Comments
1 - 20 of 226 Comments Last updated Feb 23, 2014
First Prev
of 12
Next Last

“In God we trust”

Since: Dec 12

Nothing creates... Nothing

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#1
Oct 16, 2013
 

Judged:

7

6

6

I've noticed that the majority of scientists are atheists. They believe that if God doesn't exist, evolution is the only way humans can come into existence, so they believe we came from apes.

Charles Darwin said that the evolution was part of nature simply because creatures adapt to their enviroment. Since scientists they don't believe in the supernatural, they agreed with evolution.

The supernatural is the only theory that can disprove Evolution and atheists don't believe in the super natural, so they also agree with evolution.

If you take a look a paragraph 2, scientists only agree with evolution, because it's the only logical theory besides the super natural, and the super natural isn't even a theory according to scientists.

So tell me where's the evidence. It's actually just a agreement with atheist scientists.

BTW, the big bang defies the law of cause and effect, which means both atheists and Religion believe in the super natural.
Thinking

UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#2
Oct 16, 2013
 

Judged:

4

Bollocks.
Carchar king wrote:
I've noticed that the majority of scientists are atheists. They believe that if God doesn't exist, evolution is the only way humans can come into existence, so they believe we came from apes.
Charles Darwin said that the evolution was part of nature simply because creatures adapt to their enviroment. Since scientists they don't believe in the supernatural, they agreed with evolution.
The supernatural is the only theory that can disprove Evolution and atheists don't believe in the super natural, so they also agree with evolution.
If you take a look a paragraph 2, scientists only agree with evolution, because it's the only logical theory besides the super natural, and the super natural isn't even a theory according to scientists.
So tell me where's the evidence. It's actually just a agreement with atheist scientists.
BTW, the big bang defies the law of cause and effect, which means both atheists and Religion believe in the super natural.

“In God we trust”

Since: Dec 12

Nothing creates... Nothing

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#3
Oct 16, 2013
 

Judged:

4

3

3

Thinking wrote:
Bollocks.
<quoted text>
yup, it's all just a agreement with atheists.
Thinking

UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#4
Oct 16, 2013
 

Judged:

4

2

Have you noticed how the scientific method comes up with tangible results that have to withstand peer review?
Carchar king wrote:
<quoted text>
yup, it's all just a agreement with atheists.

“Invisible Pink Unicorn”

Since: May 08

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#5
Oct 17, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Carchar king wrote:
I've noticed that the majority of scientists are atheists. They believe that if God doesn't exist, evolution is the only way humans can come into existence, so they believe we came from apes.
Charles Darwin said that the evolution was part of nature simply because creatures adapt to their enviroment. Since scientists they don't believe in the supernatural, they agreed with evolution.
The supernatural is the only theory that can disprove Evolution and atheists don't believe in the super natural, so they also agree with evolution.
If you take a look a paragraph 2, scientists only agree with evolution, because it's the only logical theory besides the super natural, and the super natural isn't even a theory according to scientists.
So tell me where's the evidence. It's actually just a agreement with atheist scientists.
BTW, the big bang defies the law of cause and effect, which means both atheists and Religion believe in the super natural.
Do you also believe in talking snakes,donkeys and unicorns as well?

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#6
Oct 17, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Carchar king wrote:
I've noticed that the majority of scientists are atheists. They believe that if God doesn't exist, evolution is the only way humans can come into existence, so they believe we came from apes.
Charles Darwin said that the evolution was part of nature simply because creatures adapt to their enviroment. Since scientists they don't believe in the supernatural, they agreed with evolution.
The supernatural is the only theory that can disprove Evolution and atheists don't believe in the super natural, so they also agree with evolution.
If you take a look a paragraph 2, scientists only agree with evolution, because it's the only logical theory besides the super natural, and the super natural isn't even a theory according to scientists.
So tell me where's the evidence. It's actually just a agreement with atheist scientists.
BTW, the big bang defies the law of cause and effect, which means both atheists and Religion believe in the super natural.
Religious liars should generally keep their mentally ill disproven ramblings to a minimum.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#7
Oct 17, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Carchar king wrote:
I've noticed that the majority of scientists are atheists. They believe that if God doesn't exist, evolution is the only way humans can come into existence, so they believe we came from apes.
Charles Darwin said that the evolution was part of nature simply because creatures adapt to their enviroment. Since scientists they don't believe in the supernatural, they agreed with evolution.
The supernatural is the only theory that can disprove Evolution and atheists don't believe in the super natural, so they also agree with evolution.
If you take a look a paragraph 2, scientists only agree with evolution, because it's the only logical theory besides the super natural, and the super natural isn't even a theory according to scientists.
So tell me where's the evidence. It's actually just a agreement with atheist scientists.
BTW, the big bang defies the law of cause and effect, which means both atheists and Religion believe in the super natural.
Ah ha, now do you really think that you are capable of speaking for us? You might ought to gather just a bit of data, that actually pertains to us, before you go shooting your mouth off. Right now you are looking equal to the crack ho' speaking on the architectural strengths of the Empire state building's sub-structure.

Atheist are minus an "ism", but that does not imbue us with any theories of evolution, it merely means that we are not indoctrinated. We have no "ism" at all. That is it. There is nothing more to being an atheist.

No "ism" means that we do not fit into the category of theist, we are not Satanist, we are not Pagans, we are not Christains, we are not Vodun, we are not Thuggee. Those are all theist, they are indoctrinated, they all are like you, they all have "isms".
Cujo

Regina, Canada

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#8
Oct 17, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Carchar king wrote:
I've noticed that the majority of scientists are atheists. They believe that if God doesn't exist, evolution is the only way humans can come into existence, so they believe we came from apes.
Charles Darwin said that the evolution was part of nature simply because creatures adapt to their enviroment. Since scientists they don't believe in the supernatural, they agreed with evolution.
The supernatural is the only theory that can disprove Evolution and atheists don't believe in the super natural, so they also agree with evolution.
If you take a look a paragraph 2, scientists only agree with evolution, because it's the only logical theory besides the super natural, and the super natural isn't even a theory according to scientists.
So tell me where's the evidence. It's actually just a agreement with atheist scientists.
BTW, the big bang defies the law of cause and effect, which means both atheists and Religion believe in the super natural.
What ever you do, stay away from those hospitals and pharmaceutical medicine, at all costs. They use that evil evolutionary science, in almost everything they do!
Siro

Brisbane, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#9
Nov 20, 2013
 

Judged:

3

3

2

Evolution has no evidence for it.
It has not been observed....ever!
It is just a theory....an opinion...nothing more
Siro

Brisbane, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#11
Nov 20, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
Siro proof of god, questioning the fact of evolution!
Youve yet to post anything confirming this 'fact'

Ad nauseum rants from a nutjob like you is not evidence..(though you are quite dense)

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#13
Nov 20, 2013
 
Siro wrote:
Evolution has no evidence for it.
It has not been observed....ever!
It is just a theory....an opinion...nothing more
Yet you worship a primate god, and think yourself not a primate? Too funny.

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#14
Nov 20, 2013
 
Siro wrote:
Evolution has no evidence for it.
It has not been observed....ever!
It is just a theory....an opinion...nothing more
And you apparently don't understand the definition and usage associated with a "scientific theory".(Let me give you a hint, it's not the same as a theory of whodunit in a mystery novel.)

Until you can at least display some understanding of what is meant by a scientific theory, trying to discuss science with you would be pointless.

You might start with a middle school science text book (any discipline) and try to comprehend the explanation of a scientific theory from the text (it should be in the first couple of chapters).

“ecrasez l'infame”

Since: May 08

Atlanta, Georgia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#15
Nov 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Carchar king wrote:
I've noticed that the majority of scientists are atheists. They believe that if God doesn't exist, evolution is the only way humans can come into existence, so they believe we came from apes.
Charles Darwin said that the evolution was part of nature simply because creatures adapt to their enviroment. Since scientists they don't believe in the supernatural, they agreed with evolution.
The supernatural is the only theory that can disprove Evolution and atheists don't believe in the super natural, so they also agree with evolution.
If you take a look a paragraph 2, scientists only agree with evolution, because it's the only logical theory besides the super natural, and the super natural isn't even a theory according to scientists.
So tell me where's the evidence. It's actually just a agreement with atheist scientists.
BTW, the big bang defies the law of cause and effect, which means both atheists and Religion believe in the super natural.
Let's try to make this as simple as possible.

1. To "evolve" means to change.

2. We can readily observe that biology on this planet has/does/continues to change over vast generational time scales.

3. Whatever the mechanisms are that drive that change in biology will be called the "theory of evolution".

Our current theory of evolution serves humanity by providing a framework where we can make predictions about some aspects of biology on this planet and then test these predictions against reality. This ability has and continues to help us develop better healthcare, better crop production, and better animal husbandry techniques.

UNTIL a better understanding of what drive these changes in biology on this planet comes along, why don't we use the only framework we have that has actually provided us with any insights into the working of biology.

Sorry you don't like the name of this framework - the theory of biological evolution.

“Reason's Greetings!”

Since: Feb 11

Pale Blue Dot

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#16
Nov 20, 2013
 
Carchar king wrote:
I've noticed that the majority of scientists are atheists. They believe that if God doesn't exist, evolution is the only way humans can come into existence, so they believe we came from apes.
I stopped reading after the first fallacies.
Siro

Sydney, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#18
Nov 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Hedonist wrote:
<quoted text>
And you apparently don't understand the definition and usage associated with a "scientific theory".(Let me give you a hint, it's not the same as a theory of whodunit in a mystery novel.)
Until you can at least display some understanding of what is meant by a scientific theory, trying to discuss science with you would be pointless.
You might start with a middle school science text book (any discipline) and try to comprehend the explanation of a scientific theory from the text (it should be in the first couple of chapters).
You topix atheists ask for physical proof of God.
Well Im asking you for physical proof of evolution
Care to oblige?
Or do you just want to go on with a dawkinesque elitist rant?
Siro

Sydney, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#19
Nov 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Hedonist wrote:
<quoted text>
Let's try to make this as simple as possible.
1. To "evolve" means to change.
2. We can readily observe that biology on this planet has/does/continues to change over vast generational time scales.
If the amount of chromosomes in a species has not changed from a continuous naturally bred lineage then it is not evolution
Hedonist wrote:
<quoted text>
3. Whatever the mechanisms are that drive that change in biology will be called the "theory of evolution".
If a white woman has a child with a black father do you call that evolution?
The reason why they met and caused a child might be love, geographical isolation, rape, white self loathing, cuckoldry (just ask Thinking), mandingo desire (just ask Reason Personified).
There could be a variety of reasons....it is not evolution
Hedonist wrote:
<quoted text>
Our current theory of evolution serves humanity by providing a framework where we can make predictions about some aspects of biology on this planet and then test these predictions against reality.
"current"?????
In other words this 'theory' does not ring true and is subject to change at any given time.
'predictions against reality'?
How far ahead in time do you offer to predict?
And how will you know if you are right?
Hedonist wrote:
<quoted text>
This ability has and continues to help us develop better healthcare, better crop production, and better animal husbandry techniques.
Improving ones skill doesnt change ones amount of chromosomes
Hedonist wrote:
<quoted text>
UNTIL a better understanding of what drive these changes in biology on this planet comes along, why don't we use the only framework we have that has actually provided us with any insights into the working of biology.
Sorry you don't like the name of this framework - the theory of biological evolution.
In other words all you have is word games, how very dialectical of you....so PC
You crapclown

“Reason's Greetings!”

Since: Feb 11

Pale Blue Dot

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#20
Nov 20, 2013
 
Siro wrote:
<quoted text>
You topix atheists ask for physical proof of God.
Well Im asking you for physical proof of evolution
Care to oblige?
Or do you just want to go on with a dawkinesque elitist rant?
It's already been proven. You just don't accept the proof. You probably think that germs, electricity and gravity are just theories too.
Siro

Sydney, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#21
Nov 20, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

MrDesoto1 wrote:
<quoted text>
It's already been proven. You just don't accept the proof. You probably think that germs, electricity and gravity are just theories too.
Really!?!?
When did this happen?!
Can you explain how this happened and how it works????????
Can I see the proof!?!?!?!?!?
.
Nah....of course not........just like the 'missing link'........its not missing.......it never existed........
.
You are a cockclown

One can physically observe the effects of germs, electricity and gravity in an instant rather than waiting 500 million years for 'evolution'

“Reason's Greetings!”

Since: Feb 11

Pale Blue Dot

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#22
Nov 20, 2013
 
Siro wrote:
<quoted text>
Really!?!?
When did this happen?!
Can you explain how this happened and how it works????????
Can I see the proof!?!?!?!?!?
.
Nah....of course not........just like the 'missing link'........its not missing.......it never existed........
.
You are a cockclown
One can physically observe the effects of germs, electricity and gravity in an instant rather than waiting 500 million years for 'evolution'
Look in the mirror and you will see a missing link.

“Reason's Greetings!”

Since: Feb 11

Pale Blue Dot

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#23
Nov 20, 2013
 
Siro wrote:
<quoted text>

One can physically observe the effects of germs, electricity and gravity in an instant rather than waiting 500 million years for 'evolution'
This one statement alone shows you have no comprehension of the subject.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

First Prev
of 12
Next Last

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••