Aliens and evolution

Jun 19, 2012 Full story: Washington Times 6,103

DENTON, Texas, June 19, 2012 - Aliens are ingrained in our cultural psyche. They abound in books, movies, radio, and a thousand theories about the extra-terrestrial, little green men, UFO sightings, abductions, Area 51, and Roswell.

Full Story

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Since: Jun 11

Patagonia

#4200 Dec 1, 2012
dr of theology wrote:
<quoted text>UFO's are sumerians from the tenth planet in our solar system.Their writings predate the bible by thousands of years.the bible coppied 99% of its stories from the sumerian writings.FYI.
OH PLEASE,...not this 10th. planet crap again.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

#4201 Dec 1, 2012
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
This is why it's advisable for you to actually read the other posts before jumping into a discussion.
You've completely missed the point.
This is not "my" God. I'm not defending the bible or Christianity as anything but mythology and a power grab by men who are afraid of women having sex with other men.
However, Skippy has spent 6 months berating everyone, claiming that he can DISPROVE "God" _scientifically_.
This demonstrates a GROSS misunderstanding of science.
Science can not prove nor disprove anything which relates to the "supernatural" because science deals only with the _NATURAL_.
Does the "supernatural" exist? I sincerely doubt it. However, I would never claim to be able to _scientifically_ prove or disprove otherwise.
When you abandon the very rules of science in order to try and advance science over mythology, you are replacing science WITH mythology.
Let the religious have they myths. Keep them away from our science. Stop pretending science does things it doesn't do.
The REASON science has been winning this war for HUNDREDS of years is because it sticks to what it does well and doesn't try and do what it can't.
What science does or doesn't do, who sleeps with who ..... who cares? You described a god with the ultimate ability to avoid being detected. So what does that have to do with a god who hides himself, from his much loved children? Nothing at all, much like you yourself ...... the god is a joke

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

#4202 Dec 1, 2012
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Yeah, an entire thread you started based on your inability to formulate an argument. AND, if you actually READ that thread, you'll see it's full of people who came to the conclusion that YOU were wrong.
.... and they are all, your socks.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

#4203 Dec 1, 2012
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Skippy, you DID Deny the moon landings. MULTIPLE times. Page 4 of THIS thread.
You also claimed that Lizards are imaginary.
That Egypt never existed.
And _most recently_ that c-14 dating is fake.
It's ALL on this thread. Continuing to deny it doesn't make your idiocy go away.
We are not alien to our own moon.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#4204 Dec 1, 2012
Richardfs wrote:
<quoted text>
A lovely story, now cite it please.
Now cite what? The tree ring record for the American SW?

Okay:
http://archaeology.about.com/od/dterms/g/dend...

Now you go ahead and provide you evidence that C-14 dating is fake.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#4205 Dec 1, 2012
Aura Mytha wrote:
YES Zeus is an imaginary gawd,
Here we go again. You classify Zeus as imaginary as opposed to WHICH other god?

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#4206 Dec 1, 2012
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>.... and they are all, your socks.
Well that's a fun little fantasy. Obviously you haven't read the thread.

Big surprise.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#4207 Dec 1, 2012
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>We are not alien to our own moon.
Mexicans are "alien" to the US.

There has been no human born on the moon. No humans live on the moon. Only a handful of humans have ever stepped foot there.

To claim that we are from the Moon is ridiculous.

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#4208 Dec 1, 2012
Let us recount the bidding:-
Richardfs wrote:
<quoted text>
So there is NO misunderstanding C14 dating is accurate, tree rings and ice cores are not.
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
That is an OUTLANDISH claim.
C-14 has an error bar. A +/-
You find a structure in New Mexico and it has wooden beams in it, you can date those beams to 3,250 years ago +/- 25 years.
However, if you take a core out of that beam, you can have a dendrochronologist tell you EXACTLY what year that tree stopped growing.
Now, you can argue that the support beam may have been reused or taken from a tree that died years earlier etc. However, those arguments apply equally to the C-14 date of that same support beam.
So, given a choice between C-14 and dendrochronology in New Mexico. DC is gonna win every time.
C-14's main advantage is that you can date a bone or a lump of charcoal etc. DC only works for trees and only in areas where the ring timeline has been well established.
However, ALL of this is irrelevant because you jumped in to defend Skippy's position that C-14 dating is fake.
So, let's see your evidence.
OR - how about you apologize for f#(king up and go away.
Richardfs wrote:
<quoted text>
A lovely story, now cite it please.
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Now cite what? The tree ring record for the American SW?
Okay:
http://archaeology.about.com/od/dterms/g/dend...
Now you go ahead and provide you evidence that C-14 dating is fake.
Now will you please cite your original story.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#4209 Dec 1, 2012
Richardfs wrote:
Let us recount the bidding:-

Now will you please cite your original story.
Funny that you cut off the front part of the conversation where you jumped in saying I was wrong about C-14.

How about you go back 3-4 more posts and THEN we'll talk about citations.

“Darwin was right..of course.”

Since: Jun 11

Patagonia

#4210 Dec 1, 2012
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny that you cut off the front part of the conversation where you jumped in saying I was wrong about C-14.
How about you go back 3-4 more posts and THEN we'll talk about citations.
Are the creotards still trying to lie about C-14? What a bunch of fools and idiots

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#4211 Dec 1, 2012
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Funny that you cut off the front part of the conversation where you jumped in saying I was wrong about C-14.
How about you go back 3-4 more posts and THEN we'll talk about citations.
Just as I thought, you are just another lying godbot. You can't cite the story because you made it up.

“Formerly "Richard"”

Since: Mar 12

In the beginning e=mc^2

#4212 Dec 1, 2012
thewordofme wrote:
<quoted text>
Are the creotards still trying to lie about C-14? What a bunch of fools and idiots
What else, lying is their stock in trade.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

#4213 Dec 2, 2012
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Mexicans are "alien" to the US.
There has been no human born on the moon. No humans live on the moon. Only a handful of humans have ever stepped foot there.
To claim that we are from the Moon is ridiculous.
Obviously, you are having trouble reading what I wrote, so I will post it again for you. Let's see if you can limit yourself to reading only to what I have written, in both postings.

Re-posted. >>> "We are not alien to our own moon."

And I agree, that to claim to be from the moon is ridiculous, so why would you imply that I said any such thing?
Come to think of it, we've seen you do this same thing before.

So maybe I'd best respond like this >>>

Nuggin wrote: Mexicans are "alien" to the US.
R.P. wrote: So, it has nothing to do with this post.

Nuggin wrote: There has been no human born on the moon.
R.P. wrote: So, it has nothing to do with this post.

Nuggin wrote: No humans live on the moon.
R.P. wrote: So it has nothing to do with this post.

Nuggin wrote: Only a handful of humans have ever stepped foot there.
R.P. wrote: So, it has nothing to do with this post.

Nuggin wrote: To claim that we are from the Moon is ridiculous.
R.P. wrote: So, don't claim it.

Since: Jun 07

Location hidden

#4214 Dec 2, 2012
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
SKIPPY CAN'T USE SCIENCE TO EVALUATE THE SUPERNATURAL.
I really pity this nuggin godbot fellow.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#4215 Dec 2, 2012
Richardfs wrote:
<quoted text>
Just as I thought, you are just another lying godbot. You can't cite the story because you made it up.
Go back and read the posts.

And stop using words you don't understand. You're here arguing that C-14 dating is fake, you don't get to call OTHER people "godbot"

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#4216 Dec 2, 2012
Richardfs wrote:
<quoted text>
What else, lying is their stock in trade.
Dipshit, he's talking about YOU

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#4217 Dec 2, 2012
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>Obviously, you are having trouble reading what I wrote, so I will post it again for you. Let's see if you can limit yourself to reading only to what I have written, in both postings.
Re-posted. >>> "We are not alien to our own moon."
And I agree, that to claim to be from the moon is ridiculous, so why would you imply that I said any such thing?
Come to think of it, we've seen you do this same thing before.
So maybe I'd best respond like this >>>
Nuggin wrote: Mexicans are "alien" to the US.
R.P. wrote: So, it has nothing to do with this post.
Nuggin wrote: There has been no human born on the moon.
R.P. wrote: So, it has nothing to do with this post.
Nuggin wrote: No humans live on the moon.
R.P. wrote: So it has nothing to do with this post.
Nuggin wrote: Only a handful of humans have ever stepped foot there.
R.P. wrote: So, it has nothing to do with this post.
Nuggin wrote: To claim that we are from the Moon is ridiculous.
R.P. wrote: So, don't claim it.
Okay, since you have disallowed ALL evidence against your argument as being "nothing to do with" it, let's flip the tables here.

Go on, PROVE your contention without referencing ANYTHING else.

“Citizen_Patriot_ Voter_Atheist!”

Since: May 09

Earth,TX

#4218 Dec 2, 2012
Nuggin wrote:
<quoted text>
Okay, since you have disallowed ALL evidence against your argument as being "nothing to do with" it, let's flip the tables here.
Go on, PROVE your contention without referencing ANYTHING else.
My contention? Earth's moon, Dipshit, as in not belonging to Mars, Pluto, Jupiter, etc.

Since: Sep 07

Valley Village, CA

#4219 Dec 2, 2012
Reason Personified wrote:
<quoted text>My contention? Earth's moon, Dipshit, as in not belonging to Mars, Pluto, Jupiter, etc.
The argument is:

Are human beings native to the moon?

Your answer is that the moon orbits the Earth.

That does not relate to the argument at hand, nor does it provide any support for your position.

You really don't seem to be able to comprehend the discussion. Perhaps there's an adult there who can help you

Tell me when this thread is updated:

Subscribe Now Add to my Tracker

Add your comments below

Characters left: 4000

Please note by submitting this form you acknowledge that you have read the Terms of Service and the comment you are posting is in compliance with such terms. Be polite. Inappropriate posts may be removed by the moderator. Send us your feedback.

Atheism Discussions

Title Updated Last By Comments
Our world came from nothing? 1 hr _Bad Company 1,110
Atheism to Defeat Religion by 2038 (Apr '12) 2 hr fadu singh 23,045
Heaven 7 hr Reason Personified 44
Man center of the universe. 8 hr Reason Personified 159
Evidence for God! 9 hr Uncle Sam 51
Atheism requires as much faith as religion? (Jul '09) 9 hr Dave Nelson 231,016
Former Atheist Academic Who Rejected God and Be... Thu Hooogle It 77

Atheism People Search

Addresses and phone numbers for FREE