Aliens and evolution

Aliens and evolution

There are 6310 comments on the Washington Times story from Jun 19, 2012, titled Aliens and evolution. In it, Washington Times reports that:

DENTON, Texas, June 19, 2012 - Aliens are ingrained in our cultural psyche. They abound in books, movies, radio, and a thousand theories about the extra-terrestrial, little green men, UFO sightings, abductions, Area 51, and Roswell.

Join the discussion below, or Read more at Washington Times.

“The Edge”

Since: Dec 10

Of Tomorow

#4890 Dec 30, 2012
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>That's not how this works. You made a claim and I proved that you were wrong. Period.
You don't get to make up the rules as you go along.
Be gracious and say, "ok, anomaly, you were right."
Sometimes.... you are AND, I worship you then as A Goddess.
Cept I resist as default response . Cause I can.

:)

“The Edge”

Since: Dec 10

Of Tomorow

#4891 Dec 30, 2012
Fancy that... resistance is far from futile!

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#4892 Dec 30, 2012
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
You proved (claimed) a certain type rock can float. I agreed with though also said you could not produce one from your environment.
Actually, YOU said that he couldn't produce one from his environment.

The rest of us recognize that his environment is irrelevant to your claim of 100% about everything thanks to your "scientific system" of "If Aura says so, then it's real 100% of the time."
That means it is virtually possible but you cannot demonstrate it.
You can not demonstrate that rocks in your enviroment sink.

You are limited to this website. Don't hold others to a higher standard than you hold yourself.

Or in this case - any standard.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#4893 Dec 30, 2012
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope try again nuglet.. The glass s half full or is it half empty?
Neither. The glass is. Period.

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#4894 Dec 30, 2012
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> Sometimes.... you are AND, I worship you then as A Goddess.
Cept I resist as default response . Cause I can.
:)
If we were doing this face to face, I'd have you on your knees by now...and you'd like it.

“The Edge”

Since: Dec 10

Of Tomorow

#4895 Dec 30, 2012
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, YOU said that he couldn't produce one from his environment.
The rest of us recognize that his environment is irrelevant to your claim of 100% about everything thanks to your "scientific system" of "If Aura says so, then it's real 100% of the time."
<quoted text>
You can not demonstrate that rocks in your enviroment sink.
You are limited to this website. Don't hold others to a higher standard than you hold yourself.
Or in this case - any standard.
I can demonstrate nuggin stole more chains than he could swim with.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#4896 Dec 31, 2012
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, YOU said that he couldn't produce one from his environment.
The rest of us recognize that his environment is irrelevant to your claim of 100% about everything thanks to your "scientific system" of "If Aura says so, then it's real 100% of the time."
<quoted text>
You can not demonstrate that rocks in your enviroment sink.
You are limited to this website. Don't hold others to a higher standard than you hold yourself.
Or in this case - any standard.
Haha, the stupid f*ck troll who's lost so many arguments here is still talking out of his a$$.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#4897 Dec 31, 2012
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Hypothesis:
Nuggin claims that if you call something "God", it automatically becomes it.
Experiment:
Random person A calls an iPhone a god (because it appears to do magic):
The iPhone doesn't turn into or become a god.
The hypothesis is DISPROVEN.
Thanks Nuggin, now f*ck off back to your troll hole.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#4898 Dec 31, 2012
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text> Hypothesis is much like an innocent until proven guilty trial. It is proven till proven false , but it's proof status is with zero confidence without testing.
Wrong way round. A hypothesis is **innocent** of the claims made of it until demonstrated otherwise. E.g. evolution is "innocent" of being responsible for biological diversification unless demonstrated otherwise.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#4899 Dec 31, 2012
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
Haha, the stupid f*ck troll who's lost so many arguments here is still talking out of his a$$.
Ah, shaddap Skippy.

(eyeroll)
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#4900 Dec 31, 2012
Aura wrote:
<quoted text>
You proved (claimed) a certain type rock can float. I agreed with though also said you could not produce one from your environment.
That means it is virtually possible but you cannot demonstrate it.

I don't make any rules but , my dear
I will enforce them.
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Actually, YOU said that he couldn't produce one from his environment.
The rest of us recognize that his environment is irrelevant to your claim of 100% about everything thanks to your "scientific system" of "If Aura says so, then it's real 100% of the time."
<quoted text>
You can not demonstrate that rocks in your enviroment sink.
You are limited to this website. Don't hold others to a higher standard than you hold yourself.
Or in this case - any standard.
'Twas naughty. Tut tut Aura.
The Dude

Birkenhead, UK

#4901 Dec 31, 2012
nanoanomaly wrote:
<quoted text>If we were doing this face to face, I'd have you on your knees by now...and you'd like it.
I know **I** would...

(Dude kneels ready for kitteh worship)

“Is that all you've got?”

Since: Jun 10

Location hidden

#4902 Dec 31, 2012
The Dude wrote:
<quoted text>
I know **I** would...
(Dude kneels ready for kitteh worship)
Wait...



I haz mood muzak!

“There is no such thing”

Since: May 08

as a reasonable person

#4903 Dec 31, 2012
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
You proved (claimed) a certain type rock can float. I agreed with though also said you could not produce one from your environment.
That means it is virtually possible but you cannot demonstrate it.
I don't make any rules but , my dear
I will enforce them.
Ever hear of feakin' google?

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#4904 Dec 31, 2012
-Skeptic- wrote:
<quoted text>
Thanks Nuggin, now f*ck off back to your troll hole.
Skippy, this is what you have been reduced to. You pop out of your little hiding place, post a fake quote and then refute it. Throw a few swear words and run away again for a week.

You are a joke.

No, jokes serve a purpose. You're less than a joke. You're you.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#4905 Dec 31, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Nope, still not how it works.
So, you are now taking Skippy's tactic of claiming to have knowledge about something but refusing to share it.

LOL. Pretty damn pathetic.

Please, oh master scientist, enlighten us all. Tell us how it is that science PROVES a hypothesis with 100% certainty 100% of the time.

This ought to be good for a laugh.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#4906 Dec 31, 2012
Aura Mytha wrote:
<quoted text>
I can demonstrate nuggin stole more chains than he could swim with.
So, since you can't defeat me in a rational argument you _AGAIN_ resort to threatening my life.

You are a child.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#4907 Dec 31, 2012
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
So, you are now taking Skippy's tactic of claiming to have knowledge about something but refusing to share it.
LOL. Pretty damn pathetic.
Please, oh master scientist, enlighten us all. Tell us how it is that science PROVES a hypothesis with 100% certainty 100% of the time.
This ought to be good for a laugh.
Well, since you have an inferiority complex, as evidenced by your insistence that everyone agree with you, posting such would be futile, and simply inflame you more. You will enter fits of denial, and eventually just spew ad homs if you cannot get someone to agree with you. The simple fact that you cannot even drop a topic until you "have the last word" demonstrates your inferiority complex, which is truly sad.

Here are a few resources on the topic:
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_method
http://www.sciencebuddies.org/science-fair-pr...
http://teacher.nsrl.rochester.edu/phy_labs/ap...

Consider those to be my final response, you shall not get me to agree with you, and I shall only reply to you when I do not agree with you. I shall also not attempt to point out the areas you are correct again. You are just as annoying as any religious zealot, because the god delusion still corrupts your mind.

“I Am No One Else”

Since: Apr 12

Seattle

#4908 Dec 31, 2012
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
So, since you can't defeat me in a rational argument you _AGAIN_ resort to threatening my life.
You are a child.
Assuming that in a rational argument one is "defeated" is itself very childish. Rational people do not aim to "defeat" or even win, they aim to educate and learn, or perhaps formulate something new that was once unthought of.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#4909 Dec 31, 2012
KittenKoder wrote:
<quoted text>
Well, since you have an inferiority complex, as evidenced by your insistence that everyone agree with you, posting such would be futile, and simply inflame you more.
Let me get this straight. In different posts now you've claimed that I have both an inferiority and a superiority complex.

And despite the fact that I've provided a specific example of what I'm talking about and asked you to do the same, you either can't or won't.

But you reserve the right to proclaim everyone else wrong.

Sort of EXACTLY like Skippy and his "burden of proof" argument.

The reason you don't want to provide an example is not that I will reject it.(I will, of course. Not because I need to be right, but because the BASIS of your argument is wrong therefore you example will also be wrong.) The reason you don't want to provide an example is that you realized a few days ago you're wrong, but you don't have the balls (figuratively or literally) to own up to that fact.
You will enter fits of denial, and eventually just spew ad homs if you cannot get someone to agree with you.
Interesting accusation from someone who started this post attacking my personality.

I don't give a crap if you agree with me. I'm right. Whether or not you continue to be wrong or correct yourself and join the me in being right is irrelevant to my life.

I'm content with being right.

The only reason I continue to respond is that you continue to pretend that you think I'm incorrect when we both know you lost this debate.

Had you HONESTLY thought you were winning, you'd be EAGER - nay, INSISTENT, on providing an example.

Such is the position of the person with conviction.

You don't provide an example because you don't have conviction. Because you are wrong and know it.
The simple fact that you cannot even drop a topic until you "have the last word" demonstrates your inferiority complex, which is truly sad.
Says the person who just replied to my request for an example with a post of insults.

Funny.

Let's see if you have conviction about THIS claim.

Tell you what. You leave the forum and NEVER post again - you win this piece of the argument. You let me have the last word.

And, as a fun benefit. I also win because you leave.

If, however, you stick around, I'll know that you lack conviction even in THIS claim.
Consider those to be my final response, you shall not get me to agree with you, and I shall only reply to you when I do not agree with you. I shall also not attempt to point out the areas you are correct again
There was some debate going on about whether you were a transvestite or just an ugly woman.

This last part leaves no room for error. Only a whiny little bitch would post this.

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
News Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 16 min Knowledge- 247,292
News Atheists Aren't the Problem, Christian Intolera... (Oct '14) 50 min Silent Echo 12,545
Proof of God for the Atheist 1 hr Amused 101
News Si Robertson, 'Duck Dynasty' Star, Says Atheist... 1 hr karl44 56
News Atheism, the Bible and sexual orientation 6 hr Amused 5
News In America, atheists are still in the closet (Apr '12) 7 hr -Stray Dog 47,776
News As an atheist, how do I maintain my relationshi... 20 hr thetruth 19
More from around the web