Why do I need to define something which you claim you have already falsified?<quoted text>
You need to define your f*cking god you troll liar with no evidence that "god is possible".
How exactly did you falsify a non-falsifiable concept?
In that case if my arguments were invalid then you should have no problem addressing them.<quoted text>
You haven't made any valid arguments whatsoever. You haven't defined the god you claim is possible, you haven't presented a shred of evidence to support this claim, and yet you keep harping on and on.
Not even a widdle tiny ickle bit.
Skippy, why are you, a known and confirmed liar accusing other people of dishonesty? Your accusation only stands when you can demonstrate it.Do yourself a favour and f*ck off with your boyfriend nuggin and come back with some solid evidence your dishonest piece of agnostic sh*t.