Gays are criminals not equals.
KJV

United States

#285 May 10, 2013
Lacez wrote:
[QUOTE who="KJV
"]<quoted text>
I'm not against a civil union. Redefining the word Marriage bothers me.
"

You mean reverting to the original definition.
Gay people used to be able to marry.
When and where?
KJV

United States

#286 May 10, 2013
macumazahn wrote:
[QUOTE who="KJV
"]<quoted text>
Just change the laws to reflex that a civil union gets all the same benefit.
Really doesn't matter that much to me.
Today the Minnesota house passed a bill to legalize gay marriage. Should pass the senate and the governor said he will sign the bill. So Minnesota will be the 12 state to legalize gay marriage.
"

Huh. That's actually rational.

"You missed a bit, though.

"Marriage" IS a civil union. You're not legally married unless you get a licence from the County Clerk. Doesn't matter what religious chicken-shaking rituals you've undergone - absent the licence, you're not married.

Now, do you have a difficulty with same-sex couples acquiring a marriage licence?

Only that's just what they're called...
Just what they call it.
NightSerf

Knoxville, TN

#287 May 10, 2013
[QUOTE who="KJV
"]<quoted text>
I don't know, is it on all of my post or just some as I do use different computers.
[/QUOTE]Seems to be all of them, but only recently. I'm trying again, this time copying and pasting from Word...

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#288 May 10, 2013
[QUOTE who="KJV
"]<quoted text>
Just what they call it.[/QUOTE]How if they call it "marriage" and you agree to call yours, say, "synthesis"?

The County Clerk doesn't care!!

Why do you??
KJV

United States

#289 May 10, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>100% spot-on correct: there are way too many laws with the word "marriage" or the legal representative of that word, to try to get a parallel-but-equal word past them all.

The simplest solution is marriage equality under the law--as guaranteed by the Constitution-- which also prevents RELIGIOUS inequality, and GENDER inequality too-- from even BEING law.

The easiest way to do that? Strip out any and all language which sets specific definitions of gender in the >>legal<< marriage laws.
Here's an easy fix a little tough for you to figure out but it's what I'm referring to.

A law that states. "A Civil Union shall be treated as equal to a marriage in all laws existing and in the future"

No rewriting all those laws.
NightSerf

Knoxville, TN

#290 May 10, 2013
NightSerf wrote:
<quoted text>Seems to be all of them, but only recently. I'm trying again, this time copying and pasting from Word...
That didn't work, either. If at first you don't succeed...
KJV

United States

#291 May 10, 2013
Bob of Quantum-Faith wrote:
<quoted text>Ironically?

The Constitution DOES GUARANTEE marriage equality ALREADY.

ALL the hate-laws that prohibit same-sex marriage are UN-constitutional.

It's just that nobody has bothered-- before now-- to fight them.

You religious bigots have had center-stage for FAR TOO LONG.

You are losing this battle-- and all the rest that you fight.

Which is a good thing.
No not at all. The definition at the time the Constitution was written was "marriage is between one man and one woman." When you quote a law you must use the definitions of the words used as they were defined at the time the law was penned.
NightSerf

Knoxville, TN

#292 May 10, 2013
...try, try again.

“H-o-o-o-o-o-o-ld on thar!”

Since: Sep 08

The Borderland of Sol

#293 May 10, 2013
[QUOTE who="KJV
"]<quoted text>
Here's an easy fix a little tough for you to figure out but it's what I'm referring to.
A law that states. "A Civil Union shall be treated as equal to a marriage in all laws existing and in the future"
No rewriting all those laws.[/QUOTE]I believe that's all anyone wants.

Here's the kicker, though: I'm an ordained minister. I plan on officiating at the first lawful gay marriage in this area.

Pro bono.

Now how exactly is that going to affect you?

If it's not (and it won't) you may as well STFU.

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#294 May 10, 2013
Lacez wrote:
<quoted text>
I'm emulating a god.
Is your wife a god?
God acts like a wife?
Thinking

UK

#295 May 10, 2013
I was until he bought his hat a first class seat on the plane to Italy.
macumazahn wrote:
<quoted text>
Pro bono.
Mary Magdalena

United States

#297 May 10, 2013
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>God acts like a wife?
He submits to you?
I doubt it.

M&M
Mary Magdalena

United States

#298 May 10, 2013
[QUOTE who="KJV
"]<quoted text>Just change the laws to reflex that a civil union gets all the same benefit.

Really doesn't matter that much to me.
Today the Minnesota house passed a bill to legalize gay marriage. Should pass the senate and the governor said he will sign the bill. So Minnesota will be the 12 state to legalize gay marriage.[/QUOTE]

Well maybe something good can come of that, maybe all the Gays will move north.
Mary Magdalena

United States

#299 May 10, 2013
[QUOTE who="KJV
"]<quoted text>I'm not against a civil union. Redefining the word Marriage bothers me.[/QUOTE]

You of all people on this board should know that Gay sex is an abomination
Of nature.

Leviticus 18:22
You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.
EdSed

Hamilton, UK

#300 May 10, 2013
[QUOTE who=" Mary Magdalena
"]<quoted text>
Well maybe something good can come of that, maybe all the Gays will move north.
[/QUOTE]I'm inclined to think that it's better to be born outside marriage than religious. It's no child's fault to be born 'outside wedlock'. Arguably 'religionist' is more derogatory than 'bastard' in this day and age.

And 'wedlock' is an interesting concept too. It suggests that someone has a key. Or evocative of hemlock.

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#301 May 10, 2013
[QUOTE who=" Mary Magdalena
"]<quoted text>
He submits to you?
I doubt it.
M&M[/QUOTE]
Your wife is a man?

“ad victoriam”

Since: Dec 10

arte et marte

#302 May 10, 2013
[QUOTE who=" Mary Magdalena
"]<quoted text>
You of all people on this board should know that Gay sex is an abomination
Of nature.
Leviticus 18:22
You shall not lie with a male as with a woman; it is an abomination.
[/QUOTE]
If you let the bible decide your morality, yes it is.
But witch burning, infanticide and slavery is in.
Most us normal people let society decide what is moral.

“Educating the uneducated”

Since: Aug 12

Montreal

#303 May 10, 2013
[QUOTE who="KJV
"]<quoted text>
When and where?[/QUOTE]

In Roman times.
The Dude

Macclesfield, UK

#304 May 10, 2013
KJV wrote:
<quoted text>
Oh my, it's not irrelevant dud it's my opinion. Or you can throw out the Constitution.
And your *opinion* is irrelevant.

That WAS the point I was making...
Mary Magdalena

United States

#305 May 10, 2013
Hey NUT job listen closely.

Romans didn't speak English so they did not use the would marriage.

Origin: Middle English mariage, from Anglo-French, from marier to marry.
First use: 14th century

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News "Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really T... (Jan '12) 2 min Subduction Zone 74,960
News Atheism, for Good Reason, Fears Questions (Jun '09) 7 min Al Caplan 32,049
News Why Atheist Richard Dawkins Supports Religious ... 7 min Brendatucker 158
The Dumbest Thing Posted by a Godbot (Jun '10) 10 min Into The Night 6,093
News Nonsense of a high order: The confused world of... 17 hr Dogen 4,059
News The war on Christmas (Dec '10) Sat John 4,952
News Why do public atheists have to behave like such... Jun 21 Eagle 12 - 4
More from around the web