans is his beloved creation, why would he love a ape that he would die for it
Jim

London, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#68
Dec 13, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Carchar king wrote:
<quoted text>
No, if God existed which he does, he would create humans in his own image instead of wasting his time on evolution and because humans is his beloved creation, why would he love a ape that he would die for it
If you're so sure god exists, why are you afraid of darwin?

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#69
Dec 14, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Carchar king wrote:
<quoted text>
No, if God existed which he does, he would create humans in his own image instead of wasting his time on evolution and because humans is his beloved creation, why would he love a ape that he would die for it
If his creation was modeled after himself, and his creation being clearly primate, then he too would have been primate, and not disinclined to love that which reflected himself

All of mankind is primate, mankind is the great ape which creates gods in his own image.

“official chess Grand master”

Since: Dec 12

Cape Town, South Africa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#70
Dec 15, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>If his creation was modeled after himself, and his creation being clearly primate, then he too would have been primate, and not disinclined to love that which reflected himself
All of mankind is primate, mankind is the great ape which creates gods in his own image.
Never knew you were a ape.

At least I'm a normal human being.

“official chess Grand master”

Since: Dec 12

Cape Town, South Africa

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#71
Dec 15, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Jim wrote:
<quoted text>
If you're so sure god exists, why are you afraid of darwin?
If you're so sure evolution happened, why you afraid of God?

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Showing posts 41 - 60 of226
|
Go to last page| Jump to page:
Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••
•••
•••