Comments
101 - 120 of 667 Comments Last updated Jul 2, 2013
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#127
May 5, 2013
 
Mary Magdalena wrote:
<quoted text>
You're just to dumb to deal with.
You're a young Earth creationist who thinks reality isn't real because the Bible said an invisible Jewish wizard did it differently using magic. And it said the Earth was flat.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#128
May 5, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Mary Magdalena wrote:
10 Reasons Why Homosexual Marriage is Harmful and Must be Opposed.
"By TFP Student Action "
1. It Is Not Marriage
Calling something marriage does not make it marriage.
Actually it does. Same way as calling a vehicle with four wheels makes it a "car", or a hard-shelled fruit with milk in it a "coconut". It's also worth noting that marriage has never been exclusively defined as only male-female monogamous relationship throughout history, despite your claim.
Mary Magdalena wrote:
2. It Violates Natural Law
Since you're a YEC then just about everything you propose violates natural law. However since gay relationships do not require magic and are observed in the natural world you are quite obviously incorrect.
Mary Magdalena wrote:
By his natural reason, man can perceive what is morally good or bad for him.
Fundies do not have this ability since they require a genocide-loving invisible wizard to tell them the difference.
Mary Magdalena wrote:
Any situation which institutionalizes the circumvention of the purpose of the sexual act violates natural law and the objective norm of morality.
Then ALL sex "must" result in kids, which explains why you guys are pro-rape and anti-sex education.
Mary Magdalena wrote:
3. It Always Denies a Child Either a Father or a Mother
Not true, as EVERY kid has a mom and dad. Gay relationships don't preclude that.
Mary Magdalena wrote:
4. It Validates and Promotes the Homosexual Lifestyle
It validates and promotes the freedom of two consenting adults to choose their relationships. You have zero right to interfere unless you are living in a theocracy. You have two choices:

1 - Go live in another country with a theocratic state

2 - Throw out the US Constitution and replace it with Biblical law.
Mary Magdalena wrote:
Legal recognition of same-sex marriage would necessarily obscure certain basic moral values, devalue traditional marriage, and weaken public morality.
Since you're a known established liar for Jesus who has no clue about morals and derive them ONLY from an old book about invisible wizards this statement is particularly ironic.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#129
May 5, 2013
 
Mary Magdalena wrote:
<quoted text>
So did the lobotomy hurt?
You tell us.... you are clearly a sociopath who is barely able to check your absolute hate for your fellow humans.

I do SO hope you do not own any firearms-- you are liable to go off on a shooting spree at any second....

... seriously: get immediate psychiatric help. Stat.

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#130
May 5, 2013
 
Amused wrote:
<quoted text>
Most people who obsess as much as him over gays and gay sex have serious issues with repressed sexual identity issues. This person has been far enough in the closet to see Narnia.
Oh... that is GOOD. The double--no--triple entendre is beautiful.

:D

Well done!

“ IT'S A CHOICE !!!”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#131
May 5, 2013
 
Mary Magdalena wrote:
<quoted text>
So did the lobotomy hurt?
Hey, Mac is actually a smart guy, and nice as well...:) Just sayin'

Have a nice night!!!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#132
May 5, 2013
 
Snevaeh legna wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, Mac is actually a smart guy, and nice as well...:) Just sayin'
Have a nice night!!!
Yes he is.

Too bad about you...

“ IT'S A CHOICE !!!”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#133
May 5, 2013
 
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Yes he is.
Too bad about you...
Hi Bob, You see the difference with Mac is, he allows me to believe the way I want, and I show him the same respect... Something to ponder...

So, how are you tonight? I had a great weekend, and you!!!

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#134
May 5, 2013
 
Snevaeh legna wrote:
<quoted text>
Hi Bob, You see the difference with Mac is, he allows me to believe the way I want, and I show him the same respect... Something to ponder...
You demonstrate zero respect for anyone you think is worthy of going to your terrorist-god's hell.

That's your deeply seated hate speaking.

Your very first post to me, threatened me with your terror-god's hell.

Or more accurately? >>YOUR<< hell-- for your god only exists in your hate-filled imagination.

So it's YOU who wants me to go to hell, for failing to be what YOU think I should be.

Respect?

You first.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#135
May 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Snevaeh legna wrote:
<quoted text>
Hey, Mac is actually a smart guy, and nice as well...:) Just sayin'
Have a nice night!!!
Why, thank you.

You'll turn my head, quite!

Laffin.
KJV

Chicago Ridge, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#136
May 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>Actually it does. Same way as calling a vehicle with four wheels makes it a "car", or a hard-shelled fruit with milk in it a "coconut". It's also worth noting that marriage has never been exclusively defined as only male-female monogamous relationship throughout history, despite your claim.

Mary Magdalena wrote, "2. It Violates Natural Law"

Since you're a YEC then just about everything you propose violates natural law. However since gay relationships do not require magic and are observed in the natural world you are quite obviously incorrect.

Mary Magdalena wrote, "By his natural reason, man can perceive what is morally good or bad for him."

Fundies do not have this ability since they require a genocide-loving invisible wizard to tell them the difference.

Mary Magdalena wrote, "Any situation which institutionalizes the circumvention of the purpose of the sexual act violates natural law and the objective norm of morality."

Then ALL sex "must" result in kids, which explains why you guys are pro-rape and anti-sex education.

Mary Magdalena wrote, "3. It Always Denies a Child Either a Father or a Mother"

Not true, as EVERY kid has a mom and dad. Gay relationships don't preclude that.

Mary Magdalena wrote, "4. It Validates and Promotes the Homosexual Lifestyle"

It validates and promotes the freedom of two consenting adults to choose their relationships. You have zero right to interfere unless you are living in a theocracy. You have two choices:

1 - Go live in another country with a theocratic state

2 - Throw out the US Constitution and replace it with Biblical law.

Mary Magdalena wrote, "Legal recognition of same-sex marriage would necessarily obscure certain basic moral values, devalue traditional marriage, and weaken public morality."

Since you're a known established liar for Jesus who has no clue about morals and derive them ONLY from an old book about invisible wizards this statement is particularly ironic.
Dude the definition of marriage is all ready written and it does not include gay unions. Sorry but you're wrong.

"Since you're a YEC then just about everything you propose violates natural law."

The Big Bang violates natural law.
The absents of everything cannot explode and create everything.

Since you're a known established liar your post really carry any weight.
EdSed

Wishaw, UK

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#137
May 6, 2013
 
KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
Dude the definition of marriage is all ready written and it does not include gay unions. Sorry but you're wrong.
"Since you're a YEC then just about everything you propose violates natural law."
The Big Bang violates natural law.
The absents of everything cannot explode and create everything.
Since you're a known established liar your post really carry any weight.
Nonsense.
Religions cannot dictate what marriage is and what natural law is for non-religionists.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/marriage
And the Big Bang is a more scientific and useful theory than man-made religious theologies, that's all. "The absents of everything cannot explode and create everything" is an absurdly simplistic (arguably a simply ignorant) way of presenting the Big Bang theory or any other scientific ones regarding the origins of the Universe.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg2102815...

Religion = superstition

“Quantum Junctn: Use Both Lanes”

Since: Dec 06

Tulsa, Oklahoma USofA

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#138
May 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
Dude the definition of marriage is all ready written and it does not include gay unions. Sorry but you're wrong.
Where? Your ugly bible?

Because in THERE:

** bible-marriage is between one man and his rib-clone
** bible-marriage is between one man and his sisters
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife, and her concubine
** bible-marriage is between one rapist, and his victim
** bible-marriage is between one war-victor and his captive-slaves
** bible-marriage is between one king and his thousand wives, thousand slaves, and in several cases his boyfriends
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife and her female slaves
** bible-marriage is between one man and his daughters
** bible-marriage is between one man and his daughters-in-law
** bible-marriage is between one man and his several wives
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife, and the wife of his dead brother

Funny... no where in the bible is it JUST between a man and a woman....!

Interesting...!

“Engaged to the love of my life”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#139
May 6, 2013
 
Mary Magdalena wrote:
<quoted text>Have you a clue as to the meaning of the equal sign avatars that is thrown in our faces?

A_Myth wrote:
"who cares what you think about their personal sex life? "

Keep it out of the schools and out of my face then I wouldn't care!
Mary Macarena, no one is putting SSM in schools, you should get your facts straight.
KJV

Chicago Ridge, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#140
May 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

EdSed wrote:
<quoted text>Nonsense.
Religions cannot dictate what marriage is and what natural law is for non-religionists.
http://www.thefreedictionary.com/marriage
And the Big Bang is a more scientific and useful theory than man-made religious theologies, that's all. "The absents of everything cannot explode and create everything" is an absurdly simplistic (arguably a simply ignorant) way of presenting the Big Bang theory or any other scientific ones regarding the origins of the Universe.
http://www.newscientist.com/article/mg2102815...

Religion = superstition
Merriam Webster Dictionary.
Not religion.

mar·riage\ˈmer-ij,ˈma-rij\
noun
1 a (1): the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law.

"And the Big Bang is a more scientific and useful theory than man-made religious theologies, that's all."

Explain it! Explain second one!

How could the complete and total absents of everything explode and create everything?
KJV

Chicago Ridge, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#141
May 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>Where? Your ugly bible?

Because in THERE:

** bible-marriage is between one man and his rib-clone
** bible-marriage is between one man and his sisters
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife, and her concubine
** bible-marriage is between one rapist, and his victim
** bible-marriage is between one war-victor and his captive-slaves
** bible-marriage is between one king and his thousand wives, thousand slaves, and in several cases his boyfriends
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife and her female slaves
** bible-marriage is between one man and his daughters
** bible-marriage is between one man and his daughters-in-law
** bible-marriage is between one man and his several wives
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife, and the wife of his dead brother

Funny... no where in the bible is it JUST between a man and a woman....!

Interesting...!
You never tire of being the fool.

Weird!

mar·riage\ˈmer-ij,ˈma-rij\
noun
1 a (1): the state of being united to a person of the opposite sex as husband or wife in a consensual and contractual relationship recognized by law.

“ IT'S A CHOICE !!!”

Since: Jun 12

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#142
May 6, 2013
 
Hi Bobby...:)
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>
Where? Your ugly bible?
Because in THERE:
** bible-marriage is between one man and his rib-clone
** bible-marriage is between one man and his sisters
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife, and her concubine
** bible-marriage is between one rapist, and his victim
** bible-marriage is between one war-victor and his captive-slaves
** bible-marriage is between one king and his thousand wives, thousand slaves, and in several cases his boyfriends
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife and her female slaves
** bible-marriage is between one man and his daughters
** bible-marriage is between one man and his daughters-in-law
** bible-marriage is between one man and his several wives
** bible-marriage is between one man, his wife, and the wife of his dead brother
Funny... no where in the bible is it JUST between a man and a woman....!
Interesting...!
Mary Magdalena

Chicago Ridge, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#144
May 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>Mary Macarena, no one is putting SSM in schools, you should get your facts straight.
Teaching About Same-sex Marriage in Minnesota Public Schools

Background: Minnesota for Marriage is running a television commercial informing voters about what has happened in Massachusetts where a public school taught second graders about gay marriage in class. The commercial features David and Tonia Parker, who were Massachusetts parents when the school attended by their young son began teaching second graders about gay marriage. The teacher read students a book called King & King, the story of a prince who ‘marries’ another prince and lives ‘happily ever after.’ Several parents, including Mr. and Mrs. Parker, objected and approached local school administrators to ask that they be notified in advance so they could opt their children out of class for this instruction. School officials refused. The Parkers and other parents sued to assert their parental rights. In the case of Parker v. Hurley (Case 07- 1528) the first District Court of Appeals ruled that parents were not entitled to notification about this instruction, nor did they have any opt-out right to remove their children from class.

Q. If marriage is redefined in Minnesota could it be taught to young children in Minnesota schools?
A. Yes. In states that have redefined marriage, a new definition of marriage as a genderless institution has replaced the prior definition of marriage of one man and one woman. It necessarily follows that whenever marriage is taught or talked about in school, it would be this new genderless type marriage, since that is the only type of marriage that will exist in the law. This is what has happened in Massachusetts and Canada.

Q. Would gay marriage be required teaching in Minnesota?
A. Initially, local schools would determine how to handle the teaching of gay marriage. This is how it was handled in Massachusetts as well, when it was taught to second graders. If history is a guide, we can expect gay marriage activists to push this teaching throughout the state, just as they have elsewhere.

Q. What evidence do you have that suggests gay marriage activists would push this teaching in Minnesota?
A. Robert Skutch, the author of the book “Who’s In A Family?”(a book currently used in elementary school libraries in Minnesota and that was also used in Massachusetts public schools) told National Public radio (NPR),“The whole purpose of the book was to get the subject out into the minds and the awareness of children before they are old enough to have been convinced there’s another way of looking at life.” The audience for Skutch’s book about gay families is kindergartners.

Q. What if gay marriage is taught to children in class, what’s the big deal?
A. There are several problems with what has happened in Massachusetts and elsewhere. First, the subject has been taught to very young children including seven year olds who are in second grade. Second, many people firmly believe that marriage can only be between one man and one woman. It puts parents and pastors in a difficult spot.
Mary Magdalena

Chicago Ridge, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#145
May 6, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

1

Amused wrote:
<quoted text>Most people who obsess as much as him over gays and gay sex have serious issues with repressed sexual identity issues. This person has been far enough in the closet to see Narnia.
Perverted sex kills!

Talk to all the kids dying of aids. Are they in the "closet"?

Is there a light in your closet? Try turning it on!
Mary Magdalena

Chicago Ridge, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#147
May 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>You're a young Earth creationist who thinks reality isn't real because the Bible said an invisible Jewish wizard did it differently using magic. And it said the Earth was flat.
You believe plants evolved into animals that eat plants. You believe that uni sex plants and animals evolved to a male / Female sexual reproduction system and got the bees to buy into it just as they evolved from an ant. You believe nothing exploded and made an ape that had you!
Mary Magdalena

Chicago Ridge, IL

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#148
May 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>Actually it does. Same way as calling a vehicle with four wheels makes it a "car", or a hard-shelled fruit with milk in it a "coconut". It's also worth noting that marriage has never been exclusively defined as only male-female monogamous relationship throughout history, despite your claim.

Mary Magdalena wrote, "2. It Violates Natural Law"

Since you're a YEC then just about everything you propose violates natural law. However since gay relationships do not require magic and are observed in the natural world you are quite obviously incorrect.

Mary Magdalena wrote, "By his natural reason, man can perceive what is morally good or bad for him."

Fundies do not have this ability since they require a genocide-loving invisible wizard to tell them the difference.

Mary Magdalena wrote, "Any situation which institutionalizes the circumvention of the purpose of the sexual act violates natural law and the objective norm of morality."

Then ALL sex "must" result in kids, which explains why you guys are pro-rape and anti-sex education.

Mary Magdalena wrote, "3. It Always Denies a Child Either a Father or a Mother"

Not true, as EVERY kid has a mom and dad. Gay relationships don't preclude that.

Mary Magdalena wrote, "4. It Validates and Promotes the Homosexual Lifestyle"

It validates and promotes the freedom of two consenting adults to choose their relationships. You have zero right to interfere unless you are living in a theocracy. You have two choices:

1 - Go live in another country with a theocratic state

2 - Throw out the US Constitution and replace it with Biblical law.

Mary Magdalena wrote, "Legal recognition of same-sex marriage would necessarily obscure certain basic moral values, devalue traditional marriage, and weaken public morality."

Since you're a known established liar for Jesus who has no clue about morals and derive them ONLY from an old book about invisible wizards this statement is particularly ironic.
Bizarre train of thought!

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••