Anti-Feminist Atheists Inevitably Choosing Sexism Over Commitment to Rationality

Nov 27, 2012 | Posted by: roboblogger | Full story: The Raw Story

I've blogged here in the past about the dogged and weird pro-harassment* cult that erupted in the atheist/skeptic movement, one that is very small but, being composed by a lot of unstable people have nothing better to do than harass others, can nonetheless make a pain of themselves.** By and large, their main obsession is screaming incoherently ... (more)

Comments
41 - 60 of 172 Comments Last updated Feb 27, 2013

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#42
Jan 3, 2013
 
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>Harris believe that moral decisions can be made objectively and that everyone should follow those objective decisions. I personally do not like being told what to do let alone think.
That I can agree with you on. As I said, everyone has some crazy idea in their head. ;)

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#43
Jan 3, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
That I can agree with you on. As I said, everyone has some crazy idea in their head. ;)
The fact that I disagree with Harris on this one subject is the only reason why Skeptic calls me a creationist.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#44
Jan 3, 2013
 
Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>The fact that I disagree with Harris on this one subject is the only reason why Skeptic calls me a creationist.
As I said, everyone has some crazy idea in their head. lol I should have that as a signature somewhere.

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#45
Jan 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
As I said, everyone has some crazy idea in their head. lol I should have that as a signature somewhere.
Some crazier than others.
KittenKoder

Sydney, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#46
Jan 3, 2013
 
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Interesting attempt here. It appears to be more projection than anything.
I was recently homeless, for a total of almost a decade, actually. Lived in a shelter for women most of that time, actually. Had to deal with learning to handle financial problems. It was an interesting experience actually.
10 years in a shelter?!?!
Must have been a generous shelter or extremely big.
The only people who spend 10 years in a shelter are homeless and destitute downs syndrome people and other genuine tards - not the revolutionary homeless or the designer poor like you.
You more or less fall into the category of a professional student who spends 10-15 years in the uni with 'studies'
Anyone who has been destitute would not describe it as 'an interesting experience'
I call BS on your story, as I understand it you are a program coder of some sort and things such as studying and using computer equipment would be a low priority for someone living on the street or in a shelter.
Deflection? Thats your aim to veer away from the reality that you are a queer with its nuts chopped off
Fag

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#47
Jan 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
10 years in a shelter?!?!
Must have been a generous shelter or extremely big.
The only people who spend 10 years in a shelter are homeless and destitute downs syndrome people and other genuine tards - not the revolutionary homeless or the designer poor like you.
You more or less fall into the category of a professional student who spends 10-15 years in the uni with 'studies'
Anyone who has been destitute would not describe it as 'an interesting experience'
I call BS on your story, as I understand it you are a program coder of some sort and things such as studying and using computer equipment would be a low priority for someone living on the street or in a shelter.
Deflection? Thats your aim to veer away from the reality that you are a queer with its nuts chopped off
Fag
Hmm, so many assertions. Why not pick one to begin with for your evidence to support these? If you have no evidence then you are a liar.

“It's just a box of rain...”

Since: May 07

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#48
Jan 3, 2013
 
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Hmm, so many assertions. Why not pick one to begin with for your evidence to support these? If you have no evidence then you are a liar.
I think of people who make assertions that they cannot or will not substantiate as blowhards, not liars. Some may think their assertions are self-evident, others may assume their world-views are universally true, and some may simply not care whether anyone agrees with them, but I suspect that many more are simply too lazy to support their assertions with logic and evidence and that still more are incapable of doing so. It doesn't take much effort to learn the basics of logic , yet surprisingly few seem to make that effort. It's sad, really...

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#49
Jan 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

NightSerf wrote:
<quoted text>
I think of people who make assertions that they cannot or will not substantiate as blowhards, not liars. Some may think their assertions are self-evident, others may assume their world-views are universally true, and some may simply not care whether anyone agrees with them, but I suspect that many more are simply too lazy to support their assertions with logic and evidence and that still more are incapable of doing so. It doesn't take much effort to learn the basics of logic , yet surprisingly few seem to make that effort. It's sad, really...
Actually, all of that equates to lying, still. Unsubstantiated claims presented as factual are lies, because they are also making the claim that they do not know, therefore they are lying about knowing. Thus it is still valid to assert they are liars until they present the evidence for their claim. Now if they do not present it as fact, that would change matters.

“It's just a box of rain...”

Since: May 07

Knoxville, TN

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#50
Jan 3, 2013
 
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, all of that equates to lying, still. Unsubstantiated claims presented as factual are lies, because they are also making the claim that they do not know, therefore they are lying about knowing. Thus it is still valid to assert they are liars until they present the evidence for their claim. Now if they do not present it as fact, that would change matters.
I disagree, but more to the point, calling someone a liar is designed to start an argument that veers away from the subject at hand and toward insubstantial and illogical quibbling, so often the purpose of a classic ad hominem. Why do that?

“talk to the kitteh”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#51
Jan 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>The fact that I disagree with Harris on this one subject is the only reason why Skeptic calls me a creationist.
Every man thinks that his "way" is the best way to think or act. It's been this way for thousands of years. Some take it too far. Harris dreams of controlling other peoples minds. The means he dreams of is what makes him despicable. ;)

I suspect he has sympathizers in high places. I hope I am wrong.

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#52
Jan 3, 2013
 

Judged:

2

2

2

nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>Every man thinks that his "way" is the best way to think or act. It's been this way for thousands of years. Some take it too far. Harris dreams of controlling other peoples minds. The means he dreams of is what makes him despicable. ;)
I suspect he has sympathizers in high places. I hope I am wrong.
You should see the applause he gets from his presentation of it on TED.

“talk to the kitteh”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#53
Jan 3, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>You should see the applause he gets from his presentation of it on TED.
It is spooky that someone claiming to be a free-thinker would be applauded for suggesting that other people should not be allowed to employ the same ability. I don't care much for his BS about free-will, either. Claiming there is none, while also saying that "we" should have free-will taken away if we believe other than he does. He thinks he's fooling us with that crap. The self-contradiction runs deep in that one. I bet some of those asses who applauded him have connections with the U.N.
KittenKoder

Leichhardt, Australia

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#54
Jan 5, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Hmm, so many assertions. Why not pick one to begin with for your evidence to support these? If you have no evidence then you are a liar.
You are not a biological female, you have male pattern baldness. If you had alapecia as some women do, then you thining out/baldness would be uniform - not a pattern like you have.
Your squeaky wavering octave voice also is inconsistent as though you are trying to emulate a female voice.
Judging by your facial/skull type you are actually quite old probably mid to late 60s or early 70s and this is why you overdose in garish makeup.
Own up fag, its over.

Lies? Heres a direct question.......
Q: Were you born biologically male?

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#55
Jan 5, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

1

KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
You are not a biological female, you have male pattern baldness. If you had alapecia as some women do, then you thining out/baldness would be uniform - not a pattern like you have.
Your squeaky wavering octave voice also is inconsistent as though you are trying to emulate a female voice.
Judging by your facial/skull type you are actually quite old probably mid to late 60s or early 70s and this is why you overdose in garish makeup.
Own up fag, its over.
Lies? Heres a direct question.......
Q: Were you born biologically male?
So, where is your evidence of all this?
ScratchandSniffV irginMary

Wylie, TX

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#56
Jan 5, 2013
 

Judged:

3

2

2

KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
You are not a biological female, you have male pattern baldness. If you had alapecia as some women do, then you thining out/baldness would be uniform - not a pattern like you have.
Your squeaky wavering octave voice also is inconsistent as though you are trying to emulate a female voice.
Judging by your facial/skull type you are actually quite old probably mid to late 60s or early 70s and this is why you overdose in garish makeup.
Own up fag, its over.
Lies? Heres a direct question.......
Q: Were you born biologically male?
It is amazing that the cowardly moderators haven't censored you yet. I got censored for making pornographic remarks about a FICTIONAL character known to all happy clapper Christians as "The Virgin Mary"...I wrote about Mary's capacious vaginal dimensions and wondered how she opened her hairy legs to a Space Ghost named Yahweh who impregnated her with Himself since the Father and Son are ONE...Open wide, Opie...There's Holy Semen on the communion wafer and you've just won a mouthful of Savior!!! EWWWWWW!

You are allowed to CONSTANTLY bully an intelligent, thoughtful, even tempered, rational, poster with your obscene, grotesque, insulting, PERSONAL remarks and the cojon-less moderators let you build a daisy chain of online harassment. I guess the moderator's cowardice mixed with a slice of tolerance and served with a dollop of Kumbaya pie is your free ticket to continue the molestation. Congratulations.

Now, could you please explain to us in DETAIL how the Whore Mary of Bethlehem was inseminated? The bible gives scant details so we must fill in the blanks as biblical exegesis is an act of delightful hermeneutics. Imagine Mary squatting in a wide stance and Yahweh approaching her with an insemination tube, latex gloves, like so much livestock breeding. Do you think Mary had an orgasm? Did she bray, "Oh God"? Yes? LOL!!!!

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#57
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

1

Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>The fact that I disagree with Harris on this one subject is the only reason why Skeptic calls me a creationist.
That and the fact that you're actually a creationist who deliberately disrupts threads here when they become too damning against creationism.

You and your tag team nanoanomaly.

Its funny how you try to lie about the reason why I call you a creationist. Just makes my claim even stronger - after all creationists lie all the time.

I couldn't care what you think of the genius that is Sam Harris.

Your opinion is coming from the same ignorance that creationists have and so is immediatelly invalid and can't be trusted.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#58
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Oh by the way, Lil Ticked, that isn't a cue for you to start a discussion about your flawed opinion of Sam Harris's morals.

You need to learn stop talking for a little while and start educating yourself a little bit because you lack self-perception and intelligence.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#59
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>You should see the applause he gets from his presentation of it on TED.
Yes, intelligent people clapping to an intelligent man.

A far better situation than stupid people talking to thin air, like your creationist cult.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#60
Jan 6, 2013
 
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
You are not a biological female, you have male pattern baldness. If you had alapecia as some women do, then you thining out/baldness would be uniform - not a pattern like you have.
Your squeaky wavering octave voice also is inconsistent as though you are trying to emulate a female voice.
Judging by your facial/skull type you are actually quite old probably mid to late 60s or early 70s and this is why you overdose in garish makeup.
Own up fag, its over.
Lies? Heres a direct question.......
Q: Were you born biologically male?
SO no proof of god then. Thanks troll.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

|
Report Abuse
|
Judge it!
|
#61
Jan 6, 2013
 

Judged:

1

Lil Ticked wrote:
<quoted text>I love the way your brain works.
;)
Shes a creationist so no surprises there.

Tell me when this thread is updated: (Registration is not required)

Add to my Tracker Send me an email

Type in your comments below
Name
(appears on your post)
Comments
Characters left: 4000
Type the numbers you see in the image on the right:

Please note by clicking on "Post Comment" you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

•••
•••