Gays are criminals not equals.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#170 May 7, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>Brilliant, and spot-on too.

Thank you.
I just realized that for some reason, posts to Macarena aren't quoting properly.

And you're welcome.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#171 May 7, 2013
emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text>I had to respond to this post, it is funny.
I guess #1 would be the marriage of Adam and Eve.
#2 Cain
#3 Abraham
#4 and 5 to a multiple of people
#6 David and Solomon
#8 Lot
Lat one would the buybull commandment that a man should marry his dead bro's childless widow.
What I would like to ask is if your now-dead-brother's wife is not a virgin (because she got it on with your brother), then should you marry her or stone her to death?
Isn't it illegal, according to the bible's words, to marry someone who lost their virginity?

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#172 May 7, 2013
emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text>I had to respond to this post, it is funny.
I guess #1 would be the marriage of Adam and Eve.
#2 Cain
#3 Abraham
#4 and 5 to a multiple of people
#6 David and Solomon
#8 Lot
Lat one would the buybull commandment that a man should marry his dead bro's childless widow.
Forgot to add:
Also, right there is grounds for polygamy.
If you already have a wife and your brother dies...well, now you have two wives.

Since: Apr 09

Location hidden

#173 May 7, 2013
[QUOTE who="Mary Magdalena
"]<quoted text>
Perverted sex kills!
[/QUOTE]

What are you babbling about?
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#174 May 7, 2013
KJV wrote:
Dude the definition of marriage is all ready written and it does not include gay unions. Sorry but you're wrong.
I never said it included gay unions. I simply pointed out that marriage has historically NOT been used to exclusively define a legal contract between one man and one woman.
KJV wrote:
"Since you're a YEC then just about everything you propose violates natural law."
The Big Bang violates natural law.
The absents of everything cannot explode and create everything.
So if we pretend you're correct for a moment you should have no problem at all with it.(shrug)

Oops.
KJV wrote:
Since you're a known established liar your post really carry any weight.
Projection.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#175 May 7, 2013
[QUOTE who="Mary Magdalena
"]<quoted text>
Perverted sex kills!
Talk to all the kids dying of aids. Are they in the "closet"?
Is there a light in your closet? Try turning it on!
[/QUOTE]

Hey bub, it's YOUR people pushing for no condoms in Africa. That ain't the gays fault. That's the heterosexual Christians fault. AIDS is not a "gay" disease as it is caught hetrosexually.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#176 May 7, 2013
Mary Magdalena wrote:
<quoted text>
You believe plants evolved into animals that eat plants. You believe that uni sex plants and animals evolved to a male / Female sexual reproduction system and got the bees to buy into it just as they evolved from an ant. You believe nothing exploded and made an ape that had you!
Gee, well done. You managed to get every sentence wrong without fail.

This is the reason the scientific community doesn't take fundies seriously. Fundies think complete ignorance of science is the best standpoint from which to criticize it.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#177 May 7, 2013
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
I never said it included gay unions. I simply pointed out that marriage has historically NOT been used to exclusively define a legal contract between one man and one woman.
So just to point out here since the Constitution guarantees equal rights, like I pointed out to Mags, you have two options:

1 - Go live in a theocratic country.

2 - Replace the US Constitution with Biblical law. This would of course make you a traitor.

But you guys love playing the martyr!
KJV

United States

#178 May 7, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>

Interesting...!
Ephesians 5:25-32 ESV

Husbands, love your wives..

Genesis 2:18-25 ESV

And the rib that the Lord God had taken from the man he made into a woman and brought her to the man....

Leviticus 18:22 ESV

You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.

Matthew 19:1-30 ESV

Now when Jesus had finished these sayings, he went away from Galilee and entered the region of Judea beyond the Jordan. And large crowds followed him, and he healed them there. And Pharisees came up to him and tested him by asking,“Is it lawful to divorce one's wife for any cause?” He answered,“Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said,‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’?...

Ephesians 5:31 ESV

“Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.”

Genesis 2:24 ESV

Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and they shall become one flesh.

Ephesians 5:31-32 ESV

“Therefore a man shall leave his father and mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh.” This mystery is profound, and I am saying that it refers to Christ and the church.

Matthew 19:4-5 ESV

He answered,“Have you not read that he who created them from the beginning made them male and female, and said,‘Therefore a man shall leave his father and his mother and hold fast to his wife, and the two shall become one flesh’?

Ephesians 5:25 ESV

Husbands, love your wives, as Christ loved the church and gave himself up for her,

Genesis 2:23 ESV

Then the man said,“This at last is bone of my bones and flesh of my flesh; she shall be called Woman, because she was taken out of Man.”

Ephesians 5:28 ESV

In the same way husbands should love their wives as their own bodies. He who loves his wife loves himself.

1 Corinthians 7:15 ESV

But if the unbelieving partner separates, let it be so. In such cases the brother or sister is not enslaved. God has called you to peace.

1 Corinthians 6:9 ESV

Or do you not know that the unrighteous will not inherit the kingdom of God? Do not be deceived: neither the sexually immoral, nor idolaters, nor adulterers, nor men who practice homosexuality,

Matthew 19:9 ESV

And I say to you: whoever divorces his wife, except for sexual immorality, and marries another, commits adultery.”
KJV

United States

#179 May 7, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>Forgot to add:
Also, right there is grounds for polygamy.
If you already have a wife and your brother dies...well, now you have two wives.
So?

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#180 May 7, 2013
Snevaeh legna wrote:
<quoted text>
...but that was on another thread, another topic, another subject. Bob, I be to differ....:)
Try again...
You have still done nothing that is worthy of respect.

And you have done several things worthy of contempt-- starting with your fantasy-delusion that I and others like me, deserve infinite torture....

... that is such a horrible thing to say, that you are literally a sociopath--- two steps from you becoming a serial killer.

Seriously.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#181 May 7, 2013
emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text>
I had to respond to this post, it is funny.
I guess #1 would be the marriage of Adam and Eve.
#2 Cain
#3 Abraham
#4 and 5 to a multiple of people
#6 David and Solomon
#8 Lot
Lat one would the buybull commandment that a man should marry his dead bro's childless widow.
*DING**DING**DING**DING**DING* *DING*

You win the BuyBull Quiz.

Alas, the "prize" is that some of your brain cells have died in protest...

<grin>

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#182 May 7, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
I love that list of biblical marriages.
Did you, by chance, happen to hear it from some YouTuber?
That's where I heard it.
Facebook. There were several photo-memes with the list going around, many with BuyBull verses too.

I decided to leave out the verses.. no need, really.:D

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#183 May 7, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
I just realized that for some reason, posts to Macarena aren't quoting properly.
And you're welcome.
Yeah-- I caught that right-off- she has inserted a non-printable character into her Avitar name, which ruins standard automatic quoting.

You have to manually delete the CR/LF characters...

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#184 May 7, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
What I would like to ask is if your now-dead-brother's wife is not a virgin (because she got it on with your brother), then should you marry her or stone her to death?
Isn't it illegal, according to the bible's words, to marry someone who lost their virginity?
I think the old Leviticus laws of forcing a brother to marry his brother's widow trumps that virgin requirement.

After all-- it >>is<< permissible to marry a widow, and if she has offspring, that is Kosher.

In fact, the "marry your brother's widow" thing is not as simple as all that-- the first SON that is born from that marriage?

Is automatically re-cristened as the official son of the DEAD guy!

This is so that he may inherit his father's property, which up until that time, could have been in limbo--if there was no SON to inherit properly.

Women and daughters were property themselves, and couldn't inherit.

A truly TWISTED and ugly religion...

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#185 May 7, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
Forgot to add:
Also, right there is grounds for polygamy.
If you already have a wife and your brother dies...well, now you have two wives.
Of course!

Polygamy was quite acceptable to OT Jewish law. Women were just property after all, so why not? A rich man could afford to feed and support many wives...

.. and a poor man, according to the OT law, was poor due to some past sin, or perhaps an ancestor's sin, so really did not deserve a wife anyhow... maybe he would WORK for one instead?

Remember that one? The poor dude works 7 years for a wife, and then has the older (ugly) sister foisted off on him instead-- so he marries her, and works ANOTHER 7 years for the younger (prettier) daughter-- and marries HER, TOO.

Thus setting the stage for Modern Republican's leaders' divorcing and re-marrying a younger and prettier model, ditching the old worn-out one....

.... meh.
Mary Magdalena

United States

#191 May 7, 2013
NightSerf wrote:
<quoted text>MW's FULL definition is:

1
a (1): the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2): the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage <same-sex marriage>
b : the mutual relation of married persons : wedlock
c : the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage
2
: an act of marrying or the rite by which the married status is effected; especially : the wedding ceremony and attendant festivities or formalities
3
: an intimate or close union <the marriage of painting and poetry — J. T. Shawcross>
"like that of a traditional marriage "

Strange to find this in the definition of Marriage.

Same sex union like that of a traditional marriage.

Like that = similar

Simply put your definition clearly is stating a Gay Union is not a Marriage.

Ok so what was your point here surfer dud.

M&M

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#192 May 7, 2013
emperorjohn wrote:
<quoted text>
I had to respond to this post, it is funny.
I guess #1 would be the marriage of Adam and Eve.
#2 Cain
#3 Abraham
#4 and 5 to a multiple of people
#6 David and Solomon
#8 Lot
Lat one would the buybull commandment that a man should marry his dead bro's childless widow.
Adam and Eve were married? I didn't see that in Genesis...
Mary Magdalena

United States

#193 May 7, 2013
Snevaeh legna wrote:
<quoted text>All I said was hello...:)
Hello

:)
Mary Magdalena

United States

#194 May 7, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>On the other thread? You said, and I quote:

Snevaeh legna wrote, "<quoted text>
Lies... just sayin':)"

So you do not engender any respect, here.
What? she's not allowed to use your middle name?

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 24 min Eagle 12 18,822
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 24 min ChristineM 27,303
News Why Do Atheists Ridicule Christianity? (May '11) 37 min Eagle 12 8,120
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 40 min Joe Fortuna 253,381
News Freethinker: The Rise of Arab Atheism 56 min emperorjohn 2
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 1 hr replaytime 6,018
News The war on Christmas (Dec '10) 2 hr thetruth 3,989
More from around the web