Educated What is a Discovery Institute Creationist

[The Dude]

And the truth is you are an atheist fundie.

[Mikko]

The Dude wrote:

And the truth is you are an atheist fundie.

impossible there is no foundation in atheism

[Educated What]

The Dude wrote:

And the truth is you are an atheist fundie.

I totally agree!

[Educated What]

-Skeptic- wrote:

<quoted text>Asking a Creationist godbot for facts is like asking a catholic priest to stop being attracted to children. It's impossible and ineffective and the person will continue to think they are in the right.

Ok let's put your money where your mouth is.

Prove that I said I believe in people riding dinosaurs. You know a claim you made.

Prove that I said the world was 6000 years old. Your claim.

Prove that I said the sun revolves around the earth. Your claim

Let's see what a great person you are.

[The Dude]

Mikko wrote:

<quoted text>
impossible there is no foundation in atheism

Ah yes, but his foundation isn't in atheism. His foundation is in anti-theism.

I was on the Dawkins forum a long time ago, and someone explained it beautifully - that just because someone takes a certain position on a particular concept (theism, in this particular case Skippy's non-belief of a God) does that automatically render them immune to psychological flaws that any other human being can have? Of course Skippy being Skippy, his ego will cry out "YES!" But I have found him to be the kind of person who wouldn't even own up to a typo, much less admit to something as drastic as any kind of psychological flaw. So in the meantime we can all enjoy the fruits of his education at charm school.

:-)

[Educated What]

The Dude wrote:

<quoted text>Ah yes, but his foundation isn't in atheism. His foundation is in anti-theism.

I was on the Dawkins forum a long time ago, and someone explained it beautifully - that just because someone takes a certain position on a particular concept (theism, in this particular case Skippy's non-belief of a God) does that automatically render them immune to psychological flaws that any other human being can have? Of course Skippy being Skippy, his ego will cry out "YES!" But I have found him to be the kind of person who wouldn't even own up to a typo, much less admit to something as drastic as any kind of psychological flaw. So in the meantime we can all enjoy the fruits of his education at charm school.

:-)

Awesome post! I would love to hear that explanation.

[-Skeptic-]

The Dude wrote:

<quoted text>
Ah yes, but his foundation isn't in atheism. His foundation is in anti-theism.
I was on the Dawkins forum a long time ago, and someone explained it beautifully - that just because someone takes a certain position on a particular concept (theism, in this particular case Skippy's non-belief of a God) does that automatically render them immune to psychological flaws that any other human being can have? Of course Skippy being Skippy, his ego will cry out "YES!" But I have found him to be the kind of person who wouldn't even own up to a typo, much less admit to something as drastic as any kind of psychological flaw. So in the meantime we can all enjoy the fruits of his education at charm school.
:-)

1. You have no evidence that "god is possible". YOu haven't provided any evidence of your claim

2. You still and I repeat still (almost half a year) have not provided any example of an item that is both real and unfalsifiable. You tried, to your credit, but failed.

3. When Nuggin got slaughtered for his ridiculous logic, you ducked out to avoid a beating, and now still cower behind him like a wuss.

4. You still haven't looked up the burden of proof, which lies upon the idiot who invents bullsh*t ie. you, to provide it.

So provide it or f*ck off you waste of forum space.

[-Skeptic-]

The Dude wrote:

And the truth is you are an atheist fundie.

The truth is that you're frustrated that I'm not a fundie and that everyone has defeated your arguments here.

False ad-hominem are all you've got left after being caught out.

[The Dude]

-Skeptic- wrote:

<quoted text>
1. You have no evidence that "god is possible". YOu haven't provided any evidence of your claim
2. You still and I repeat still (almost half a year) have not provided any example of an item that is both real and unfalsifiable. You tried, to your credit, but failed.
3. When Nuggin got slaughtered for his ridiculous logic, you ducked out to avoid a beating, and now still cower behind him like a wuss.
4. You still haven't looked up the burden of proof, which lies upon the idiot who invents bullsh*t ie. you, to provide it.
So provide it or f*ck off you waste of forum space.

http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/atheism/T...

-Skeptic- wrote:

<quoted text>
The truth is that you're frustrated that I'm not a fundie and that everyone has defeated your arguments here.
False ad-hominem are all you've got left after being caught out.

You misunderstand. I've never been frustrated with you at all. No-one has "caught me out" on anything so far. And no, it's not ad-hom - your attitude towards NettieBelle for example. She's cool and a nice lady. She IS a theist, but not a reality-denying fundie creationist dingbat. Yet you treat both the same. You may not be aware of this, but over in the evolution forums we have many long-time established posters all involved with deconstructing the usual creationist bollox, and we do it very well. But not all of them are atheists.

Atheism may be the most important thing in YOUR book, but it's not relevant to science. Sorry if you don't like it.

[Skeptic]

Educated What wrote:

<quoted text>
Ok let's put your money where your mouth is.
Prove that I said I believe in people riding dinosaurs. You know a claim you made.
Prove that I said the world was 6000 years old. Your claim.
Prove that I said the sun revolves around the earth. Your claim
Let's see what a great person you are.

Why do I need to prove something you've been saying for the last two years?

Nobody is going make an effort for your Creationist troll.

Nobody here believes that the earth is 6000 years old. Your cult of lies has failed.

[-Skeptic-]

The Dude wrote:

<quoted text>
http://www.topix.com/forum/religion/atheism/T...
<quoted text>
You misunderstand. I've never been frustrated with you at all. No-one has "caught me out" on anything so far. And no, it's not ad-hom - your attitude towards NettieBelle for example. She's cool and a nice lady. She IS a theist, but not a reality-denying fundie creationist dingbat. Yet you treat both the same. You may not be aware of this, but over in the evolution forums we have many long-time established posters all involved with deconstructing the usual creationist bollox, and we do it very well. But not all of them are atheists.
Atheism may be the most important thing in YOUR book, but it's not relevant to science. Sorry if you don't like it.

1. You have no evidence that "god is possible". YOu haven't provided any evidence of your claim

2. You still and I repeat still (almost half a year) have not provided any example of an item that is both real and unfalsifiable. You tried, to your credit, but failed.

3. When Nuggin got slaughtered for his ridiculous logic, you ducked out to avoid a beating, and now still cower behind him like a wuss.

4. You still haven't looked up the burden of proof, which lies upon the idiot who invents bullsh*t ie. you, to provide it.

So provide it or f*ck off you waste of forum space.

[Educated What]

Skeptic wrote:

<quoted text>Why do I need to prove something you've been saying for the last two years?

Nobody is going make an effort for your Creationist troll.

Nobody here believes that the earth is 6000 years old. Your cult of lies has failed.

Prove I have been saying that. Lol! So how are your Final Solution plans?

[The Dude]

Hey Skip, I notice you're repeating stuff I've already addressed. You do know how debate format works, yes? Post, counter post, counter post, counter post, counter post, etc.

Do you have fun judging your own posts? Or you still got all those groupies you told us about?

[Monkey's Paw]

The Dude wrote:

Hey Skip, I notice you're repeating stuff I've already addressed. You do know how debate format works, yes? Post, counter post, counter post, counter post, counter post, etc.

Do you have fun judging your own posts? Or you still got all those groupies you told us about?

don't you mean Christian post,atheist nasty comment, Christian post, atheist nasty comment, etc.

[The Dude]

[QUOTE who="Monkey's Paw "]<quoted text>
don't you mean Christian post,atheist nasty comment, Christian post, atheist nasty comment, etc.[/QUOTE]

No, I meant exactly what I said.

Especially as I was referring to a disagreement between me and Skip, and you would consider both of us to be 'atheists'.

Besides, many on Topix who consider themselves Christians are also very fond of nasty comments, so your post is a non-sequitor.

[Educated What]

The Dude wrote:

Hey Skip, I notice you're repeating stuff I've already addressed. You do know how debate format works, yes? Post, counter post, counter post, counter post, counter post, etc.

Do you have fun judging your own posts? Or you still got all those groupies you told us about?

Lol

[KJV]

The Dude wrote:

[QUOTE who="Monkey's Paw "]<quoted text>
don't you mean Christian post,atheist nasty comment, Christian post, atheist nasty comment, etc. "

No, I meant exactly what I said.

Especially as I was referring to a disagreement between me and Skip, and you would consider both of us to be 'atheists'.

Besides, many on Topix who consider themselves Christians are also very fond of nasty comments, so your post is a non-sequitor.

Yes we are!