Gays are criminals not equals.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#149 May 6, 2013
[QUOTE who="Mary Magdalena
"]<quoted text>Teaching About Same-sex Marriage in Minnesota Public Schools

Background: Minnesota for Marriage is running a television commercial informing voters about what has happened in Massachusetts where a public school taught second graders about gay marriage in class. The commercial features David and Tonia Parker, who were Massachusetts parents when the school attended by their young son began teaching second graders about gay marriage. The teacher read students a book called King & King, the story of a prince who ‘marries’ another prince and lives ‘happily ever after.’ Several parents, including Mr. and Mrs. Parker, objected and approached local school administrators to ask that they be notified in advance so they could opt their children out of class for this instruction. School officials refused. The Parkers and other parents sued to assert their parental rights. In the case of Parker v. Hurley (Case 07- 1528) the first District Court of Appeals ruled that parents were not entitled to notification about this instruction, nor did they have any opt-out right to remove their children from class.

Q. If marriage is redefined in Minnesota could it be taught to young children in Minnesota schools?
A. Yes. In states that have redefined marriage, a new definition of marriage as a genderless institution has replaced the prior definition of marriage of one man and one woman. It necessarily follows that whenever marriage is taught or talked about in school, it would be this new genderless type marriage, since that is the only type of marriage that will exist in the law. This is what has happened in Massachusetts and Canada.

Q. Would gay marriage be required teaching in Minnesota?
A. Initially, local schools would determine how to handle the teaching of gay marriage. This is how it was handled in Massachusetts as well, when it was taught to second graders. If history is a guide, we can expect gay marriage activists to push this teaching throughout the state, just as they have elsewhere.

Q. What evidence do you have that suggests gay marriage activists would push this teaching in Minnesota?
A. Robert Skutch, the author of the book “Who’s In A Family?”(a book currently used in elementary school libraries in Minnesota and that was also used in Massachusetts public schools) told National Public radio (NPR),“The whole purpose of the book was to get the subject out into the minds and the awareness of children before they are old enough to have been convinced there’s another way of looking at life.” The audience for Skutch’s book about gay families is kindergartners.

Q. What if gay marriage is taught to children in class, what’s the big deal?
A. There are several problems with what has happened in Massachusetts and elsewhere. First, the subject has been taught to very young children including seven year olds who are in second grade. Second, many people firmly believe that marriage can only be between one man and one woman. It puts parents and pastors in a difficult spot.[/QUOTE]

That's just a bunch of lies from the FRC.
They aren't "teaching gay marriage."
They're teaching acceptance and that there are different types of families out there.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#150 May 6, 2013
[QUOTE who="Mary Magdalena
"]<quoted text>Perverted sex kills!

Talk to all the kids dying of aids. Are they in the "closet"?

Is there a light in your closet? Try turning it on![/QUOTE]

Why do you obsess do much about something you don't like, Macarena?

You don't hear about people starting threads on brussel sprouts and screaming about how much they hate them.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#151 May 6, 2013
[QUOTE who="Mary Magdalena
"]<quoted text>Care to go to a few funerals?

Seeing baby's being buried because of a STD. Seeing all the orphan because of STD. Ya kudos! High five!

F,,,n wet dripping d|cks.[/QUOTE]

What is wrong with you?
Did you forget to take your meds or something, Macarena?

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#152 May 6, 2013
[QUOTE who="Mary Magdalena
"]<quoted text>You believe plants evolved into animals that eat plants. You believe that uni sex plants and animals evolved to a male / Female sexual reproduction system and got the bees to buy into it just as they evolved from an ant. You believe nothing exploded and made an ape that had you![/QUOTE]

More crazy babble from Macarena-macaroni-brains.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#153 May 6, 2013
KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
You never tire of being the fool.
Weird!
mar·riage\ˈmer-ij,ˈma-rij\
noun
1 a (1): the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law.
Now you think your DICTIONARY is SUPERIOR to your bible?

Well... you are right about THAT.

But. Your BIBLE states MARRIAGE IS:

** bible-marriage is between one man and his rib-clone
** bible-marriage is between one man and his sisters
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife, and her concubine
** bible-marriage is between one rapist, and his victim
** bible-marriage is between one war-victor and his captive-slaves
** bible-marriage is between one king and his thousand wives, thousand slaves, and in several cases his boyfriends
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife and her female slaves
** bible-marriage is between one man and his daughters
** bible-marriage is between one man and his daughters-in-law
** bible-marriage is between one man and his several wives
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife, and the wife of his dead brother

Funny... no where in the bible is it JUST between a man and a woman....!

Interesting...!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#154 May 6, 2013
Snevaeh legna wrote:
Hi Bobby...:)
<quoted text>
So you agree with the bible-marriage rules?

** bible-marriage is between one man and his rib-clone
** bible-marriage is between one man and his sisters
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife, and her concubine
** bible-marriage is between one rapist, and his victim
** bible-marriage is between one war-victor and his captive-slaves
** bible-marriage is between one king and his thousand wives, thousand slaves, and in several cases his boyfriends
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife and her female slaves
** bible-marriage is between one man and his daughters
** bible-marriage is between one man and his daughters-in-law
** bible-marriage is between one man and his several wives
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife, and the wife of his dead brother

Funny... no where in the bible is it JUST between a man and a woman....!

Interesting...!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#155 May 6, 2013
[QUOTE who="Mary Magdalena
"]<quoted text>
Perverted sex kills!
Talk to all the kids dying of aids. Are they in the "closet"?
Is there a light in your closet? Try turning it on!
[/QUOTE]

Let's look at your BIBLE:

** bible-marriage is between one man and his rib-clone
** bible-marriage is between one man and his sisters
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife, and her concubine
** bible-marriage is between one rapist, and his victim
** bible-marriage is between one war-victor and his captive-slaves
** bible-marriage is between one king and his thousand wives, thousand slaves, and in several cases his boyfriends
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife and her female slaves
** bible-marriage is between one man and his daughters
** bible-marriage is between one man and his daughters-in-law
** bible-marriage is between one man and his several wives
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife, and the wife of his dead brother

Funny... no where in the bible is it JUST between a man and a woman....!

Interesting...!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#157 May 6, 2013
Lacez wrote:
Teaching About Same-sex Marriage in Minnesota Public Schools

Background: Minnesota for Marriage is running a television commercial informing voters about what has happened in Massachusetts where a public school taught second graders about gay marriage in class. The commercial features David and Tonia Parker, who were Massachusetts parents when the school attended by their young son began teaching second graders about gay marriage. The teacher read students a book called King & King, the story of a prince who ‘marries’ another prince and lives ‘happily ever after.’ Several parents, including Mr. and Mrs. Parker, objected and approached local school administrators to ask that they be notified in advance so they could opt their children out of class for this instruction. School officials refused. The Parkers and other parents sued to assert their parental rights. In the case of Parker v. Hurley (Case 07- 1528) the first District Court of Appeals ruled that parents were not entitled to notification about this instruction, nor did they have any opt-out right to remove their children from class.

Q. If marriage is redefined in Minnesota could it be taught to young children in Minnesota schools?
A. Yes. In states that have redefined marriage, a new definition of marriage as a genderless institution has replaced the prior definition of marriage of one man and one woman. It necessarily follows that whenever marriage is taught or talked about in school, it would be this new genderless type marriage, since that is the only type of marriage that will exist in the law. This is what has happened in Massachusetts and Canada.

Q. Would gay marriage be required teaching in Minnesota?
A. Initially, local schools would determine how to handle the teaching of gay marriage. This is how it was handled in Massachusetts as well, when it was taught to second graders. If history is a guide, we can expect gay marriage activists to push this teaching throughout the state, just as they have elsewhere.

Q. What evidence do you have that suggests gay marriage activists would push this teaching in Minnesota?
A. Robert Skutch, the author of the book “Who’s In A Family?”(a book currently used in elementary school libraries in Minnesota and that was also used in Massachusetts public schools) told National Public radio (NPR),“The whole purpose of the book was to get the subject out into the minds and the awareness of children before they are old enough to have been convinced there’s another way of looking at life.” The audience for Skutch’s book about gay families is kindergartners.

Q. What if gay marriage is taught to children in class, what’s the big deal?
A. There are several problems with what has happened in Massachusetts and elsewhere. First, the subject has been taught to very young children including seven year olds who are in second grade. Second, many people firmly believe that marriage can only be between one man and one woman. It puts parents and pastors in a difficult spot.

That's just a bunch of lies from the FRC.
They aren't "teaching gay marriage."
They're teaching acceptance and that there are different types of families out there.
Brilliant, and spot-on too.

Thank you.

“It's just a box of rain...”

Since: May 07

Knoxville, TN

#158 May 6, 2013
KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
Merriam Webster Dictionary.
Not religion.
mar·riage\ˈmer-ij,ˈma-rij\
noun
1 a (1): the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law.
"And the Big Bang is a more scientific and useful theory than man-made religious theologies, that's all."
Explain it! Explain second one!
How could the complete and total absents of everything explode and create everything?
MW's FULL definition is:

1
a (1): the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2): the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage <same-sex marriage>
b : the mutual relation of married persons : wedlock
c : the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage
2
: an act of marrying or the rite by which the married status is effected; especially : the wedding ceremony and attendant festivities or formalities
3
: an intimate or close union <the marriage of painting and poetry — J. T. Shawcross>

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#159 May 6, 2013
NightSerf wrote:
<quoted text>
MW's FULL definition is:
1
a (1): the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law (2): the state of being united to a person of the same sex in a relationship like that of a traditional marriage <same-sex marriage>
b : the mutual relation of married persons : wedlock
c : the institution whereby individuals are joined in a marriage
2
: an act of marrying or the rite by which the married status is effected; especially : the wedding ceremony and attendant festivities or formalities
3
: an intimate or close union <the marriage of painting and poetry — J. T. Shawcross>
Thank you.. he lied by omission. What else is new?

“ IT'S A CHOICE !!!”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#160 May 6, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
So you agree with the bible-marriage rules?
** bible-marriage is between one man and his rib-clone
** bible-marriage is between one man and his sisters
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife, and her concubine
** bible-marriage is between one rapist, and his victim
** bible-marriage is between one war-victor and his captive-slaves
** bible-marriage is between one king and his thousand wives, thousand slaves, and in several cases his boyfriends
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife and her female slaves
** bible-marriage is between one man and his daughters
** bible-marriage is between one man and his daughters-in-law
** bible-marriage is between one man and his several wives
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife, and the wife of his dead brother
Funny... no where in the bible is it JUST between a man and a woman....!
Interesting...!
All I said was hello...:)

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

#161 May 6, 2013
Snevaeh legna wrote:
<quoted text>
All I said was hello...:)
On the other thread? You said, and I quote:
Snevaeh legna wrote:
<quoted text>
Lies... just sayin':)
So you do not engender any respect, here.

“ IT'S A CHOICE !!!”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#162 May 6, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
On the other thread? You said, and I quote:
<quoted text>
So you do not engender any respect, here.
...but that was on another thread, another topic, another subject. Bob, I be to differ....:)

Try again...

“It's just a box of rain...”

Since: May 07

Knoxville, TN

#163 May 6, 2013
Snevaeh legna wrote:
<quoted text>
...but that was on another thread, another topic, another subject. Bob, I be to differ....:)
Try again...
Since most of the same people post on the active threads in the Atheist forum, no one really starts fresh when entering a new one. Your reputation follows you into new threads like bad perfume.

“ IT'S A CHOICE !!!”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#164 May 6, 2013
NightSerf wrote:
<quoted text>
Since most of the same people post on the active threads in the Atheist forum, no one really starts fresh when entering a new one. Your reputation follows you into new threads like bad perfume.
lol... I know, I'm just messin' with him. I'm sure he'd be fun in person.

ps...What scent do you like?

“ IT'S A CHOICE !!!”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

#165 May 6, 2013
NightSerf wrote:
<quoted text>
Since most of the same people post on the active threads in the Atheist forum, no one really starts fresh when entering a new one. Your reputation follows you into new threads like bad perfume.
I think I like you...

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#166 May 7, 2013
[QUOTE who="Mary Magdalena
"]<quoted text>
You believe plants evolved into animals that eat plants. You believe that uni sex plants and animals evolved to a male / Female sexual reproduction system and got the bees to buy into it just as they evolved from an ant. You believe nothing exploded and made an ape that had you!
[/QUOTE]

You have no proof of god and are a coward, content to lie about a god that simply does not exist.

And you use this personal hallucination of yours to judge others.

If you are selling yourself as a moral person, why don't you try being honest and proving your god?

Its difficult for a lying cult member to tell the truth, isn't it?

“Sombrero Galaxy”

Since: Jan 10

I'm An Illegal Alien

#167 May 7, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Now you think your DICTIONARY is SUPERIOR to your bible?
Well... you are right about THAT.
But. Your BIBLE states MARRIAGE IS:
** bible-marriage is between one man and his rib-clone
** bible-marriage is between one man and his sisters
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife, and her concubine
** bible-marriage is between one rapist, and his victim
** bible-marriage is between one war-victor and his captive-slaves
** bible-marriage is between one king and his thousand wives, thousand slaves, and in several cases his boyfriends
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife and her female slaves
** bible-marriage is between one man and his daughters
** bible-marriage is between one man and his daughters-in-law
** bible-marriage is between one man and his several wives
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife, and the wife of his dead brother
Funny... no where in the bible is it JUST between a man and a woman....!
Interesting...!
I had to respond to this post, it is funny.
I guess #1 would be the marriage of Adam and Eve.
#2 Cain
#3 Abraham
#4 and 5 to a multiple of people
#6 David and Solomon
#8 Lot
Lat one would the buybull commandment that a man should marry his dead bro's childless widow.

“It's just a box of rain...”

Since: May 07

Knoxville, TN

#168 May 7, 2013
Snevaeh legna wrote:
<quoted text>
lol... I know, I'm just messin' with him. I'm sure he'd be fun in person.
ps...What scent do you like?
Shalimar is nice...

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#169 May 7, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>So you agree with the bible-marriage rules?

** bible-marriage is between one man and his rib-clone
** bible-marriage is between one man and his sisters
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife, and her concubine
** bible-marriage is between one rapist, and his victim
** bible-marriage is between one war-victor and his captive-slaves
** bible-marriage is between one king and his thousand wives, thousand slaves, and in several cases his boyfriends
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife and her female slaves
** bible-marriage is between one man and his daughters
** bible-marriage is between one man and his daughters-in-law
** bible-marriage is between one man and his several wives
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife, and the wife of his dead brother

Funny... no where in the bible is it JUST between a man and a woman....!

Interesting...!
I love that list of biblical marriages.
Did you, by chance, happen to hear it from some YouTuber?
That's where I heard it.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 17 min scientia potentia... 48,381
News The war on Christmas (Dec '10) 2 hr Amused 4,906
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 2 hr Amused 21,861
Why you need to make sure you are saved before ... Nov 30 Eagle 12 13
Jesus Christ and Wisdom, Knowledge, Understandi... Nov 29 Richardfs 5
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) Nov 29 New Age Spiritual... 258,038
News Delta Schools Will Get Satanic Coloring Books o... (Apr '16) Nov 29 Amused 7
More from around the web