Yep. Refusing to look means that he didn't see it... and if he didn't see he can claim it doesn't exist... and since it "doesn't exist" (simply because he refused to look) means he can continue to use it as an 'argument' for his 'god'.<quoted text>
Indeed we do-- his first reply to me, was to try to prove Hitler was not associated with the catholics-- in spite of photographic evidence to the contrary (which he refused to even look at).
Apparently, the 'god' he worships is dumb as a stump and more gullible than it's followers. But that would make sense wouldn't it?
They'll claim it's all knowing and all seeing and one of it's top 10 no-no's is about bearing false witness... yet bearing false witness is all they have to use when they argue for their religion. Apparently they believe their 'god' is too stupid to notice when they flat out ignore that particular commandment
Seeing is believing so NOT seeing is not believing.... except in religion, of course, where NOT seeing is grounds for die-hard belief.